😐 Recently, I rarely browse X, because the page is filled with monotonous "score-boosting content".
During the limited time I spend on Twitter, more and more people are attacking @KaitoAI, and it seems that everyone is starting to join the new lineup @Cookiedotfun.
———⚠️⚠️⚠️——— If Kaito's original intention was to improve info to enhance the quality of link content and economic efficiency, then its current direction is gradually going astray.
Content is becoming more and more "shallow" because, in order to gain points, everyone is starting to create the “template emotions” that are easiest for the algorithm to capture.
In this process, objectivity and authenticity are sacrificed, and the algorithm is guiding KOL discourse towards uniformity, increasingly resembling an attempt to please the platform rather than serve the readers. 🤖
———🆚🆚🆚——— We compared @Cookiedotfun, and it seems to have provided a different start.
First, the conclusion: 1. Kaito's business design is better; the team has essentially captured all profitable aspects.
From the project's perspective, it needs to spend hundreds of thousands at Kaito to find KOLs for events, to the long-term economic sustainability of KOL content cycles, and then to the product's subscription monetization, the entire path is already running very smoothly.
2. Cookie's product is more solid; it is a platform that anyone can use to check project sentiment indices objectively.
If Kaito is a product for projects and KOLs, then Cookie is an infoFi product for a broad audience. It integrates social heat, KOL trends, on-chain behavior, and interaction data, attempting to make a comprehensive assessment.
It doesn't seem to be about "forcing a sense of presence", but rather aims to make some quantifiable signals more valuable as references.
Its positioning is essentially an overall panel designed for retail investors and market participants, which naturally leans more towards objectivity and reliability than the mechanism of writing content "for the sake of the scoring system".
At least for now, its data structure appears to be cooler and more aggregated. 🎯
Of course, the Snap points system may also incentivize the issue of "content formulaicness" in the future. Under the driving force of interests, whether artificially generated info (like tweets) can maintain sufficient fairness and objectivity is an eternal challenge. ♾️
But ultimately, where Kaito and Cookie's products will end up still depends on what essential problems they are solving. 🔍 (This article does not consider the premise of the secondary market).
——🤔🧠 Whose algorithm is better? ——
I don't consider myself a KOL, and my sample size of followers is not large enough. However, just from the panels of Kaito and Cookie, Cookie's data collection indeed seems to be more comprehensive.
🌟Recently, I rarely scroll through X, because the page is filled with monotonous "score content". During the limited time I have to open Twitter, more and more people are attacking @KaitoAI, and everyone seems to be joining the new lineup @Cookiedotfun ————————————⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️—————————————— If Kaito's original intention was to enhance info to improve the quality of link content and economic efficiency, then its current direction seems to be gradually going off course. Content is becoming increasingly "shallow" because, in order to gain points, people have started creating the easiest "template emotions" that can be captured by algorithms. In this process, objectivity and authenticity are sacrificed, and the algorithm guides KOL statements towards uniformity, increasingly resembling a bid to please the platform rather than serve the readers. 🤖
————————————🆚🆚🆚🆚—————————————— We compared @Cookiedotfun, which seems to offer a different starting point. First, the conclusion: 1. Kaito's business design is better, as the team has basically captured all profitable aspects. From the project's need to spend hundreds of thousands to find KOLs for activities on Kaito, to the subsequent long-term economic content cycles of KOLs, and finally to the product's subscription monetization, the entire path has been running smoothly. 2. Cookie's product is more solid, serving as a platform for anyone to check the objective sentiment index of projects.
If Kaito is a product for projects and KOLs, then Cookie is an infoFi product for a broader audience. It pulls together social heat, KOL movements, on-chain behavior, and interaction data, attempting to create a comprehensive assessment. It doesn't seem to be about "prompting people to boost their presence," but rather aims to make some quantitative signals more valuable as references.
Its positioning is essentially a comprehensive panel for retail investors and market participants, naturally leaning towards objectivity and reliability compared to the mechanism of writing content "for the scoring system." At least for now, its data structure appears to be cooler and more aggregated. 🎯 Of course, the Snap point system may also incentivize the issue of "content templating" in the future; under profit-driven motives, whether artificial info (like tweets) can maintain sufficient fairness and objectivity is an eternal challenge. ♾️ But ultimately, where Kaito and Cookie's two products will end up still depends on what essential problems they are actually solving 🔍 (this article does not consider the secondary market premise).
————————————🤔😕 Whose algorithm is better 🧠 ——————————————
I don't consider myself a KOL, and my follower count sample is not large enough. However, just from the panels of Kaito and Cookie, the data collection of Cookie indeed appears to be more comprehensive.
