Binance Square
freeman 1
5 Publicações

freeman 1

0 A seguir
0 Seguidores
3 Gostaram
Publicações
·
--
Ver tradução
Funny seeing #LAB dump. It felt inevitable. The funny part is almost nobody wins in these setups. Longs got rekt by the crash. Shorts got rekt by funding while waiting for the crash. That's the part many people miss. On platforms like Bitget, funding for shorting $LAB reportedly exceeded -1.2% every 4 hours, with some intervals hitting exchange caps around -2.0%. Think about that for a second. A trader holding a $10,000 short at a -2% funding rate would be paying roughly $200 every 4 hours, that's $1,200 per day, directly to long holders, regardless of whether price moved lower or stayed flat. So while everyone knew the move looked unsustainable, betting against it wasn't cheap. Longs were collecting the funding yield, but that "free money" came with its own risk. The yield attracted more capital, liquidity stayed locked in, and when momentum finally disappeared, many of those same longs got caught in the dump. We've seen this movie before with $RAVE. Shorts identified the obvious bubble but got farmed by funding fees and squeezes while waiting. Then the eventual collapse arrived and late longs got wiped out. In these pump & dump style markets, being right on direction isn't enough. You can be right and still lose. Timing, funding costs, liquidity, and risk management matter just as much as the thesis itself. $LAB is another reminder that: - Chasing the pump is dangerous. - Blindly shorting the pump is dangerous. - The market often punishes both sides before rewarding anyone. Longs got rekt by price. Shorts got rekt by funding. Few walked away with the profits.
Funny seeing #LAB dump.

It felt inevitable.

The funny part is almost nobody wins in these setups.

Longs got rekt by the crash.

Shorts got rekt by funding while waiting for the crash.

That's the part many people miss.

On platforms like Bitget, funding for shorting $LAB reportedly exceeded -1.2% every 4 hours, with some intervals hitting exchange caps around -2.0%.

Think about that for a second.

A trader holding a $10,000 short at a -2% funding rate would be paying roughly $200 every 4 hours, that's $1,200 per day, directly to long holders, regardless of whether price moved lower or stayed flat.

So while everyone knew the move looked unsustainable, betting against it wasn't cheap.

Longs were collecting the funding yield, but that "free money" came with its own risk. The yield attracted more capital, liquidity stayed locked in, and when momentum finally disappeared, many of those same longs got caught in the dump.

We've seen this movie before with $RAVE.

Shorts identified the obvious bubble but got farmed by funding fees and squeezes while waiting.

Then the eventual collapse arrived and late longs got wiped out.

In these pump & dump style markets, being right on direction isn't enough.

You can be right and still lose.

Timing, funding costs, liquidity, and risk management matter just as much as the thesis itself.

$LAB is another reminder that:

- Chasing the pump is dangerous.

- Blindly shorting the pump is dangerous.

- The market often punishes both sides before rewarding anyone.

Longs got rekt by price.

Shorts got rekt by funding.

Few walked away with the profits.
Ver tradução
Funny seeing $LAB dump. It felt inevitable. The funny part is almost nobody wins in these setups. Longs got rekt by the crash. Shorts got rekt by funding while waiting for the crash. That's the part many people miss. On platforms like Bitget, funding for shorting $LAB reportedly exceeded -1.2% every 4 hours, with some intervals hitting exchange caps around -2.0%. Think about that for a second. A trader holding a $10,000 short at a -2% funding rate would be paying roughly $200 every 4 hours, that's $1,200 per day, directly to long holders, regardless of whether price moved lower or stayed flat. So while everyone knew the move looked unsustainable, betting against it wasn't cheap. Longs were collecting the funding yield, but that "free money" came with its own risk. The yield attracted more capital, liquidity stayed locked in, and when momentum finally disappeared, many of those same longs got caught in the dump. We've seen this movie before with $RAVE. Shorts identified the obvious bubble but got farmed by funding fees and squeezes while waiting. Then the eventual collapse arrived and late longs got wiped out. In these pump & dump style markets, being right on direction isn't enough. You can be right and still lose. Timing, funding costs, liquidity, and risk management matter just as much as the thesis itself. $LAB is another reminder that: - Chasing the pump is dangerous. - Blindly shorting the pump is dangerous. - The market often punishes both sides before rewarding anyone. Longs got rekt by price. Shorts got rekt by funding. Few walked away with the profits.
Funny seeing $LAB dump.

It felt inevitable.

The funny part is almost nobody wins in these setups.

Longs got rekt by the crash.

Shorts got rekt by funding while waiting for the crash.

That's the part many people miss.

On platforms like Bitget, funding for shorting $LAB reportedly exceeded -1.2% every 4 hours, with some intervals hitting exchange caps around -2.0%.

Think about that for a second.

A trader holding a $10,000 short at a -2% funding rate would be paying roughly $200 every 4 hours, that's $1,200 per day, directly to long holders, regardless of whether price moved lower or stayed flat.

