Exploring the crypto world with smart trading, learning,and growing. Focused on building a diversified portfolio.Join me on this exciting digital asset journey!
Silver’s incredible rally this year has pushed its total market capitalization to approximately $4.04–$4.49 trillion, placing it as the third-largest asset in the world, behind only gold and NVIDIA. This means silver now ranks above major global companies like Apple, Google (Alphabet), Microsoft and others in terms of total value.
Key Highlights: According to 8Marketcap data, silver’s total market cap is around $4.485 trillion, ranking it #3 globally behind gold ($4.64 trillion). Silver’s market cap now surpasses those of Apple, Alphabet (Google) and Microsoft, showcasing its extraordinary performance as both a precious metal and investment asset. By comparison, Bitcoin’s market cap sits near ~$1.75 trillion (ranking around 8th), and Ethereum’s around ~$355 billion (43rd), highlighting the unique strength of silver in the broader asset landscape.
Why This Matters: Silver’s ascent reflects a massive rally in 2025, driven by strong industrial demand (electronics, solar, EVs), heightened safe-haven buying, expectations of monetary easing, and a weakening U.S. dollar. Precious metals have drawn investor attention amid macro uncertainty, while other asset classes have seen more mixed performance.
In short: Silver’s rise to become the third-largest asset globally underscores how dramatic the metal’s gains have been this year — and how traditional commodities can still rival top tech giants and financial assets in total market value.
Note: This ranking is based on market cap estimates, which fluctuate with prices and supply.
How Expanding Real-World Asset Collateral Could Shape the Long-Term Value of FF
One of the most important shifts happening inside Falcon Finance isn’t loud or speculative — it’s structural. The protocol’s gradual expansion into real-world asset (RWA) collateral has deeper implications than most people realize, especially for the long-term role and value of the FF token.
At a surface level, adding RWAs like tokenized gold or sovereign bonds looks like a diversification move. In reality, it changes who the protocol is built for and how capital flows through the system.
RWAs bring a different kind of user.
Unlike purely crypto-native collateral, RWAs attract institutions, funds, and conservative capital that prioritize stability, yield predictability, and risk controls. When this type of capital enters Falcon Finance, it increases demand for USDf in a more durable way. These users are not chasing short-term leverage — they are looking for structured exposure and reliable liquidity.
As USDf adoption grows through RWA-backed minting, governance becomes more valuable.
This is where FF quietly gains importance. Expanding collateral types means more decisions around onboarding standards, risk thresholds, liquidation rules, and geographic exposure. These are not cosmetic choices. They directly affect protocol safety. As complexity rises, governance power becomes more meaningful, and $FF sits at the center of that decision-making layer.
RWA expansion also raises the stakes of long-term alignment.
When real-world assets are involved, sudden governance shifts or short-term voting behavior can have serious consequences. Falcon’s design increasingly favors long-term FF participants, ensuring that those influencing the protocol are aligned with system health, not short-lived incentives. As institutional capital grows, this alignment becomes a core value proposition — not just an internal design choice.
There’s also a subtle supply-demand effect at play.
More RWAs mean higher-quality collateral, which supports larger and more stable USDf issuance. As the protocol scales, demand for participation — staking, governance influence, ecosystem access — naturally increases. $FF is not used to “fuel” speculation; it’s used to coordinate growth. That makes its relevance scale with the protocol, not market cycles.
What’s important is what Falcon is avoiding.
There’s no narrative of RWAs magically pumping token price. Instead, Falcon is building infrastructure first. The value of FF emerges indirectly, through responsibility, governance relevance, and access to a growing financial system that bridges on-chain and off-chain assets.
In the long run, this is how durable token value is created.
As Falcon Finance continues expanding its RWA footprint, $FF evolves from a governance token into a stake in a regulated-aware, capital-efficient liquidity network. Not flashy — but foundational. And in finance, foundations tend to matter more than noise.
From Price Feeds to Intelligence Feeds: How APRO Is Redefining What an Oracle Can Be
For years, the word oracle in crypto meant just one thing: price feeds. Tokens, pairs, numbers — updated every few seconds so DeFi could function.
That model worked for DeFi 1.0. But the industry has moved on. Today, Web3 isn’t just about swaps and lending. It’s about AI agents, real-world assets, enterprise workflows, and autonomous decision-making.
