ITAPEMA -SC-BRASIL
24 Following
161 Followers
104 Liked
3 Shared
All
Quotes
See original
I have already seen a video on the Brazilian channel, TRUE SCIENCE, Professor Afonso, he shows a hypothesis that BTC was created by a super AI, HOWEVER, not from the future but from now.
E L E N
--
🚨 BREAKING: In a recent interview, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) proposed a provocative theory: Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic creator of Bitcoin, might not have been human but rather an AI from the year 2140, sent back in time to prevent the collapse of fiat currency.
CZ suggests that the 21 million BTC supply cap isn't arbitrary but a deliberate design to counteract inflation and unchecked monetary policies. He further speculates that Satoshi's disappearance wasn't a mere vanishing act but a transition—uploading himself into a quantum cold wallet, dispersing the keys across time.
While this theory is captivating, it's essential to note that it remains speculative. Experts emphasize that there's no concrete evidence supporting the idea that Satoshi was an AI or that such advanced technology existed at the time of Bitcoin's inception.
Nonetheless, this narrative adds a fascinating layer to the ongoing mystery surrounding Bitcoin's origin. Whether viewed as science fiction or a glimpse into a possible reality, it underscores the profound impact of Bitcoin on our financial systems and imaginations.
For those interested in exploring this theory further, CZ's full interview is available on Binance Square.
#Write2Earn #CryptoComeback #TrumpVsMusk #StrategyBTCPurchase #REX-OSPREYSolanaETF
CZ suggests that the 21 million BTC supply cap isn't arbitrary but a deliberate design to counteract inflation and unchecked monetary policies. He further speculates that Satoshi's disappearance wasn't a mere vanishing act but a transition—uploading himself into a quantum cold wallet, dispersing the keys across time.
While this theory is captivating, it's essential to note that it remains speculative. Experts emphasize that there's no concrete evidence supporting the idea that Satoshi was an AI or that such advanced technology existed at the time of Bitcoin's inception.
Nonetheless, this narrative adds a fascinating layer to the ongoing mystery surrounding Bitcoin's origin. Whether viewed as science fiction or a glimpse into a possible reality, it underscores the profound impact of Bitcoin on our financial systems and imaginations.
For those interested in exploring this theory further, CZ's full interview is available on Binance Square.
#Write2Earn #CryptoComeback #TrumpVsMusk #StrategyBTCPurchase #REX-OSPREYSolanaETF
See original
my god, 10x in a crypto that was under monitoring, it's very risky, to tell the truth, futures themselves are addictive, I got out, I lost everything, everything, now it's time to start over
GUYSSS I WAS SLEEPING😭😭😭 AND GOT A NOTIFICATION FROM BINANCE... WATCH AND SAW THIS😭, What should I do now?
$BSW IS DESTROYINGGGG MEE BADLYYYYY 😭😭
1
$BSW IS DESTROYINGGGG MEE BADLYYYYY 😭😭
1
See original
each one, 1 minute chart 😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 UAL
Quoted content has been removed
See original
how long I was missing from here, I follow you on X
Vanessa Sierra
--
Trump vs. Musk is cooking us.
Short term - chaos & more volatility.
Mid term - BTC could pump on Trump pro crypto hype.. but it’s still fragile.
If politics heat up and regulators step in then BTC might win the narrative war. Alts are too risky here.
Short term - chaos & more volatility.
Mid term - BTC could pump on Trump pro crypto hype.. but it’s still fragile.
If politics heat up and regulators step in then BTC might win the narrative war. Alts are too risky here.
See original
🧠 The key question: Is it more likely for BTC to drop to 100k now?
🔍 1. Where is the institutional interest (Smart Money)?
The 100,000 USDT region is a key psychological and technical level.
It is where:
There are a lot of retail stops positioned below, and
Whales/institutions like to seek liquidity.
🔁 The system “likes” to force the price into zones where retail gives up and institutional buys cheap.
📉 2. Current market behavior
BTC is making corrections with clean and orderly candles, it’s not a crash — it’s programmed liquidity.
Hourly and daily RSI close to the oversold zone.
Last strong support: 103,000
If lost with volume, the next stop is 101,800–100,000.
📌 Partial conclusion:
👉 It is very likely that the system seeks 100k to liquidate longs and accumulate liquidity.
🔥 3. What is more likely in the short term?
ScenarioCurrent ProbabilityCommentBTC holding at 103,000 and rising⬅️ 30%Only if buying volume comes in strongBTC dropping to 101,800–100,000✅ 60%It’s the natural stop hunt zoneBTC breaking directly upwards❌ 10%Unlikely without cleaning liquidity below
✅ Final verdict (strategy):
📉 It is more likely for BTC to go to the 100,000 region before rising.
This cleans stops, triggers forced sales, and gives a “cheap” entry for the big players.
🔍 1. Where is the institutional interest (Smart Money)?
The 100,000 USDT region is a key psychological and technical level.
It is where:
There are a lot of retail stops positioned below, and
Whales/institutions like to seek liquidity.
🔁 The system “likes” to force the price into zones where retail gives up and institutional buys cheap.
