🚨 The Double Standards in Crypto Listings? 🚨
First, we see 202,547 eligible votes (87.1%) in favor of listing $PI on @binance. Amazing, right? ✅ The community has spoken! But wait… there’s a twist!
Binance then clarifies: “This vote is just for reference.” The final decision? It depends on:
✔ Roadmap 📜
✔ Innovative Technology ⚙
✔ Community Engagement 🤝
✔ Project Quality 🌟
Sounds fair? Sure, we all want credible projects on major exchanges. BUT… here’s the problem!
How is it that meme tokens with no clear roadmap, zero innovation, and questionable fundamentals get listed almost overnight? 🚀 Meanwhile, $PI—backed by a massive community and solid fundamentals—has to go through endless scrutiny? 🤨
Where’s the consistency? Where’s the fairness?
We get it—hype moves markets. But if exchanges want to position themselves as trustworthy, they can’t pick and choose when to enforce strict policies.
💡 If utility and innovation matter, why are joke coins prioritized?
💡 If community engagement is key, why ignore a network with millions of active users?
Crypto should be a level playing field. No cherry-picking, no favoritism. **If
