Binance Square

BMD RG

Built in losses🔸Refined by discipline🔸7 Years in Crypto🔸Now I move different.
958 Urmăriți
3.1K+ Urmăritori
206 Apreciate
7 Distribuite
Postări
·
--
Bearish
Vedeți traducerea
congratulations my friend 🔥🔥
congratulations my friend 🔥🔥
BMD RG
·
--
Bearish
$SKYAI Vânzare pe piață / short 👇🏼
{future}(SKYAIUSDT)
Stop loss : 0.28600$

Intrare: preț de piață

Țintă : 0.2350$🔸0.2200$🔸0.2060$

fără vânzare Ținta traderului : 0.1500$
·
--
Bearish
Vedeți traducerea
$NAORIS sell / short 👇🏼 {future}(NAORISUSDT) Entry : market price Target : 0.10652$🔸0.10146$🔸 9.09597$ stop loss : 0.11522
$NAORIS sell / short 👇🏼
Entry : market price

Target : 0.10652$🔸0.10146$🔸 9.09597$

stop loss : 0.11522
·
--
Bullish
Vedeți traducerea
$SOON going to moon 🤷‍♂️
$SOON going to moon 🤷‍♂️
·
--
Bearish
$SKYAI Vânzare pe piață / short 👇🏼 {future}(SKYAIUSDT) Stop loss : 0.28600$ Intrare: preț de piață Țintă : 0.2350$🔸0.2200$🔸0.2060$ fără vânzare Ținta traderului : 0.1500$
$SKYAI Vânzare pe piață / short 👇🏼
Stop loss : 0.28600$

Intrare: preț de piață

Țintă : 0.2350$🔸0.2200$🔸0.2060$

fără vânzare Ținta traderului : 0.1500$
·
--
Bearish
Vedeți traducerea
wait for big red candle 😭 My friends $BAS short 👇🏼 {future}(BASUSDT) Entry: Market price Stop loss : swing high Target : 0.0145$🔸0.0137$🔸0.012$ Guys share your trade on my comment box 🥰
wait for big red candle 😭
My friends $BAS short 👇🏼
Entry: Market price
Stop loss : swing high
Target : 0.0145$🔸0.0137$🔸0.012$

Guys share your trade on my comment box 🥰
·
--
Bearish
Vedeți traducerea
It's not break out, it’s fake out 🌊🫂 $CHIP Short 👇🏼 {future}(CHIPUSDT) stop loss : 0.1$ Entry : Market price Target : 0.07$🔸0.062$🔸0.055$
It's not break out, it’s fake out 🌊🫂
$CHIP Short 👇🏼