And that’s exactly where APRO is evolving the oracle narrative.
The Limitation of Traditional Oracles
Traditional oracles answer simple questions: What is the price of ETH? What is the exchange rate? Did a transaction occur?
But modern applications ask much harder questions: Is this document authentic? Did this real-world event actually happen? Is this AI-generated output trustworthy? Does this contract meet compliance conditions?
APRO moves beyond raw data delivery into intelligence feeds.
Instead of just pushing values on-chain, APRO: Interprets unstructured data (text, images, reports) Uses AI to extract meaning and context Verifies outputs through decentralized validation Allows disputes and arbitration when interpretation matters
In simple words, APRO doesn’t just say what the data is — it helps determine what the data means.
That’s a massive shift.
Why Intelligence Feeds Matter for the Next Web3 Phase
AI agents are already being designed to: Execute trades Manage portfolios Approve payments Trigger smart contracts automatically
But AI without verified intelligence is dangerous. Hallucinated data, fake sources, or incorrect assumptions can lead to real financial losses.
APRO solves this by acting as a trust layer between AI and reality.
AI agents don’t blindly act — they act based on verified intelligence feeds.
Real-World Impact Beyond DeFi
This evolution unlocks entirely new use cases: RWA verification: checking documents, ownership, and valuation logic Enterprise automation: compliance checks before execution Prediction markets: resolving complex, non-binary outcomes AI governance: validating AI decisions with transparent logic
These are problems price feeds were never built to solve.
Why This Evolution Is Important
APRO isn’t replacing traditional oracles — it’s expanding what an oracle can be.
From: > “Here’s the price.”
To: > “Here’s the verified truth behind the data.”
That distinction will define the next generation of Web3 infrastructure.
As AI, RWAs, and autonomous systems grow, intelligence feeds will matter more than price feeds ever did.
And APRO is positioning itself right at the center of that shift.
Why KITE Is Built to Scale Across Ecosystems, Not Stay Isolated
One common mistake many blockchain projects make is building in isolation. They create strong internal systems but forget that real adoption happens when technology connects easily with the outside world. Kite takes a more practical approach—and this is where KITE’s long-term relevance becomes clear.
Instead of locking itself into a closed ecosystem, Kite is designed to work alongside existing blockchains, tools, and services.
AI Doesn’t Live on a Single Chain
AI agents are not loyal to one network. They pull data from multiple sources, interact with different protocols, and execute tasks wherever it makes the most sense.
If an AI system is forced to operate inside a single blockchain environment, it becomes limited very quickly.
Kite acknowledges this reality.
By designing its infrastructure to be interoperable, Kite allows agents using KITE to: Interact across chains Access diverse liquidity sources Connect with existing Web3 services
This flexibility is critical for real-world deployment.
Interoperability as a Growth Multiplier
When systems connect easily, adoption accelerates.
Developers don’t need to rebuild logic for every environment. They can integrate Kite’s agent payment and identity layer into existing workflows, expanding use cases without friction.
For KITE, this means: Broader utility beyond a single platform Increased transaction pathways More consistent demand driven by real usage
Interoperability turns $KITE from a niche token into a functional bridge between systems.
Why This Matters for Developers and Enterprises
Enterprises rarely commit to isolated infrastructure. They prefer solutions that integrate with what they already use.
Kite’s cross-ecosystem mindset makes it easier for: Businesses to experiment with AI agents Developers to launch faster Institutions to test automation without full migration
This lowers adoption risk significantly.
Avoiding the “Walled Garden” Trap
Many promising technologies fail because they try to own everything.
Kite doesn’t.
It positions itself as a utility layer, not a destination. That makes it easier to adopt, harder to replace, and more resilient as the ecosystem evolves.
Final Thought
The future of AI-driven economies won’t belong to isolated systems. It will belong to platforms that connect seamlessly across environments.
By designing $KITE for interoperability from the start, Kite isn’t just building technology—it’s building relevance that can scale with the entire Web3 and AI landscape.
The Road Ahead for FF: How Falcon Finance Is Expanding Token Utility Beyond Governance
Most governance tokens reach a ceiling quickly. They launch with big promises, get used for voting a few times, and slowly fade into passive assets. @Falcon Finance appears determined not to let FF follow that path. Instead, the protocol is positioning the token as an active layer within its broader financial system — and the next phase of FF development makes that clear.
