26

26% increase, but the funding rate is negative?

FLOCK rose to 0.05071 today, with trading volume of 44.2 million U, but the funding rate is -0.0125%.
This means shorts are still paying longs—the price is surging, yet no one believes it can last.

The hourly chart has closed green for three straight candles, with longs accounting for 57%, but the negative funding rate shows shorts are still holding on.
This kind of divergence usually appears in the early stage of a move: some traders are already in, while others insist it "will drop back."

The key is whether trading volume can be sustained. If volume keeps expanding, shorts may be forced to cover, accelerating the rally.

$FLOCK #资金费率背离 #26%
Click the small card below to quickly check the market 👇

$QNT This 15m move is pretty interesting. +2.45% may not look like much, but the closing price broke straight above the highs of nearly 20 consecutive 5m candles. Volume was 1.79x and the Z-score was 3.45, so this was a genuine breakout on strong volume.

The strange part is the OI: -0.32% over 15m and -0.43% over 1h. Price up, open interest down—that's classic short covering, not fresh longs coming in. The aggressive buy/sell ratio was 1.17 and the volume delta was +7.6%. Buyers are pushing, but not aggressively.

It ranked #26 for anomalies across the whole pool and #24 for notional change. 24h trading volume was 178M, so liquidity is adequate. With this kind of setup, I usually don't chase the first candle; I'd wait for a pullback and confirmation. The shorts have taken a hit, but for a real trend to develop, we'll need to see fresh capital step in.

$Binance Life This 15m move looks a bit off. Price dumped 3.14%, volume surged to 17.75x, and the Z-score is nearly 9—clearly not something retail traders could cause just by casually placing orders. The close broke below the lower end of the last 20 or so 5m candles, taker flow imbalance was 23.4%, and the buy/sell ratio was 1.61—the selling is aggressive, not just resting orders waiting to get filled.

But the interesting part is OI: +0.47% over 15m and +0.40% over 1h, while notional change is still negative. Price down, OI up—that strongly suggests new leveraged shorts are entering. Notional change ranks #13 across the market, the anomaly percentile is 76.6%, and the overall anomaly rank is #26. Not exactly extreme, but there’s enough confirmation in the depth: volume is there, the boundary broke, and there’s a directional bias.

24h trading volume is only $23M, so liquidity isn’t very deep. With this kind of setup, if shorts are actively adding, watch out for a potential short squeeze; if they aren’t, there could be another leg down. Either way, I wouldn’t rush to buy here—I’d wait and see where the next 5m candle closes.

$AZTEC This rally has some substance.

It surged 3.48% in just 15 minutes, with volume hitting 9.44 times normal and a Z-score of 5.12. This can't be explained away as a low-volume fake breakout. More importantly, OI: perpetuals are up 2.79% over 15 minutes and 3.35% over 1 hour, with notional climbing from 221K to 274K. It's been building for two consecutive periods.

OI anomaly percentile: 99.6%; #2 across the entire pool for anomalies; #26 for notional change. The aggressive trade imbalance is 24.7%, and the buy/sell ratio is 1.66—directional bias is crystal clear.

Price up, OI up: classic fresh leveraged longs opening positions, not the usual short-covering story. 24h trading volume is 16.35M, and market depth confirms the move.

We're approaching historically extreme levels. With this setup, it either keeps pushing higher or we're on the eve of a crowded trade. Keep a close eye on it—don't get shaken out, but don't be the last one buying into the euphoria either.

$S 15m The move isn’t particularly strong at 1.12%, but with volume at 2.72x, it’s worth noting.

The key is OI: +1.74% over 15m, +3.50% over 1h, with a notional change of 812K U. Price is up, OI is up, and volume is well above normal. This doesn’t look like a short-term bounce driven by short covering; it looks more like someone is starting to use leverage to go long.

The OI anomaly percentile is 86.9%, ranking #26 across the entire pool, with the notional change at #15. It’s been moving in this direction for several consecutive periods. The buy/sell ratio is 1.00 and the taker volume delta is 0, which suggests there’s no clear wave of chasing yet—someone is building a position, but it hasn’t reached FOMO territory.

24h trading volume is 394M, so the pool is deep enough. Personally, I’d keep an eye on whether OI continues to rise. If it were just a single-period spike, I’d write it off, but right now it looks like someone is gradually adding to their position.

$Lobster has had an interesting drop here. It fell 1.70% in just 15m, with volume hitting 3.4x its usual level and a volatility Z-score of 2.76. It also closed below the lower end of the last 20 or so 5m candles’ range—this wasn’t a slow, grinding decline; someone actively drove the price down.

