Binance Square
#andrecronje

andrecronje

123,862 views
87 Discussing
橙夕-Ethreal
·
--
Andre Cronje dropped a statement today, and the core message is this: I'm not the founder of Fantom. Coming from the DeFi godfather, there's a bit of dark humor in that. Yearn Finance, Keep3r, Solidly—these projects made him one of the most renowned devs on Ethereum. He joined Fantom in 2018 as a tech advisor, later became CTO, and the outside world has always referred to him as a 'co-founder.' He himself has used that title too. Now he's saying that's not accurate. In the statement, he also drew a few lines: the migration from FTM to S tokens wasn't led by him, the Sonic airdrop wasn't designed by him, and he didn't set the tokenomics. The implication is clear: if the community is upset about those issues, don't blame me. On the same day, Sonic Labs announced a major shake-up. Michael Kong, Andre Cronje, and David Richardson all resigned from the board. New CEO Matt Visser said something pretty real: 'I won't promise instant changes; I'm just aiming for 1% improvement every day.' Take a look at Sonic Labs' timeline for 2026: CEO Mitchell Demeter resigned in February, a quantum-resistant PoS upgrade roadmap was proposed in April, and now there's another round of management changes. In less than a year, three CEOs. The price of the $S token has been on a downward slope from its peak, and community sentiment has hit rock bottom. The new management claims the next 100 days will be 'Day 1,' aiming for transparent governance and establishing a risk compliance committee. It all sounds good, but with a project changing CEOs three times in a year, which 'Day 1' are you going to believe? Interestingly, AC's statement sheds some light. He said his focus has been on Flying Tulip for the past 18 months, and he hasn't really been involved with Sonic. This explains why the Sonic ecosystem hasn't made major moves for half a year—its tech lead has been busy elsewhere. From a different angle, AC's proactive distancing is actually responsible. Instead of letting the community pin all the issues on someone who's no longer involved, it's better to clarify: who's responsible for what, and who should be held accountable. Sonic used to be called Fantom, kicked off by a Korean team in 2018 through an ICO. AC's technical skills are unquestionable; the consensus mechanism of the Sonic network and Sonic Gateway are his creations. But blockchain projects aren't just about tech; they also need operations, community, and tokenomics. Those aren't things one person can shoulder alone. Now Sonic Labs faces a simple question: without AC's tech halo, what will keep developers and users around? Matt Visser said it takes 100 days to see any changes with a 1% daily improvement. Whether the community is willing to wait is another story. $SONIC #AndreCronje #SonicLabs #DeFi #BinanceSquare
Andre Cronje dropped a statement today, and the core message is this: I'm not the founder of Fantom.

Coming from the DeFi godfather, there's a bit of dark humor in that. Yearn Finance, Keep3r, Solidly—these projects made him one of the most renowned devs on Ethereum. He joined Fantom in 2018 as a tech advisor, later became CTO, and the outside world has always referred to him as a 'co-founder.' He himself has used that title too. Now he's saying that's not accurate.

In the statement, he also drew a few lines: the migration from FTM to S tokens wasn't led by him, the Sonic airdrop wasn't designed by him, and he didn't set the tokenomics. The implication is clear: if the community is upset about those issues, don't blame me.

On the same day, Sonic Labs announced a major shake-up. Michael Kong, Andre Cronje, and David Richardson all resigned from the board. New CEO Matt Visser said something pretty real: 'I won't promise instant changes; I'm just aiming for 1% improvement every day.'

Take a look at Sonic Labs' timeline for 2026: CEO Mitchell Demeter resigned in February, a quantum-resistant PoS upgrade roadmap was proposed in April, and now there's another round of management changes. In less than a year, three CEOs.

The price of the $S token has been on a downward slope from its peak, and community sentiment has hit rock bottom. The new management claims the next 100 days will be 'Day 1,' aiming for transparent governance and establishing a risk compliance committee. It all sounds good, but with a project changing CEOs three times in a year, which 'Day 1' are you going to believe?

Interestingly, AC's statement sheds some light. He said his focus has been on Flying Tulip for the past 18 months, and he hasn't really been involved with Sonic. This explains why the Sonic ecosystem hasn't made major moves for half a year—its tech lead has been busy elsewhere.

From a different angle, AC's proactive distancing is actually responsible. Instead of letting the community pin all the issues on someone who's no longer involved, it's better to clarify: who's responsible for what, and who should be held accountable.

Sonic used to be called Fantom, kicked off by a Korean team in 2018 through an ICO. AC's technical skills are unquestionable; the consensus mechanism of the Sonic network and Sonic Gateway are his creations. But blockchain projects aren't just about tech; they also need operations, community, and tokenomics. Those aren't things one person can shoulder alone.

Now Sonic Labs faces a simple question: without AC's tech halo, what will keep developers and users around? Matt Visser said it takes 100 days to see any changes with a 1% daily improvement. Whether the community is willing to wait is another story.

$SONIC #AndreCronje #SonicLabs #DeFi #BinanceSquare
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number