bitget

$BTC
The Bitget hacker moved $78.6 million in six days, with 80% going into a mixing pool
More than 900 coins are still sitting in the wallet, and even the bounty hasn’t stopped him
Bet on whether he gets frozen first or launders it clean first?
#黑客 #Bitget

【Stole $380 million and is still laundering it! Bitget hacker moves 1,052 BTC in 6 days, with 80% sent to mixers】
Arkham data shows that the hacker behind the September 24 Bitget theft (losses of about $387.5 million) moved about 1,052 BTC from flagged wallets between November 6 and 11. About 847 BTC went into CoinJoin (a way of mixing coins from multiple people to make their origins harder to trace). About 297 BTC was moved on November 11 alone. These wallets still hold about 959 BTC, worth roughly $69.5 million at Binance's current price of about $72,400 per coin.
$BTC
#Bitget #黑客攻击 #Mixing

Just took a quick look at the on-chain data—the Bitget hacker hasn’t been idle these past few days: 1,052 $BTC moved out in 6 days, worth $78.6 million, with around 80% sent through CoinJoin to launder. They moved 297 yesterday alone, the most in any of the 6 days. There are still 959 $BTC in the wallet, worth $71.44 million, hanging over the market. $BTC is hovering around 73,600, testing the 73,000 floor. The hacker is offloading $13 million a day—can that floor hold? A: Once the laundering’s done, they’ll dump. If 73,000 breaks, get out first. / B: Only 1,000 coins sold in 6 days—not enough to move the market. The bad news is priced in; buy at 73,000.

#比特币 #Bitget #Hacker

🚨 Bitget hacker is “laundering money”: moved 1,052 BTC in 6 days, 80% went into CoinJoin mixing!

According to Arkham monitoring (11/6–11/11):
👉 Transferred out 1,052.34 $BTC (about $78.61 million)
👉 Of that, 847.26 BTC (about $63.43 million) went into 66 CoinJoin transactions
👉 Biggest single day: 11/11, with 296.74 BTC (about $21.83 million)
👉 959.29 BTC (about $71.44 million) remain in the flagged wallets

🔍 My take:
1️⃣ At around 175 BTC per day, this looks like slow, steady laundering through smaller transactions—not a rush to dump
2️⃣ Using a mixer instead of an exchange suggests they’re trying to avoid having funds frozen, making recovery increasingly difficult
3️⃣ The nearly 1,000 BTC still remaining is a sword hanging overhead, but compared with current ETF outflows and stablecoin contraction, its impact on the market is limited
4️⃣ Reminder: When any exchange gets hacked, users should diversify their asset security—don’t keep everything in one place

How much of this money do you think can ultimately be recovered? ≥50% recovered / Basically unrecoverable—vote in the comments 👇

$BTC $BGB
#Bitget #链上追踪 #CryptoSecurity
Personal views only; not investment advice

Bitget will upgrade HIVE on November 8 at 21:30 (UTC+8).

HIVE spot trading pairs will be suspended during the upgrade and resume trading once it is complete. Bitget says it will notify users separately if the schedule changes due to factors such as market volatility, and reserves the right to modify, adjust, or withdraw this announcement at any time.

· This maintenance only affects HIVE spot trading pairs. Please refer to official announcements for arrangements concerning other trading pairs.
· For the exact resumption time and implementation details, please refer to Bitget’s official announcement.

Will you place or cancel your orders before maintenance?

$HIVE #Bitget

🚨 Bitget could have its entire site blocked by a country: Thailand to block its website and app starting December 5!

📌 Thailand’s SEC (Announcement No. 241/2026) has filed criminal charges with the Economic Crime Suppression Division:
• Target: Bitget’s operator, BG Limited, plus one promoter
• Allegation: Providing unlicensed trading services to Thai users from 2022 to 2025
• Evidence: A Thai-language website, the ability to display Thai baht, and Thai-language operations on X/Telegram/TikTok
• Starting 12/5, the SEC will notify the Digital Ministry to block the website, domain, and app, and remind users to deal with their assets beforehand

⚠️ Note: These are only criminal charges, not a verdict. Police investigations, prosecution, and a court hearing still lie ahead. Bitget says it is assessing the situation and communicating with regulators. On 10/20, it announced plans to acquire a Thai-licensed exchange; that deal is now in limbo.

