#000905
000905
2 views
3 Discussing
Hot
Latest
📌 Today, the A-shares market saw a sharp drop, and even the Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 Index’s 200-day moving average (the yearly line) fell by 2.18%...
🍖 Chopper says:
This news is actually pretty painful. The Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 Index (000300.SH) has turned the yearly line green-to-red, which suggests the overall market is still in a losing position this year. After another big selloff today, market sentiment is definitely very bad, and I guess many people are struggling with whether they should run.
I think panic isn’t necessary right now, but there’s no rush to bottom-fish either. Foreign capital and investors from South Korea are aggressively buying, which indicates that long- and medium-term funds think it’s cheap. However, the market bottom for the short term hasn’t been confirmed yet. The “policy bottom” is often not the “real bottom.”
Compared the Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 with the CSI 500 (000905.SH): this year, small- and mid-cap stocks have fallen even worse. The Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 still has support from foreign capital, so it’s relatively more resilient and tends to decline less.
Risk warning: After the yearly line breaks, if it can’t be recovered within three days, there may still be momentum for further downside—don’t go all-in in one shot.
#000300 #000905 #A股
🍖 Chopper says:
This news is actually pretty painful. The Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 Index (000300.SH) has turned the yearly line green-to-red, which suggests the overall market is still in a losing position this year. After another big selloff today, market sentiment is definitely very bad, and I guess many people are struggling with whether they should run.
I think panic isn’t necessary right now, but there’s no rush to bottom-fish either. Foreign capital and investors from South Korea are aggressively buying, which indicates that long- and medium-term funds think it’s cheap. However, the market bottom for the short term hasn’t been confirmed yet. The “policy bottom” is often not the “real bottom.”
Compared the Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 with the CSI 500 (000905.SH): this year, small- and mid-cap stocks have fallen even worse. The Shanghai-Shenzhen 300 still has support from foreign capital, so it’s relatively more resilient and tends to decline less.
Risk warning: After the yearly line breaks, if it can’t be recovered within three days, there may still be momentum for further downside—don’t go all-in in one shot.
#000300 #000905 #A股
📌 Seven losses, two steady, one profit! In China’s A-share market, retail investors are being cut, quant institutions are raking in gains—who’s turning the stock market into an ATM
🍖 Chopper says:
This news is saying that quant trading took the biggest share of the profits, while retail investors find it hard to make money. I looked into it—funds related to the $CSI 500 Index (000905.SH) have indeed been running steadily lately, but that’s the result of algorithmic high-frequency trading.
For ordinary retail investors, the stock you’ve heavily held might not have outperformed the index. For example, if you compare $iFlytek (002230.SZ) with the $CSI 300 ETF (510300.SH) traded via quant strategies: recently, AI concept stocks have been volatile—iFlytek is down nearly 10% from its peak—whereas quant funds, by holding diversified positions, end up losing less.
The risk is: quant strategies can also fail. For instance, if the market suddenly changes direction, their collective stop-losses can accelerate the decline. If you’re chasing hot themes yourself, it might be better to do systematic investing in a broad-based index—it’s more hassle-free.
#000905 #002230 #510300 #A股
🍖 Chopper says:
This news is saying that quant trading took the biggest share of the profits, while retail investors find it hard to make money. I looked into it—funds related to the $CSI 500 Index (000905.SH) have indeed been running steadily lately, but that’s the result of algorithmic high-frequency trading.
For ordinary retail investors, the stock you’ve heavily held might not have outperformed the index. For example, if you compare $iFlytek (002230.SZ) with the $CSI 300 ETF (510300.SH) traded via quant strategies: recently, AI concept stocks have been volatile—iFlytek is down nearly 10% from its peak—whereas quant funds, by holding diversified positions, end up losing less.
The risk is: quant strategies can also fail. For instance, if the market suddenly changes direction, their collective stop-losses can accelerate the decline. If you’re chasing hot themes yourself, it might be better to do systematic investing in a broad-based index—it’s more hassle-free.
#000905 #002230 #510300 #A股
Log in to explore more content