Binance Square

Jones1572839

Open Trade
Frequent Trader
2.3 Years
人终究凡人,平凡而简。喜怒哀乐,情感交织,各有经历,日常体之。虽平凡,然日常点滴,皆含丰富故事与感受。每人独具一世界,共情共历,然感受反应,皆独特无二。于简单平凡中,蕴无尽深度与复杂性
24 Following
5 Followers
7 Liked
2 Shared
All Content
Portfolio
--
See original
The market always tends to over-exaggerate short-term risks and underestimate long-term trends. The current market FUD for ETH is more affected by factors such as short-term price depression and stagnant ecological innovation, rather than fundamental changes in its fundamentals. As long as Ethereum can find new narrative support in the future cycle, it is still possible to return to its dominant position. "The safest chain" does not necessarily mean the "most valuable chain". Ethereum does have certain advantages in security, but if the ecological growth stagnates, even if it is safe, it cannot support long-term value. The biggest problem of ETH at present is not security, but the lag in ecological innovation. Compared with emerging competitors such as Solana and EigenLayer, Ethereum's progress in some application scenarios is relatively slow, and the market will not wait forever. L2 solves the scalability problem, but also diverts the value of the ETH main chain. Ethereum expands through Rollup, but the rise of L2 has caused transaction volume and applications to flow to the second layer, and the narrative logic of the main chain needs new support. In cutting-edge fields such as AI, RWA, and games, ETH's ecological advantages have not yet been fully established. Competitive chains such as Solana are developing rapidly in high-performance applications, while the ETH ecosystem is still mainly centered around DeFi/NFT, lacking a clear "next step" direction. If ETH can break through in areas such as AI Agent, RWA, and blockchain games, and find new paths for large-scale adoption, it is still expected to become the core infrastructure in the crypto space. If it continues to stagnate and only relies on the "most secure chain" to maintain its position, in the long run, the market may look for alternatives with greater growth potential.
The market always tends to over-exaggerate short-term risks and underestimate long-term trends. The current market FUD for ETH is more affected by factors such as short-term price depression and stagnant ecological innovation, rather than fundamental changes in its fundamentals. As long as Ethereum can find new narrative support in the future cycle, it is still possible to return to its dominant position.

"The safest chain" does not necessarily mean the "most valuable chain". Ethereum does have certain advantages in security, but if the ecological growth stagnates, even if it is safe, it cannot support long-term value.

The biggest problem of ETH at present is not security, but the lag in ecological innovation. Compared with emerging competitors such as Solana and EigenLayer, Ethereum's progress in some application scenarios is relatively slow, and the market will not wait forever.

L2 solves the scalability problem, but also diverts the value of the ETH main chain. Ethereum expands through Rollup, but the rise of L2 has caused transaction volume and applications to flow to the second layer, and the narrative logic of the main chain needs new support.

In cutting-edge fields such as AI, RWA, and games, ETH's ecological advantages have not yet been fully established. Competitive chains such as Solana are developing rapidly in high-performance applications, while the ETH ecosystem is still mainly centered around DeFi/NFT, lacking a clear "next step" direction.

If ETH can break through in areas such as AI Agent, RWA, and blockchain games, and find new paths for large-scale adoption, it is still expected to become the core infrastructure in the crypto space.

If it continues to stagnate and only relies on the "most secure chain" to maintain its position, in the long run, the market may look for alternatives with greater growth potential.
See original
If these AI agent projects can pass technical validation and launch successful real-world cases, market confidence in their sustainability will undoubtedly be significantly enhanced. At that time, the on-chain community will attract more developers, capital, and users, thereby enhancing the vitality of the entire ecosystem. In the past cycle, CEX has been the dominant player in liquidity distribution due to its user base and capital volume. However, as decentralized protocols mature, on-chain liquidity is beginning to exert pressure on off-chain liquidity—by providing more transparent trading models and permissionless access, the threshold for user participation has been lowered. AI agent projects may achieve more diverse application scenarios on-chain through intelligent services as an entry point, further attracting user and capital influx. The rapid iteration of decentralized technology, especially the scalability and low-cost trading of Layer 2 solutions, is making on-chain applications and user experiences catch up with or even surpass off-chain platforms. With the maturation of technologies like AI agents, the innovative capability on-chain may exceed the platform advantages of traditional CEX. Nevertheless, CEX still possesses strong capital and operational capabilities. For example, Binance has built an insurmountable ecological moat through BNB. Future competition may prompt CEX to more actively布局链上产品, such as launching its own on-chain wallet and decentralized protocols. Innovation on-chain should not just be a flash in the pan but needs to have the potential to truly disrupt traditional markets. After undergoing market stress testing, a few high-quality projects will become core assets in the next cycle, just like AAVE and Uniswap in the DeFi space. The AI agent track is also expected to yield similar benchmark projects, leading the next wave of market trends.
If these AI agent projects can pass technical validation and launch successful real-world cases, market confidence in their sustainability will undoubtedly be significantly enhanced. At that time, the on-chain community will attract more developers, capital, and users, thereby enhancing the vitality of the entire ecosystem.