stop loss : 0.1$

Entry : Market price
Target : 0.07$🔸0.062$🔸0.055$
·
--
Bullish
Pixeli nu au încercat să evite să facă agricultura mai productivă. În schimb, încep să pună o întrebare diferită: Ce ar trebui să aibă jucătorii dacă agricultura singură nu este suficientă? Această întrebare marchează începutul schimbării sale către valoarea pe termen lung. Schimbarea nu s-a întâmplat peste noapte. Agricultura este încă acolo, încă familiară, dar nu mai definește întreaga experiență. Noi sisteme încep să se formeze în jurul ei—sisteme care nu doar creează valoare, ci o conturează. Crearea, nivelurile de progresie, dependențele de resurse și piețele conduse de jucători încep să se conecteze într-un mod care face ca jocul să pară mai puțin un ciclu și mai mult o structură. Valoarea încetează să fie ceva ce colectezi pur și simplu. A devenit ceva ce trebuie să navighezi. În acest design în evoluție, nu fiecare acțiune duce direct la o recompensă. Unele acțiuni pregătesc terenul pentru câștiguri viitoare. Altele creează oportunități pentru diferite tipuri de jucători. Un agricultor poate produce materii prime, dar acele materiale câștigă valoare reală doar atunci când altcineva are nevoie de ele—pentru crafting, upgrade-uri sau schimb. Economia începe să depindă de interacțiune, nu de izolare. Aici începe să prindă contur valoarea pe termen lung. În loc să injecteze constant recompense în sistem, pixeli creează căi prin care valoarea are loc. Tokenii și activele nu sunt doar create; Ele sunt consumate. Upgrade-urile necesită investiție. Progresul are costuri. Deciziile de pe piață au rezultate. Fiecare câștig este echilibrat de un angajament de vreun fel, ceea ce încetinește rata la care valoarea este extrasă. Această lentitate este intenționată. Sistemele rapide atrag atenția, dar rareori durează. Fricțiunea—momentele în care jucătorii trebuie să gândească, să ia decizii sau să aștepte—pixeli îndepărtează experiența de gratificarea instantanee. Îi încurajează pe jucători să considere nu ce pot câștiga acum, ci la ce ar putea duce acțiunile lor mai târziu. În timp, schimbă modul în care jucătorii interacționează cu jocul. Mentalitatea inițială „Cât de mult pot cultiva astăzi?” începe să dispară. În locul ei apare un set mai complex de întrebări. Care active devin rare? @pixels $PIXEL #pixel
Pixeli nu au încercat să evite să facă agricultura mai productivă. În schimb, încep să pună o întrebare diferită: Ce ar trebui să aibă jucătorii dacă agricultura singură nu este suficientă?
Această întrebare marchează începutul schimbării sale către valoarea pe termen lung.
Schimbarea nu s-a întâmplat peste noapte. Agricultura este încă acolo, încă familiară, dar nu mai definește întreaga experiență. Noi sisteme încep să se formeze în jurul ei—sisteme care nu doar creează valoare, ci o conturează. Crearea, nivelurile de progresie, dependențele de resurse și piețele conduse de jucători încep să se conecteze într-un mod care face ca jocul să pară mai puțin un ciclu și mai mult o structură.
Valoarea încetează să fie ceva ce colectezi pur și simplu. A devenit ceva ce trebuie să navighezi.
În acest design în evoluție, nu fiecare acțiune duce direct la o recompensă. Unele acțiuni pregătesc terenul pentru câștiguri viitoare. Altele creează oportunități pentru diferite tipuri de jucători. Un agricultor poate produce materii prime, dar acele materiale câștigă valoare reală doar atunci când altcineva are nevoie de ele—pentru crafting, upgrade-uri sau schimb. Economia începe să depindă de interacțiune, nu de izolare.
Aici începe să prindă contur valoarea pe termen lung.
În loc să injecteze constant recompense în sistem, pixeli creează căi prin care valoarea are loc. Tokenii și activele nu sunt doar create; Ele sunt consumate. Upgrade-urile necesită investiție. Progresul are costuri. Deciziile de pe piață au rezultate. Fiecare câștig este echilibrat de un angajament de vreun fel, ceea ce încetinește rata la care valoarea este extrasă.
Această lentitate este intenționată.
Sistemele rapide atrag atenția, dar rareori durează. Fricțiunea—momentele în care jucătorii trebuie să gândească, să ia decizii sau să aștepte—pixeli îndepărtează experiența de gratificarea instantanee. Îi încurajează pe jucători să considere nu ce pot câștiga acum, ci la ce ar putea duce acțiunile lor mai târziu.
În timp, schimbă modul în care jucătorii interacționează cu jocul.
Mentalitatea inițială „Cât de mult pot cultiva astăzi?” începe să dispară. În locul ei apare un set mai complex de întrebări. Care active devin rare?
@Pixels
$PIXEL
#pixel
·
--
Vedeți traducerea
