币圈半边天
Open Trade
LISTA Holder
Occasional Trader
3 Years
#推X特X同名#chinashe1
54 Following
1.8K+ Followers
2.0K+ Liked
601 Shared
See original
PINNED
Let's understand this through an example:
You have 1 million yuan in assets and decide to use 700,000 yuan of it to buy a cryptocurrency.
On the first day, the coin fell by 1%, and you lost 7,000 yuan, but you didn't care, thinking that the price would rise sooner or later.
On the second day, the price fell by another 3%, and you lost nearly 20,000 yuan, but you still firmly believed that it would rise again.
On the third day, the price rose by 2%, and you recovered about 10,000 yuan of losses. Your mood improved slightly, and you felt that everything was under control.
On the fourth day, the price of the coin suddenly plummeted by 20%, and you lost 140,000 yuan. You began to feel uneasy and hoped that it would rebound the next day.
On the fifth day, the price of the coin rebounded by 5%, and you breathed a sigh of relief, thinking that there were still rules to follow in currency trading.
On the sixth day, the price of the coin rose by another 1%. Although the increase was not large, at least there was hope of making a profit, and you felt satisfied.
On the seventh day, the price of the coin rose by another 1%, and you began to look forward to the future trend.
On the eighth day, the price of the currency continued to rise slowly, but you remained optimistic and believed that you would get your money back one day. On the ninth day, the price of the currency suddenly plummeted by 30%. You began to panic and wondered if you had chosen the wrong currency. On the tenth day, the price of the currency fell another 10%, and you felt angry and disappointed. On the eleventh day, the price of the currency entered a sideways consolidation period. You saw someone on the Internet saying that this was a bottoming signal. You believed that the market was accumulating momentum and firmly believed that the price of the currency would rebound soon. In the following week, the price of the currency continued to go sideways. You learned more about cryptocurrency online and believed that this was the "main force accumulation stage", so you continued to hold the currency. A month later, the price of the currency not only did not rise, but continued to fall by 20%. You began to feel numb and thought that it would be great if you could get your money back. You decided to withdraw the funds and stay away from cryptocurrency. But things did not go as you wished. The price of the currency continued to fall. At this time, you finally understood the concept of "stop loss". You struggled painfully in your heart, not knowing whether to liquidate or continue to hold. At this moment, one of your friends told you that a new coin has soared by 200% recently, and shared his "leading strategy". You believed it, sold the coins in your hands, and told yourself that you would come back to cover your position after making enough money on the new coin, and hold it for a long time after you get your money back.
Through this process, do you understand the root cause of the loss in coin speculation?
You have 1 million yuan in assets and decide to use 700,000 yuan of it to buy a cryptocurrency.
On the first day, the coin fell by 1%, and you lost 7,000 yuan, but you didn't care, thinking that the price would rise sooner or later.
On the second day, the price fell by another 3%, and you lost nearly 20,000 yuan, but you still firmly believed that it would rise again.
On the third day, the price rose by 2%, and you recovered about 10,000 yuan of losses. Your mood improved slightly, and you felt that everything was under control.
On the fourth day, the price of the coin suddenly plummeted by 20%, and you lost 140,000 yuan. You began to feel uneasy and hoped that it would rebound the next day.
On the fifth day, the price of the coin rebounded by 5%, and you breathed a sigh of relief, thinking that there were still rules to follow in currency trading.
On the sixth day, the price of the coin rose by another 1%. Although the increase was not large, at least there was hope of making a profit, and you felt satisfied.
On the seventh day, the price of the coin rose by another 1%, and you began to look forward to the future trend.
On the eighth day, the price of the currency continued to rise slowly, but you remained optimistic and believed that you would get your money back one day. On the ninth day, the price of the currency suddenly plummeted by 30%. You began to panic and wondered if you had chosen the wrong currency. On the tenth day, the price of the currency fell another 10%, and you felt angry and disappointed. On the eleventh day, the price of the currency entered a sideways consolidation period. You saw someone on the Internet saying that this was a bottoming signal. You believed that the market was accumulating momentum and firmly believed that the price of the currency would rebound soon. In the following week, the price of the currency continued to go sideways. You learned more about cryptocurrency online and believed that this was the "main force accumulation stage", so you continued to hold the currency. A month later, the price of the currency not only did not rise, but continued to fall by 20%. You began to feel numb and thought that it would be great if you could get your money back. You decided to withdraw the funds and stay away from cryptocurrency. But things did not go as you wished. The price of the currency continued to fall. At this time, you finally understood the concept of "stop loss". You struggled painfully in your heart, not knowing whether to liquidate or continue to hold. At this moment, one of your friends told you that a new coin has soared by 200% recently, and shared his "leading strategy". You believed it, sold the coins in your hands, and told yourself that you would come back to cover your position after making enough money on the new coin, and hold it for a long time after you get your money back.
Through this process, do you understand the root cause of the loss in coin speculation?
See original
PINNED
Stop speculating in coins like this.
There is a method of cryptocurrency trading that is known as the "dumbest but most effective" method, which is said to be able to achieve almost 100% profit.
The method is actually very simple, with only four steps: selecting coins, buying, position management, and selling. He has figured out every detail clearly, and now I will share this method with you.
Step 1: Choose a currency
Open the daily chart and focus only on the MACD indicator at the daily level. Choose those currencies with MACD golden cross, preferably above the zero axis, as this signal usually works best.
Why choose MACD Golden Cross?
The method is actually very simple, with only four steps: selecting coins, buying, position management, and selling. He has figured out every detail clearly, and now I will share this method with you.
Step 1: Choose a currency
Open the daily chart and focus only on the MACD indicator at the daily level. Choose those currencies with MACD golden cross, preferably above the zero axis, as this signal usually works best.
Why choose MACD Golden Cross?
See original
If you find a coin with 75x leverage and a funding rate of -2 or +2, just go all in in the last second. If it explodes, do you still make a profit?
See original
Deputy Chief Physician of the Thoracic Surgery Department at the prestigious China-Japan Friendship Hospital, having an affair with the head nurse, bringing a lover onto the operating table, and leaving a patient under anesthesia unattended for 40 minutes—any one of these incidents would be enough to trend online. But what really stirred the waters is the "rocket-like rise" of Dong Mouying.
