CoinRank

#Trump will not announce his Fed Chair nominee during Davos Forum.
#Coinbase CEO: French central bank governor misunderstands Bitcoin; Bitcoin is more independent.
#Solana Policy Institute calls for the protection of software developers, stating that "the Roman Storm case is not an isolated incident."
Vitalik proposes "native DVT staking" to improve Ethereum's security and decentralization.
Bloomberg: #Bitcoin futures-spot price spread narrows, marking the end of the Wall Street arbitrage era.
#CoinRank

A Prediction Market uses blockchain and financial incentives to convert collective beliefs into real-time, tradable probability signals.

 

Outcome tokens, smart contracts, and market pricing enable transparent, trustless forecasting without centralized intermediaries.

 

While powerful for price discovery, Prediction Markets still face risks from liquidity limits, regulation, and information asymmetry.

A crypto Prediction Market lets users trade on future event outcomes using blockchain, smart contracts, and market pricing to turn collective expectations into real-time probabilities.

 

WHAT IS PREDICTION MARKET?

 

A crypto Prediction Market is a decentralized platform that allows users to trade on the outcomes of future events using blockchain technology. Instead of relying on traditional betting systems or centralized bookmakers, a Prediction Market uses cryptocurrencies, smart contracts, and market-driven pricing to reflect real-time probabilities of specific outcomes.

 

As the Web3 ecosystem continues to evolve, crypto Prediction Market platforms have become increasingly popular tools for forecasting a wide range of events, including elections, sports competitions, financial indicators, and trends within the cryptocurrency market itself.

📌 How Prediction Markets Harness Collective Intelligence

 

At its core, a Prediction Market combines financial incentives with collective intelligence. Participants are encouraged to express their expectations by committing capital, not merely opinions. When thousands of users trade based on their individual insights, information, and risk assessments, the resulting market price aggregates these views into a single probability signal.

 

Rather than counting votes, a Prediction Market weights opinions by conviction and capital at risk. This mechanism allows prices to represent what the market collectively believes is the most likely outcome, making prediction markets a powerful information-discovery tool.

📌 How Prices Represent Probabilities in a Prediction Market

 

For example, consider a Prediction Market asking: “Will Bitcoin exceed $200,000 in 2026?” This market would typically issue two outcome tokens: “Yes” and “No.”

 

If the “Yes” token is trading at 0.60, the market is effectively pricing a 60% probability that Bitcoin will surpass $200,000 by that time. This price does not guarantee the outcome—it simply reflects the market’s aggregated expectation based on current information and participant behavior.

This pricing mechanism is what allows a Prediction Market to translate subjective beliefs into quantifiable probabilities.

 

(source: kalshi.com)

📌 Why Blockchain Is Essential for Prediction Markets

 

Blockchain technology provides the foundation that makes a crypto Prediction Market transparent, secure, and globally accessible. All transactions are recorded on-chain, smart contracts enforce settlement rules automatically, and users from around the world can participate without relying on trusted intermediaries.

 

These properties significantly reduce trust assumptions and centralized risks, while increasing market openness and credibility. As a result, crypto Prediction Market platforms are often viewed as one of the most direct Web3 applications for aligning information, capital, and consensus within a single system.

📌 Key Advantages of Crypto Prediction Markets

 

Crypto Prediction Market platforms offer several distinct advantages over traditional forecasting or betting systems, largely due to their decentralized and incentive-driven design.

 

▶ Decentralization

A core strength of a crypto Prediction Market is its decentralized structure. There is no central authority controlling the market or managing payouts. All trades, fund custody, and settlements are executed on-chain through smart contracts, ensuring transparency and reducing reliance on trusted intermediaries.

 

▶ Real-Time Forecasting

In a Prediction Market, prices adjust immediately as new information enters the market. When participants react to news, data releases, or shifting expectations, outcome token prices update in real time. This allows the market to function as a continuously evolving probability signal rather than a static forecast.

 

▶ Higher Predictive Accuracy

Financial incentives play a critical role in improving accuracy within a Prediction Market. Because participants risk capital on their beliefs, they are motivated to make informed decisions rather than random guesses. Over time, this mechanism helps filter noise and reward well-reasoned predictions.

 

▶ Global Accessibility

Crypto Prediction Market platforms are accessible to users worldwide. Participation is not restricted by geography, institutional status, or traditional financial infrastructure. As long as users can access the blockchain and hold crypto assets, they can take part—making prediction markets open, inclusive, and globally representative.

 

>>> More to read: What is Polymarket? Web3 Prediction Market

HOW CRYPTO PREDICTION MARKETS WORK

 

From a structural perspective, a crypto Prediction Market operates entirely on-chain. Each event is broken down into a set of possible outcomes, and each outcome is represented by a token. Users buy and sell these outcome tokens based on what they believe will happen.

 

Once the event concludes and the result becomes verifiable, smart contracts automatically handle settlement. Participants holding tokens tied to the correct outcome receive payouts according to predefined rules, without the need for manual intervention or centralized control.

 

A crypto Prediction Market operates through a combination of outcome tokens, trading mechanisms, smart contracts, and automated settlement. Together, these components allow markets to transform uncertainty into real-time, tradable probabilities.

🪙 Outcome Tokens

 

In a Prediction Market, each event is divided into multiple possible outcomes, and every outcome is represented by a dedicated token. Users purchase the token corresponding to the result they believe will occur.

 

If the outcome tied to a token is correct once the event concludes, that token can be redeemed for its full value. Tokens associated with incorrect outcomes become worthless after settlement. This structure ensures that market participants are financially incentivized to price outcomes accurately.

✏️ Trading Mechanisms

 

Outcome tokens in a Prediction Market can be traded using several common market structures, including:

 

Automated Market Makers (AMMs)

Liquidity pools

Order book–based systems

 

Regardless of the mechanism, prices continuously adjust based on supply and demand. As traders enter and exit positions, token prices fluctuate in real time—effectively turning the Prediction Market into a live probability indicator for the event in question.

