initial takeaway from today's acd call: the 2 frontrunners for glamsterdam are EIP 7732, enshrined proposer builder separation (ePBS) and EIP 7782, shortening slot times, client devs weigh more in favor of the former while researchers the latter
can't make it to today's all core developers testing call ? not to fret , i'll have a summary on acdt #41 out tnght on the main updates from the call :) 🙌
with the inclusion of eip 7939, there are now a total of 12 eips being shipped in the fusaka upgrade, making it officially the largest ethereum upgrade after pectra by # of eips, no such thing as a small fork folks ^^
cool data visualization by @seouldatalabs on @Dune showing the breakdown of eth validators by staked balance, ~25% of validators are validators with 1000+ consolidated EB 👀
i want to promote my content but im just too busy writing content so fyi, summary + insights on today's acdt(esting) call coming out tnght at 8pm (et), also i wrote a post on friday addressing the obvious concerns about the new @ethereumfndn no one seems to be talking about
IFYKYK, there's no *one* way to make changes to Ethereum, and whoever says there is doesn't get how Ethereum works https://christinedkim.substack.com/p/ethereum-governance-101
PSA: if you are a data provider with a dashboard on eth supply, please check your methodology. since pectra, the way you calculate staking rewards should be based on validator EBs, *not* active validator numbers.
so @ralexstokes @barnabemonnot and @TimBeiko lead all of the ef's r&d teams while also leading their own teams and being responsible for scaling l1, l2, and improving ux in the next 12 months?
ICYMI, there's a new section in my ACD call summaries now called "Coming up," and it gives you an overview of all the Ethereum protocol calls and meetings scheduled for the next week.
Here's what's on the calendar for this week: https://christinedkim.substack.com/p/acde-213-minutes