This young woman has a resume more surreal than a TV drama: a Columbia University undergraduate in economics, she returned to China and transformed into a participant in the Xiehe "4+4" pilot program, obtaining a medical doctorate in just four years. While others endure ten years of hard study in medicine, she took the "fast track" to the finish line, reducing her residency from three years to one, with papers spanning imaging, gastroenterology, and neurosurgery, and after just two years of practical experience, she dares to perform level four surgeries. Netizens discovered that her thesis acknowledgment section listed a group of academicians, and the rapid removal of her thesis from CNKI added to the suspicion.
The Xiehe "4+4" program was originally aimed at cultivating interdisciplinary talents, but now it is being roasted under public scrutiny. Traditional medical students toil for years in the "5+3+4" system, while the likes of Dong Mouying can cross fields directly; it’s no wonder some self-deprecatingly say, "Ten years of hard study is not as good as choosing the right path." What’s even more heartbreaking is that the first batch of graduates faced discrimination during employment due to insufficient clinical rotation, and this innovative "medicine + X" concept finds itself stuck between ideals and reality.
But what truly strikes a chord with the public is the anxiety for safety under the shadow of privilege. When the lead surgeon in the operating room abandons their responsibilities for a lover, and the residency training system devolves into a bargaining chip for power and sex, who still dares to entrust their life to the operating table? The bold statement on the Xiehe official website about "cultivating great medical talents" seems particularly ironic in front of patients whose blood oxygen saturation has dropped to 90%.
This storm has long exceeded the realm of scandalous news, exposing the hidden ailments of the medical system: Is the academic evaluation system being held hostage by resources? Has the residency training system devolved into a game of personal favors? When the halo of the "genius girl" requires the backing of privilege, and when the sanctuary of healing breeds a bed of power and sex, perhaps we should ask: Why should patients pay the price for the trial-and-error costs of medical education reform with their lives?
This young woman has a resume more surreal than a TV drama: a Columbia University undergraduate in economics, she returned to China and transformed into a participant in the Xiehe "4+4" pilot program, obtaining a medical doctorate in just four years. While others endure ten years of hard study in medicine, she took the "fast track" to the finish line, reducing her residency from three years to one, with papers spanning imaging, gastroenterology, and neurosurgery, and after just two years of practical experience, she dares to perform level four surgeries. Netizens discovered that her thesis acknowledgment section listed a group of academicians, and the rapid removal of her thesis from CNKI added to the suspicion.
The Xiehe "4+4" program was originally aimed at cultivating interdisciplinary talents, but now it is being roasted under public scrutiny. Traditional medical students toil for years in the "5+3+4" system, while the likes of Dong Mouying can cross fields directly; it’s no wonder some self-deprecatingly say, "Ten years of hard study is not as good as choosing the right path." What’s even more heartbreaking is that the first batch of graduates faced discrimination during employment due to insufficient clinical rotation, and this innovative "medicine + X" concept finds itself stuck between ideals and reality.
But what truly strikes a chord with the public is the anxiety for safety under the shadow of privilege. When the lead surgeon in the operating room abandons their responsibilities for a lover, and the residency training system devolves into a bargaining chip for power and sex, who still dares to entrust their life to the operating table? The bold statement on the Xiehe official website about "cultivating great medical talents" seems particularly ironic in front of patients whose blood oxygen saturation has dropped to 90%.
This storm has long exceeded the realm of scandalous news, exposing the hidden ailments of the medical system: Is the academic evaluation system being held hostage by resources? Has the residency training system devolved into a game of personal favors? When the halo of the "genius girl" requires the backing of privilege, and when the sanctuary of healing breeds a bed of power and sex, perhaps we should ask: Why should patients pay the price for the trial-and-error costs of medical education reform with their lives?
See original
Trump is at it again! This time he directly gifted a 'Victory Tourbillon Watch' worth $100,000 as a souvenir to select individuals—however, not everyone gets one; only the top four holders of TRUMP coins qualify to receive this 'presidential-level' gold watch at the banquet.
First, let's take a look at the 'luxurious' configuration of this watch:
The entire watch is made of 18K pure gold, the dial is adorned with 122 small diamonds, and the back of the watch is engraved with Trump's autograph and the classic slogan "James, let’s achieve greatness together!". There are only 147 pieces worldwide, each with an individual serial number, and the most remarkable thing is that the number 1 watch has long been kept private by Trump himself—this operation is just like when he sold Bibles and kept the "first one for himself."
But the watch enthusiasts have already stripped it down:
• The movement has been revealed to be the TX07 tourbillon from the small Swiss manufacturer Olivier Mory, and experts say this movement alone cannot be bought for less than $3,500, with a significant portion of parts made in China.
• The crown guard designed for diving watches has been awkwardly forced into a dress watch, criticized as looking like "wearing swimming goggles with a suit."
• The official image is labeled "for reference only," and the actual product may not even have the same carat count of diamonds.
But Trump doesn’t care about the negative reviews!
This move is clearly aimed at giving MAGA die-hard fans a 'badge of identity'—what they wear is not just a watch, but a 'political vote' cast for Trump. It’s worth noting that his previous 'Battle Dive Watch' sold for $499, with the back directly printed with the image of raising a fist after an assassination attempt, and it sold out just as quickly. This time, using the amount of virtual currency held as a threshold not only boosts the popularity of TRUMP coins but also makes wealthy fans feel like "I shared a banquet with the president"—this psychological maneuver is brilliant.
Even more sophisticated is the business strategy:
• Pre-sale model with zero cost—collect money first, then find a factory to assemble.
• Bitcoin payment + limited purchase of 3 pieces, implying "if you don’t buy now, you’ll regret it later."
• Claims to be "unrelated to the campaign," but suddenly launched before the election, and even a fool understands this is a new form of political donation.
Ultimately, this watch is just like Trump himself—shiny and controversial. For ordinary people, it represents a tax on intelligence, but for the MAGA army, it’s a 'totem of power' that can be passed down through generations; after all, who can resist the temptation of wearing a watch with the president's signature and an individual serial number on their wrist?
First, let's take a look at the 'luxurious' configuration of this watch:
The entire watch is made of 18K pure gold, the dial is adorned with 122 small diamonds, and the back of the watch is engraved with Trump's autograph and the classic slogan "James, let’s achieve greatness together!". There are only 147 pieces worldwide, each with an individual serial number, and the most remarkable thing is that the number 1 watch has long been kept private by Trump himself—this operation is just like when he sold Bibles and kept the "first one for himself."