From Earning Passively to Playing Intelligently: Pixels’ System ShiftYou can log in, follow a familiar routine and watch the rewards accumulate Farming, staking, repetitive actions—all point to a common concept: consistency equals earnings. It didn't require much thought. If you are present and active, the system will refund you. For many players, this was enough. The game has become a habit, almost mechanical, something you can optimize without engaging with it But systems built on passive income are rarely sustainable for long. As more players discover the most efficient path, behavior begins to converge. Everyone starts doing the same thing, chasing the same prize, extracting value in the same predictable way. Over time, the system lost its diversity. What once felt like a game began to feel like a loop—one that produced output but not necessarily meaning. Pixels didn't try to fix this by just increasing rewards or adding more tasks. Instead, the system began to reshape how players responded. The first signs were easy to miss. Small changes in the way rewards are distributed. New mechanics that require time rather than repetition. Subtle adjustments that made some actions less predictable. At a glance, it still looked like the same game. But underneath, the logic began to change. Passive income was no longer a safe path. Players who depend on the routine begin to notice something different. The same action does not always lead to the same result. Markets have moved. Asset values ​​have changed. Opportunities appeared and disappeared depending on what others were doing. Reaction begins when the game begins. And that response has forced new kinds of thinking. Instead of asking "What should I do every day?" Players began to ask "what does that mean now?" This question is short,But it changes everything. It pulls the player out of automation and into awareness. The system stops being a script to follow and becomes something to read. This is where the smart game comes in. In this new structure, time alone is no longer the main advantage. Information matters. Timing matters. Understanding the flow of resources, the behavior of other players, and the changing economics of the game becomes just as important as the effort. Two players can spend the same amount of time and get completely different results, depending on how they interact with the system. The gap between participation and strategy begins to widen. Pixels lean into that gap, connecting more of its systems together Farming feeds into crafts. Crafting the market feed. Affects market demand. Demand size rewards. There is nothing else in isolation. Each action carries a result somewhere else in the loop. This interconnected design does something subtle but powerful. It creates feedback. When too many players focus on an activity, its value decreases. When an area is neglected, its importance increases. The system begins to balance not through fixed rules, but through player behavior. And in that balance, opportunities emerge for those who are paying attention. But this shift is not comfortable for everyone. Passive systems are easy to understand. They provide transparency and predictability. Intelligent systems introduce uncertainty. Not every decision leads to a reward. Not every strategy works all the time. For players who entered hoping for steady, guaranteed returns, the game can feel slow, even limiting. Yet that friction is part of the transition. Pixels seems to be moving toward a model where engagement is measured not just by activity, but by awareness It is not enough to be present. Have to adapt. You have to notice the patterns,Anticipate changes and adjust your approach. The game becomes less about doing things differently and more about doing things differently. Over time, it creates a different type of player. Some begin to specialize by focusing on specific roles within the economy. Others become flexible, changing tactics as the situation changes. Few begin to look at the system as a whole, understanding how small changes in one area ripple through everything else. The experience becomes less about isolated tasks and more about navigating a living structure. This is the real change—from earning passively to playing smart. It's not about removing rewards. It's about changing their ways. Instead of rewarding players for just showing up, the system asks them to engage with the complexities. Thinking, observing, choosing. Whether this approach will be successful in the long term is still uncertain. Intelligent systems can be powerful, but they can also be demanding. They require balance, careful design, and players willing to fill half of the system. If pushed too far, complexity can alienate people just as easily as simplicity can alienate them. But if it works, the result is different from the normal GameFi cycle. Instead of hordes of players chasing easy prizes and leaving when they fade, you get a slower, more deliberate ecosystem. One where value is not just extracted, but shaped by the people inside it. One where the game doesn't just play - it evolves.And in that evolution the role of the player changes. @pixels $PIXEL #pixel