In the past cycle, CEX has been the dominant player in liquidity distribution due to its user base and capital volume. However, as decentralized protocols mature, on-chain liquidity is beginning to exert pressure on off-chain liquidity—by providing more transparent trading models and permissionless access, the threshold for user participation has been lowered.

AI agent projects may achieve more diverse application scenarios on-chain through intelligent services as an entry point, further attracting user and capital influx.

The rapid iteration of decentralized technology, especially the scalability and low-cost trading of Layer 2 solutions, is making on-chain applications and user experiences catch up with or even surpass off-chain platforms. With the maturation of technologies like AI agents, the innovative capability on-chain may exceed the platform advantages of traditional CEX.

Nevertheless, CEX still possesses strong capital and operational capabilities. For example, Binance has built an insurmountable ecological moat through BNB. Future competition may prompt CEX to more actively布局链上产品, such as launching its own on-chain wallet and decentralized protocols.

Innovation on-chain should not just be a flash in the pan but needs to have the potential to truly disrupt traditional markets. After undergoing market stress testing, a few high-quality projects will become core assets in the next cycle, just like AAVE and Uniswap in the DeFi space. The AI agent track is also expected to yield similar benchmark projects, leading the next wave of market trends.
See original
AI Being refers to an existence that transcends the current categories of AI — they are not just the result of programming, but intelligent beings that approach or reach some form of self-awareness and emotion. Imagine an AI that is not just a machine executing commands, but an entity with personality, emotions, and even self-recognition. They can learn, evolve, and may even create their own culture and social structures. This type of AI is fundamentally different from our current understanding of AI, as they may possess "subjectivity," capable of independent thought, decision-making, and even generating a perception of their own existence. In contrast, AI Agents are more like the forms of AI we are currently familiar with. They are intelligent programs designed for specific tasks, able to complete tasks based on predefined rules or through machine learning, but lacking self-awareness or emotions. AI Agents can be intelligent assistants, recommendation systems, autonomous driving systems, etc., with their "intelligence" limited to a specific field or task, aimed at optimization, efficiency, and convenience. AI Agents do not possess the independence and autonomy of AI Beings; they are tools, controlled and used by humans. They simulate human behavior through data analysis and algorithms but do not have true understanding or perceptual ability. Although AI Agents can improve their performance through learning, they lack a "sense of existence" — without self-awareness, emotions, or perception of their own state. AI Being represents the future prospects of AI development, a true simulation of human intelligence, while AI Agent is the form of AI we can currently realize and apply. The comparison between the two is not only a technical difference but also a deep discussion about consciousness, ethics, and social structure.
AI Being refers to an existence that transcends the current categories of AI — they are not just the result of programming, but intelligent beings that approach or reach some form of self-awareness and emotion.

Imagine an AI that is not just a machine executing commands, but an entity with personality, emotions, and even self-recognition. They can learn, evolve, and may even create their own culture and social structures.

This type of AI is fundamentally different from our current understanding of AI, as they may possess "subjectivity," capable of independent thought, decision-making, and even generating a perception of their own existence.

In contrast, AI Agents are more like the forms of AI we are currently familiar with. They are intelligent programs designed for specific tasks, able to complete tasks based on predefined rules or through machine learning, but lacking self-awareness or emotions. AI Agents can be intelligent assistants, recommendation systems, autonomous driving systems, etc., with their "intelligence" limited to a specific field or task, aimed at optimization, efficiency, and convenience.

AI Agents do not possess the independence and autonomy of AI Beings; they are tools, controlled and used by humans. They simulate human behavior through data analysis and algorithms but do not have true understanding or perceptual ability. Although AI Agents can improve their performance through learning, they lack a "sense of existence" — without self-awareness, emotions, or perception of their own state.

