@Succinct ZK Towards the 'Computing Power and Compliance' Bilateral Market (Part Two)
Products and Mechanisms
@Succinct One side uses Prover Network to make 'Proof Generation' a purchasable computing power (low latency/standard/multi-tier SLA, proof number traceable); the other side uses SP1 zkVM to allow teams to write business scripts in Rust and automatically generate proofs, version/gray/rollback regression DevOps. The combined effect is to transform ZK from 'algorithmic capability' into a public good that is 'engineered and accountably measurable'.
Economics and Ecology
The essence of SLA stratification is 'Determinism as a Service': high latency sensitive tasks pay premiums, long-tail tasks go for bulk pricing; scaling reduces 'cost per thousand proofs', shifting business from exploration to unit economics optimization. SP1 incorporates 'verifiable execution' into the regular release system, making auditing, disclosure, and cross-chain read/write traceable.
Metrics and Verification
Focus: ① Task volume and SLA structure (an increase in low latency proportion indicates high-value application penetration); ② Average proof time and failure retry rate; ③ Median time from POC to production cycle; ④ Number of integrations with Rollup/bridge/oracle/DA; ⑤ Growth in priced seats on the enterprise side.
Case
A blockchain game entrusts 'Result Verification' to Prover Network, switching to low latency tier during peak hours (minute-level proof), and standard tier during off-peak; monthly reports align budget with 'cost per thousand proofs' and 'failure rate'. Meanwhile, the issuer uses SP1 to version the 'Anti-Cheat Detection Script' on-chain, allowing players to self-verify, shifting the controversy from 'who to trust' to 'what to verify'.