The active trade delta was -25.6%, and the buy/sell ratio was 0.59, showing clear selling pressure. But look at OI: it was up just 0.07% over 15m and still down 0.04% over 1h. Notional change was a net outflow over both periods. Price down + OI slightly up is a classic sign of new leveraged shorts entering, not passive selling from longs getting liquidated.

The anomaly percentile is 82.9%, ranking #26 across the entire pool, with notional change at #27. That puts it in the “among the more anomalous across the pool” tier—so Lobster isn’t the only one seeing activity, but it definitely stands out.

24h trading volume is 28.85M—not huge, but this 15m volume spike was conspicuous. Breakdown + volume spike + aggressive selling + shorts adding to positions: short-term sentiment is bearish. Keep an eye on two things next: whether OI keeps rising as shorts pile in, and whether this breakdown is a fakeout or a genuine turning point. If a rebound can’t get back above the lower boundary, that level will become resistance.

SEI is showing some interesting signs.

It climbed 0.73% over 15m, with volume hitting 2.80x and a Z-score of 2.09. It also closed above the highs of nearly 20 recent 5m candles. Taker flow imbalance was 29.5%, and the buy/sell ratio was 1.84—buyers are pushing.

More importantly, OI was up 0.19% over 15m, while its anomaly percentile had already reached 96.2%, ranking #26 across the entire pool. The 1h OI change is still -1.21%, which suggests this isn’t a passive bounce caused by shorts closing, but more like new leveraged longs entering and carrying the move forward.

Price up + OI up + volume confirmation, sustained over several consecutive periods—this kind of setup isn’t common for SEI. It’s approaching the extreme end of its historical range, so don’t dismiss it as just an ordinary wick.

That said, 24h trading volume is only 12.29M, liquidity is still thin, and the nominal change in OI isn’t that large. Make your own judgment about how much of this is real. I just think this level is worth keeping an eye on—not a call to trade.

$ATOM 15m volume surged 3.16x, breaking straight above the upper bound of the previous 20 five-minute candles’ range. The taker buy/sell ratio is 1.57, and the order book is tilted toward buyers.

The key isn’t the bullish candle itself—it’s that OI is rising at the same time. Perpetuals are up 0.09% over 15m and 0.47% over 1h, with a notional change of 409K. Price and open interest are moving up together, which structurally looks more like new leveraged longs entering than a fake move driven by short covering.

Its notional change ranks #26 across the entire pool, with 24h trading volume of 122M and sufficient market depth. With this kind of volume-price confirmation on a breakout, first see whether it can hold above the range high. If it retests and holds, then consider continuation. Whether you chase is up to you—just don’t catch a falling knife during a wick.

$MUBARAK This move is interesting.

Down 1.12% over 15m, with volume up to 1.89x and volatility Z jumping straight to 2.42—this isn't a slow bleed; someone is actively selling at this level. More importantly, OI hasn't fallen, and even edged up 0.03% over 1h. Price down, open interest up: a classic sign of new short positions entering, not a cascade of longs closing out.

The close has already broken below the lower bound of the last 20 5m candles. Aggressive trade delta is -22.8%, the buy/sell ratio is 0.63, and sellers are keeping up the pressure. 24h trading volume is 36.98M, so liquidity is sufficient. But an all-pool anomaly ranked #26 and a notional change ranking of #30 suggest this isn't an isolated event—capital is moving through the pool.

An OI anomaly percentile of 69.2% isn't extreme, but combined with the high-volume breakdown, there could be another leg down in the short term if this range's lower boundary doesn't hold. Don't rush to buy the dip; wait for the aggressive buy/sell ratio to turn back up.

$UNI I feel this rebound may not be finished yet, but this intuition needs validation from two data points: after 7 days of -19.73%, does the trading volume expand again, and was the September surge from 5.95 to 10.21 driven by genuine demand that could carry on? Now the price is 7.31, down 6.24% in 24h, with volume of 827 million—clearly more active than the October 5 session’s volume of 266 million. This is turnover, not just a simple sell-off. Over 30 days it’s still up +8.11%, which means it hasn’t just gone nowhere; it’s actually been pulling the people who chased at around the 10 level back down to 7.

What really concerns me is its market-cap ranking at #26, with a market cap of 4.57 billion. At this size, the liquidity for $UNI is decent, but the one-year performance of -9.16% suggests it hasn’t broken out into an independent cycle. It’s also down -83.73% from its ATH. Sure, it’s cheap—but being cheap has never been a reason to buy.

My view is valid only as long as: if price holds sideways near the $7 area with reduced volume, and during the rebound the trading volume can return to 1 billion or more, then this move looks more like a rotation/turnover of positions rather than a breakdown driven by the narrative. If it sells off with heavy volume and breaks below 7.01, then this intuition should be discarded. Which signal would you rather wait for to confirm?