Looking ahead, Falcon’s roadmap focuses on deepening utility, not inflating hype.
The first major shift is how $FF interacts with capital efficiency. Rather than existing separately from USDf, $FF is increasingly tied to how users access liquidity. Long-term stakers are expected to receive preferential treatment across the ecosystem — from improved minting conditions to yield multipliers inside advanced vaults. This creates a practical reason to hold and stake FF, not just vote with it.
Another important direction is risk-aligned participation.
As Falcon expands into more complex collateral — including real-world assets and multi-chain deployments — governance decisions become higher stakes. The protocol’s future plans suggest that FF holders who demonstrate long-term alignment may gain influence over risk parameters, vault onboarding, and collateral thresholds. This moves FF away from symbolic governance and toward responsibility-driven control.
There is also a growing emphasis on ecosystem access.
Upcoming structured products, agentic vaults, and specialized yield strategies are expected to offer tiered access based on $FF participation. In simple terms, the deeper your commitment to the ecosystem, the more opportunities you unlock. This mirrors how traditional finance rewards long-term stakeholders — but executed on-chain with transparency.
What’s notable is what Falcon is not promising.
There’s no aggressive token burn narrative or artificial scarcity campaigns. Instead, the value of FF is designed to emerge naturally as the protocol grows. More users minting USDf, more assets flowing into vaults, and more real-world integration all increase the relevance of governance and coordination — which is exactly where FF sits.
From a market perspective, this approach is slower, but stronger. Tokens built purely on speculation tend to peak early. Tokens tied to system usage mature alongside the product. Falcon seems firmly in the second camp.
For long-term participants, this matters. FF is not being framed as a quick upside asset, but as a stake in an evolving financial infrastructure. As Falcon Finance scales across chains, assets, and user segments, the token’s role expands with it.
In a sector crowded with short-lived token narratives, Falcon’s approach to FF feels deliberate and grounded. The roadmap doesn’t promise instant rewards — it promises relevance. And in the long run, relevance is what sustains value.
APRO’s Validator Arbitration System: Why Trust in Oracles Can’t Be Optional
In Web3, we talk a lot about “trustless” systems. But when it comes to oracles, complete trustlessness is a myth. Any system that connects blockchains to real-world data has to answer one uncomfortable question:
What happens when data is wrong, disputed, or manipulated?
Most oracle networks quietly avoid this topic. APRO doesn’t. Instead, it builds trust directly into the system through a structured validator arbitration model.
The Core Problem: Oracles Are Not Always Black and White
Price feeds are simple. Either the number is correct or it’s not.
But APRO goes far beyond prices. It works with: Documents and contracts AI-generated interpretations Real-world events Unstructured data like images, reports, and logs
In these cases, disputes are inevitable. Two data sources can disagree. AI can interpret context differently. Someone can challenge the outcome.
Without arbitration, the entire system breaks.
How APRO’s Arbitration Model Works
APRO introduces validators not just as passive data relayers, but as active truth adjudicators.
Here’s the simplified flow:
1. Data is processed and interpreted using AI 2. Results are submitted on-chain 3. If no dispute arises, execution continues 4. If challenged, validators step in to arbitrate 5. Validators review evidence, context, and sources 6. A final decision is made through decentralized consensus
This isn’t a court system. It’s a protocol-level resolution mechanism.
Why Validators Matter More Than Ever
In APRO, validators are economically incentivized to be honest: Incorrect rulings are penalized Malicious behavior costs real value Honest arbitration earns rewards
This creates a system where trust doesn’t rely on reputation or authority, but on aligned incentives.
Unlike centralized moderation, no single party controls outcomes.
Arbitration Is What Makes Enterprises Care
Institutions don’t just ask, “Does this work?” They ask, “What happens when something goes wrong?”
APRO has an answer.
With arbitration: Enterprises can challenge incorrect data AI decisions become explainable Auditors can review past disputes Legal and compliance teams get clarity
This is a massive step toward making oracles enterprise-ready.
Why This Separates APRO From Traditional Oracles
Most oracle networks assume data is final once published. APRO assumes data can be questioned.