📜 Smart Contracts

 

Smart contracts form the backbone of every crypto Prediction Market. They handle the creation of markets, the issuance and exchange of outcome tokens, and the final settlement process.

 

By encoding rules directly into code, smart contracts remove the need for intermediaries and ensure that market operations remain transparent, automated, and trustless. Participants do not need to rely on a central authority to enforce payouts or manage funds.

📈 Market Settlement

 

When an event concludes, verified data sources are used to determine the final outcome. Once the result is confirmed, smart contracts immediately execute settlement and distribute payouts to holders of the correct outcome tokens.

 

This automated settlement process ensures speed, accuracy, and fairness—key characteristics that distinguish a blockchain-based Prediction Market from traditional, centralized alternatives.

 

>>> More to read: What is Kalshi Prediction Market? How Does It Work

EVENT TYPES TRADED IN CRYPTO PREDICTION MARKETS

 

A crypto Prediction Market supports a wide range of event categories, allowing users to trade on outcomes across many real-world and digital domains. This diversity is one of the reasons Prediction Market platforms attract both casual participants and professional forecasters.

 

(source: polymarket.com)

 

🚩 The most common event types include:

 

Elections and political events

Sports competition outcomes

Cryptocurrency price movements and broader market trends

Macroeconomic events

Celebrity-related and cultural news

Technology product launches

 

By covering both high-impact global events and everyday news topics, a Prediction Market offers opportunities for users with different expertise, interests, and risk preferences. This broad event coverage helps maintain active participation and improves the overall quality of market-based predictions.

 

>>> More to read: What Is a Prediction Market: How Markets Turn Uncertainty Into Usable Knowledge

CRYPTO PREDICTION MARKETS BENEFITS & RISKS

 

Compared with traditional online betting platforms, blockchain technology introduces meaningful improvements to how a Prediction Market operates, particularly in terms of transparency, efficiency, and security.

 

✅ Transparent Settlement

In a blockchain-based Prediction Market, smart contracts handle settlement automatically once an outcome is verified. This ensures that results are resolved fairly and immediately, without manual intervention or discretionary decisions from a central operator.

 

✅ Lower Fees

By eliminating intermediaries, a crypto Prediction Market significantly reduces operational overhead. Fewer middlemen mean lower fees for participants, allowing more value to flow directly between traders rather than being absorbed by platform costs.

 

✅ Security and Data Integrity

All transactions in a Prediction Market are recorded on-chain, creating a transparent and immutable transaction history. This makes it far more difficult to manipulate outcomes or alter records, strengthening trust in the integrity of the market.

 

✅ Interoperability

Outcome tokens issued by a Prediction Market are not confined to a single platform. They can be held in wallets, integrated into applications, or even used within DeFi protocols, increasing flexibility and expanding potential use cases beyond simple event settlement.

❗Incorrect Predictions

If a prediction turns out to be wrong, participants will lose the capital committed to that outcome. A Prediction Market rewards accuracy, not participation, and losses are a natural part of the system.

 

❗Low Liquidity

Smaller or less active Prediction Market events may suffer from limited liquidity. In such cases, prices can be more volatile and potentially more vulnerable to manipulation.

 

❗Regulatory Uncertainty

The legal status of Prediction Market platforms varies by jurisdiction. In some regions, regulations remain unclear or are still evolving, which may affect platform availability or user access.

 

❗Smart Contract Vulnerabilities

Participants in a crypto Prediction Market ultimately rely on the security of the underlying code. Bugs or vulnerabilities in smart contracts could lead to unexpected losses or operational issues.

 

>>> More to read: How does polymarket work: a complete guide to prediction markets

CONCLUSION: THE FUTURE OF PREDICTION MARKETS

 

A crypto Prediction Market is fundamentally a decentralized system that allows users to trade on the outcomes of future events. By combining market-based incentives with blockchain technology, Prediction Market platforms enable transparent settlement while transforming dispersed opinions into measurable probability signals.

 

As the Web3 ecosystem continues to evolve, Prediction Market platforms have moved beyond their early experimental phase. They are increasingly becoming an important component of both crypto-native markets and the broader financial landscape. Their ability to reflect expectations in real time gives them a unique role in price discovery and forecasting.

 

That said, challenges remain. Information asymmetry, the risk of insider behavior, and regulatory uncertainty continue to shape the industry’s development. However, as adoption grows and regulatory frameworks mature, Prediction Market platforms are likely to operate within more structured and balanced market environments.

 

In the long run, Prediction Market may emerge as one of the most influential applications in the crypto ecosystem—one that most clearly demonstrates how markets can aggregate information, capital, and collective expectations into a single, transparent system.

PREDICTION MARKET FAQ

 

🔍 What is a prediction market?

 

A Prediction Market is a market that allows participants to trade on the probability of future events. By taking positions on outcomes that have not yet occurred, participants can profit if their predictions prove correct. Market prices are often interpreted as the collective probability assigned to a specific outcome.

🔍 Why do prediction markets suffer from information asymmetry?

 

The core mechanism of a Prediction Market relies on participant forecasts, which are influenced by access to information. Some participants may benefit from earlier or more detailed information, allowing them to gain an advantage over others. This dynamic can place less-informed participants at a disadvantage, resulting in information asymmetry within the market.

🔍 How are prediction markets regulated?

 

The regulatory status of Prediction Market platforms remains unclear and inconsistent across jurisdictions. In some countries, prediction markets are subject to strict financial regulations, while in others they operate in regulatory gray areas with limited oversight. This lack of uniform regulation continues to shape how prediction markets evolve globally.

 

 

 

 

ꚰ CoinRank x Bitget – Sign up & Trade!

Looking for the latest scoop and cool insights from CoinRank? Hit up our Twitter and stay in the loop with all our fresh stories!

〈What is Crypto Prediction Market? A Beginner’s Guide〉這篇文章最早發佈於《CoinRank》。

Chiliz uses blockchain and fan tokens to transform how sports teams engage, govern, and monetize their global fan bases.

 

CHZ functions as the core utility token for payments, staking, governance, and ecosystem incentives across Chiliz Chain.