From Earning Passively to Playing Intelligently: Pixels’ System Shift

You can log in, follow a familiar routine and watch the rewards accumulate Farming, staking, repetitive actions—all point to a common concept: consistency equals earnings. It didn't require much thought. If you are present and active, the system will refund you. For many players, this was enough. The game has become a habit, almost mechanical, something you can optimize without engaging with it
But systems built on passive income are rarely sustainable for long.
As more players discover the most efficient path, behavior begins to converge. Everyone starts doing the same thing, chasing the same prize, extracting value in the same predictable way. Over time, the system lost its diversity. What once felt like a game began to feel like a loop—one that produced output but not necessarily meaning.
Pixels didn't try to fix this by just increasing rewards or adding more tasks. Instead, the system began to reshape how players responded.
The first signs were easy to miss. Small changes in the way rewards are distributed. New mechanics that require time rather than repetition. Subtle adjustments that made some actions less predictable. At a glance, it still looked like the same game. But underneath, the logic began to change.
Passive income was no longer a safe path.
Players who depend on the routine begin to notice something different. The same action does not always lead to the same result. Markets have moved. Asset values ​​have changed. Opportunities appeared and disappeared depending on what others were doing. Reaction begins when the game begins.
And that response has forced new kinds of thinking.
Instead of asking "What should I do every day?" Players began to ask "what does that mean now?" This question is short,But it changes everything. It pulls the player out of automation and into awareness. The system stops being a script to follow and becomes something to read.
This is where the smart game comes in. In this new structure, time alone is no longer the main advantage. Information matters. Timing matters. Understanding the flow of resources, the behavior of other players, and the changing economics of the game becomes just as important as the effort. Two players can spend the same amount of time and get completely different results, depending on how they interact with the system.
The gap between participation and strategy begins to widen.
Pixels lean into that gap, connecting more of its systems together Farming feeds into crafts. Crafting the market feed. Affects market demand. Demand size rewards. There is nothing else in isolation. Each action carries a result somewhere else in the loop.
This interconnected design does something subtle but powerful. It creates feedback.
When too many players focus on an activity, its value decreases. When an area is neglected, its importance increases. The system begins to balance not through fixed rules, but through player behavior. And in that balance, opportunities emerge for those who are paying attention.
But this shift is not comfortable for everyone.
Passive systems are easy to understand. They provide transparency and predictability. Intelligent systems introduce uncertainty. Not every decision leads to a reward. Not every strategy works all the time. For players who entered hoping for steady, guaranteed returns, the game can feel slow, even limiting.
Yet that friction is part of the transition.
Pixels seems to be moving toward a model where engagement is measured not just by activity, but by awareness It is not enough to be present. Have to adapt. You have to notice the patterns,Anticipate changes and adjust your approach. The game becomes less about doing things differently and more about doing things differently.
Over time, it creates a different type of player.
Some begin to specialize by focusing on specific roles within the economy. Others become flexible, changing tactics as the situation changes. Few begin to look at the system as a whole, understanding how small changes in one area ripple through everything else. The experience becomes less about isolated tasks and more about navigating a living structure.
This is the real change—from earning passively to playing smart.
It's not about removing rewards. It's about changing their ways. Instead of rewarding players for just showing up, the system asks them to engage with the complexities. Thinking, observing, choosing.
Whether this approach will be successful in the long term is still uncertain. Intelligent systems can be powerful, but they can also be demanding. They require balance, careful design, and players willing to fill half of the system. If pushed too far, complexity can alienate people just as easily as simplicity can alienate them.
But if it works, the result is different from the normal GameFi cycle.
Instead of hordes of players chasing easy prizes and leaving when they fade, you get a slower, more deliberate ecosystem. One where value is not just extracted, but shaped by the people inside it. One where the game doesn't just play - it evolves.And in that evolution the role of the player changes.
@Pixels
$PIXEL
#pixel
·
--
Bullish
Vedeți traducerea
The good side of Pixels' “Rebuilding the Economic Layer” approach. 1. Real Ownership Players get actual control over their assets, progress, items—everything. It is the biggest upgrade from the traditional game. 2. Player-Driven Economy Game dev doesn't—players themselves create demand–supply. In this, the economy grows organically. 3. Time = Value The time you give is not just “fun”—it creates long-term value (assets, skills, network). 4. Less Pay-to-Win Pressure If the system is right, skill + consistency is more important—not just the advantage of pouring money. 5. Sustainable Model Potential No short-term hype—there is an opportunity to build a long-term ecosystem, where the economy does not collapse easily even if a new player emerges. 6. Multiple Income Paths Farming, trading, crafting, social interaction—earn or grow in multiple ways. 7. Community-Centric Growth Players are not just users—part of the ecosystem. Their activity is game-Drives its value. @pixels $PIXEL #pixel
The good side of Pixels' “Rebuilding the Economic Layer” approach.