But the watch enthusiasts have already stripped it down:
• The movement has been revealed to be the TX07 tourbillon from the small Swiss manufacturer Olivier Mory, and experts say this movement alone cannot be bought for less than $3,500, with a significant portion of parts made in China.
• The crown guard designed for diving watches has been awkwardly forced into a dress watch, criticized as looking like "wearing swimming goggles with a suit."
• The official image is labeled "for reference only," and the actual product may not even have the same carat count of diamonds.
But Trump doesn’t care about the negative reviews!
This move is clearly aimed at giving MAGA die-hard fans a 'badge of identity'—what they wear is not just a watch, but a 'political vote' cast for Trump. It’s worth noting that his previous 'Battle Dive Watch' sold for $499, with the back directly printed with the image of raising a fist after an assassination attempt, and it sold out just as quickly. This time, using the amount of virtual currency held as a threshold not only boosts the popularity of TRUMP coins but also makes wealthy fans feel like "I shared a banquet with the president"—this psychological maneuver is brilliant.
Even more sophisticated is the business strategy:
• Pre-sale model with zero cost—collect money first, then find a factory to assemble.
• Bitcoin payment + limited purchase of 3 pieces, implying "if you don’t buy now, you’ll regret it later."
• Claims to be "unrelated to the campaign," but suddenly launched before the election, and even a fool understands this is a new form of political donation.
Ultimately, this watch is just like Trump himself—shiny and controversial. For ordinary people, it represents a tax on intelligence, but for the MAGA army, it’s a 'totem of power' that can be passed down through generations; after all, who can resist the temptation of wearing a watch with the president's signature and an individual serial number on their wrist?
See original
Thirty Days in the East, Thirty Days in the West
On the ever-changing political and business stage in the U.S., the tumultuous 'love-hate relationship' between Musk and Trump can be described as a spectacular reality drama.
As the tariff war erupted, Musk really had no words for his grievances. He didn't dare to directly criticize Trump and could only vent his anger on Navarro, the behind-the-scenes driver of the tariff war. On Twitter, Musk bluntly called Navarro dumber than a sack of bricks for making such an unreliable decision. But this criticism was like poking a hornet's nest. After enjoying the feeling for just two days, Trump responded: 'I don't need Musk to do anything; I just happen to like him.' Trump was probably thinking: you criticize my strategist as dumb, but all my policies listen to him, aren’t you indirectly criticizing me?
As the tariff war erupted, Musk really had no words for his grievances. He didn't dare to directly criticize Trump and could only vent his anger on Navarro, the behind-the-scenes driver of the tariff war. On Twitter, Musk bluntly called Navarro dumber than a sack of bricks for making such an unreliable decision. But this criticism was like poking a hornet's nest. After enjoying the feeling for just two days, Trump responded: 'I don't need Musk to do anything; I just happen to like him.' Trump was probably thinking: you criticize my strategist as dumb, but all my policies listen to him, aren’t you indirectly criticizing me?
See original
A late-night email sent to Yiwu is stirring the foreign trade waters—Walmart suddenly informs 1,700 Chinese factories to 'ship directly to the U.S., and I will bear all the tariffs.' This multinational giant, known for being frugal, has voluntarily taken on the burden of 25% tariffs in the fifth year of the China-U.S. trade war, leaving countless cross-border business owners astonished.
Do you remember a month ago when they arrogantly forced Chinese suppliers to absorb the tariffs? At that time, American retail giants thought they had the supply chain under control, but after just 20 days, they were in a panic—warehouses were nearly empty, shelves were about to be bare, and the CEOs of three retail giants were lined up at the White House seeking answers from Trump.
Insiders reveal that Walmart has secretly restructured its global supply chain model. Unlike the traditional multi-layered pricing agent model, the new plan requires Chinese manufacturers to label containers with 'Wal-Mart Direct' and ship directly to North American store warehouses. On the surface, each product earns $0.5 less in tariff costs, but by cutting out the middleman’s markup, the overall profit margin actually increases by 3 percentage points.
"This move is quite cunning!" said the head of a toy factory in Shenzhen: The multiple handling fees that originally went through Hong Kong have disappeared, and the shipping time has been reduced from 42 days to 22 days. "Walmart calculates everything down to the atomic level, even sending engineers to guide how to pack cargo in the container seams."
The deeper change lies in the transfer of bargaining power. Industry analysts point out that when retail giants internalize tariff costs, it is equivalent to throwing a ten-year long-term contract olive branch to Chinese manufacturers. The head of the Foshan Lighting Association candidly stated: 'The payment period has been compressed from 90 days to 15 days, which is more attractive than lowering tariffs. Now, large factories are all working overnight to modify production lines to meet Walmart's standards.'
At a time when China-U.S. shipping volumes have decreased by 12.7% year-on-year, Walmart's third-quarter purchases from China grew against the trend by 8%, and its self-operated fleet has quietly expanded to 63 cargo ships. Behind this seemingly profit-sacrificing gamble lies a significant reshaping of the global distribution landscape—when traditional trade barriers are transformed into supply chain moats, the business logic is undergoing a fundamental reversal.
Do you remember a month ago when they arrogantly forced Chinese suppliers to absorb the tariffs? At that time, American retail giants thought they had the supply chain under control, but after just 20 days, they were in a panic—warehouses were nearly empty, shelves were about to be bare, and the CEOs of three retail giants were lined up at the White House seeking answers from Trump.
Insiders reveal that Walmart has secretly restructured its global supply chain model. Unlike the traditional multi-layered pricing agent model, the new plan requires Chinese manufacturers to label containers with 'Wal-Mart Direct' and ship directly to North American store warehouses. On the surface, each product earns $0.5 less in tariff costs, but by cutting out the middleman’s markup, the overall profit margin actually increases by 3 percentage points.
"This move is quite cunning!" said the head of a toy factory in Shenzhen: The multiple handling fees that originally went through Hong Kong have disappeared, and the shipping time has been reduced from 42 days to 22 days. "Walmart calculates everything down to the atomic level, even sending engineers to guide how to pack cargo in the container seams."
The deeper change lies in the transfer of bargaining power. Industry analysts point out that when retail giants internalize tariff costs, it is equivalent to throwing a ten-year long-term contract olive branch to Chinese manufacturers. The head of the Foshan Lighting Association candidly stated: 'The payment period has been compressed from 90 days to 15 days, which is more attractive than lowering tariffs. Now, large factories are all working overnight to modify production lines to meet Walmart's standards.'
