Five criteria for judging rune casting

1/ Zero pre-mining/full pre-mining Each has its own advantages, and there is no absolute good or bad. The most important thing is whether it can generate a wealth effect. The advantage of zero pre-mining is that the consensus is relatively strong, because it is all cast by users with real money; while full pre-mining depends on the operation and empowerment of the project party, whether there are strong dealers to protect the market, etc.

2/ Number of holders/number of holding addresses This is very important. The more dispersed the chips are, the more retail investors hold them, and the stronger the consensus is

3/ Community discussion, Twitter popularity, especially the popularity of Western communities. You can search the rune name on Twitter, mainly to see the popularity of Western discussions and whether there are big KOLs to promote the products

4/ Rune name, the cultural attributes behind it, the native culture of encryption (including the native culture of Bitcoin), the meme culture of the Western community, and the consensus on culture is also divided into strong and weak

5/ Total supply (supply), single casting amount (amount) and the total number of castings (cap); be cautious if the cap is too small, because the smaller the cap, the fewer the corresponding holders will definitely be