1. Real Ownership
Players get actual control over their assets, progress, items—everything. It is the biggest upgrade from the traditional game.
2. Player-Driven Economy
Game dev doesn't—players themselves create demand–supply. In this, the economy grows organically.
3. Time = Value
The time you give is not just “fun”—it creates long-term value (assets, skills, network).
4. Less Pay-to-Win Pressure
If the system is right, skill + consistency is more important—not just the advantage of pouring money.
5. Sustainable Model Potential
No short-term hype—there is an opportunity to build a long-term ecosystem, where the economy does not collapse easily even if a new player emerges.
6. Multiple Income Paths
Farming, trading, crafting, social interaction—earn or grow in multiple ways.
7. Community-Centric Growth
Players are not just users—part of the ecosystem. Their activity is game-Drives its value.
@Pixels
$PIXEL
#pixel
·
--
Vedeți traducerea
This Isn’t Just a Game — It’s Pixels, Pixels Will Change How You See Gaming1. “From Playing to Realizing” Understand while playing Pixels—it's not just fun, it teaches ownership, economy and decision-making. 2. “A Game That Teaches You Value” Here time, resource, effort—everything has a real value. You learn how even small actions create long-term impact. 3. “More Than Entertainment” Pixels isn't just time pass—it's an ecosystem where you can create, trade, grow. It is more like a virtual life simulation. 4. “Awareness of Digital Ownership” Many understand for the first time - "This asset is actually mine." It's an awakening moment, especially for Web3 newcomers. 5. “Freedom With Responsibility” Pixels give you freedom—but also responsibility. what will you doHow to grow — all your decision. @pixels $PIXEL {future}(PIXELUSDT) #pixel

This Isn’t Just a Game — It’s Pixels, Pixels Will Change How You See Gaming

1. “From Playing to Realizing”
Understand while playing Pixels—it's not just fun, it teaches ownership, economy and decision-making.
2. “A Game That Teaches You Value”
Here time, resource, effort—everything has a real value. You learn how even small actions create long-term impact.
3. “More Than Entertainment”
Pixels isn't just time pass—it's an ecosystem where you can create, trade, grow. It is more like a virtual life simulation.
4. “Awareness of Digital Ownership”
Many understand for the first time - "This asset is actually mine." It's an awakening moment, especially for Web3 newcomers.
5. “Freedom With Responsibility”
Pixels give you freedom—but also responsibility. what will you doHow to grow — all your decision.
@Pixels
$PIXEL
#pixel
·
--
Bullish
Vedeți traducerea
Not every Web3 game fails because of a bad idea — most fail because the incentives don’t last. I’ve been around this space long enough to see the pattern: hype launches, early excitement, তারপর endless grinding… chasing a token that may or may not hold value. At some point, it stops feeling like a game and starts feeling like a job. That’s where $PIXEL feels different. What stands out isn’t hype — it’s direction. The focus seems to be on building something sustainable, not just grabbing short-term attention. And yeah, that approach takes time. You don’t get instant fireworks. But what you do get is a stronger foundation. Because at the end of the day, a game only survives if people actually enjoy playing it — not just earning from it. If Web3 gaming is going to last, the model has to shift: 🎮 Fun first 📊 Economy second 🔄 Sustainability always Otherwise, it’s just another cycle waiting to repeat. @pixels $PIXEL #pixel
Not every Web3 game fails because of a bad idea — most fail because the incentives don’t last.

I’ve been around this space long enough to see the pattern: hype launches, early excitement, তারপর endless grinding… chasing a token that may or may not hold value. At some point, it stops feeling like a game and starts feeling like a job.

That’s where $PIXEL feels different.