AI Being represents the future prospects of AI development, a true simulation of human intelligence, while AI Agent is the form of AI we can currently realize and apply. The comparison between the two is not only a technical difference but also a deep discussion about consciousness, ethics, and social structure.
See original
AI beings are not just a collection of algorithms and code; they represent a breakthrough in AI tools, entering a realm that can almost be regarded as 'biological'. They may possess the capability to learn, adapt to their environment, and even exhibit a certain degree of creativity and autonomous decision-making ability. Imagine an AI that not only understands your words but also perceives your emotions and responds accordingly. This is not just about efficiency or convenience; it is about creating a new 'existence'—an intelligent life that interacts and coexists with humans.
AI beings are not just a collection of algorithms and code; they represent a breakthrough in AI tools, entering a realm that can almost be regarded as 'biological'. They may possess the capability to learn, adapt to their environment, and even exhibit a certain degree of creativity and autonomous decision-making ability.

Imagine an AI that not only understands your words but also perceives your emotions and responds accordingly. This is not just about efficiency or convenience; it is about creating a new 'existence'—an intelligent life that interacts and coexists with humans.
See original
Bitcoin, as the beginning of the cryptocurrency realm, achieves decentralized value distribution through the proof-of-work (PoW) mechanism, allowing everyone the opportunity to earn Bitcoin by contributing computing power. After Ethereum introduced smart contracts, project teams quickly raised funds using the ICO mechanism, paving the way for decentralized crowdfunding. DeFi, by incentivizing users to provide liquidity, has built the infrastructure for decentralized finance while also driving new fundraising models. Today's AI Agent narrative combines blockchain technology with AI capabilities, enabling the autonomy and operation of agents through a distributed network. Periodic narratives have driven waves of innovation in the industry, promoting technological advancements and diversification of business models. The rise of DeFi has laid the foundation for on-chain finance, while the current AI Agent may promote the popularization of on-chain intelligence. A large number of AI Agent projects will emerge, but most will gradually fade away due to technical bottlenecks, insufficient market demand, or unsustainable economic models. A few projects will stand out through technological breakthroughs, alignment with user needs, and community consensus, becoming the core achievements of this cycle. For example, projects that can genuinely integrate on-chain AI capabilities with decentralized ecosystems may have long-term potential. The AI Agent era also needs to focus on technological capabilities, ecological compatibility, and user value.
Bitcoin, as the beginning of the cryptocurrency realm, achieves decentralized value distribution through the proof-of-work (PoW) mechanism, allowing everyone the opportunity to earn Bitcoin by contributing computing power.

After Ethereum introduced smart contracts, project teams quickly raised funds using the ICO mechanism, paving the way for decentralized crowdfunding.

DeFi, by incentivizing users to provide liquidity, has built the infrastructure for decentralized finance while also driving new fundraising models.

Today's AI Agent narrative combines blockchain technology with AI capabilities, enabling the autonomy and operation of agents through a distributed network.

Periodic narratives have driven waves of innovation in the industry, promoting technological advancements and diversification of business models. The rise of DeFi has laid the foundation for on-chain finance, while the current AI Agent may promote the popularization of on-chain intelligence.

A large number of AI Agent projects will emerge, but most will gradually fade away due to technical bottlenecks, insufficient market demand, or unsustainable economic models.

A few projects will stand out through technological breakthroughs, alignment with user needs, and community consensus, becoming the core achievements of this cycle. For example, projects that can genuinely integrate on-chain AI capabilities with decentralized ecosystems may have long-term potential.

The AI Agent era also needs to focus on technological capabilities, ecological compatibility, and user value.
See original
Compared to DeFi, the threshold for the popularity of AI Agents is lower, making them more attractive to ordinary users. DeFi primarily attracts users with a deep understanding of financial products, which tend to be more complex. AI Agents offer more contextualized intelligent services (such as personalized assistants, on-chain interactions, etc.), catering to a wider range of user needs and being closer to everyday demands. The usage scenarios for AI Agents can cover areas such as entertainment, education, and productivity, adapting to more user requirements. Compared to DeFi, the adoption scale of AI Agents is expected to be larger, as they target a broader user base and have lower interaction costs. Looking at the successful performance of the Virtual ecosystem, this trend is accelerating: users can achieve asset management, automated decision-making, and personalized services through on-chain intelligent agents. The rapid growth of the AI Agent market also provides more application demand for on-chain infrastructure (such as payments, identity verification, data storage). The widespread application of AI Agents relies on efficient and secure on-chain protocol support, such as encrypted payments, NFT assetization, and decentralized data verification. The broad adoption of AI Agents requires more low-threshold, high-practicality application scenarios. This will be key to driving their popularity. Although Virtual's revenue performance is outstanding, to ensure long-term growth, the design of its economic mechanism needs continuous optimization to avoid short-term booms caused by inflation or bubbles, similar to those seen in past DeFi. As the AI Agent ecosystem expands, the crypto space is ushering in a new growth cycle, with its scale and influence expected to surpass the previous DeFi wave.
Compared to DeFi, the threshold for the popularity of AI Agents is lower, making them more attractive to ordinary users. DeFi primarily attracts users with a deep understanding of financial products, which tend to be more complex.