That single design choice changes everything: Trust becomes measurable Errors become manageable AI outputs become accountable
In a future where AI agents make decisions worth millions, that accountability isn’t optional.
The Bigger Picture
Trust in Web3 won’t come from slogans. It will come from systems that expect failure and handle it transparently.
APRO’s validator arbitration system doesn’t promise perfection. It promises fair resolution when perfection fails.
Entry: 0.0260 – 0.0263 (On rejection from this resistance zone) Target 1:0.0252 Target 2:0.0248 Stop Loss:0.0266 (Above the recent high)
My View: DAM has experienced a sharp rejection from the 24h high(0.02778) and is currently in a downtrend within the day's session. The price is retracing into a defined supply area, which aligns with the level where the recent decline accelerated. The order book shows a dominant Ask volume (68.76%), indicating significant selling pressure is stacked above the current price. Price action shows a clear breakdown and a series of lower highs, with the current bounce appearing weak and corrective. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, anticipating a continuation of the day's downtrend towards the 24h low and potentially a breakdown to new lows.
Bias: Bearish below 0.0263. A break and hold above 0.0266 would suggest a stronger corrective bounce is underway.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Did the Fed Inject $17 Billion Into the Market? Here’s the Real Story
What’s Happening: On December 26, 2025, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s overnight repo operations reported about $17.25 billion in emergency liquidity accessed by banks, which many traders are interpreting as a stealth liquidity injection.
Important Clarification: This $17 billion figure comes from banks tapping the Fed’s repo facility — a mechanism where banks borrow cash overnight in exchange for collateral like Treasury securities. It’s not a direct “money printing” or QE-style stimulus package, but extra liquidity provided to ease short-term funding pressures. Usage of these facilities spikes when banks need cash to meet funding demands, particularly in tight credit conditions or at quarter-end settlement dates.
How It Works: The Fed’s repo market operations are routine tools to manage liquidity in the banking system. When banks borrow through the repo/Standing Repo Facility (SRF), the Fed temporarily adds cash into the system — helping short-term funding markets function smoothly.
Why It Matters: Liquidity operations like this can relieve stress in the short-term funding markets and prevent spikes in interest rates for overnight cash borrowing. Traders sometimes view large repo usage as a signal of underlying market strain or tightening liquidity conditions, not necessarily a broad monetary expansion. This does not mean the Fed has launched a new quantitative easing (QE) program or printed fresh money in the classic sense — instead, it’s a temporary support mechanism for banks.
In short: Yes — approximately $17 billion was accessed by banks via the Fed’s repo operations, but this is a short-term liquidity tool designed to stabilize short-term funding markets, not a direct “money printing” event or large-scale market stimulus. It reflects stress or demand for cash in the banking system, not a decisive new monetary easing policy.
Altcoin Season Incoming — Here’s What Could Spark the Next Rally
As the crypto market prepares for a potential 2026 bull cycle, investors and analysts are shifting focus from a broad market rally to targeted altcoin opportunities that could outperform major assets. This change in focus reflects both renewed narratives and evolving market dynamics.
Selective Strength Over Broad Rally Many analysts believe the crypto bear phase of 2025 may give way to a more structured recovery in 2026. While a broad altcoin bull market isn’t guaranteed, certain projects with strong fundamentals, institutional backing, or real-world use cases are catching serious attention among traders.
Top Altcoin Themes for 2026 Ethereum (ETH) — Continues to be a core hub for DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 applications. Institutional demand and ETF inflows are seen as key drivers for renewed upside.
XRP — DeepSeek AI forecasts a bullish scenario approaching $4.50-$6 if regulatory clarity and institutional interest grow — though downside risk remains significant.
Solana (SOL) — Despite lagging price performance in 2025, SOL’s high throughput and ecosystem growth could fuel a rebound if adoption expands.
Emerging Picks & Speculative Names — Smaller altcoins like Pippin, Merlin Chain, and DeepSnitch AI are highlighted for potentially higher ROI if their ecosystems scale with 2026 liquidity trends.
Why This Matters Institutional flows & ETFs: Predictions of increased altcoin ETF listings and rising capital inflows could tilt market sentiment in favor of diversified altcoins. Rotation from BTC to alts: As Bitcoin dominance stabilizes, traders may rotate into high-growth alt sectors, especially with utility-oriented projects. Volatility & risk: Strong targets come with higher risk and greater price swing potential — meaning careful positioning and risk management are crucial.