What stands out isn’t hype — it’s direction. The focus seems to be on building something sustainable, not just grabbing short-term attention. And yeah, that approach takes time. You don’t get instant fireworks. But what you do get is a stronger foundation.

Because at the end of the day, a game only survives if people actually enjoy playing it — not just earning from it.

If Web3 gaming is going to last, the model has to shift:
🎮 Fun first
📊 Economy second
🔄 Sustainability always

Otherwise, it’s just another cycle waiting to repeat.

@Pixels
$PIXEL
#pixel
·
--
Articol
Vedeți traducerea
Pixels is not a “money game” anymore, it is an “economy-based game”How Pixels Work Now 1️⃣ Game + Economy = Going together Pixels is not just a game, it is a full economy system You play games (farming, quest, crafting) Earn resources Trade in the marketplace Then the value is generated 👉 Means: Gameplay = Production system 📌 Now focus: fun + economy balance (not just earning as before) 🪙 2️⃣ Dual Currency System (Most Important) Pixels now works with 2 main currencies: 🔹 Coins (off-chain) In-game money It takes farming, crafting, upgrading unlimited supply (inflation controlled by devs) CoinGecko 👉 Progress is made with it, but direct cash out cannot be done 🔹 PIXEL (on-chain) Real crypto token NFT mint, VIP, guild, premium features Captures marketplace value CoinMarketCap 👉 It is the real “value layer” ⚙️ 3️⃣ Core Loop (current system) Currently the flow at Pixels is: Play → farm / quest Earn → resources + coins Upgrade → better tools / land Access → more earning opportunities Earn PIXEL → via tasks / events 👉 Don't earn directly — first progress → then earning 🧠 4️⃣ Chapter 2 Update (Game-Changer 🚨) Pixels is now moving to the “Chapter 2” model: What has changed? ❌ old: earn token by grinding only ✅ new: smart economy + data-driven system New features: Tiered resources (not all resources are equal) Guild system (team play important) Better reward balancing Anti-inflation system 👉 goal: Not “everyone earn” → “smart players earn” BingX 🏗️ 5️⃣ NFT + Ownership System Now on Pixels: Land NFT 🏡 Pets NFT 🐶 Items ownership 👉 What you earn is real asset 📊 6️⃣ Biggest Shift Before: Play-to-Earn = earn & dump ❌ Now: Play-and-Own = engage & spend & earn ✅ 👉 Pixels now wants players like: Those who just won't sell Those who will invest in the game (time + token) ⚠️ Reality Check (honest part) Earning is not guaranteed Economy is demand-supply dependent too many farmers = price drop Smart strategy is needed 🔥 Final Simple Idea Pixels currently work like this:👉 Fun game → player activity → economy → token value. @pixels $PIXEL {future}(PIXELUSDT) #pixel

Pixels is not a “money game” anymore, it is an “economy-based game”

