At a meeting hosted by @lucycoulden, she posed a great question: Should we continue to encourage free proposals, or should we set clear quarterly/annual goals for everyone to base their proposals around? 🤔
Let's see how @BillLaboon responded in a technical and governance education interview with the Web3 Foundation: 👇
"I do think that OpenGov can indeed be a bit 'more like a government'—that is, with some coordination and sense of direction.
But on the other hand, the process of exploring what we want to do, gathering feedback, and discovering pathways is exactly what OpenGov is about.
While this process may be a bit messy, we also know that democracy itself is messy; there will be disagreements, but this is precisely how we figure out what the community truly cares about."
What do you think?