 

Tokenomics upgrades like the Pepper8 hard fork aim to support long-term sustainability, DeFi growth, and ecosystem expansion.

Chiliz is a Web3 sports ecosystem powered by CHZ, enabling fan tokens, on-chain governance, and digital ownership that connects sports teams with global fan communities.

 

WHAT IS CHILIZ?

 

Chiliz is a cryptocurrency designed specifically for the sports and entertainment industry and is widely recognized as one of the earliest and most prominent fan token ecosystems. Through CHZ, fans are able to participate in activities related to their favorite sports teams or athletes using crypto-based mechanisms, creating a closer and more interactive relationship between teams and their global fan bases.

 

Rather than functioning solely as a speculative digital asset, CHZ serves as a utility token that powers fan engagement. It enables tokenized participation models where supporters can interact, vote, and engage with teams in ways that were previously unavailable through traditional sports fandom structures.

 

📌 Background of the Chiliz Project

 

Chiliz was founded in 2018 by Alexandre Dreyfus, the founder of travel consultancy company Webcity and a co-founder of Winamax, one of France’s largest online betting platforms. The project was created with the goal of applying blockchain technology to redefine how fans interact with sports organizations.

 

Dreyfus envisioned a system where fans could engage with their favorite teams beyond passive consumption, while clubs and entertainment companies could more effectively connect with and monetize their global audiences. By leveraging blockchain-based fan tokens, Chiliz introduced a new engagement framework that benefits both supporters and organizations.

 

As the concept evolved, Chiliz positioned itself as a dedicated blockchain ecosystem for sports and entertainment, demonstrating how tokenization could be applied beyond purely financial use cases.

🔍 How Chiliz Works

 

At its core, Chiliz operates as an innovative fan engagement and reward platform built around sports-focused crypto assets. It addresses two long-standing challenges in the industry.

 

First, it enhances fan participation.
Before Chiliz, fan interaction was largely limited to watching matches or purchasing merchandise. With the introduction of CHZ and fan tokens, supporters gained the ability to take part in polls, interactive campaigns, and engagement initiatives directly connected to their favorite teams.

 

Second, it offers sports and entertainment companies new ways to expand their reach.

By accessing the Chiliz platform, organizations can design engagement-driven programs that deepen fan loyalty while opening additional development and growth opportunities within a digital ecosystem.

 

>>> More to read: What is Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)?

CORE COMPONENTS OF THE CHILIZ ECOSYSTEM

 

The success of Chiliz is not driven solely by its blockchain technology, but by a comprehensive ecosystem built around fan tokens. This ecosystem consists of several key platforms and tools that together support the operation of Web3 sports, while continuously attracting new users and developers. Understanding these core components provides a clearer picture of how Chiliz actually functions in practice.

 

🌐Socios.com: The Central Hub for Fan Engagement

 

Socios.com is the most well-known and central platform within the Chiliz ecosystem. It is a comprehensive fan engagement and rewards application designed to deliver a full Web3 sports experience. Through Socios.com, users can purchase and trade fan tokens, participate in team-related voting events, and redeem exclusive fan-only rewards—all within a single platform.

 

With its intuitive interface and rich feature set, Socios.com has become the primary gateway for millions of fans entering the Web3 sports ecosystem. More than just a trading platform, it acts as a community hub where fan voices can be heard and loyalty can be meaningfully rewarded, reinforcing the core vision behind Chiliz and CHZ.

✅ FanX: A Decentralized Exchange Built for Fan Tokens

 

To further enhance liquidity and accessibility within the ecosystem, Chiliz introduced FanX. FanX is a decentralized exchange (DEX) purpose-built for fan tokens, allowing users to swap fan tokens directly without relying on centralized intermediaries.

 

As a DEX, FanX emphasizes transparency and security while enabling permissionless asset exchange. Its presence strengthens on-chain liquidity across the Chiliz ecosystem and supports the idea that fan tokens are not only engagement tools, but also digital assets with market-driven value. This makes CHZ and related fan tokens more flexible and accessible within the broader Web3 environment.

✅ Governance Structure: Trust Built on a World-Class Validator Network

 

As previously outlined, Chiliz Chain operates under a Proof of Staked Authority (PoSA) consensus mechanism, supported by a network of 11 globally recognized validator nodes. These validators provide technical security while also signaling broad institutional trust in the Chiliz ecosystem.

 

The validator network includes participants from multiple sectors:

 

Blockchain Leaders: OKX, Animoca Brands, Ankr, and other major Web3 players contribute deep technical expertise and network stability.

 

Financial Institutions: SBI Holdings represents traditional finance, highlighting Chiliz’s credibility and relevance beyond the crypto-native space.

 

Energy Sector: France’s state-owned energy provider EDF Group reflects institutional confidence in blockchain infrastructure.

 

Sports Innovators: Paris Saint-Germain became the world’s first sports team to act as a validator, marking a milestone in direct club participation in blockchain governance and demonstrating how Chiliz integrates with professional sports at a structural level.

 

Asian Representation: The inclusion of Asia’s first professional football league, K League, further strengthens Chiliz’s presence in global sports markets, particularly across Asia.

 

 

This diverse and high-reputation validator structure reinforces decentralization and security while symbolizing cross-industry confidence in the long-term vision of Chiliz

 

>>> More to read: What is Midnight Network & $NIGHT?

CHZ TOKENOMICS

 

 

 

CHZ is the native token of the Chiliz ecosystem, designed to function as the core fuel that powers the entire platform. Understanding the tokenomics of CHZ is essential for anyone looking to invest in or evaluate what Chiliz represents as a long-term Web3 sports infrastructure project. CHZ is not merely a digital asset—it carries multiple functional and economic roles within the ecosystem.

🪙 Functional Role of the CHZ Token

 

➤ Medium of Exchange
CHZ serves as the sole base currency for acquiring fan tokens within the Chiliz ecosystem. Regardless of which team a user chooses to support, fan tokens must be purchased using CHZ. In addition, CHZ is used to pay network transaction fees on Chiliz Chain, ensuring smooth execution of on-chain activity.

