Sirimopu

#IsraelIranConflict
The recent escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict, marked by Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military facilities on June 12-13, 2025, has significantly impacted the cryptocurrency market, introducing volatility and a risk-off sentiment among investors. Here's a concise overview of the latest effects based on available information:
• Market Crash and Liquidations: The crypto market experienced a sharp sell-off following the Israeli strikes, with total market capitalization dropping by approximately 2.47% to $3.32 trillion. Over $1.16 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated within 24 hours, with Bitcoin alone seeing nearly $428 million in long position liquidations. This was driven by a wave of forced sales, particularly affecting altcoins like Solana, Cardano, and Dogecoin, which saw declines of up to 7%.
• Bitcoin's Performance: Bitcoin (BTC) dropped from a high of $108,500 to a low of $101,095, stabilizing around $104,000-$107,000 by June 17. Despite the initial 2-5% decline, Bitcoin showed relative resilience compared to altcoins, with some recovery driven by institutional buying and ETF inflows. Analysts note Bitcoin's price hovering above the $100,000 psychological level, with $1.74 billion in long positions at risk if it falls below this threshold.
• Altcoin Volatility: Altcoins faced steeper losses, with Ethereum (ETH) dropping 8-11% to around $2,500, testing key support levels like the 200-day EMA. Other major altcoins like XRP, Solana, and Dogecoin saw declines of 3-7%, with Dogecoin being the worst performer among top coins. This reflects a broader risk-off rotation away from riskier assets during geopolitical uncertainty.
• Market Sentiment: The Crypto Fear & Greed Index remained in the "Greed" zone at 60 on June 15, despite the conflict, indicating cautious optimism among investors. However, analysts warn that prolonged tensions could shift sentiment to "Fear," as seen in April 2024 when similar tensions caused an 8.4% Bitcoin drop. Bitcoin's resilience is attributed to long-term holders (70% of supply) and institutional support via ETFs, which saw $1.37 billion in inflows last week.
• Geopolitical and Macro Factors: The conflict raised concerns about oil supply disruptions, with Brent crude jumping 3.7-13%, strengthening the US dollar as a safe-haven asset. A stronger dollar typically pressures crypto prices, as seen with Bitcoin's correlation to risk assets like stocks rather than safe-havens like gold, which rose 1-5%. Rising energy costs could also impact crypto miners' profitability, adding further downward pressure.
• Market Outlook: While the crypto market has shown some recovery, with Bitcoin climbing above $107,000 by June 17, uncertainty persists due to ongoing retaliatory actions, including Iran's missile and drone attacks on Israel. Historical patterns suggest quick rebounds after geopolitical shocks, as seen in April 2024 when Bitcoin recovered from $62,570 to $66,096 within a day. However, a prolonged conflict or disruption to key oil routes like the Strait of Hormuz could exacerbate volatility and lead to further sell-offs.
• Investor Strategies: Analysts like Ryan McMillin suggest that such dips have historically provided buying opportunities when crises subside. Institutional interest remains strong, with firms like Metaplanet adding 1,112 BTC to their holdings. However, caution is advised, with key support levels for Bitcoin at $102,513 and $100,000, and potential resistance at $110,000.
In summary, the Israel-Iran conflict has triggered significant short-term volatility in the crypto market, with Bitcoin showing relative strength compared to altcoins. While institutional support and long-term holder resilience provide some stability, the market remains sensitive to further escalations and macroeconomic shifts. Investors should monitor geopolitical developments and key price levels closely.