AI Agents offer more contextualized intelligent services (such as personalized assistants, on-chain interactions, etc.), catering to a wider range of user needs and being closer to everyday demands.

The usage scenarios for AI Agents can cover areas such as entertainment, education, and productivity, adapting to more user requirements. Compared to DeFi, the adoption scale of AI Agents is expected to be larger, as they target a broader user base and have lower interaction costs.

Looking at the successful performance of the Virtual ecosystem, this trend is accelerating: users can achieve asset management, automated decision-making, and personalized services through on-chain intelligent agents.

The rapid growth of the AI Agent market also provides more application demand for on-chain infrastructure (such as payments, identity verification, data storage). The widespread application of AI Agents relies on efficient and secure on-chain protocol support, such as encrypted payments, NFT assetization, and decentralized data verification.

The broad adoption of AI Agents requires more low-threshold, high-practicality application scenarios. This will be key to driving their popularity. Although Virtual's revenue performance is outstanding, to ensure long-term growth, the design of its economic mechanism needs continuous optimization to avoid short-term booms caused by inflation or bubbles, similar to those seen in past DeFi.

As the AI Agent ecosystem expands, the crypto space is ushering in a new growth cycle, with its scale and influence expected to surpass the previous DeFi wave.
See original
Among the current CEX giants, Binance, OKX, and Bitget are the three major players. There is no doubt that BNB, as Binance's platform currency, has become the "golden shovel" for its long-term dominance - an extremely solid moat. OKX and Bitget followed closely and launched their own platform currencies, but compared with Binance, BNB's leading advantage is obvious. OKX launched its own X-chain, while Bitget made BGB into a "golden shovel", but neither has yet been able to surpass Binance in the battlefield of platform currencies. As the CEX bonus period is coming to an end, the quiet rise of DEX has made major platforms smell the breath of threat. Various platforms have begun to exert their strength in the wallet field in order to occupy a place in the future competition. In this regard, OKX has occupied a certain territory with its first-mover advantage, while Binance has relied on BNB's moat and years of accumulated capital to catch up. What really needs to be vigilant is Bitget's situation. However, Bitget did not sit idly by. Through the GetGas function of Bitget Wallet, BGB will have the opportunity to act as the GAS token of various public chains across chains. This may be a major breakthrough in the three major areas of CEX, DEX and wallets, but it may also be a new strategy for Bitget to survive in the cracks. If successful, BGB may find a new position in the Web3 ecosystem and become Bitget's unique competitive advantage. Therefore, although Bitget has tried to find a fleeting opportunity in the three major areas of CEX, DEX and wallets through BGB's cross-chain GAS payment, concerns about Binance still linger. The strong network effect that Binance has established in the industry over the years and the "golden shovel" effect of BNB have enabled it to maintain its market dominance even at the end of the CEX dividend. However, this may also cause it to become too conservative in innovation and adapting to new market needs, missing out on emerging trends. Whether Binance can continue to maintain its leading edge while effectively responding to the wave of decentralization and the challenges of increasingly stringent regulation will be a key test it needs to face in the future.
Among the current CEX giants, Binance, OKX, and Bitget are the three major players. There is no doubt that BNB, as Binance's platform currency, has become the "golden shovel" for its long-term dominance - an extremely solid moat.

OKX and Bitget followed closely and launched their own platform currencies, but compared with Binance, BNB's leading advantage is obvious. OKX launched its own X-chain, while Bitget made BGB into a "golden shovel", but neither has yet been able to surpass Binance in the battlefield of platform currencies.

As the CEX bonus period is coming to an end, the quiet rise of DEX has made major platforms smell the breath of threat. Various platforms have begun to exert their strength in the wallet field in order to occupy a place in the future competition.