At a time when China-U.S. shipping volumes have decreased by 12.7% year-on-year, Walmart's third-quarter purchases from China grew against the trend by 8%, and its self-operated fleet has quietly expanded to 63 cargo ships. Behind this seemingly profit-sacrificing gamble lies a significant reshaping of the global distribution landscape—when traditional trade barriers are transformed into supply chain moats, the business logic is undergoing a fundamental reversal.
See original
When the Wild Road Trading Platform Wears a "Red Top Hat"
Late at night, I came across Liangxi's chilling warning post. This person, known for their genuine character in the cryptocurrency circle as a "whistleblower," has once again torn off the industry's fig leaf. Those exchanges that emphasize "strictly complying with local laws" in their user agreements may have much deeper collusion with power behind the scenes than ordinary players can imagine.
After spending ten years weaving a well-known political and business network in the industry, OKX's sudden emergence of the dark horse Bitget in 2024 is truly the chilling character that makes one's back shiver. After a certain untouchable young master, accompanied by a business team with a red halo, settled in, the once third-tier trading platform established a direct line to the capital city in just six months—this reminds one of the absurd stories from twenty years ago when certain suddenly wealthy private entrepreneurs appeared on the CPPCC list.
Today, it is hard for young people playing contracts to imagine that when the first batch of miners built mines in urban villages using iron sheet shanties, exchange owners genuinely waited at the network supervision bureau's office at three in the morning. Now, the leading players have advanced to a new realm. A certain trader once boasted after drinking: "Now, as long as a certain district-level economic investigation deputy captain passes a message, it can reach the X office secretary's desk within 24 hours."
These platforms with Cayman Islands licenses have already taken the study of relationships with Chinese characteristics to new heights. When you click "one-click withdrawal" in the app, what seems to be a simple flow of funds might actually involve a city investment fund from a new first-tier city, a low-key overseas Chinese business association, or even an innovative pilot index from a provincial financial office—within this closed-loop ecology, the real force that can shake the chessboard has never been in the white paper.
Liangxi's warning about "telephone case handling" is chilling upon reflection. Last year, the filing speed of "illegal business operations" for a certain second-tier platform's rights protection heavyweight was three times faster than the receipt for reporting a stolen electric vehicle on the street. These stories suddenly made the onlooking investors realize that they were no longer facing tech geeks in plaid shirts but a new form of "red-top businessmen" dressed in the guise of blockchain.
—Instead of waiting for someone to investigate, it’s better to put a gold chain on the regulators first.
Late at night, I came across Liangxi's chilling warning post. This person, known for their genuine character in the cryptocurrency circle as a "whistleblower," has once again torn off the industry's fig leaf. Those exchanges that emphasize "strictly complying with local laws" in their user agreements may have much deeper collusion with power behind the scenes than ordinary players can imagine.
After spending ten years weaving a well-known political and business network in the industry, OKX's sudden emergence of the dark horse Bitget in 2024 is truly the chilling character that makes one's back shiver. After a certain untouchable young master, accompanied by a business team with a red halo, settled in, the once third-tier trading platform established a direct line to the capital city in just six months—this reminds one of the absurd stories from twenty years ago when certain suddenly wealthy private entrepreneurs appeared on the CPPCC list.
Today, it is hard for young people playing contracts to imagine that when the first batch of miners built mines in urban villages using iron sheet shanties, exchange owners genuinely waited at the network supervision bureau's office at three in the morning. Now, the leading players have advanced to a new realm. A certain trader once boasted after drinking: "Now, as long as a certain district-level economic investigation deputy captain passes a message, it can reach the X office secretary's desk within 24 hours."
These platforms with Cayman Islands licenses have already taken the study of relationships with Chinese characteristics to new heights. When you click "one-click withdrawal" in the app, what seems to be a simple flow of funds might actually involve a city investment fund from a new first-tier city, a low-key overseas Chinese business association, or even an innovative pilot index from a provincial financial office—within this closed-loop ecology, the real force that can shake the chessboard has never been in the white paper.
Liangxi's warning about "telephone case handling" is chilling upon reflection. Last year, the filing speed of "illegal business operations" for a certain second-tier platform's rights protection heavyweight was three times faster than the receipt for reporting a stolen electric vehicle on the street. These stories suddenly made the onlooking investors realize that they were no longer facing tech geeks in plaid shirts but a new form of "red-top businessmen" dressed in the guise of blockchain.
—Instead of waiting for someone to investigate, it’s better to put a gold chain on the regulators first.
See original
🚨No more waiting! The ultimate airdrop intel for SLGN is unlocked
Binance Alpha just dropped a bombshell—an airdrop score of 65+ allowed a big player to directly snag 1500 $SLGN! Data was sealed at 2 AM, and wallets are already receiving funds in seconds🔥
The strategic value of continuous staking and high-frequency interactions has long been quietly recorded on-chain. Those who persist in daily deep interactions have directly earned top-tier rewards this time.
Upon further investigation, it turns out that the technical team behind SLGN includes former core developers from Cosmos, and the ecological roadmap even hides a staking linkage protocol with AAVE. This airdrop clearly indicates that the project is filtering out true ecological builders, while those who casually participate are directly eliminated.
Qualified friends have already started sharing their gains🎉 If you missed out, don't worry; according to internal news, there will be follow-up staking boosts and ecological construction incentives. Wallets holding coins for more than 72 hours are likely to trigger hidden weights for the second phase airdrop, and on-chain data tracking shows that whale addresses have already started building their positions in batches...
Binance Alpha just dropped a bombshell—an airdrop score of 65+ allowed a big player to directly snag 1500 $SLGN! Data was sealed at 2 AM, and wallets are already receiving funds in seconds🔥
The strategic value of continuous staking and high-frequency interactions has long been quietly recorded on-chain. Those who persist in daily deep interactions have directly earned top-tier rewards this time.
Upon further investigation, it turns out that the technical team behind SLGN includes former core developers from Cosmos, and the ecological roadmap even hides a staking linkage protocol with AAVE. This airdrop clearly indicates that the project is filtering out true ecological builders, while those who casually participate are directly eliminated.
Qualified friends have already started sharing their gains🎉 If you missed out, don't worry; according to internal news, there will be follow-up staking boosts and ecological construction incentives. Wallets holding coins for more than 72 hours are likely to trigger hidden weights for the second phase airdrop, and on-chain data tracking shows that whale addresses have already started building their positions in batches...
