Follow ➕ Binance Square group chat, the airdrop commander will help you seize the opportunity

In today's alpha ecosystem, the anxiety of "too many wolves and too few sheep" is becoming increasingly apparent. Airdrops have transformed from direct arrival to being laden with rules, and the points system has become a tool for gaming the system. We can't help but wonder: are the rules being optimized, or are they just adding obstacles? The core of the problem always revolves around the struggle between studios and real users. If the rules are too lenient, studios exploit them in bulk, and rewards get diluted; if too strict, real users find it difficult to navigate, and trading behavior for rewards becomes the norm. The key to breaking the deadlock may lie in making the rules "smarter." Instead of complicating matters for ordinary people with intricate terms, we should use technology to accurately identify "abnormal accounts"—those with traces of bulk registration, mechanical traffic, and solely profit-driven studios, which are already hidden in login frequency, device information, and transaction logic. Rewards should tilt towards "long-term active users with genuine behavior," with basic benefits easily accessible, while substantial "big rewards" should be linked to real contributions, such as active duration, effective interactions, and ecological participation, rendering studios' short-term operations unprofitable. More importantly, rewards should return to being "substantial." Points should be redeemable for core services rather than merely for profit, and airdrops should flow to those who genuinely stay in the ecosystem. Fewer vague rule adjustments and more transparent anti-cheat disclosures would allow users to see that every reward goes where it should. After all, what we want is not a complicated game of rules, but a sense of "the longer you use it, the more stable your earnings." #币安八周年 #alpha