What we are talking about is that Sesame actively invites KEY to go online, but KEY may not necessarily go online. Can't you understand this? If KEY is not good, will Sesame actively invite it? I am questioning whether everyone can really see if a project is good or not.

1. Actively giving benefits to private placement users, with a maximum return of 10 times. At the beginning of the private placement, the haters kept criticizing, and in the end, they all got slapped in the face. This made those who believed the haters' words miss out on 10 times the profits. Even now, there are still people criticizing; you can keep believing that, we will not provide any explanations, just go and grasp it yourself.

2. Actively giving up the fourth round of private placement and airdropping to token holders, the official does not want private placement to make money.

3. Professional exchanges like Sesame understand projects better than you do; they actively send invitations, yet you still cannot see the value; it can only be said that: you have no awareness at all and cannot earn money in the crypto circle.

Based on these three points, everyone should understand for themselves; I won't say more.