⚠️💰 BE CAREFUL WITH FALSE "SAYLORIZATION"! Not all cryptos are Bitcoin for store of value.
Companies imitate Michael Saylor's strategy of accumulating digital assets 📈, but many buy altcoins ($SOL , $ETH , $TRUMP ) instead of just Bitcoin (#BTC ) 🤦♂️.
Huge difference! Saylor accumulates BTC as a solid store of value with fundamentals 🥇. Others "bet" on volatile and risky assets 🎲.
Examples:
- Addentax (China): Will buy BTC and #TRUMP with stock issuance 💸🐶.
- Sol Strategies (Canada): Accumulates SOL ☀️.
- Janover (USA): Bought a large amount of SOL 🏢.
- Upexi (USA): Increases its position in SOL 🛍️.
- BTCS Inc. (USA): Plans to buy ETH with convertible notes 🔷.
Key mistake! Bitcoin is not "just another crypto" 🚫. It is decentralized, censorship-resistant, with limited issuance (21M) and functions as "digital gold" 🛡️. Altcoins are controlled, have defined objectives, and many are inflationary 🎈.
#solana (SOL) has an inflationary model (~5.3% annual) that dilutes its value 📉. Using it as a reserve involves risk due to volatility and inherent loss of value 😬.
Bitcoin acts as protection in economic uncertainty 🌍🛡️, unlike altcoins.
Trump's idea of including several #altcoins (XRP, SOL, ADA) in a digital strategic reserve is a mistake that confuses the unique value of BTC as a solid and scarce reserve 🤔.
Many altcoins like ETH and XRP have depreciated against BTC over time 📉➡️🥇.
Conclusion: The true "saylorización" is understanding why #bitcoin YES and the other cryptos NO are suitable as a fundamental store of value 💡.
Do you think companies that accumulate altcoins as reserves are making a mistake? 🤔 Why is Bitcoin different?
If you liked it, remember to follow me, give it a like, and share 👍