📉 2. Current market behavior
BTC is making corrections with clean and orderly candles, it’s not a crash — it’s programmed liquidity.
Hourly and daily RSI close to the oversold zone.
Last strong support: 103,000
If lost with volume, the next stop is 101,800–100,000.
📌 Partial conclusion:
👉 It is very likely that the system seeks 100k to liquidate longs and accumulate liquidity.
🔥 3. What is more likely in the short term?
ScenarioCurrent ProbabilityCommentBTC holding at 103,000 and rising⬅️ 30%Only if buying volume comes in strongBTC dropping to 101,800–100,000✅ 60%It’s the natural stop hunt zoneBTC breaking directly upwards❌ 10%Unlikely without cleaning liquidity below
✅ Final verdict (strategy):
📉 It is more likely for BTC to go to the 100,000 region before rising.
This cleans stops, triggers forced sales, and gives a “cheap” entry for the big players.
See original
UAL congratulations 😁😁😁
$ENA / USDT
ENA/USDT at the price of $0.3202:
📌 Entry Point (EP)
$0.3202
🎯 Take Profit Targets (TP)
TP1: $0.3280 — recent short-term resistance
TP2: $0.3350 — aligns with mid-Bollinger band or moving average zone
TP3: $0.3450 — near previous high/wick zone
🛡️ Stop Loss (SL)
$0.3125 — below local support and lower wick area
#ena #ENAUSDT🚨 #ENA走势分析 #ENA智能策略库🥇🥇#ethana
ENA/USDT at the price of $0.3202:
📌 Entry Point (EP)
$0.3202
🎯 Take Profit Targets (TP)
TP1: $0.3280 — recent short-term resistance
TP2: $0.3350 — aligns with mid-Bollinger band or moving average zone
TP3: $0.3450 — near previous high/wick zone
🛡️ Stop Loss (SL)
$0.3125 — below local support and lower wick area
#ena #ENAUSDT🚨 #ENA走势分析 #ENA智能策略库🥇🥇#ethana
See original
stop it, that's already done, who will have the courage to put money in there, think carefully, the market is reacting, there's still time if you bought at the bottom, at least that's better, as many have lost everything
I am buying Mantra with strength I like to buy when it crashes! When it goes up, they will regret!!!!!
00
HOW MUCH MONEY WILL YOU MAKE IF $OM MANTRA REACHES IT ALL TIME HIGH TO $9 AGAIN?
See original
kkkk which planet did you come from again, because here April only goes up to the 30th,
Quoted content has been removed
See original
Talking to AI is easy, just ask me, it will find many other names that were satoshinakamoto
Is this coincidence or was planned as it is ?
#SatoshiNakamoto.?
#SatoshiNakamoto.?
See original
is being monitored on Binance, soon it will be delisted, if you see it having a big rise it's better to keep an eye on it because they are doing this with all, then they pull the rug.
Quoted content has been removed
See original
everything depends on BTC, if it drops 5 percent it drops 20, but if it rises it is a big bet, there are highs of 10 15 percent in one day.
$ENA Is down almost 6%
Will it drop more? Or will it go back up?
Is there anyone here used to buying this currency?
Will it drop more? Or will it go back up?
Is there anyone here used to buying this currency?
See original
infinite cunhagem, ♾️OM
Binance themselves confirmed it:
$OM M crash was caused by one desperate trader's reckless dump.
It’s clear now — MANTRA is neither a scam nor a rug pull.
The only thing left is UP. 🚀
The clues are everywhere.
Those who still hesitate will simply be left behind as fools.
$OM M crash was caused by one desperate trader's reckless dump.
It’s clear now — MANTRA is neither a scam nor a rug pull.
The only thing left is UP. 🚀
The clues are everywhere.
Those who still hesitate will simply be left behind as fools.
See original
the problem is when we lose, there is not even pity for the chicken
Some will say it was luck!
But it's grain by grain that the hen fills its belly!
But it's grain by grain that the hen fills its belly!
See original
don't look at YouTube anymore, it's all a bunch of nonsense, I invested in Cheyenne when XEXA USA talked about her, he and Alex Backer, when they get one right they boast, but they get it wrong more often.
I put the house in $OM after those backes videos
10K dollars turned to Mantra dust, what do I do now... Backes you promised me.
10K dollars turned to Mantra dust, what do I do now... Backes you promised me.
See original
delete this post, it doesn't fit your profile, you share many good teachings. Check the performance of gold and BTC, they have the same value. from 10 kg of gold to 10 years
CRYPTO MECHANIC
--
What a beautiful trend on GOLD.
Unfortunately Bitcoin failed to provide a sustained move. This is why i always say Bitcoin can never be Gold.
Gold will always remain a safe heaven for investors
Unfortunately Bitcoin failed to provide a sustained move. This is why i always say Bitcoin can never be Gold.