See original
"Presidential Dinner" Rakes in 3.8 Billion, the Dealer's Wallet Conceals Dangers
This June, the most magical business war is unfolding in the crypto world: former President Trump is holding an NFT launch event while simultaneously using a crypto wallet to execute a textbook-style harvest of retail investors. The marketing strategy of the TRUMP coin, which features the "Presidential Dinner," exploded into a staggering $3.8 billion in trading volume within 24 hours, yet the hidden capital game left many in cold sweat.
Checking on-chain data reveals a shocking truth: of the total supply of 1 billion TRUMP coins, a staggering 820 million are held in the founding team’s wallet. When the project incentivized the market with the bait of "Top 220 holders can join the dinner," the token price skyrocketed from $9 to $16, yet the mysterious address signed "Tump.ETH" continued to sell off — blockchain doesn't lie, and over the past three days, more than 23,000 ETH were cashed out, worth about $40 million at current prices.
This brings to mind Sun Yuchen's inherited strategy from years ago: creating hype through live-stream giveaways of Moutai and raffles for Teslas, and quietly cashing out after the token price surged. Now Trump's team has taken this to a new level, seamlessly combining the presidential IP with the Ponzi effect of MEME coins — using political charisma to attract speculators while creating FOMO (fear of missing out) through hunger marketing.
A more deadly trap lies in the token economics: 80% of the tokens are unreleased, meaning the dealer holds the nuclear button. When retail investors scramble for dinner qualifications, if the dealer drops just 5% of the tokens later, it would be enough to trigger a catastrophic decline. It should be noted that Sun Yuchen's JST project caused a 70% drop in token price by selling off just 5% of the tokens.
The most ironic outcome of this capital game is that those who ultimately get to dine with Trump are likely the dealer’s disguised accounts holding billions in chips, while the real retail investors are merely participating in a paid viewing of the "Presidential Reality Show." The transparency granted by blockchain technology has ironically become a tool for perfect crime — everyone can see the dealer's manipulation trajectory, yet no one can stop this conspiracy.
This June, the most magical business war is unfolding in the crypto world: former President Trump is holding an NFT launch event while simultaneously using a crypto wallet to execute a textbook-style harvest of retail investors. The marketing strategy of the TRUMP coin, which features the "Presidential Dinner," exploded into a staggering $3.8 billion in trading volume within 24 hours, yet the hidden capital game left many in cold sweat.
Checking on-chain data reveals a shocking truth: of the total supply of 1 billion TRUMP coins, a staggering 820 million are held in the founding team’s wallet. When the project incentivized the market with the bait of "Top 220 holders can join the dinner," the token price skyrocketed from $9 to $16, yet the mysterious address signed "Tump.ETH" continued to sell off — blockchain doesn't lie, and over the past three days, more than 23,000 ETH were cashed out, worth about $40 million at current prices.
This brings to mind Sun Yuchen's inherited strategy from years ago: creating hype through live-stream giveaways of Moutai and raffles for Teslas, and quietly cashing out after the token price surged. Now Trump's team has taken this to a new level, seamlessly combining the presidential IP with the Ponzi effect of MEME coins — using political charisma to attract speculators while creating FOMO (fear of missing out) through hunger marketing.
A more deadly trap lies in the token economics: 80% of the tokens are unreleased, meaning the dealer holds the nuclear button. When retail investors scramble for dinner qualifications, if the dealer drops just 5% of the tokens later, it would be enough to trigger a catastrophic decline. It should be noted that Sun Yuchen's JST project caused a 70% drop in token price by selling off just 5% of the tokens.
The most ironic outcome of this capital game is that those who ultimately get to dine with Trump are likely the dealer’s disguised accounts holding billions in chips, while the real retail investors are merely participating in a paid viewing of the "Presidential Reality Show." The transparency granted by blockchain technology has ironically become a tool for perfect crime — everyone can see the dealer's manipulation trajectory, yet no one can stop this conspiracy.
See original
A big surprise from the sky! Bitget's recent actions are explosive💥 After staying up all night to check the announcements, I found this script quite thrilling:
1️⃣ The platform reveals it was robbed of 20 million dollars by 8 "sheep shearing teams", but thinking deeper is terrifying—these accounts were able to precisely target the bugs during the timing, did the platform's risk control collectively drop the ball?
2️⃣ The most outrageous operation is here: all the recovered funds will be airdropped! At first glance, it seems like a conscience discovery, but then I realized BG holds 90% of BGB, taking 10% of users' losses as a cover-up, making a blood profit of 90%?
3️⃣ An announcement was made at 3 AM, and accounts will be unlocked by Wednesday; this public relations speed is ten times faster than fixing bugs (manual dog head emoji)
🕵️♂️ Three soul-searching questions from the onlookers:
① Why were the platform's vulnerabilities precisely captured by 8 accounts?
② Who actually holds the 90% of the 200 million BGB pool?
③ Is the so-called "professional sheep shearing party" just the platform’s self-directed scapegoat?
Guide to avoid being scammed:
√ Wait for the official complete report
√ It's advised to withdraw small assets to a cold wallet to avoid risks
√ Don’t be blinded by the "full airdrop"; think of the lessons learned from the GALA incident
This incident teaches us: when an exchange has issues, what’s not written in the announcement can be more deadly than what's written. It’s advised to let the bullets fly a bit longer, don’t rush to be a bystander. After all, in the crypto circle, your USDT isn't really yours until it’s in a hardware wallet👀
#ExchangeConfusingBehaviorAward #OnChainSherlockHolmesOnline
1️⃣ The platform reveals it was robbed of 20 million dollars by 8 "sheep shearing teams", but thinking deeper is terrifying—these accounts were able to precisely target the bugs during the timing, did the platform's risk control collectively drop the ball?
2️⃣ The most outrageous operation is here: all the recovered funds will be airdropped! At first glance, it seems like a conscience discovery, but then I realized BG holds 90% of BGB, taking 10% of users' losses as a cover-up, making a blood profit of 90%?
3️⃣ An announcement was made at 3 AM, and accounts will be unlocked by Wednesday; this public relations speed is ten times faster than fixing bugs (manual dog head emoji)
🕵️♂️ Three soul-searching questions from the onlookers:
① Why were the platform's vulnerabilities precisely captured by 8 accounts?
② Who actually holds the 90% of the 200 million BGB pool?
③ Is the so-called "professional sheep shearing party" just the platform’s self-directed scapegoat?