 

➤ Staking and Participation
Holders of CHZ may stake their tokens to participate in Chiliz Chain’s network governance. Through staking, participants contribute to the security and stability of the network while earning staking rewards. This mechanism encourages long-term holding and active involvement in the Chiliz ecosystem.

 

➤ Ecosystem Incentives
CHZ is also used to incentivize various participants across the Chiliz ecosystem, including developers, validators, and community members. These incentive mechanisms are designed to promote innovation, participation, and sustained ecosystem growth.

📌 Pepper8 Hard Fork and Tokenomics Optimization

 

According to the latest governance proposal released in August 2025, Chiliz implemented significant updates to its tokenomics model through the successful Pepper8 hard fork. This upgrade represents a key evolutionary step in understanding what Chiliz is becoming, with long-term implications for CHZ value sustainability and ecosystem development.

 

🔍 The main improvements introduced by the Pepper8 hard fork include:

 

➤ Introduction of a Declining Inflation Model
The update replaces the previous inflation mechanism with a gradually decreasing inflation schedule. From Year 3 through Year 7, CHZ inflation is designed to decline annually, ultimately aligning in Year 8 with the initial supply framework established during the earlier Dragon8 hard fork. This predictable and decreasing inflation structure aims to support long-term value stability while providing clearer expectations for CHZ holders.

 

➤ Enhanced Community Participation Rewards
Pepper8 introduces higher incentive levels to further motivate community members to actively participate in Chiliz Chain governance and ecosystem initiatives.

 

➤ Support for Sustainable Growth
The revised tokenomics model is designed to provide long-term, sustainable incentives for all ecosystem participants, helping ensure steady and resilient development of the Chiliz platform.

 

➤ Expanded DeFi Opportunities
Tokenomics optimization also creates new opportunities for decentralized finance (DeFi) applications and services to be built within the Chiliz Chain ecosystem, expanding potential use cases for CHZ beyond fan engagement alone.

 

➤ Long-Term Ecosystem Funding
A portion of token allocation will continue to be dedicated to ecosystem development and operations, ensuring ongoing funding for Chiliz Chain upgrades, ecosystem programs, and community initiatives—laying a foundation for future innovation.

 

➤ Integration of New Partners
The integration of new partners, such as Turkish exchange Paribu Net, expands CHZ accessibility and strengthens its global market presence.

 

https://t.co/69UuRQNlxl

— Chiliz – The Sports Blockchain (@Chiliz) January 20, 2026

CONCLUSION

 

Chiliz has successfully introduced the core principles of Web3—decentralization, community governance, and digital ownership—into the large and traditionally centralized sports and entertainment industry. Through its fan token model, these concepts are translated into practical, real-world use cases that extend blockchain adoption beyond purely financial applications.

 

As additional top-tier partners join the ecosystem, the developer community continues to grow, and the underlying technology evolves, Chiliz is steadily advancing toward its long-term vision of becoming a critical bridge between traditional sports organizations and the blockchain economy. Within this structure, CHZ serves as the core economic asset that aligns incentives across fans, teams, and ecosystem participants.

 

For investors seeking long-term exposure to Web3-driven innovation, closely following the development of Chiliz and CHZ provides valuable insight into how blockchain technology may continue to reshape mainstream industries and digital ownership models in the years ahead.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ꚰ CoinRank x Bitget – Sign up & Trade!

Looking for the latest scoop and cool insights from CoinRank? Hit up our Twitter and stay in the loop with all our fresh stories!

〈What is Chiliz (CHZ)?〉這篇文章最早發佈於《CoinRank》。

Former #Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison to be released from prison today.
#Bessant : Not worried about a sell-off of US Treasury bonds; Japanese counterparts will step in.
#Vitalik : Full return to decentralized social networking in 2026.
#Alchemy Pay receives Nebraska MTL license, expanding its scope to 14 US states.
Google to provide $2 million to Sundance Film Academy to support #AI training for artists.
#CoinRank

The MEMES rally was primarily sentiment-driven, sparked by social amplification rather than fundamentals, with on-chain data showing rapid wallet churn and high turnover instead of sustained accumulation.

 

Incentive structures such as the BNB Chain USD1 trading competition significantly magnified trading volume and visibility, converting short-term attention into measurable on-chain activity.

 

The episode highlights a structural feature of meme markets in 2026, where attention functions as liquidity and price discovery is driven by reflexive coordination rather than long-term value creation.

A single repost triggered a speculative surge on BNB Chain as the MEMES token soared over 280× intraday, illustrating how social signals, on-chain incentives, and shallow liquidity can rapidly turn attention into extreme volatility.

 

THE SPARK

 

On January 21, a little-noticed meme token called MEMES on the BNB Chain became the center of one of the most extreme short-term rallies seen in recent months, after a repost by He Yi, combined with a rare and widely circulated White House social media post referencing “memes,” abruptly pushed the asset from obscurity into global crypto discourse, triggering a rapid influx of speculative capital that sent its price surging by more than 280× intraday and briefly lifted its market capitalization above $18 million, according to real-time tracking data from GMGN and BNB Chain explorers.

 

On-chain records show that MEMES was deployed and primarily traded on BNB Chain, with its liquidity concentrated in pools indexed by GMGN and visible on BscScan, and within hours of the repost its 24-hour trading volume expanded to approximately $37.9 million, a figure that far exceeded its early liquidity base and underscored how quickly attention-driven flows can overwhelm shallow order books when social amplification and narrative alignment converge.

 

 

ON-CHAIN MECHANICS

 

What distinguished the MEMES episode from routine meme volatility was not merely the price movement, but the speed at which on-chain metrics re-priced risk, as liquidity migrated aggressively into MEMES pools and turnover ratios spiked, indicating that capital was rotating rapidly rather than accumulating with long-term conviction, a pattern that is clearly observable in block-by-block transaction data on BscScan, where bursts of high-frequency swaps dominated activity during peak momentum windows.