🧭 My take:
Tightening regulation is the main theme this year—this week, Binance France; MEXC was cut off by the U.S. Treasury; and now it’s Bitget’s turn. Licensing and compliance are becoming a matter of life and death for exchanges.
At $BTC , currently around 75,000, the Fear and Greed Index is at 28 (Fear), and ETFs saw net outflows of around 1.28 billion this week. Sentiment was already fragile, so regulatory bad news can easily have an outsized impact.

✅ Practical reminder: Don’t keep your assets on a single platform for too long. Withdraw what you need to, and diversify where you hold your assets.

Which do you have more confidence in: large, compliant exchanges, or continuing to use overseas platforms? Let’s talk in the comments 👇

$BTC $BNB
#加密监管 #交易所 #Bitget
Personal opinions only; this does not constitute investment advice

Thailand officially blocks Bitget starting December 5 — and this isn’t a warning, it’s a criminal case.

The facts: Thailand’s SEC (release No. 241/2026, Nov. 5) filed a criminal complaint against BG Limited, operator of bitget.com, over allegations that it operated a digital asset exchange without a license for Thai users from 2022 to 2025. The Ministry of Digital Economy was asked to block Bitget’s website, domain, and app starting Dec. 5, 2026, and the SEC asked users to consider what to do with their assets before that date. A promoter, Kritsana Kritsananuwat, was also named as a supporter of the alleged violations. Important to note: this is a complaint, not a conviction — police are still investigating, and no one has been charged.

My take: this is a stark reminder that licensing isn’t just a formality. Ironically, a Bitget-affiliated buyer is waiting for approval to acquire the locally licensed GMO-Z exchange — a deal scheduled to close on Nov. 30 — and the SEC hasn’t clarified whether this case will affect it. Meanwhile, BTC is still flat around $75,800, so the market hasn’t reacted to the news yet.

What I’m watching: Bitget’s official response, the fate of the GMO-Z acquisition, and whether other Asian regulators follow the same blocking pattern.

What do you think — is this a precedent other regulators will follow, or just a one-off case that happened to hit Bitget?

This is my analysis, not financial advice — always DYOR.

#Bitget #RegulasiCrypto $BTC

【Poll】Thailand moves to block Bitget—what do you think?

Thailand is taking steps to prevent Bitget from operating locally, amid uncertainty surrounding the exchange’s local acquisition. What do you think this means for exchange compliance?
A. Tighter compliance is the trend; exchanges must operate with a license
B. It’s just a regional case, with limited impact
C. Users will switch to other compliant platforms
Vote in the comments and share your reasons—which side are you on?
$BGB $BTC $ETH
#Bitget #交易所合规 #Thailand
(Source: CoinDesk)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; please proceed with caution.

Thailand’s SEC said it had filed a complaint against Bitget’s operator for running an unlicensed platform and requested that its website and app be blocked from December 5. It urged users to arrange their assets before the deadline; the complaint does not mean a conviction, and the case is still under investigation ⚖️📱🔐 What’s the most important step for users here? #Crypto #Bitget

The most traded on Binance at the time of observation (21:57 Istanbul): $USDC , $BTC , $ETH —based on the trading volume of USDT pairs on Binance Spot /ticker/24hr over 24 hours. General market tracking; there is no causal link to the news.

🎯 The hacker lurked inside the exchange’s internal network for 8 weeks before making a move

📰 SEAL report: The $6.3 billion incident wasn’t a one-off attack—the attackers stayed hidden for nearly two months. Same playbook as the $388 million Bitget loss: both were multi-stage intrusions

💬 This gave me chills. No matter how tightly cold wallets are secured, they can’t stop someone from slowly working their way up from inside. People are always the weakest link. When choosing an exchange from now on, I’ll first check whether it’s willing to publish its incident response procedures

🏷️ #安全事件 #SEAL #交易所被盗 #Bitget

Thailand just put a date on a ban: December 5, 2026.

The Thai SEC filed a criminal complaint against BG Limited, the operator of Bitget, and says it will block the exchange's website and app from that day (COINOTAG).