Guide to avoid being scammed:
√ Wait for the official complete report
√ It's advised to withdraw small assets to a cold wallet to avoid risks
√ Don’t be blinded by the "full airdrop"; think of the lessons learned from the GALA incident
This incident teaches us: when an exchange has issues, what’s not written in the announcement can be more deadly than what's written. It’s advised to let the bullets fly a bit longer, don’t rush to be a bystander. After all, in the crypto circle, your USDT isn't really yours until it’s in a hardware wallet👀
#ExchangeConfusingBehaviorAward #OnChainSherlockHolmesOnline
See original
Attention travelers to Hong Kong: Bringing more than 19 cigarettes will incur a fine of HKD 5,000. Carrying an extra box of cigarettes at the border can instantly vaporize your hard-earned money of 5,000. This new operation by the Hong Kong Customs is shocking!
You may not know that starting from February 1, 2023, as you drag your suitcase towards the customs channel at Hong Kong West Kowloon High Speed Rail Station, that X-ray machine is scrutinizing every piece of luggage with digital imaging like a judge. Is there a stash of 20/21/22 cigarettes in the corner of your suitcase? Sorry, this will directly trigger a red alert under Chapter 109 of the Hong Kong Ordinance on Taxable Goods.
A real case: Last Friday, Mr. Zhang, a tourist from Hangzhou, was inspected at customs and found to have half a pack of Furongwang (containing 40 cigarettes) hidden at the bottom of his suitcase, resulting in an immediate fine of 5,000 HKD. This amount is enough to buy 12 packs of the same cigarettes!
The absurd setting of 19 cigarettes: Why not a neat 20? Officials from the Hong Kong Department of Health explain that this is designed as a psychological defense against common carrying scenarios. Most tourists are used to carrying a 'whole pack' of cigarettes, and the standard 20 cigarettes per pack instantly crosses the line, forcing travelers to rethink their carrying strategy.
Survival guide for seasoned smokers:
1. Separate storage strategy: Keep 18 cigarettes in your carry-on bag and 17 hidden in your suitcase. Remember not to concentrate them in one place.
2. Open pack tactic: Ensure that the number of opened cigarette packs strictly remains within 19.
3. Group travel tips: Each adult traveler should carry separately; do not entrust all to one person.
4. Shopping receipt protection: If you have receipts from duty-free shop purchases, be prepared with them in both Chinese and English.
Behind this seemingly stringent cigarette crackdown lies a grand strategy of the Hong Kong SAR government—to use economic leverage to defend their hard-earned results of 16 years of being a 'smoke-free city.' Since the implementation of a comprehensive indoor smoking ban in 2017, the smoking rate in Hong Kong has been reduced from 11% to 9.5%. Now, they aim for a new target of 7.8% by 2025, making tobacco control for incoming travelers a battleground for victory.
As we hold our cameras on the streets of Mong Kok searching for cyberpunk shadows, the few cigarettes quietly lying in our backpacks construct the most ironic civilizational paradox of modern urban life: in the pursuit of individual freedom while traveling, we must dance with countless invisible rules. Perhaps this is the most authentic travel law in the era of globalization—every city we long for uniquely guards its rhythm of breath.
You may not know that starting from February 1, 2023, as you drag your suitcase towards the customs channel at Hong Kong West Kowloon High Speed Rail Station, that X-ray machine is scrutinizing every piece of luggage with digital imaging like a judge. Is there a stash of 20/21/22 cigarettes in the corner of your suitcase? Sorry, this will directly trigger a red alert under Chapter 109 of the Hong Kong Ordinance on Taxable Goods.
A real case: Last Friday, Mr. Zhang, a tourist from Hangzhou, was inspected at customs and found to have half a pack of Furongwang (containing 40 cigarettes) hidden at the bottom of his suitcase, resulting in an immediate fine of 5,000 HKD. This amount is enough to buy 12 packs of the same cigarettes!
The absurd setting of 19 cigarettes: Why not a neat 20? Officials from the Hong Kong Department of Health explain that this is designed as a psychological defense against common carrying scenarios. Most tourists are used to carrying a 'whole pack' of cigarettes, and the standard 20 cigarettes per pack instantly crosses the line, forcing travelers to rethink their carrying strategy.
Survival guide for seasoned smokers:
1. Separate storage strategy: Keep 18 cigarettes in your carry-on bag and 17 hidden in your suitcase. Remember not to concentrate them in one place.
2. Open pack tactic: Ensure that the number of opened cigarette packs strictly remains within 19.
3. Group travel tips: Each adult traveler should carry separately; do not entrust all to one person.
4. Shopping receipt protection: If you have receipts from duty-free shop purchases, be prepared with them in both Chinese and English.
Behind this seemingly stringent cigarette crackdown lies a grand strategy of the Hong Kong SAR government—to use economic leverage to defend their hard-earned results of 16 years of being a 'smoke-free city.' Since the implementation of a comprehensive indoor smoking ban in 2017, the smoking rate in Hong Kong has been reduced from 11% to 9.5%. Now, they aim for a new target of 7.8% by 2025, making tobacco control for incoming travelers a battleground for victory.
As we hold our cameras on the streets of Mong Kok searching for cyberpunk shadows, the few cigarettes quietly lying in our backpacks construct the most ironic civilizational paradox of modern urban life: in the pursuit of individual freedom while traveling, we must dance with countless invisible rules. Perhaps this is the most authentic travel law in the era of globalization—every city we long for uniquely guards its rhythm of breath.
See original
India "cuts off water" to Pakistan, how outrageous is the truth?
Do you think India wants to "thirst out Pakistan"? In fact, Modi is planning a bigger scheme.
The overwhelming news of "India cutting off water" these days sounds frightening, right? The loss of 26 lives triggered a snowballing retaliation, and Modi threatened to cut off Pakistan's water sources, with many people on social media starting to mourn for Pakistan. But when we open the map—wait, the Indus River doesn't even pass through India!
What the Indian officials are actually talking about is freezing the Indus Water Treaty (IWT), which is much more insidious than just cutting off water. In 1960, the two countries exchanged three eastern tributaries for three western tributaries, clearly stating the rights of use in black and white. Now India suddenly says, "I'm not giving you hydrological data," clearly inserting a fuse into Pakistan's lifeline.
What do you think Modi really wants to do? It's not to cut off water, it's to release water during the rainy season! In 2022, Pakistan suffered $30 billion in damages from a once-in-a-century flood, affecting 34 million people, which is about 15% of the national population. If India suddenly opens the floodgates upstream... looking at the map, the Jhelum River has already shown abnormal surges in flow, and Pakistani farmlands are beginning to flood—this is the real lethal strike.