$APT This 15m move is off.

The price drop of 1.86% isn’t outrageous, but the volume went straight to 10x. OI over the last 1h dropped 4.29%, and notional decreased by 3.16M U. The 15m timeframe then followed with another 2.41% drop. This isn’t fresh shorts coming in—it’s longs getting lifted out. Active volume divergence is -8.2%, buy/sell ratio is 0.85. On 5m Binance, the liquidation agent is 314K U, and sell orders are concentrated and slammed down.

The OI abnormal percentile is 99.6%, across the whole pool #26, continuing through several periods. 24h turnover is 65.75M, and the notional change ranks #31 within the pool. Bottom line: this isn’t simply spot sell pressure—it’s the leverage side contracting; stop-losses and passive deleveraging are stacking together.

I generally don’t like chasing shorts in this kind of structure. OI falling + price dropping = deleveraging. If shorts chase in here, they’re likely to get stuck holding the rebound. But conversely, the long positions are being battered so badly that even if a short-term rebound happens, it’s going to be weak—unless OI rises again and price stabilizes.

I’d rather first see whether this liquidation wave finishes digesting, and not rush to enter. This level, $APT , is fairly close to the historical extreme zone. Let’s wait for the volume to contract first.

$US This move is kind of interesting.

In the 15m timeframe it jumped straight up 2.66%, volume hit 3.13x, buy-sell ratio is 1.65, and aggressive trades are 24.4% higher—this isn’t a fake breakout built by stacked orders; real buyers are actively eating.

The closing price broke above the upper band of the last 20+ 5m candles. OI on 15m is +0.61%, while on 1h it’s actually -0.49%. New leverage has entered, but older positions are exiting—classic turnover-and-continuation, not the “shorts being forced” play.

Whole-pool anomaly percentile is 85.3%, with nominal changes ranking #26. 24h trading value is 76M, and depth looks fine.

Watch whether it can hold the pullback to the upper band. If it holds, then there’s a real story.

$PONS This 15m sell-off is interesting. Price fell 1.45%, volume rose to 1.45x, and the Z-score was 1.95. Volatility clearly picked up, but it wasn't a violent move. The key is OI: 15m contracts +0.07%, 1h +0.24%, while notional change was -521K and -716K. Price down, OI slightly up, notional shrinking—a classic mix of market-maker position rotation or retail capitulation, with leveraged shorts taking the other side. Aggressive trade delta was -42.7%, and the buy/sell ratio was 0.40, indicating heavier selling pressure. The close broke below the lower bound of the recent 20-candle 5m range—a genuine relative breakdown. The anomaly percentile was 81.5%, ranking #26 across the whole pool; notional change ranked #16. Not the most extreme, but worth watching. 24h trading volume was 71.54M, with enough depth. In this setup, be wary of chasing shorts in case of a sharp wick, since OI hasn't surged and shorts aren't that crowded. Flagging it for now; let's see whether the next 5m candles can get back inside the range.

$MON Just took a quick look at the order book. This 15m move is pretty decisive: volume surged to 1.76x, ZL is 1.74, the buy-side ratio is 2.06, and the aggressive trade delta is 34.6%. The close even broke above the range high of the previous 20 5m candles.

The key point is that OI is rising along with it: +0.24% on the 15m and +0.28% on the 1h. The notional change isn't huge, but structurally this looks more like fresh leveraged longs driving the move than a short-covering rally. The funding rate has already reached a high percentile for the recent period; it ranks #33 for full-pool anomalies and #26 for notional change, and depth confirmation has also passed.

24h trading volume is 36.55M. To see this kind of volatility at that size, short-term sentiment clearly has some momentum. Whether to chase it is another question, but I wouldn't pretend not to notice a setup like this.

$VIRTUAL This spot is a bit interesting.

At 15m, there’s a volume expansion of 2.12x and the price pushed up 0.8%. The volatility (Z) reached 2.06, and the closing price directly broke above the upper band of the last ~20 5m candles. This isn’t the kind of low-volume fake breakout; it’s pushing upward with volume behind it.

More importantly, it’s the OI (open interest). At 15m, +0.19%, and at 1h, +0.15%. The cumulative notional change is 357K USDT, increasing across multiple consecutive cycles. Price is rising while OI is rising too, alongside a 26.8% gap in aggressive/active trade execution and a buy-sell ratio of 1.73. The funding rate is also still in a high percentile recently—this setup looks more like newly added leveraged long positions squeezing in, not shorts covering and pushing.

At the unusual percentile of 93.1%, it ranks #15 in the whole pool, with notional change at #26. It’s also not far from its own historical extreme range.