In short: While Bitcoin and Ethereum remain backbone assets, altcoins with robust networks, institutional appeal, and real-world utility are gaining serious attention for potential upside in 2026.
Entry: 0.4060 – 0.4090 (On rejection from this supply zone) Target 1:0.3950 Target 2:0.3880 Stop Loss:0.4120 (Above the recent high)
My View: AVNT has experienced a sharp rejection from the 24h high(0.4209) after a significant pump over the past week (+54.93%). The price is now showing signs of distribution and is currently in a weak retracement, approaching a defined resistance area. This zone aligns with the recent breakdown level and the 24h open acting as resistance. The order book shows a dominant Ask volume (51.82%), indicating selling pressure is stacked just above the current price. Price action shows a clear lower high structure forming, and the bounce lacks sustainability, characteristic of a profit-taking move within a larger bear trend. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, anticipating a retracement of recent gains towards more established support levels.
Bias: Bearish below 0.4090. A break and hold above 0.4120 would suggest the bullish momentum may extend further.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Entry: 0.7200 – 0.7230 (On rejection from this resistance zone) Target 1:0.7100 Target 2:0.7050 Stop Loss:0.7250 (Above the 24h high)
My View: CYBER is entrenched in a severe and persistent downtrend across all major timeframes,with catastrophic losses over the past year (-76.99%) and 90 days (-58.27%). The price is currently in a weak retracement, approaching a defined supply area. This zone is capped by the 24h high (0.7309) and aligns with a prior breakdown level. The order book shows a dominant Ask volume (57.31%), indicating significant selling pressure is stacked just above the current price. Price action shows a clear breakdown structure, and the current bounce lacks the momentum to challenge the established bear trend, appearing corrective. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, anticipating a continuation of the primary downtrend towards the 24h low and potentially lower support levels.
Bias: Bearish below 0.7230. A break and hold above 0.7250 would indicate a stronger corrective bounce is in play.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Entry: 518.00 – 522.00 (On rejection from this resistance zone) Target 1:505.00 Target 2:495.00 Stop Loss:525.00 (Above the recent high)
My View: ZEC has experienced a significant pump but is now showing signs of rejection and distribution near the top of its range.The price is approaching a critical resistance area defined by the 24h high (528.86). The order book shows a dominant Ask volume (74.91%), indicating overwhelming selling pressure is stacked just above the current price. Price action shows a clear struggle to sustain momentum at these elevated levels, suggesting the bounce is corrective and profit-taking is likely. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, targeting a retracement towards the middle of the day's range and the 24h low.
Bias: Bearish for a pullback below 522.00. A break and hold above 525.00 would signal a resumption of the bullish momentum.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Entry: 1.850 – 1.855 (On rejection from this resistance zone) Target 1:1.830 Target 2:1.815 Stop Loss:1.860 (Above the 24h high)
My View: DOT is entrenched in a severe and persistent downtrend across all major timeframes,with catastrophic losses over the past year (-78.78%) and 90 days (-52.48%). The price is currently in a weak retracement, approaching a defined supply area. This zone is capped by the 24h high (1.848) and aligns with a prior breakdown level. The order book shows a near-balanced volume but with immediate Ask liquidity present, indicating selling pressure is ready to engage. Price action shows a clear breakdown structure, and the current bounce lacks conviction, characteristic of a corrective move within a larger bear trend. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, anticipating a continuation of the primary downtrend towards the 24h low and potentially lower support levels.
Bias: Bearish below 1.855. A break and hold above 1.860 would indicate a stronger corrective bounce is in play.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Entry: 0.0690 – 0.0700 (On rejection from this resistance zone) Target 1:0.0660 Target 2:0.0640 Stop Loss:0.0710 (Above the recent high)
My View: ONT has experienced a sharp rejection from the 24h high(0.0717) and is currently in a strong downtrend within the day's session. The price is retracing into a defined supply area, which aligns with the level where the recent decline accelerated. The order book shows a dominant Ask volume (58.98%), indicating significant selling pressure is stacked above the current price. Price action shows a clear breakdown and a series of lower highs, with the current bounce appearing weak and corrective. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, anticipating a continuation of the day's downtrend towards the 24h low and potentially a breakdown to new lows.