#IranUSConflict
The latest developments in the Iran-US conflict, as of June 18, 2025, center on heightened tensions amid the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, with significant US involvement being debated. Here are the key points:
US Rhetoric and Actions: President Donald Trump has escalated his rhetoric, calling for Iran's "unconditional surrender" and claiming the US knows the location of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, though stating he is safe "for now." Trump has suggested the US has "complete control" of Iran's skies, implying involvement through American equipment, though the US has not directly participated in Israel's strikes. The Pentagon is deploying additional fighter jets (F-16, F-22, F-35) and extending warplane deployments to the Middle East, described as defensive measures to protect US forces. The US Embassy in Jerusalem is closed until June 20 due to the security situation, and US personnel are sheltering in place.Israel-Iran Conflict Context: The conflict, now in its sixth day, began with Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear and military facilities on June 13, killing key figures, including nuclear scientists and military leaders. Iran has retaliated with missile attacks on Israel, including hypersonic missiles, though many were intercepted. Iran's Supreme Leader has vowed a "strong response" to Israel, and Israel has warned Tehran residents to evacuate, targeting areas like District 18. Casualties include 24 dead in Israel and 224 in Iran, with Iran minimizing its losses.US Domestic and International Reactions: US lawmakers are moving to limit Trump's war powers, citing constitutional concerns over unilateral military action against Iran. Some Republicans support his approach, while others, including MAGA isolationists, urge non-intervention. European leaders, like EU's Kaja Kallas, warn that US involvement could broaden the conflict. The UK and France have dismissed claims of imminent US strikes, and Russia has offered mediation, noting Israel's reluctance for diplomacy.Iran's Stance: Iran accuses the US of complicity in Israel's attacks, citing Trump's public statements and US-supplied equipment. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi claims "solid evidence" of US support. Iran has threatened to target US bases in the region if attacked and is conducting military exercises while building a third uranium enrichment facility. An internet blackout in Iran complicates information flow, and the rial has depreciated significantly.Nuclear Concerns: Israel's strikes targeted Iran's nuclear program, which Tehran insists is for peaceful purposes. Trump has expressed skepticism about nuclear talks, previously pulling out of the 2015 deal. A planned round of negotiations was disrupted by the conflict, with one of Iran's negotiators killed.Regional Impact: Airspace closures affect Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, and Syria, and flights to Israel are suspended until June 23. Iran's medical system is strained, with leave canceled for doctors and nurses.
Trump's National Security Council is actively assessing options, with speculation about potential US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, though no direct involvement has occurred yet. The situation remains volatile, with risks of wider regional escalation.
For real-time updates, check credible news sources or posts on X, keeping in mind that X posts may contain unverified claims.

#GENIUSActPass
The GENIUS Act, or Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, passed the U.S. Senate on June 17, 2025, with a bipartisan vote of 68-30. This landmark legislation establishes the first federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, digital currencies pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, with a market size of approximately $238-250 billion.
Key provisions include:
Consumer Protections: Requires stablecoin issuers to maintain 1:1 reserves with liquid assets like U.S. dollars or Treasury bills, ensuring holders can redeem coins at any time. It also prioritizes stablecoin holders over other creditors in case of issuer bankruptcy.Regulatory Oversight: Permits issuers to choose federal or state regulation, with state oversight limited to those with issuance under $10 billion. The Department of Treasury holds significant authority, though the House version (STABLE Act) splits oversight among multiple agencies.Anti-Money Laundering (AML): Subjects issuers to the Bank Secrecy Act for AML compliance, though critics argue it lacks robust safeguards against illicit activities.Restrictions: Bans non-financial tech giants from issuing stablecoins unless partnered with regulated entities and prohibits yield-bearing stablecoins.
The bill faced resistance, particularly from Democrats like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who criticized it for potential conflicts of interest, notably President Trump’s involvement in stablecoin ventures like USD1. Despite amendments addressing some concerns, provisions barring the president from profiting were excluded, though Congress members are restricted.
The legislation is seen as a step toward legitimizing stablecoins, potentially boosting their mainstream adoption for faster, cheaper payments and reinforcing the U.S. dollar’s global dominance. Critics, however, warn of risks to financial stability and insufficient protections against fraud or national security threats. The bill now heads to the House, where it may face revisions or be reconciled with the STABLE Act.