 

According to GMGN monitoring, MEMES experienced a sharp “wick down” to roughly $14.29 million in market value during a brief liquidity vacuum, before rebounding above $18 million, a sequence that illustrates how meme markets often oscillate between euphoria and fragility within minutes, especially when price discovery is driven less by fundamentals and more by reflexive trading behavior amplified by social cues.

 

THE USD1 EFFECT

 

Momentum intensified further when MEMES qualified for the BNB Chain USD1 Trading Competition, a ten-day incentive program that ranks meme tokens by market capitalization and trading activity, provided they maintain active USD1-denominated liquidity pools, a condition that MEMES met shortly after launch, allowing it to enter the competition’s top tier alongside other high-beta meme assets.

 

By mid-day, GMGN data showed MEMES had climbed to an estimated $23 million market capitalization, with a quoted price near $0.023, placing it among the top three meme tokens in the USD1 competition by market value, while simultaneously ranking first by 24-hour trading volume, a convergence that highlights how incentive structures can magnify speculative flows by converting short-term attention into measurable on-chain activity.

 

SOCIAL SIGNALS AND CROWD DYNAMICS

 

The catalytic role of He Yi’s repost is less about authority endorsement and more about signaling, because in meme markets credibility is often inferred through proximity to recognized figures rather than explicit validation, and the repost acted as a coordination point for traders already primed by the White House’s viral phrasing, effectively synchronizing attention across retail channels.

 

This synchronization is visible in wallet-level data, where clusters of new addresses entered the MEMES pools shortly after the repost, a pattern consistent with retail-driven participation rather than concentrated whale accumulation, reinforcing the view that the rally was primarily sentiment-led, with capital cycling rapidly through positions rather than settling into longer-term holdings.

 

A BROADER MEME CYCLE ON BNB CHAIN

 

The MEMES surge did not occur in isolation but within a broader resurgence of meme activity on BNB Chain, where lower transaction costs and fast block times continue to attract speculative traders, particularly when combined with competitive incentives such as the USD1 trading program, which effectively gamifies liquidity provision and turnover rather than usage or utility.

 

Historical comparisons on CoinMarketCap and BNB Chain analytics suggest that such meme-driven bursts tend to peak quickly once attention disperses or incentives rotate, yet they also serve as stress tests for on-chain infrastructure and liquidity design, revealing how rapidly capital can mobilize when narrative catalysts, social amplification, and incentive alignment coincide.

 

INTERPRETATION

 

From a structural perspective, the MEMES episode reinforces a familiar but often underestimated reality of on-chain markets: attention is a form of liquidity, and when attention is compressed into a narrow time window by social signals, even tokens with no intrinsic utility can temporarily absorb tens of millions of dollars in volume, provided the execution environment is frictionless and incentives are aligned.

 

At the same time, on-chain transparency makes the risks equally visible, as wallet churn, liquidity concentration, and rapid drawdowns are all traceable in real time, offering a reminder that meme rallies are less about value creation and more about reflexive coordination, where gains and losses are redistributed at speed rather than accumulated sustainably.

 

CONCLUSION

 

The explosive rise of MEMES on BNB Chain, catalyzed by a single high-profile repost and amplified by incentive-driven liquidity programs, illustrates how modern meme markets operate at the intersection of social signaling, on-chain mechanics, and speculative reflexivity, producing short-lived but intense price discovery events that are fully observable, verifiable, and repeatable under similar conditions.

 

While MEMES itself may or may not retain relevance once attention shifts, the episode underscores a broader truth about crypto markets in 2026: narratives move faster than fundamentals, incentives accelerate behavior, and on-chain data provides a transparent record of how quickly collective sentiment can turn visibility into volatility.

 

Read More：

When Prediction Becomes Infrastructure: How Probable Markets Is Positioning Itself Inside BNB Chain

〈A Single Repost Ignites a Meme Frenzy on BNB Chain〉這篇文章最早發佈於《CoinRank》。

Solana redirected 100% of priority fees to validators in 2025, then implemented automatic distribution to SOL stakers to reclaim value from applications.

The upcoming Alpenglow upgrade targets 100-millisecond settlement speeds, increasing application dependence on the chain to justify higher fee extraction from profitable applications.

Solana’s mainnet-only architecture creates atomic composability that makes application migration costly, giving the chain leverage to capture value without losing developers.

 Solana fights back against application dominance through aggressive fee restructuring and the Alpenglow upgrade, pursuing a Nasdaq-like value capture model for 2026.

While Ethereum’s response to application-layer revenue dominance leans toward philosophical acceptance and infrastructure refinement, Solana has charted an entirely different course. Anatoly Yakovenko’s vision for Solana couldn’t be more distinct from Vitalik’s approach, and understanding this divergence reveals why these two major chains might be headed toward fundamentally different futures.

 

Anatoly has been explicit about his belief that a blockchain should function like Nasdaq—not just fast, but actively capturing value from every transaction that occurs on it. This philosophy rejects the idea of pushing applications toward Layer 2 solutions. Instead, Solana insists that all business should happen on the mainnet, ensuring that every successful transaction directly translates into demand for SOL and fee capture for the network. Even though Solana’s application revenue currently exceeds its mainnet revenue, the team began preparing a counteroffensive in 2025 to reclaim value that had drifted toward the application layer.

 

The first move came in early 2025 when Solana adjusted its priority fee distribution model. Previously, the network burned 50% of priority fees and allocated the other 50% to validators. Under the new structure, 100% of priority fees now flow to validators. Shortly afterward, Solana implemented programmatic mechanisms to automatically distribute these recaptured priority fees to SOL stakers. This wasn’t just a minor technical adjustment but a strategic repositioning of how value flows through the network.

 

Bitwise: Why Crypto Is Moving Beyond the Four-Year Cycle

Messari 2026 Crypto Theses: Why Speculation Is No Longer Enough (Part 1)

 

THE ALPENGLOW GAMBIT

 

Now in 2026, Solana is preparing the Alpenglow upgrade, which aims to achieve 100-millisecond settlement speeds. The logic here is straightforward yet powerful: higher performance means greater application dependence on the chain, which in turn means the “chain tax” becomes easier to collect. Applications simply can’t afford to leave when the infrastructure they rely on becomes too superior to replicate elsewhere. This strategy essentially forces applications to keep feeding revenue back to SOL, whether they like it or not.