Even more outrageous is that Modi has calculated this chess game and knows he won't lose: by 2024, Pakistan's external debt will exceed $100 billion, and nationwide blackouts are frequent, making even the freedom to drink tea hard to maintain. India's GDP growth rate was 7.8% last year, and Modi has already aimed his gun at the presidential election. At this time, playing military adventures is too costly; manipulating water resources not only aligns with "traditional skills" but also turns the international public opinion battlefield into his own home ground.
But the real stabilizing factor is that button—when two nuclear-armed countries are looking for reasons to go to war under a magnifying glass, the melting snow of the Himalayas might just be the savior. After all, no one wants to be the madman who ignites the nuclear powder keg in South Asia; all Modi needs is a negotiating chip to raise the stakes at the negotiating table. Who knows, maybe tomorrow they will wake up and tacitly "restore the hydrological data sharing system"? This is the most absurd script of international politics.
Do you think India wants to "thirst out Pakistan"? In fact, Modi is planning a bigger scheme.
The overwhelming news of "India cutting off water" these days sounds frightening, right? The loss of 26 lives triggered a snowballing retaliation, and Modi threatened to cut off Pakistan's water sources, with many people on social media starting to mourn for Pakistan. But when we open the map—wait, the Indus River doesn't even pass through India!
What the Indian officials are actually talking about is freezing the Indus Water Treaty (IWT), which is much more insidious than just cutting off water. In 1960, the two countries exchanged three eastern tributaries for three western tributaries, clearly stating the rights of use in black and white. Now India suddenly says, "I'm not giving you hydrological data," clearly inserting a fuse into Pakistan's lifeline.
What do you think Modi really wants to do? It's not to cut off water, it's to release water during the rainy season! In 2022, Pakistan suffered $30 billion in damages from a once-in-a-century flood, affecting 34 million people, which is about 15% of the national population. If India suddenly opens the floodgates upstream... looking at the map, the Jhelum River has already shown abnormal surges in flow, and Pakistani farmlands are beginning to flood—this is the real lethal strike.
Even more outrageous is that Modi has calculated this chess game and knows he won't lose: by 2024, Pakistan's external debt will exceed $100 billion, and nationwide blackouts are frequent, making even the freedom to drink tea hard to maintain. India's GDP growth rate was 7.8% last year, and Modi has already aimed his gun at the presidential election. At this time, playing military adventures is too costly; manipulating water resources not only aligns with "traditional skills" but also turns the international public opinion battlefield into his own home ground.
But the real stabilizing factor is that button—when two nuclear-armed countries are looking for reasons to go to war under a magnifying glass, the melting snow of the Himalayas might just be the savior. After all, no one wants to be the madman who ignites the nuclear powder keg in South Asia; all Modi needs is a negotiating chip to raise the stakes at the negotiating table. Who knows, maybe tomorrow they will wake up and tacitly "restore the hydrological data sharing system"? This is the most absurd script of international politics.
See original
Is Chinese Cuisine Really Invincible?
The map of China unfolds like a vibrant menu. Sichuan people make their tongues dance with Sichuan pepper, Cantonese cook rich soups that embody the cycle of seasons, Huaiyang chefs can thread needles with tofu, and Northeast iron pot stews can encompass half of the martial world. Just the eight major cuisines can take taste buds on a journey around the world, not to mention the local dishes hidden in alleys and the flavors of the streets. As the Chongqing people joke: 'Here, if you change to a different alley for hot pot, the base recipe could vary by a dynasty.'
Behind this diversity is a 'foodie gene' that has existed for three thousand years. During the Shang and Zhou dynasties, the earliest form of hot pot was simmered in bronze cauldrons, and Tang and Song literati wrote about 'golden minced meat and jade-like fish' in their poems. The Qing Dynasty imperial kitchen had over four hundred dim sum varieties. It takes a French chef three years to master stock preparation, while a Chinese master needs to wear out ten kitchen knives just to perfect knife skills.
Behind this diversity is a 'foodie gene' that has existed for three thousand years. During the Shang and Zhou dynasties, the earliest form of hot pot was simmered in bronze cauldrons, and Tang and Song literati wrote about 'golden minced meat and jade-like fish' in their poems. The Qing Dynasty imperial kitchen had over four hundred dim sum varieties. It takes a French chef three years to master stock preparation, while a Chinese master needs to wear out ten kitchen knives just to perfect knife skills.
See original
Upsetting Programmers' Livelihood?
While programmers in Silicon Valley are still struggling to solve LeetCode problems, three Chinese-American genius engineers have thrown out a game changer—Devin, the world's first AI software engineer capable of independently completing end-to-end programming. This thing can not only write code and fix bugs by itself but can also predict program vulnerabilities, taking over the work of 'ten-year veteran coders' completely. In just six months since its establishment, the parent company Cognition AI's valuation soared from $2 billion to $4 billion, with whispers of 'secretly using' it even within Google.
Devin's most ruthless move is to specifically target the most painful 'spaghetti code' of programmers. Those old systems with chaotic logic give human engineers headaches, but Devin can dissect them with surgical precision—automatically reconstructing code logic, optimizing performance bottlenecks, and even seamlessly migrating Java modules to Python.
Devin's most ruthless move is to specifically target the most painful 'spaghetti code' of programmers. Those old systems with chaotic logic give human engineers headaches, but Devin can dissect them with surgical precision—automatically reconstructing code logic, optimizing performance bottlenecks, and even seamlessly migrating Java modules to Python.
See original
When most people are at FOMO 0, the smart ones have already bought the NFTs.
See original
Instead of waiting and watching, let AI work for you.
1U cost, 70U returns. All you have to do is tap the screen a few times.
Step 1: Enter Binance Web3 Wallet
Open the Binance App → Click 'Web3 Wallet' → Enter the DApp list, search for Mind Network.
Step 2: Activate AI Agent
After entering the page, find the 'Launch my AI' option, and the system will randomly assign an AI agent (such as data analysis, trading prediction, etc.).
Step 3: Stake FHE Tokens
After selecting an agent, stake at least 10 FHE (about 1U); it is recommended to stake 100 (cost 10U) for higher returns. Staked tokens can be withdrawn at any time, with no locking period.
Step 1: Enter Binance Web3 Wallet
Open the Binance App → Click 'Web3 Wallet' → Enter the DApp list, search for Mind Network.