China has started consumer subsidies, in the past two days, the appliances I bought received a consumer subsidy of 15% of the total amount from the government (those who are shopaholics like me can start shopping).
At the same time, the RMB interest rate has decreased, leading to an increased desire for investment, and a large amount of investment funds are expected to flow into US stocks. Bybit @Bybit_Official has now opened direct trading for US stocks. It can be said that the product strategy has responded quickly, manual thumbs up @benbybit.
Most of the information for the day is basically covered by Token2049 and @boopdotfun, but upon closer inspection, it's actually @dingalingts's project.
The overall introduction to the project is already very comprehensive, but to highlight the key points: 1. The economic model is used to support $BOOP itself. 2. Airdrops connect the key forces behind creating and promoting memes. 3. Economic adjustments reward the 'dog' groups, allowing strong meme creators to maximize their benefits.
However, I want to say more about @dingalingts from my perspective: very Degen, smart, and humble. If I had to pick someone in the industry that I respect the most, @dingalingts would absolutely be at the top of my list. For his project, I will buy coins as a sign of respect. The rest is just my blind trust in him to create products that can change the meme landscape and waiting for time to validate that.
🌟Why have I been increasingly focused on PLUME recently? | Q1 2025 Update Overview
When it comes to the most underrated sector in crypto this year, RWA definitely stands out. And PLUME—this project with a price stability that feels like it's cheating—quietly yet powerfully delivered a remarkable performance in Q1 2025.
Today, let's break it down and see what it has accomplished.📈
——-Note this down🤯 ——————
1️⃣ Growth Momentum|Quietly Growing🌱
1. It has quietly launched on over 40 exchanges, rapidly expanding its territory; 2. It has caught the attention of Grayscale, being included in their official review list; 3. The TVL of the core product Nest has surpassed $50 million, making it a heavyweight player in the current RWA field.
2️⃣ Product Breakthrough|More than just on-chain, it's about reshaping the experience🛠
1. The Skylink protocol connects 17 chains directly, allowing multi-chain earnings to be easily accessed; 2. The newly proposed RWA 2.0 narrative focuses on one thing: not just being asset movers, but becoming asset experience designers.
Simply put: It's not just about slapping blockchain labels on real-world assets, but enabling them to truly "go Crypto"—to trade, lend, and circulate like crypto assets, completely breaking down the barriers on both sides.
3️⃣ Industry Recognition|Big names are starting to enter the game🎯
The entire RWA sector is heating up, and PLUME is reaping the benefits, securing new investments from institutions like YZi Labs, LayerZero Catalyst, and Apollo Global.
Notably worth highlighting:
🧠 Apollo Global, the institution that has invested in SUI and is recognized on Wall Street for its keen insight, has only invested in one RWA project on-chain, which is—PLUME.
Everyone knows the market trend of SUI after Apollo's involvement.
I believe this is not a coincidence, but rather a matter of insight.
4️⃣ Team Advantage|A reliable and capable group of people⚡️
The Plume team has always been the type that "works quietly and delivers consistently." I truly have high hopes for this team because they have the right timing, location, and people for industry development—
🔹Timing: The RWA sector is starting to heat up, and on-chain real assets are becoming a prominent field. PLUME is perfectly positioned on this trend.
🔹Location: Team members have strong backgrounds, coming from top-tier companies like Coinbase, Robinhood, LayerZero, and Binance. This diverse background allows the team to integrate the stability of traditional finance with the innovation of crypto technology when building the RWAfi ecosystem.
🔹People: The team collaborates exceptionally well, featuring technical experts as well as market-savvy veterans, embodying a combination that is capable of both hard work and strategic engagement.
Such a team that "understands both finance and technology," and "can get things done while also creating opportunities" is one of the key reasons PLUME is rapidly rising in the RWA sector.
————🧠 Summary——————— 🧠Why is PLUME worth continuous attention?
PLUME has not taken the old route of "just slapping a token on it," but is attempting to redefine the method of "on-chain real assets," moving beyond superficial transport to deep Crypto integration.
In a market with trillion-dollar potential like RWA, this means—
They are not just participants in the flow, but have the potential to become standard setters.
Of course, the early stages mean opportunity, but also uncertainty and risk. To go far, they need continuous product refinement, liquidity building, and compliance advancement.
However, based on the results delivered in Q1, this team and this rhythm give me a rare sense of stability and reassurance.
In my view, this path is worth looking forward to, and I am willing to walk with them slowly to discover better scenery ahead! LFG——🚀
@plumenetwork Official Portal #PLUME #RWA #CryptoFi