 

What enables Solana to pursue this aggressive value recapture strategy? The answer lies in architectural choices that differ fundamentally from Ethereum’s design. Every application on Solana operates on the same ledger. The network maintains a philosophy of “mainnet as execution layer,” meaning there’s no meaningful Layer 2 concept despite some sidechains existing at the margins. All transactions, slippage, and MEV extraction happen directly on the mainnet. For applications requiring AI-powered payments or high-frequency transactions, this represents a fatal attraction. Ethereum’s proliferation of Layer 2s and sidechains introduces cross-chain friction that becomes genuinely painful for certain use cases.

 

This architectural difference creates a fascinating contrast in how the two networks approach power and value distribution. Ethereum’s ecosystem has become decentralized across various applications and Layer 2s, with value capture remaining passive—essentially waiting for applications to give back through burns or other mechanisms. The network’s core advantage lies in its uncompromising security and censorship resistance. Solana, conversely, maintains power highly concentrated in Layer 1 validator nodes, with value capture being active and protocol-enforced through direct priority fee allocation. Its competitive edge comes from extreme composability and transaction speed. As we move through 2026, Ethereum struggles with an identity crisis while searching for new narratives, whereas Solana pursues what might be called “Nasdaq-ification” with an increasingly closed-loop business model.

 

THE BATTLE LINES ARE DRAWN

 

Galaxy Digital’s price predictions for SOL emerge from this strategic positioning, though reclaiming value from the application layer in 2026 will inevitably trigger adversarial game theory dynamics. We’ve already seen hints of this tension with platforms like Jito. The central question becomes: if Solana successfully recaptures revenue, will it squeeze value out of applications running on the network? 

 

Understanding where this battle gets won or lost requires examining specific pressure points.

 

Liquidity stickiness represents the first critical dimension. Can “atomic composability” survive if applications decide to migrate? Here, the chain likely holds the advantage. If application migration breaks the ability to interlock with other DApps in real-time, applications will hesitate before making the jump. The technical debt of rebuilding those integrations elsewhere becomes prohibitively expensive. However, user ownership tells a different story. Are users coming for “Jupiter” or for “Solana”? As native applications like Jupiter Mobile V3 gain traction, if users identify primarily with application entry points rather than the underlying chain, applications gain negotiating leverage to demand lower fees from the infrastructure layer.

 

The numbers from 2025 illustrate why this matters so much. Solana’s annual on-chain fee revenue exceeded $600 million, with some institutional estimates putting total revenue at $1.4 billion. Crucially, application revenue and chain revenue maintain high correlation on Solana because the network succeeds at keeping business within the “single shard” of its mainnet. Yet it’s essential to understand that Solana’s value recapture efforts won’t change Galaxy’s prediction that the ratio of application income to network income will double by 2026.

 

THE SHOPPING MALL ANALOGY

 

Think of the current dynamic this way: the cake is getting bigger, not being redistributed. Solana functions as the shopping mall, while applications serve as individual stores. The mall has essentially announced: “All queuing fees from customers rushing into stores now belong entirely to mall management.” A store like Jupiter might get taxed on this “queue revenue,” but early 2026 data shows that Solana applications still generate roughly 3.5 times the revenue that the mainnet captures. Even after Solana implements its fee recapture mechanisms, applications continue to thrive because the overall pie keeps expanding.

 

This creates a peculiar equilibrium where both sides can claim victory. Solana increases its take from each transaction while applications simultaneously grow their absolute revenue through ecosystem expansion and user growth. The mall gets richer from its cut, but successful stores still make more money than ever because foot traffic keeps increasing. Whether this balance proves sustainable depends largely on whether Solana can keep attracting applications despite higher extraction rates, and whether applications can maintain their growth trajectories even as they surrender a larger percentage to the chain.

 

The broader implications extend beyond just Solana and Ethereum. This divergence between infrastructure philosophies might actually benefit the industry by creating genuine differentiation rather than convergence. Ethereum positions itself as the immutable, censorship-resistant base layer where security trumps all other concerns, potentially appealing to applications that prioritize these characteristics over raw performance. Solana brands itself as the high-performance business platform where speed and capital efficiency matter most, attracting applications where user experience and transaction costs determine competitive outcomes.

 

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR 2026 AND BEYOND

 

Looking ahead, the question isn’t whether applications will continue outearning chains—that seems inevitable given the maturation of the blockchain application layer. Rather, the question is which model proves more sustainable: Ethereum’s acceptance of lower direct revenue in exchange for ecosystem dominance, or Solana’s aggressive recapture of value from applications that depend on its unique performance characteristics.

 

Neither approach is obviously correct, and the market will likely support both models serving different niches. Projects requiring maximum decentralization and security will gravitate toward Ethereum despite higher costs and lower speeds. Applications where milliseconds matter and user experience determines survival will choose Solana despite surrendering more revenue to the chain. The real winners might be users and developers who benefit from having genuine alternatives rather than a monoculture.

 

What we’re witnessing isn’t just a technical disagreement about blockchain architecture but a fundamental debate about what public infrastructure should be. Should it extract maximum value from its users and applications, using that revenue to further improve itself and reward stakeholders? Or should it minimize extraction, focusing instead on being the most neutral, accessible foundation possible? Both Ethereum and Solana are placing billion-dollar bets on their respective answers, and 2026 will provide crucial evidence about which philosophy resonates more deeply with the market.

 

Why Gold Is Surging: Central Banks, Sanctions, and Trust-1

〈Solana’s Power Play: Why One Chain Chose to Fight Back Against Application Dominance-2〉這篇文章最早發佈於《CoinRank》。

By late 2025, Solana applications generated 3.5 times more revenue than the mainnet itself, with total application fees exceeding $4 billion annually.

Ethereum’s Layer 1 fee revenue collapsed to under 3% of total ecosystem income as EIP-4844 and Layer 2 adoption drove transaction costs down.