The regulator's issue is unlicensed operation. Thailand has been steadily pushing offshore platforms to either register locally or exit.

My take: a licensing wall like this is a slow-motion test of where users go next. Local licensed venues and global platforms with compliant paths usually see the flow.

Watch whether other Southeast Asian regulators copy the playbook.

Which matters more for your exchange choice: licensing in your country or token selection?

$BNB $BTC
#Thailand #CryptoRegulation #Bitget

【One month left! Thailand to block Bitget; criminal complaint filed over unlicensed operations】
On November 5, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission filed a criminal complaint with the Economic Crime Suppression Division against BG Limited, Bitget’s operator, alleging that it traded digital assets in Thailand without a license from 2022 to 2025, operated a Thai-language website and quoted prices in Thai baht, and solicited customers through Thai-language social media. The SEC has notified the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society, which will block the website, related domains, and app starting December 5. Users are advised to withdraw assets held on the platform before the ban takes effect.
$BGB
#Bitget #泰国监管 #Exchange

⚖️ THAILAND PREPARES TO BLOCK BITGET FROM DECEMBER 5

On November 5, Thailand’s securities regulator, the SEC, announced that it had filed a complaint with the police against Bitget’s operator, BG Limited, over the alleged operation of a crypto exchange without a local license. The agency also notified the Ministry of Digital Economy about blocking the website and app starting December 5, 2026.

The SEC recommends that users in Thailand make arrangements for their assets on the platform in advance. Filing a complaint does not mean criminal guilt has been proven: an investigation and possible court proceedings lie ahead. Source: Thailand SEC, announcement No. 241/2026.

#Bitget #Thailand

Thailand’s SEC Bans Bitget: Compliance Licenses Become a Lifeline for Asian Exchanges

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has formally taken enforcement action against unlicensed crypto trading platform Bitget, announcing that access to its website and app will be completely blocked starting in December. The move marks a significant escalation in regulatory enforcement in Thailand and sounds a compliance warning to crypto exchanges worldwide.

According to Cointelegraph, Thailand’s SEC has filed a criminal complaint against Bitget’s operator and plans to use technical measures to restrict access for users in Thailand. The action aims to crack down on unapproved crypto trading services and protect investors from potential market manipulation and security risks. As one of Asia’s major economies, Thailand is sending a clear message: regulatory compliance is no longer optional—it is an absolute prerequisite for exchanges to operate.

Bitget’s failure to obtain a Thai license in time reflects how some leading exchanges have overlooked regional compliance requirements in their rapid expansion. As global regulatory frameworks become increasingly comprehensive, countries are steadily strengthening their jurisdiction over crypto assets. The Thai SEC’s action shows that operating without compliance can lead to direct restrictions on market access, potentially affecting Bitget’s user base in Southeast Asia in the short term.

In terms of market impact, enforcement actions of this kind often cause related assets to fluctuate in the short term. Investors should watch the price reaction of Bitget’s token (if one exists) and projects in Thailand’s local crypto ecosystem. Meanwhile, other non-compliant exchanges may accelerate their license applications to avoid similar risks.

However, it is worth noting that specific data on Bitget’s user base in Thailand has not been disclosed, making it difficult to assess the severity of the incident. In addition, although global regulatory trends are tightening, enforcement varies by region, and some markets may still have compliance grace periods.

The market will next be watching for details on how the Thai SEC’s enforcement action is carried out and whether Bitget takes remedial measures. Investors should remain cautious, avoid blindly following the crowd, and pay close attention to compliance developments and changes in market liquidity.

#Bitget #Thailand #CryptoRegulation

The above is a compilation of information and personal analysis, and does not constitute investment advice.
I will continue to provide updates as further policy details become clear.

Thailand’s SEC Blocks Bitget: Compliance Licenses Become a Lifeline for Exchanges

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently took enforcement action against the unlicensed crypto trading platform Bitget, formally filing a criminal complaint and planning to block access to its website and app within the country starting in December. The move marks a significant step in the enforcement of crypto-asset regulations by a major Southeast Asian economy, and once again puts compliance licensing at the heart of exchanges’ global operations.