In this regard, OKX has occupied a certain territory with its first-mover advantage, while Binance has relied on BNB's moat and years of accumulated capital to catch up. What really needs to be vigilant is Bitget's situation.

However, Bitget did not sit idly by. Through the GetGas function of Bitget Wallet, BGB will have the opportunity to act as the GAS token of various public chains across chains.

This may be a major breakthrough in the three major areas of CEX, DEX and wallets, but it may also be a new strategy for Bitget to survive in the cracks. If successful, BGB may find a new position in the Web3 ecosystem and become Bitget's unique competitive advantage.

Therefore, although Bitget has tried to find a fleeting opportunity in the three major areas of CEX, DEX and wallets through BGB's cross-chain GAS payment, concerns about Binance still linger. The strong network effect that Binance has established in the industry over the years and the "golden shovel" effect of BNB have enabled it to maintain its market dominance even at the end of the CEX dividend.

However, this may also cause it to become too conservative in innovation and adapting to new market needs, missing out on emerging trends. Whether Binance can continue to maintain its leading edge while effectively responding to the wave of decentralization and the challenges of increasingly stringent regulation will be a key test it needs to face in the future.
See original
AI is gaining popularity, especially the breakthroughs in generative AI (such as the GPT series, DALL-E, etc.), which not only attract developers and researchers, but also become a topic of discussion among the general public. In this context, AI meme can become a cultural symbol, and quickly gain attention with the help of technological progress and the dissemination effect of social media. Just like the success of Dogecoin and Pepe, behind them is not only the concept of "coin", but also the recognition of a group of people on culture. The success of AI meme may not rely entirely on its own intrinsic value, but on the establishment of new communities and cultural labels. The appeal of AI meme may come from the future technological dream and enthusiasm for innovation it carries. Although there are already representatives of classic AI memes such as Dogecoin and Pepe, AI meme may still stand out through unique themes or visual expressions. Through the characteristics related to AI technology, AI meme may be distinguished from existing memes in a more futuristic and technological performance. For example, through elements such as generative art, artificial intelligence assistants, and virtual characters, AI meme can be constructed as a new digital cultural identity. From a cultural perspective, whether AI meme is necessary to replace the existing cryptocurrency culture depends on whether a new "language" or "symbol" can be formed. AI meme may be more like a supplement to existing memes rather than a complete replacement. It may not necessarily have a deep-rooted symbolic meaning like BTC meme, but it may gain short-term popularity in a specific period and specific circle.
AI is gaining popularity, especially the breakthroughs in generative AI (such as the GPT series, DALL-E, etc.), which not only attract developers and researchers, but also become a topic of discussion among the general public. In this context, AI meme can become a cultural symbol, and quickly gain attention with the help of technological progress and the dissemination effect of social media.

Just like the success of Dogecoin and Pepe, behind them is not only the concept of "coin", but also the recognition of a group of people on culture. The success of AI meme may not rely entirely on its own intrinsic value, but on the establishment of new communities and cultural labels. The appeal of AI meme may come from the future technological dream and enthusiasm for innovation it carries.

Although there are already representatives of classic AI memes such as Dogecoin and Pepe, AI meme may still stand out through unique themes or visual expressions. Through the characteristics related to AI technology, AI meme may be distinguished from existing memes in a more futuristic and technological performance. For example, through elements such as generative art, artificial intelligence assistants, and virtual characters, AI meme can be constructed as a new digital cultural identity.