Vitalik Buterin’s strategy accepts lower revenue capture, focusing instead on making Ethereum the cheapest and most secure data availability layer for ecosystem growth.

Blockchain applications now generate more revenue than their underlying chains. Solana and Ethereum face this shift with radically different strategies for 2026.

Something fundamental shifted in the blockchain landscape during 2024, and the numbers tell a story that challenges everything we thought we knew about layer-1 value capture. Both Solana and Ethereum are watching their applications generate more revenue than the underlying chains themselves, marking what Galaxy Digital calls one of the most consequential trends heading into 2026.

 

The data points are striking, though perhaps not entirely surprising to those who’ve been watching closely. For Solana, June 2024 marked a watershed moment. That’s when application-layer revenue from platforms like Pump.fun and Jito first exceeded the chain’s own gas fee income. By the end of 2025, this ratio had widened dramatically to 3.5 to 1 in favor of applications. Throughout 2025, Solana’s applications collectively generated over $4 billion in fees, while the November ETF inflows of $420 million suggested that institutional capital was shifting from speculation toward genuine asset allocation.

 

Ethereum’s situation mirrors this dynamic, albeit with its own distinct characteristics. During the first quarter of 2025, applications running on Ethereum—think Uniswap, Lido, and Aave—produced approximately $1.01 billion in total fees. Meanwhile, the Ethereum mainnet captured only about one-fifth of what its applications were earning. The rollout of EIP-4844, which introduced blob space, combined with widespread Layer 2 adoption, drove average transaction fees down by over 95%. Layer 1’s share of total fee revenue, which once stood at 40% back in 2021, plummeted to less than 3%.

 

Messari 2026 Crypto Theses: Why Speculation Is No Longer Enough (Part 1)

Bitwise: Why Crypto Is Moving Beyond the Four-Year Cycle

 

THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH ABOUT VALUE CAPTURE

 

These figures point toward an uncomfortable reality for blockchain infrastructure: applications have become better at capturing value than the chains hosting them. This isn’t just a temporary market anomaly or a brief period of misalignment. Rather, it represents a structural shift in how value flows through blockchain ecosystems, one that has profound implications for how we think about layer-1 tokens as investment vehicles.

 

The phenomenon supports what some researchers have started calling “application-layer supremacy.” However, the responses from Ethereum and Solana reveal two radically different philosophies about what a blockchain should be and how it should capture value. Messari’s perspective on Ethereum frames the issue as an identity crisis, questioning whether the network is becoming merely a “settlement dumpster” for Layer 2 chains. Their analysis suggests that by 2026, Ethereum must implement major upgrades—possibly mainnet sharding or other significant architectural changes—to reclaim execution-layer value capture.

 

From Messari’s viewpoint, Ethereum faces the risk of becoming a bargain-basement settlement layer. As Layer 2 fees have dropped to nearly nothing, the mainnet’s gas fee capture has cratered, undermining ETH’s deflationary narrative. This creates a zero-sum dynamic: if ETH wins, it means Layer 2s will funnel profits back to the mainnet, or applications will choose to remain on the mainnet despite higher “protection fees.” But if the application layer wins—as Galaxy Digital’s analysis suggests is happening—then applications will increasingly build their own chains or use app-chains to capture all the gas fees and MEV revenue that would otherwise flow to Ethereum. Uniswap’s launch of Unichain exemplifies this trend perfectly.

 

VITALIK’S COUNTERINTUITIVE STRATEGY

 

Yet Messari’s predictions about Ethereum’s comeback strategy appear to diverge from what Vitalik Buterin himself has been articulating in recent public statements. Looking at Vitalik’s comments from early 2026, it becomes clear that the Ethereum team isn’t planning to compete with applications for revenue. Instead, they’re doubling down on becoming cheaper and more secure.

 

Vitalik has repeatedly emphasized that Ethereum’s ultimate value doesn’t lie in how much gas it collects, but rather in how much “indestructible value” it hosts—meaning censorship resistance and uncompromising security. The 2026 roadmap prioritizes pushing forward PeerDAS and full zkEVM integration through upgrades like “Glamsterdam” and “Hegota,” with the goal of making Ethereum the cheapest and most secure data availability layer possible.

 

In other words, facing the reality of value being siphoned off to the application layer, Vitalik’s team has chosen not to fight applications for revenue but to continue making Ethereum better, cheaper, and more secure. The strategy is to attract more applications to deploy on Ethereum by being the best possible infrastructure. Think of it as being the soil that helps seeds take root, rather than competing with those seeds for nutrients.

 

This represents a fundamental identity shift for Ethereum, essentially abandoning the role of “profitable commercial company” in favor of becoming something like a “constitution for global digital territory.” While this transformation might frustrate retail investors who want to see faster price appreciation, it potentially appeals more to institutional players focused on long-term infrastructure value. The strategy accepts that Ethereum’s value proposition is evolving beyond simple fee capture toward something more foundational, even if that means sacrificing some near-term revenue in exchange for ecosystem growth and adoption.

 

Solana in 2026: From Meme Speculation to Real Revenue

〈The Great Revenue Reversal: When Blockchain Applications Started Outearning Their Chains-1〉這篇文章最早發佈於《CoinRank》。

Massachusetts court rules to ban #Kalshi sports betting, effective as early as this Friday
Anthropic fixes three high-risk vulnerabilities in its MCP Git server, involving arbitrary file access and remote code execution
SlowMist CISO: Snap Store experiences new attacks targeting crypto wallets
#OpenAI to launch chatbot ads in February, charging based on ad views
#CryptoQuan CEO: #Coinbase "disrupts" wallets to raise the bar for on-chain data analytics in order to protect privacy

#CoinRank

The $4.2 million DUSD exploit was a precision flash loan attack that manipulated short-term pricing assumptions, draining a single Curve pool without compromising the broader stablecoin system.

 

The incident highlights a recurring DeFi vulnerability where deep liquidity and oracle dependencies can become liabilities under extreme, short-lived capital imbalances.