So while everyone knew the move looked unsustainable, betting against it wasn't cheap.

Longs were collecting the funding yield, but that "free money" came with its own risk. The yield attracted more capital, liquidity stayed locked in, and when momentum finally disappeared, many of those same longs got caught in the dump.

We've seen this movie before with $RAVE.

Shorts identified the obvious bubble but got farmed by funding fees and squeezes while waiting.

Then the eventual collapse arrived and late longs got wiped out.

In these pump & dump style markets, being right on direction isn't enough.

You can be right and still lose.

Timing, funding costs, liquidity, and risk management matter just as much as the thesis itself.

$LAB is another reminder that:

- Chasing the pump is dangerous.

- Blindly shorting the pump is dangerous.

- The market often punishes both sides before rewarding anyone.

Longs got rekt by price.

Shorts got rekt by funding.

Few walked away with the profits.
$B2 despencou de $0.725 para $0.50 (-31% intraday em relação ao pico de hoje) Foi bombado para $0.73 ontem, e depois rejeitado violentamente para $0.50 hoje Razões para a queda 1. Distribuição nas Exchanges - Nos últimos 7 dias: Entrada líquida de +$204k nas exchanges, os holders estavam se posicionando para vender - Isso preparou a pressão de venda que acionou a queda de hoje 2. Vendas pesadas da Wintermute ✅ Lado Positivo Alguém está acumulando na baixa Acabei de garantir algumas moedas. Meta 0.65 - 0.7
$B2 despencou de $0.725 para $0.50 (-31% intraday em relação ao pico de hoje)

Foi bombado para $0.73 ontem, e depois rejeitado violentamente para $0.50 hoje

Razões para a queda

1. Distribuição nas Exchanges
- Nos últimos 7 dias: Entrada líquida de +$204k nas exchanges, os holders estavam se posicionando para vender
- Isso preparou a pressão de venda que acionou a queda de hoje

2. Vendas pesadas da Wintermute

✅ Lado Positivo
Alguém está acumulando na baixa

Acabei de garantir algumas moedas.
Meta 0.65 - 0.7
Este ano não tem sido tão bom, pra ser honesto. Sinto falta de 2025. Nesta época do ano passado, já tínhamos garantido Magic Newton Nillion $PLUME Succinct Cadera $HOME $LINEA Union Turtles Initia Loud Eclipse (ASC) Mammoth (mintei 2 e vendi por $1.500 cada) Binance Alpha: $NXPC (Vendi por $750) ...e muitos outros que nem consigo lembrar. E mesmo assim, o pessoal gritava "airdrop tá morto" naquela época 💀 O que vão dizer sobre 2026?
Este ano não tem sido tão bom, pra ser honesto. Sinto falta de 2025.

Nesta época do ano passado, já tínhamos garantido

Magic Newton
Nillion
$PLUME
Succinct
Cadera
$HOME
$LINEA
Union
Turtles
Initia
Loud

Eclipse (ASC)
Mammoth (mintei 2 e vendi por $1.500 cada)

Binance Alpha: $NXPC (Vendi por $750)
...e muitos outros que nem consigo lembrar.

E mesmo assim, o pessoal gritava "airdrop tá morto" naquela época 💀 O que vão dizer sobre 2026?
Este ano não tem sido tão bom, pra ser sincero. Sinto falta de 2025. Nesta época do ano passado, já tínhamos garantido Magic Newton Nillion Plume Succinct Cadera HOME Linea Union Turtles Initia Loud Eclipse (ASC) Mammoth (mintamos 2 e vendemos por $1.500 cada) Binance Alpha: $NXPC (Vendemos por $750) ...e muitos mais que nem consigo lembrar. E as pessoas gritavam "airdrop está morto" naquela época 💀 O que vão dizer sobre 2026?
Este ano não tem sido tão bom, pra ser sincero. Sinto falta de 2025.

Nesta época do ano passado, já tínhamos garantido

Magic Newton
Nillion
Plume
Succinct
Cadera
HOME
Linea
Union
Turtles
Initia
Loud

Eclipse (ASC)
Mammoth (mintamos 2 e vendemos por $1.500 cada)

Binance Alpha: $NXPC (Vendemos por $750)
...e muitos mais que nem consigo lembrar.

E as pessoas gritavam "airdrop está morto" naquela época 💀 O que vão dizer sobre 2026?
Inicia sessão para explorar mais conteúdos
Junta-te a utilizadores de criptomoedas de todo o mundo na Binance Square
⚡️ Obtém informações úteis e recentes sobre criptomoedas.
💬 Com a confiança da maior exchange de criptomoedas do mundo.
👍 Descobre perspetivas reais de criadores verificados.
E-mail/Número de telefone
Mapa do sítio
Preferências de cookies
Termos e Condições da Plataforma