Binance Square
#spasex

spasex

129 views
6 Discussing
必盈小马
·
--
The combined wealth of China's top 36 billionaires barely equals that of Musk alone (around $830 billion). Why is the gap so big? 1. Market dimensions differ - Chinese billionaires: Their base is China's 1.4 billion people market, focusing on internet, consumption, and manufacturing, which is all about 'existing competition'. - Musk: Global market plus the new frontier of space. Tesla is a global carmaker, SpaceX monopolizes commercial space travel, and Starlink has worldwide coverage; it's all about 'expansion exploration'. 2. Different ceilings in their lanes - Domestic top players: They change how people socialize, shop online, drink beverages, and use cars, which is about optimizing business efficiency, with a clear upper limit. - Musk: Energy revolution, space colonization, AI—these are global necessities for the coming decades, without borders and no limits. 3. Differences in asset structure - Chinese billionaires: Their wealth is concentrated in a single country/industry, heavily influenced by policies, cycles, and emotional fluctuations, making it prone to wild swings. - Musk: Tesla + SpaceX + Starlink + AI, spanning cycles and industries, globalized, highly resilient to risks, and with greater growth potential. My take: - Don’t deny the gap: Musk is a product of an era-level 'tech + capital + risk' combination, hard to replicate; but the wealth scale and industry heights created by top billionaires in China and the U.S. are definitely not on the same level. - Also, don’t mythologize Musk; Chinese billionaires are not incapable; it's just a different stage: they've built world-class enterprises in a developing country over decades, which is an impressive achievement; we just haven't reached the stage of 'defining the future outward'. - What truly deserves attention is not just the money, but 'what they do': Musk invests massive wealth into civilization-level projects (space, energy, AI); Chinese billionaires are more focused on consumer needs and digital services. Different directions lead to naturally different landscapes. In summary: The gap genuinely exists; it's not about 'who makes more money' but about 'where they make money and what they do with it'. #马斯克的传奇人生 #特斯拉 #SpaseX
The combined wealth of China's top 36 billionaires barely equals that of Musk alone (around $830 billion). Why is the gap so big?

1. Market dimensions differ
- Chinese billionaires: Their base is China's 1.4 billion people market, focusing on internet, consumption, and manufacturing, which is all about 'existing competition'.
- Musk: Global market plus the new frontier of space. Tesla is a global carmaker, SpaceX monopolizes commercial space travel, and Starlink has worldwide coverage; it's all about 'expansion exploration'.
2. Different ceilings in their lanes
- Domestic top players: They change how people socialize, shop online, drink beverages, and use cars, which is about optimizing business efficiency, with a clear upper limit.
- Musk: Energy revolution, space colonization, AI—these are global necessities for the coming decades, without borders and no limits.
3. Differences in asset structure
- Chinese billionaires: Their wealth is concentrated in a single country/industry, heavily influenced by policies, cycles, and emotional fluctuations, making it prone to wild swings.
- Musk: Tesla + SpaceX + Starlink + AI, spanning cycles and industries, globalized, highly resilient to risks, and with greater growth potential.

My take:

- Don’t deny the gap: Musk is a product of an era-level 'tech + capital + risk' combination, hard to replicate; but the wealth scale and industry heights created by top billionaires in China and the U.S. are definitely not on the same level.
- Also, don’t mythologize Musk; Chinese billionaires are not incapable; it's just a different stage: they've built world-class enterprises in a developing country over decades, which is an impressive achievement; we just haven't reached the stage of 'defining the future outward'.
- What truly deserves attention is not just the money, but 'what they do': Musk invests massive wealth into civilization-level projects (space, energy, AI); Chinese billionaires are more focused on consumer needs and digital services. Different directions lead to naturally different landscapes.

In summary: The gap genuinely exists; it's not about 'who makes more money' but about 'where they make money and what they do with it'.

#马斯克的传奇人生 #特斯拉 #SpaseX
·
--
Bullish
#SPASEX Long buy trade Entry: 152 Stop loss: 146 Target: 204 Note: Entry with 1% of capital + max leverage 10x Risk management is more important than profit$SPCXB
#SPASEX Long buy trade
Entry: 152
Stop loss: 146
Target: 204
Note: Entry with 1% of capital + max leverage 10x
Risk management is more important than profit$SPCXB
Binance Academy
·
--
One account for crypto and stocks.

Diversification isn't just a crypto strategy, it's an investing principle.
Now you can trade over 7,000 U.S. stocks and ETFs directly from your Binance account. Fund with USDC, BNB, or USDT. Start at just $5 with zero commissions.

Before you dive in, take a few minutes to understand how it works
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number