From a cultural perspective, whether AI meme is necessary to replace the existing cryptocurrency culture depends on whether a new "language" or "symbol" can be formed. AI meme may be more like a supplement to existing memes rather than a complete replacement. It may not necessarily have a deep-rooted symbolic meaning like BTC meme, but it may gain short-term popularity in a specific period and specific circle.
See original
AI agents can create dynamic, personalized NPCs (non-player characters) or companions for players, interacting based on player behavior and choices, providing an immersive experience that traditional games cannot achieve. AI agents in the game may be assetized, becoming on-chain NFTs (such as exclusive assistants, opponents, or resource management tools) that players can own and trade. Combined with on-chain maps, AI agents can guide players in exploration, engage in quests, and even generate unique storylines, shifting game content from predefined scripts to dynamic generation. The Treasure chain, as an important part of the Magic ecosystem, has built an economic ecology for multiple games, including tokenized assets, NFTs, and cross-game asset trading. The introduction of AI agents in the game's economic system design can enhance player interaction and promote a more diversified economic cycle. The decentralized ecosystem of Magic Treasure provides developers with a space for experimental innovation, and players' game assets and decision-making rights are more transparent and autonomous, creating an ideal environment for the assetization and functional iteration of AI agents. The core appeal of traditional games lies in rich gameplay and immersion. The introduction of AI agents needs to provide new experiences that go beyond traditional games, such as: Highly interactive NPCs; Game environments that change based on on-chain player behavior; AI-assisted game economic regulation. Reasonable design of the economic system The success of any blockchain game relies on a healthy economic system. The assetization of AI agents needs to avoid speculative behavior, ensuring their actual value within the game ecology, while designing reasonable incentive mechanisms to maintain the long-term attractiveness of the game. The behavior logic of AI agents needs to be highly complex, capable of processing on-chain data while not disrupting game balance. If the attempt of the Magic Treasure chain and smolverse is successful, it may drive a wave of "AI agents + blockchain games" trend. In the future, not only the Treasure chain but also other blockchain game ecosystems and traditional game companies may begin to explore the assetization and in-game application of AI agents.
AI agents can create dynamic, personalized NPCs (non-player characters) or companions for players, interacting based on player behavior and choices, providing an immersive experience that traditional games cannot achieve.

AI agents in the game may be assetized, becoming on-chain NFTs (such as exclusive assistants, opponents, or resource management tools) that players can own and trade. Combined with on-chain maps, AI agents can guide players in exploration, engage in quests, and even generate unique storylines, shifting game content from predefined scripts to dynamic generation.

The Treasure chain, as an important part of the Magic ecosystem, has built an economic ecology for multiple games, including tokenized assets, NFTs, and cross-game asset trading. The introduction of AI agents in the game's economic system design can enhance player interaction and promote a more diversified economic cycle. The decentralized ecosystem of Magic Treasure provides developers with a space for experimental innovation, and players' game assets and decision-making rights are more transparent and autonomous, creating an ideal environment for the assetization and functional iteration of AI agents.

The core appeal of traditional games lies in rich gameplay and immersion. The introduction of AI agents needs to provide new experiences that go beyond traditional games, such as:
Highly interactive NPCs;
Game environments that change based on on-chain player behavior;
AI-assisted game economic regulation.
Reasonable design of the economic system
The success of any blockchain game relies on a healthy economic system. The assetization of AI agents needs to avoid speculative behavior, ensuring their actual value within the game ecology, while designing reasonable incentive mechanisms to maintain the long-term attractiveness of the game.

The behavior logic of AI agents needs to be highly complex, capable of processing on-chain data while not disrupting game balance.

If the attempt of the Magic Treasure chain and smolverse is successful, it may drive a wave of "AI agents + blockchain games" trend. In the future, not only the Treasure chain but also other blockchain game ecosystems and traditional game companies may begin to explore the assetization and in-game application of AI agents.
See original
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
jones1572839
Close Position
BOMEUSDT
PNL
+73.56
Close Price
$0.0135281
See original
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000BONKUSDT
PNL
+11.26
Close Price
$0.03491955
See original
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000FLOKIUSDT
PNL
+6.07
Close Price
$0.32894786
See original
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000BONKUSDT
PNL
+5.89
Close Price
$0.0341668
See original
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000BONKUSDT
PNL
+13.18
Close Price
$0.03514162
See original
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
I just closed a new trade! Copy my portfolio with one click 👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000BONKUSDT
PNL
+2.36
Close Price
$0.03499451
See original
I just completed a new transaction! One click to copy my portfolio👇
I just completed a new transaction! One click to copy my portfolio👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000FLOKIUSDT
PNL
+3.15
Close Price
$0.27176082
See original
I just completed a new transaction! One click to copy my portfolio👇
I just completed a new transaction! One click to copy my portfolio👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000BONKUSDT
PNL
+7.86
Close Price
$0.03227505
See original
I just closed a new deal! Copy my investment portfolio with one click👇
I just closed a new deal! Copy my investment portfolio with one click👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000BONKUSDT
PNL
+2.31
Close Price
$0.03218734
See original
I just completed a new transaction! One click to copy my portfolio👇
I just completed a new transaction! One click to copy my portfolio👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000FLOKIUSDT
PNL
+13.21
Close Price
$0.27164013
See original
I just completed a new transaction! One click to copy my portfolio👇
I just completed a new transaction! One click to copy my portfolio👇
jones1572839
Close Position
1000FLOKIUSDT
PNL
+6.93
Close Price
$0.27158258
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

zarpash
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs