I don't understand what the reason is for being obsessed with a first-come, first-served score of 200. If we really can't get to the second stage, then having a first-come, first-served score of 250 that drops 15 points every hour would still be better than the current situation.

If the airdrop project team really can't distribute so much money, then raising the second stage will just mean fewer people getting a share. How about giving at least those who really invested more and scored high some positive feedback with a 250+ first stage? There's no need to be afraid of the people in the square who say there aren't enough points every day. Didn't you start this event to attract users who are really willing to invest? I've had 260+ points for several days now, and I don't believe that raising the first stage to above 260 points won't allow the project team to distribute the big rewards.
You let those who are constantly losing points fight for the 200 points on a first-come, first-served basis, and they still might not even get that little reward 😑. Who still has the motivation to compete with studios for internet speed while also trying to score high? Or simply divide it into three stages: first stage 300, second stage 250, third stage 200, with all but the first stage being first-come, first-served. We can't keep setting low thresholds and then have a bunch of people unable to spend their points. How does rewarding those who score 18+ points every day the same as those who score 15 or 16 points benefit anyone?
@币安Binance华语 hopes this can be communicated to the project team responsible for designing the points threshold.