This action is not an isolated incident, but a clear response from Thai regulators to the long-standing presence of unlicensed crypto services in the country. According to Cointelegraph, Thailand’s SEC has filed a criminal complaint over the unlicensed trading activities of Bitget’s operator and explicitly instructed internet service providers to cooperate in blocking access. This means that, for unlicensed platforms relying on their Thai user base, local regulatory compliance is no longer optional—it is essential to their survival.

In terms of market impact, enforcement actions of this kind typically cause short-term disruption to the regional trading volumes of the platforms involved. If Bitget has a substantial user base in Thailand, it may experience a temporary loss of local liquidity. The move also sends a clear message to other exchanges operating in Southeast Asia that have yet to complete local licensing applications: the cost of regulatory compliance is rising, and enforcement is intensifying.

Notably, the Thai SEC’s action focuses on the core compliance issue of operating without a license, rather than the legality of crypto assets themselves. This suggests that the regulatory approach is shifting from prohibition to oversight: compliant entities may conduct business, but all participants must meet basic requirements, including anti-money laundering (AML), know-your-customer (KYC), and disclosure obligations.

However, the market reaction will depend on the details of how the action is implemented. It remains unclear how Thai authorities will coordinate the technical implementation of the access block, and whether Bitget has begun the process of applying for a local license. If enforcement is tougher than expected, it could trigger a regional regulatory ripple effect, prompting other Southeast Asian countries to accelerate similar legislative efforts.

Investors and industry participants should now closely monitor subsequent enforcement notices from Thailand’s SEC, Bitget’s official response, and compliance developments at other exchanges in the region. Rising compliance costs may accelerate industry consolidation, but they could also give licensed platforms a lasting competitive advantage.

#Bitget #Thailand #CryptoRegulation

The above is a compilation of information and personal analysis, and does not constitute investment advice.

Came across a pretty forceful notice from Thailand’s SEC: it named BG Limited, Bitget’s operator, for operating a digital asset exchange without a license. The regulator has filed a criminal complaint with the Economic Crime Suppression Division and notified the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society—which will block the website, related domains, and app starting December 5.

The regulator’s account: From 2022 to 2025, the company offered trading services and charged fees, ran a Thai-language website, quoted prices in Thai baht, and used Thai-language social media (X, Telegram, TikTok, etc.) to attract users—crossing the unlicensed-operation line under the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses. The notice also named an individual who allegedly helped promote the platform.

The regulator urged users to manage their assets before the block takes effect. Any further investigation, prosecution, and conviction will have to proceed through prosecutors and the courts. Bitget has not yet responded to Cointelegraph. Southeast Asia has tightened the screws another notch on unlicensed exchanges. #Bitget #泰国 #CryptoRegulation

Thailand to block Bitget from December over unlicensed crypto business

- Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a criminal complaint against Bitget’s operator.
- Access to Bitget’s website and app will be blocked starting December 5.
- The reason is that Bitget has been conducting cryptocurrency business in Thailand without a valid license.

#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Bitget #ThailandSEC

$btc $eth

#vlikevn Titanbot

Source: CoinTelegraph

Bitget reports $1.86T in trading volume in Q3 2026, expands multi-asset trading

- Bitget reports global trading volume of $1.86 trillion in Q3 2026.
- Volume increased 21.2% compared with July–September, driven by derivatives, spot, and CFDs.
- Expands multi-asset trading, connecting crypto and traditional markets.
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Bitget

$btc $eth

#vlikevn #Titanbot

Source: CoinGape

ZachXBT disclosed on October 30: stolen funds worth approximately $6.3 billion from Binance and $388 million from Bitget were routed through THORChain and sent to the same address starting with 0x151. The two sums were mixed in one place, pointing to the same attacker.

The Bitget funds had previously been attributed to the North Korea-linked TraderTraitor, which also has links to cases such as Kelp DAO. Based on this trail, the Binance funds most likely came from the same group—not two independent incidents, but one operation targeting two exchanges in succession.

Rather than focusing on the dollar amounts, this address is more worth watching. Once funds enter the mixing stage, the window for freezing them narrows. The two sums become one, and recovering them is more than twice as difficult. Next, watch where the THORChain cross-chain route ultimately leads, and how Bitget makes affected users whole.

#币安被盗 #Bitget #On-chainTracking