How Pixels Work Now
1️⃣ Game + Economy = Going together
Pixels is not just a game, it is a full economy system
You play games (farming, quest, crafting)
Earn resources
Trade in the marketplace
Then the value is generated
👉 Means:
Gameplay = Production system
📌 Now focus:
fun + economy balance (not just earning as before)
🪙 2️⃣ Dual Currency System (Most Important)
Pixels now works with 2 main currencies:
🔹 Coins (off-chain)
In-game money
It takes farming, crafting, upgrading
unlimited supply (inflation controlled by devs)
CoinGecko
👉 Progress is made with it, but direct cash out cannot be done
🔹 PIXEL (on-chain)
Real crypto token
NFT mint, VIP, guild, premium features
Captures marketplace value
CoinMarketCap
👉 It is the real “value layer”
⚙️ 3️⃣ Core Loop (current system)
Currently the flow at Pixels is:
Play → farm / quest
Earn → resources + coins
Upgrade → better tools / land
Access → more earning opportunities
Earn PIXEL → via tasks / events
👉 Don't earn directly — first progress → then earning
🧠 4️⃣ Chapter 2 Update (Game-Changer 🚨)
Pixels is now moving to the “Chapter 2” model:
What has changed?
❌ old: earn token by grinding only
✅ new: smart economy + data-driven system
New features:
Tiered resources (not all resources are equal)
Guild system (team play important)
Better reward balancing
Anti-inflation system
👉 goal:
Not “everyone earn” → “smart players earn”
BingX
🏗️ 5️⃣ NFT + Ownership System
Now on Pixels:
Land NFT 🏡
Pets NFT 🐶
Items ownership
👉 What you earn is real asset
📊 6️⃣ Biggest Shift
Before:
Play-to-Earn = earn & dump ❌
Now:
Play-and-Own = engage & spend & earn ✅
👉 Pixels now wants players like:
Those who just won't sell
Those who will invest in the game (time + token)
⚠️ Reality Check (honest part)
Earning is not guaranteed
Economy is demand-supply dependent
too many farmers = price drop
Smart strategy is needed
🔥 Final Simple Idea
Pixels currently work like this:👉 Fun game → player activity → economy → token value.
@Pixels
$PIXEL
#pixel
·
--
Bullish
$POWER Cumpără păstrează 3/4 săptămâni apoi fă mai mulți bani Minimum 20x–30x Profit carte. Țintă 2.5$–3$
$POWER Cumpără păstrează 3/4 săptămâni apoi fă mai mulți bani Minimum 20x–30x Profit carte. Țintă 2.5$–3$
·
--
Bullish
BMD RG
·
--
Bullish
$COAI long Armata BMD RG a mea 🌊🫂
{future}(COAIUSDT)
Intrare : preț de piață

Stop loss : 0.300$

Obiectiv : 0.3980$🔸0.4150$🔸0.4340$
·
--
Bearish
Vedeți traducerea
My friend $APR short 🫂🌊 {future}(APRUSDT) Entry : market price Stop loss : 0.350$ Target : 0.3150$🔸0.30$🔸0.2860$🔸0.27$ Long time holder : Target 0.15600৳
My friend $APR short 🫂🌊
Entry : market price

Stop loss : 0.350$

Target : 0.3150$🔸0.30$🔸0.2860$🔸0.27$

Long time holder : Target 0.15600৳
·
--
Bearish
$BR short Armata mea 🫂🌊 {future}(BRUSDT) 4h lumânare foarte puternică zonă de vânzare. Intrare : preț de piață stop Loss: 0.2250$ Obiectiv : 0.1750$🔸0.1600$🔸0.1520$🔸0.1460$
$BR short Armata mea 🫂🌊
4h lumânare foarte puternică zonă de vânzare.

Intrare : preț de piață

stop Loss: 0.2250$

Obiectiv : 0.1750$🔸0.1600$🔸0.1520$🔸0.1460$
·
--
Bearish
Vedeți traducerea
$IN Short My Friend 🌊🫂 {future}(INUSDT) 1h candle strong Selling zone🌊 Entry: market Price Stop loss : 0.1150$ Target : 0.09010$🔸0.0850$🔸0.0730$🔸0.0680$
$IN Short My Friend 🌊🫂
1h candle strong Selling zone🌊

Entry: market Price

Stop loss : 0.1150$

Target : 0.09010$🔸0.0850$🔸0.0730$🔸0.0680$
·
--
Bullish
Băieți $RAVE păstrați poziția lungă sau închideți, acest token nu este disponibil cu analiza graficului 😂 {future}(RAVEUSDT)
Băieți $RAVE păstrați poziția lungă sau închideți, acest token nu este disponibil cu analiza graficului 😂
Conectați-vă pentru a explora mai mult conținut
Alăturați-vă utilizatorilor globali de cripto pe Binance Square
⚡️ Obțineți informații recente și utile despre criptomonede.
💬 Alăturați-vă celei mai mari platforme de schimb cripto din lume.
👍 Descoperiți informații reale de la creatori verificați.
E-mail/Număr de telefon
Harta site-ului
Preferințe cookie
Termenii și condițiile platformei