 

While Makina’s rapid containment limited contagion, the event reinforces that LP risk in stablecoin pools is structurally different from simple token-holding risk.

A targeted flash loan attack on Makina’s DUSD/USDC Curve pool shows how stablecoin liquidity, oracle design, and flash liquidity can combine to create concentrated risk for LPs.

 

THE INCIDENT

 

In the early hours of January 20, a highly targeted flash loan attack drained roughly $4.2 million from the DUSD/USDC liquidity pool on Curve, marking one of the most technically precise stablecoin exploits of early 2026 and underscoring how composability, while powerful, continues to create attack surfaces when oracle dependencies and liquidity assumptions align imperfectly.

 

 

DUSD, a multi-chain stablecoin issued by Makina Finance, was not attacked through its core mint–redeem mechanism but through a single liquidity venue, where an attacker borrowed approximately $280 million in USDC via flash loans, temporarily distorted oracle-referenced pricing inputs, inflated the apparent value of a liquidity position, and extracted the pool’s available assets before the system could re-equilibrate, ultimately walking away with funds equivalent to around 1,299 ETH at the time of the exploit.

 

Crucially, the incident did not compromise the broader DUSD supply or users simply holding DUSD, Pendle positions, or Gearbox exposure, a distinction that Makina emphasized in post-incident communications, yet the speed and precision of the drain made it clear that even well-isolated pools can become single points of failure when capital concentration, oracle latency, and flash liquidity intersect.

 

HOW THE ATTACK WORKED

 

At a technical level, the exploit followed a pattern increasingly familiar to DeFi security researchers, but with execution refined to a narrow target: by injecting an enormous, short-lived amount of USDC into the DUSD/USDC Curve pool, the attacker was able to manipulate pricing assumptions relied upon by downstream logic, creating the illusion of excess liquidity and enabling profitable arbitrage within a single transaction bundle.

 

Because flash loans require no upfront capital and must be repaid within the same block, the attacker bore minimal directional risk, instead exploiting temporal price distortion, a class of vulnerability that has repeatedly surfaced across DeFi when pools depend on price feeds that can be skewed by short-term imbalances rather than time-weighted or multi-source aggregation.

 

The result was not a systemic collapse but a clean extraction: approximately $5.1 million in USDC equivalent, as later disclosed by Makina, was siphoned from the pool, leaving liquidity providers fully exposed while the broader protocol infrastructure remained intact.

 

 

CONTAINMENT AND RESPONSE

 

Makina’s response was notable for its speed and scope, reflecting lessons learned from earlier DeFi crises: the team immediately confirmed that the exploit was isolated to the Curve DUSD/USDC pool, performed a pre-attack snapshot of liquidity provider balances, and activated a recovery mode that allowed affected LPs to withdraw unilaterally into DUSD while longer-term remediation options were evaluated.

 

In public statements released on January 21, Makina indicated that it had identified leads related to the attacker’s on-chain identity and was actively attempting to engage, while also committing to reopen redemption functionality and provide alternative exit paths for liquidity providers once safeguards were in place, a strategy aimed at preventing panic-driven contagion across other venues.

 

This approach contrasts sharply with earlier DeFi incidents where delayed communication and unclear scope amplified losses, and it highlights how operational maturity—rather than absolute exploit prevention—has become a key differentiator among protocols managing stablecoin infrastructure.

 

MARKET SIGNALS AND LIQUIDITY MEMORY

 

What makes the DUSD episode particularly instructive is the contrast between the exploit and DUSD’s prior liquidity narrative: just months earlier, in September 2025, the DUSD/USDT pair on PancakeSwap had topped the platform’s TVL rankings at $129 million, with $82.11 million in 24-hour volume and $439 million over seven days, positioning DUSD as one of the most actively used stablecoin pairs within certain trading ecosystems.

 

That historical context matters, because it illustrates how liquidity depth, while often interpreted as a sign of stability, can also become a magnet for precision attacks when capital is sufficiently concentrated and economic incentives align, especially in pools where stablecoin parity is assumed rather than continuously stress-tested.

 

In this sense, the exploit does not invalidate DUSD as a stablecoin, but it does reinforce a recurring DeFi lesson: liquidity is not synonymous with safety, and the very pools that appear most resilient under normal conditions can become optimal targets under adversarial ones.

 

A BROADER STABLECOIN LESSON

 

Beyond the immediate loss, the DUSD flash loan attack speaks to a structural challenge facing on-chain stablecoins as they scale across chains and protocols: while composability enables rapid growth and capital efficiency, it also creates complex dependency graphs in which localized failures can produce disproportionate outcomes for specific user cohorts.

 

As regulators, institutions, and infrastructure providers increasingly scrutinize stablecoins not just as instruments but as payment and settlement layers, incidents like this sharpen the distinction between protocol solvency and venue-level risk, a nuance often overlooked by users chasing yield in liquidity pools without fully accounting for oracle design, withdrawal mechanics, or adversarial stress scenarios.

 

The fact that DUSD holders outside the affected pool remained unharmed may ultimately work in Makina’s favor, yet the episode reinforces that the next phase of DeFi stability will depend less on headline TVL figures and more on how protocols architect their weakest links, particularly where flash liquidity and price discovery collide.

 

Read More：

What Are Flash Loans? Beginner’s Guide

From Flash Loans to Global Bank: The Story of Aave

〈A Targeted Flash Loan Strike Exposes Fault Lines in Stablecoin Liquidity〉這篇文章最早發佈於《CoinRank》。

#Pundi AI colaborează cu Vital Block: Injectarea încrederii în datele AI on-chain
Trend Research a împrumutat 30 de milioane $USDT de la #Aave și l-a transferat la #Binance astăzi.
#BlackRock ETF-ul PFF deține acțiuni preferențiale în valoare de 380 de milioane de dolari.
Bloomberg: Puterea și resursele de reglementare insuficiente pot împiedica atingerea rezultatelor dorite în legislația crypto din SUA.
Regulatorii portughezi ordonă #Polymarket să înceteze operațiunile în țară în termen de 48 de ore.
#CoinRank