Gold will always remain a safe heaven for investors
See original
became a billionaire, then?
because the photo says nothing
because the photo says nothing
CryptoBirb
--
Shoutout to this legend
linda
Vanessa Sierra
--
Congress Targets Politicians’ Memecoin’s ‼️
You might’ve caught wind of the latest regulatory buzz - the MEME Act. Dropped by U.S. House Democrats, this bill’s got the ecosystem talking—and not just because of its catchy acronym. Officially aimed at keeping public officials’ hands off memecoins, the MEME Act could signal a new frontier in how lawmakers grapple with the wild west of digital assets.
Here’s the TLDR: the proposal wants to ban the President, Vice President, Congress members, senior exec branch suits, and their immediate families from issuing, sponsoring, or shilling memecoins—think $TRUMP, $LIBRA, or any of those tokens born from internet culture that moon-chasing degens love. The vibe? Stop politicians from pumping their bags using their clout. It’s a power play dressed up as ethics, and crypto natives are already dissecting it.
Posts on X today show the community’s split. Some see it as a W— a crackdown on insider grift in a scene already plagued by rug pulls and hype-driven scams. “Finally, a step to keep the suits from front-running us,” one user quipped. Others? Not so stoked. They’re calling it a half-measure, pointing out that Congress still hasn’t touched the real elephant in the room: insider stock trading. “Ban memecoins but not Pelosi’s calls? Lmao, okay,” another user says.
Details on the bill are still murky—no official text has dropped as of this writing, and it’s unclear if it’s got legs to pass. But the intent tracks with the broader regulatory heat crypto’s been feeling. Memecoins, often dismissed as shitcoin gambling, have exploded in visibility, with some tied to political figures (remember $MAGA?). Lawmakers seem spooked by the optics of a Senator yeeting a token to their base while voting on market-moving bills.
This raises the usual questions: Is this about protection or control? And let’s be real—enforcement sounds like a nightmare. How do you prove a politician’s cousin didn’t just “organically” back $DOGE2.0?
No hard confirmation yet on where this lands.
You might’ve caught wind of the latest regulatory buzz - the MEME Act. Dropped by U.S. House Democrats, this bill’s got the ecosystem talking—and not just because of its catchy acronym. Officially aimed at keeping public officials’ hands off memecoins, the MEME Act could signal a new frontier in how lawmakers grapple with the wild west of digital assets.
Here’s the TLDR: the proposal wants to ban the President, Vice President, Congress members, senior exec branch suits, and their immediate families from issuing, sponsoring, or shilling memecoins—think $TRUMP, $LIBRA, or any of those tokens born from internet culture that moon-chasing degens love. The vibe? Stop politicians from pumping their bags using their clout. It’s a power play dressed up as ethics, and crypto natives are already dissecting it.
Posts on X today show the community’s split. Some see it as a W— a crackdown on insider grift in a scene already plagued by rug pulls and hype-driven scams. “Finally, a step to keep the suits from front-running us,” one user quipped. Others? Not so stoked. They’re calling it a half-measure, pointing out that Congress still hasn’t touched the real elephant in the room: insider stock trading. “Ban memecoins but not Pelosi’s calls? Lmao, okay,” another user says.
Details on the bill are still murky—no official text has dropped as of this writing, and it’s unclear if it’s got legs to pass. But the intent tracks with the broader regulatory heat crypto’s been feeling. Memecoins, often dismissed as shitcoin gambling, have exploded in visibility, with some tied to political figures (remember $MAGA?). Lawmakers seem spooked by the optics of a Senator yeeting a token to their base while voting on market-moving bills.
This raises the usual questions: Is this about protection or control? And let’s be real—enforcement sounds like a nightmare. How do you prove a politician’s cousin didn’t just “organically” back $DOGE2.0?
No hard confirmation yet on where this lands.
See original
I bought it when it was 20 cents, I made good money, but then I got out of it and just bought crap, if I had stayed and left it alone I would be ok now even with these drops,
$ENA Everyone say you stay hold and hold but it's eassy to exit here and get some profit from another which coin indicate really good profit cause may be this shit is going down and down if you spent $100 dollar at the time of 0.8 you get only 125 now if you spent the same amount you get 222 . If you sell all of this you get now $53 and you again buy at 0.25 you get 212 ENA .May be it's a careful decession to exit and buy again.
***Crypto is very much volatile market and unpredictable. So please Do your own research and step carefully move if you are not much expert then you need to grab more experience***
#BTCvsInflation
***Crypto is very much volatile market and unpredictable. So please Do your own research and step carefully move if you are not much expert then you need to grab more experience***
#BTCvsInflation
See original
will hit 0.19 again, they are still not satisfied..
$ENA
Update:
It's very tempting to see such a downfall but the key is spotting the bounce. IMO, we’re near the bottom, and long opportunities may come soon. Watch for green candles on LTF, monitor the trendline, and confirm before entering. It will soon start to rise and we can make our day from it. Mark my words.😉
Update:
It's very tempting to see such a downfall but the key is spotting the bounce. IMO, we’re near the bottom, and long opportunities may come soon. Watch for green candles on LTF, monitor the trendline, and confirm before entering. It will soon start to rise and we can make our day from it. Mark my words.😉
Login to explore more contents