Step 2: Activate AI Agent
After entering the page, find the 'Launch my AI' option, and the system will randomly assign an AI agent (such as data analysis, trading prediction, etc.).
Step 3: Stake FHE Tokens
After selecting an agent, stake at least 10 FHE (about 1U); it is recommended to stake 100 (cost 10U) for higher returns. Staked tokens can be withdrawn at any time, with no locking period.
See original
Institutional Entry
1. ETF Breakthrough: Traditional Asset Management Giants Enter, Opening Up Incremental Funding Channels
Canary Capital submitted the first SUI ETF application to the U.S. SEC in April 2025, marking the formal inclusion of SUI into the category of compliant investment tools by traditional financial institutions. If approved, investors will be able to indirectly hold SUI tokens through traditional financial markets, lowering the threshold for directly managing cryptocurrency assets. VanEck predicts this will bring $3.5 billion in incremental funds to SUI and may replicate the explosive path of the Bitcoin ETF (which saw trading volume exceed $95 billion after its approval).
2. RWA Layout: Trillions of Dollars in Traditional Assets on-chain, Building a New Financial Ecosystem
SUI is collaborating with global asset management giant Franklin Templeton to jointly build a tokenized asset platform, promoting the on-chain management of $15 trillion in traditional assets (such as bonds and private equity).
Highlights of the collaboration:
Technical Integration: Utilizing SUI's high throughput (measured TPS over 120,000) and the Move smart contract language to achieve full-process automation of asset issuance and trading.
Yield-bearing Products Launched: Franklin's tokenized fund FOBXX is already operating on chains such as Polygon and Aptos, managing over $424 million, and may expand into the Middle Eastern market through the SUI network in the future.
Industry Impact: The on-chain transition of traditional assets will break regional limitations, attracting more sovereign funds and family offices to participate.
3. Compliance Breakthrough: Middle Eastern Regulatory Recognition, Sovereign Funds Heavily Invested
In April 2025, SUI obtained a compliance license issued by the Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), becoming the first compliant public chain in the Middle East.
Strategic Achievements:
Sovereign Fund Entry: The Abu Dhabi sovereign fund completed a strategic allocation of $230 million through compliant channels, promoting SUI to become the core of digital infrastructure in the Middle East.
Regulatory Sandbox Advantages: Through VARA's Innovative Testing License (ITL), SUI can be exempted from certain capital requirements within 6-12 months, rapidly testing tokenized products.
Regional Radiating Effect: As a global RWA hub, Dubai has attracted institutions such as BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, and the compliance of SUI will accelerate the migration of Middle Eastern capital to the cryptocurrency market.
1. ETF Breakthrough: Traditional Asset Management Giants Enter, Opening Up Incremental Funding Channels
Canary Capital submitted the first SUI ETF application to the U.S. SEC in April 2025, marking the formal inclusion of SUI into the category of compliant investment tools by traditional financial institutions. If approved, investors will be able to indirectly hold SUI tokens through traditional financial markets, lowering the threshold for directly managing cryptocurrency assets. VanEck predicts this will bring $3.5 billion in incremental funds to SUI and may replicate the explosive path of the Bitcoin ETF (which saw trading volume exceed $95 billion after its approval).
2. RWA Layout: Trillions of Dollars in Traditional Assets on-chain, Building a New Financial Ecosystem
SUI is collaborating with global asset management giant Franklin Templeton to jointly build a tokenized asset platform, promoting the on-chain management of $15 trillion in traditional assets (such as bonds and private equity).
Highlights of the collaboration:
Technical Integration: Utilizing SUI's high throughput (measured TPS over 120,000) and the Move smart contract language to achieve full-process automation of asset issuance and trading.
Yield-bearing Products Launched: Franklin's tokenized fund FOBXX is already operating on chains such as Polygon and Aptos, managing over $424 million, and may expand into the Middle Eastern market through the SUI network in the future.
Industry Impact: The on-chain transition of traditional assets will break regional limitations, attracting more sovereign funds and family offices to participate.
3. Compliance Breakthrough: Middle Eastern Regulatory Recognition, Sovereign Funds Heavily Invested
In April 2025, SUI obtained a compliance license issued by the Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), becoming the first compliant public chain in the Middle East.
Strategic Achievements:
Sovereign Fund Entry: The Abu Dhabi sovereign fund completed a strategic allocation of $230 million through compliant channels, promoting SUI to become the core of digital infrastructure in the Middle East.
Regulatory Sandbox Advantages: Through VARA's Innovative Testing License (ITL), SUI can be exempted from certain capital requirements within 6-12 months, rapidly testing tokenized products.
Regional Radiating Effect: As a global RWA hub, Dubai has attracted institutions such as BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, and the compliance of SUI will accelerate the migration of Middle Eastern capital to the cryptocurrency market.
See original
At 27, he made $3 million selling e-books.
Tommy Pedruzzi's story sounds like a 'counterintuitive' myth of getting rich quick—having never written a complete book, lacking a fan base, and not even engaging in social media, yet he made $3 million selling e-books. But beneath the surface, you'll find he has tapped into three underlying logics of 'quietly making money', and this approach can be completely replicated by ordinary people.
1. Turn 'knowledge fast food' into a 'buffet'.
The traditional publishing industry always emphasizes 'originality', but Tommy understands a truth: 90% of users are not looking for Nobel Prize-level works, but rather 'knowledge bundles' that can solve problems.
1. Turn 'knowledge fast food' into a 'buffet'.
The traditional publishing industry always emphasizes 'originality', but Tommy understands a truth: 90% of users are not looking for Nobel Prize-level works, but rather 'knowledge bundles' that can solve problems.
See original
Brothers! The SUI ecosystem has recently become incredibly🔥 explosive, especially with those new mining and airdrop projects casually distributing tens of thousands of U. If you don't jump in now, you'll be at a serious loss!
S✨GOLD is coming soon - join now and claim your mysterious gift!!! BTC X GAMEFI on #SUI@SGOLD_FUN Join using my referral: 2M2V2M Join now: https://sgold.fun/login?ref=2M2V2M #InviteFriend #SUI #SGOLD_FUN
S✨GOLD is coming soon - join now and claim your mysterious gift!!! BTC X GAMEFI on #SUI@SGOLD_FUN Join using my referral: 2M2V2M Join now: https://sgold.fun/login?ref=2M2V2M #InviteFriend #SUI #SGOLD_FUN
Login to explore more contents