Bias: Bearish below 0.0700. A break and hold above 0.0710 would suggest a stronger corrective bounce is underway.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Entry: 0.120 – 0.125 (On rejection from this resistance zone) Target 1:0.108 Target 2:0.102 Stop Loss:0.128 (Above the recent high)
My View: FLOW has experienced a catastrophic collapse over the past week(-68.76%) following a major protocol security incident. The price is currently in an extremely weak and volatile consolidation after the crash, attempting a shallow retracement. It is approaching a defined resistance area, which is now a former support level that failed. The order book data is limited, but the overwhelming bearish sentiment and severe breakdown suggest any bounce is a dead cat bounce within a continued collapse. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, anticipating a continuation of the collapse towards the 24h low and potentially new lows.
Bias: Bearish below 0.125. A break and hold above 0.128 would suggest a stronger relief rally is unfolding.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Entry: 0.7140 – 0.7170 (On rejection from this resistance zone) Target 1:0.7060 Target 2:0.7020 Stop Loss:0.7190 (Above the recent high)
My View: ASTER is trading within a bearish structure,having been rejected from higher levels and now consolidating near the top of its recent range. The price is approaching a defined resistance area capped by the 24h high (0.7235). The order book shows a dominant Ask volume (51.84%), indicating significant selling pressure is stacked just above the current price. Price action shows a clear struggle to sustain momentum above the 0.7120 level, and the current bounce appears corrective within the larger downtrend. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined supply zone, anticipating a move back down to test the recent swing low and potentially the 24h low.
Bias: Bearish below 0.7170. A break and hold above 0.7190 would challenge the immediate bearish outlook.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Entry: 0.0116 – 0.0118 (On rejection from this supply zone) Target 1:0.0113 Target 2:0.0111 Stop Loss:0.0120 (Above the recent high)
My View: TRU is in a severe and persistent downtrend across all major timeframes.The price experienced a sharp pump but has been strongly rejected and is now resuming its downtrend. It is retracing into a defined resistance area, which aligns with the recent breakdown level. The order book shows a dominant Ask volume (50.39%), indicating selling pressure is stacked just above the current price. Price action shows a clear lower high structure forming, and the bounce lacks sustainability, characteristic of a dead cat bounce within a larger bear trend. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, anticipating a continuation of the primary downtrend towards the 24h low and potentially new yearly lows.
Bias: Bearish below 0.0118. A break and hold above 0.0120 would suggest a stronger corrective bounce is underway.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Entry: 0.00462 – 0.00470 (On rejection from this resistance zone) Target 1:0.00445 Target 2:0.00435 Stop Loss:0.00475 (Above the recent high)
My View: RVV has experienced a significant pump today but is now showing signs of rejection and distribution near the top of its range.The price is approaching a critical resistance area defined by the 24h high (0.004880). The order book shows significant Ask liquidity stacked just above the current price, indicating heavy selling pressure is present as early buyers take profits. Such strong single-day rallies are typically followed by pullbacks as momentum fades and profit-taking occurs. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, targeting a retracement of today's gains towards the middle of the day's range and the 24h low.
Bias: Bearish for a pullback below 0.00470. A break and hold above 0.00475 would signal a resumption of the bullish momentum.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.
Entry: 0.0330 – 0.0335 (On rejection from this supply zone) Target 1:0.0310 Target 2:0.0300 Stop Loss:0.0340 (Above the 24h high)
My View: NTRN has experienced a massive,volatile pump today (+21.23%) but remains entrenched in a severe and persistent downtrend across all major timeframes, with catastrophic losses over the past year (-91.36%) and 90 days (-59.50%). The price is now showing signs of exhaustion and distribution near the top of its range, approaching the 24h high (0.03318). The order book shows a dominant Ask volume (88.46%), indicating overwhelming selling pressure is stacked just above the current price as early buyers take profits. Such explosive single-day rallies within a relentless downtrend are typically corrective and prone to sharp reversals. The plan is to enter a short position on a confirmed rejection from the defined resistance area, anticipating a retracement of today's gains and a continuation of the primary downtrend towards the recent low.
Bias: Bearish below 0.0335. A break and hold above 0.0340 would suggest the bullish momentum may extend further.
Disclaimer:My plan. Not advice. Trade your own risk.