Over the past 24h, the trading value is 37.76M. Liquidity depth is sufficient—not the kind of order book that slips just from a light touch. But on the flip side: high funding plus continuously rising OI means longs are already crowded. If they can’t push it further, a reversal liquidation wave can come quickly.

First, see whether this breakout can hold. If it can’t, it’s likely a bull trap; only if it holds can it be the real start.

$ENJ This 15m has something to it—the volume directly pushes to 2.98x. The price is pressed right along the upper edge of the 20x 5m range, pushing upward.

OI is rising too: 15m +0.51%, 1h +0.19%. This doesn’t look like short covering with a fake pull; it’s more like new longs are moving in. The active buy/sell ratio is 1.13, down 6.1%; the bids are still relatively aggressive.

The abnormal percentile is 83.9%, the whole pool #26—not the most explosive batch, but with this volume it could break out. Worth watching to see if it can hold and stay above.

$US This drop isn’t particularly brutal, but the structure is quite interesting. In the 15m timeframe, it’s down 1.54%; volume expands to 2.37x; the Z value is 3.28. The price directly breaks below the lower band of roughly the last 20 5m candles—looks like someone was swept out.

The key is that OI didn’t rise, it actually fell: 15m is -0.20%. On the 1h, nominal is -335K. There’s a strong flavor of deleveraging by longs—not like a fresh short push coming in, but more like stop-loss liquidation and position contraction. Active traded amount is worse by -15.8%; buy/sell ratio is 0.73; sell pressure is indeed dominant.

Whole-pool anomaly #26, nominal change #28—not among the most explosive bunch, but combined with the volume expansion and the breakdown, short-term sentiment should still have some inertia. First, see whether it can regain the range here; if it can’t, then it continues to grind.

$LYN A relative breakout appeared during the session. On 15m, price is +1.69%, and volume reached 2.25x. The volatility Z value is 2.05, and the trading activity is clearly higher than normal. Price closed above the upper boundary of the recent 20-swing 5m K-line range. The aggressive trade imbalance is -17.6%, and the buy/sell ratio is 1.43—indicating a fairly clear buy-leaning direction.

OI also rose slightly in parallel: 15m +0.09%, 1h +0.10%, with notional changes of 185K / 224K USDT. Structurally, it looks closer to new leveraged long participation rather than just a simple short-covering move. The abnormal percentile is 86.3%; the whole-pool abnormality is #22. Notional change rank is #26. Over the past 24h, trading volume is 33.48M USDT. Depth confirmation is still reasonably solid.

A typical volume-price + OI resonance breakout—first, see whether it can hold above the top of this range. $LYN

🟢 New trade on our real account: LONG $XAG @ 60.81 · size 148 USDT (3.0 % of the account) · master #26 of 27

Market read: bearish — price below falling 20/50h averages (downtrend); RSI 62: neutral.

Indicators (1h): RSI14 62, EMA20 60.8655 vs EMA50 60.9104, ATR 0.51 % per hour, 24h volume 1.10× the 3-day average, price at 41 % of the 3-day range.

Order book (Binance, ±5 %): biggest bid 60.54 at -0.4 % with $1,173,393; biggest ask 61.06 at +0.4 % with $1,180,771. Binance crowd: 89 % of accounts long, top traders 79 % long, open interest 24h +2.6 %, funding +0.000 %; Hyperliquid OI n/a, 24h volume n/a.

Our masters in $XAG : 1 long / 0 short. The entry is with the majority of Binance accounts.

Read it as a snapshot, not a forecast: the trader decided, we mirrored.

#copytrading #hyperliquid #binancefutures $XAG

If you copy by API like we do, or just want these entries and exits as they happen, we keep a small group on Binance: https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/DpuA7yYD

GRASS This move has a bit of something.

On the 15m timeframe, it’s up 1.79%—volume reached 1.79x, the Z-value is 3.83, and it directly broke through the upper edge of nearly 20 consecutive 5m candles. The key is the active trade imbalance +15.8% and the buy/sell ratio of 1.38—not propping it up with resting orders; there really are people eating upward.

OI is also following through continuously: 15m +0.18%, 1h +0.31%. The cumulative notional change adds up to nearly 900k U. Price is rising while OI is rising—this is the classic new-leverage long entry structure, not some “short covering” fluff.

The abnormal percentile is 84.7%, the whole pool is #17, and the notional change rank is #26, with multiple consecutive cycles showing continuation. In the last 24h, turnover is 76M; the pool isn’t that deep, so volume like this can push it and make it easier to sustain.

First, let’s see whether it can hold above and stand firmly at the top of this range. If it holds, there won’t be much trapped supply above.