Binance Square
CHAINLINK RWA
81 Publications

CHAINLINK RWA

#COIN 💍 | #RWA 🌐 | #AI 📊 | Market Analysis 🚀 | Alpha Seeker & Airdrop Hunter 🔍 | Provice services: Play-2-Earn, METAVERSE, NFT, RWA, Depin
780 Suivis
179 Abonnés
127 J’aime
Publications
PINNED
·
--
Calling @Chainlink "an oracle" is becoming increasingly incomplete. Imagine an asset manager wants to bring a fund onchain. Minting the token might be the easiest part, but the asset still needs: 1. Data: NAV, pricing, reserves and other information have to move between existing systems and blockchains. 2. Interoperability: The fund shouldn't become trapped on whichever blockchain it was originally issued on. 3. Operations: Investors still need to subscribe and redeem. Existing systems still need to communicate with the token. 4. Compliance: The asset needs rules around who can hold it, where it can move and under what conditions. 5. Financing: Once the asset exists, institutions need to actually put it to work as collateral. This is where the Chainlink stack starts making more sense as a whole. > Data Feeds / Data Streams → data > CCIP → interoperability > CRE → orchestration > ACE → compliance > DTA → fund operations > Fulcrum → financing/collateral mobility The institutional Chainlink thesis isn't that every financial institution needs an oracle, it's that tokenized assets still need almost all of the infrastructure and workflows that make financial assets useful today. Chainlink is increasingly building the layer connecting all of it. The orchestration layer. $LINK
Calling @Chainlink "an oracle" is becoming increasingly incomplete.

Imagine an asset manager wants to bring a fund onchain.

Minting the token might be the easiest part, but the asset still needs:

1. Data: NAV, pricing, reserves and other information have to move between existing systems and blockchains.

2. Interoperability: The fund shouldn't become trapped on whichever blockchain it was originally issued on.

3. Operations: Investors still need to subscribe and redeem. Existing systems still need to communicate with the token.

4. Compliance: The asset needs rules around who can hold it, where it can move and under what conditions.

5. Financing: Once the asset exists, institutions need to actually put it to work as collateral.

This is where the Chainlink stack starts making more sense as a whole.

> Data Feeds / Data Streams → data
> CCIP → interoperability
> CRE → orchestration
> ACE → compliance
> DTA → fund operations
> Fulcrum → financing/collateral mobility

The institutional Chainlink thesis isn't that every financial institution needs an oracle, it's that tokenized assets still need almost all of the infrastructure and workflows that make financial assets useful today.

Chainlink is increasingly building the layer connecting all of it.

The orchestration layer. $LINK
🚨 Chainlink Volatility Sends Whale Activity Through The Roof 🐋 Chainlink whale activity just exploded to a 2026 high. $LINK recorded 681 transactions worth $100K or more in one day, the most since November 19th, 2025. Big holders are moving at a pace we have not seen all year. 🌊 Price volatility is likely a major catalyst. LINK rallied from around $8 in August to above $15 before sharply retreating over the past 10 days. This creates opportunities for whales to buy weakness as retail sells off. 🏦 Institutional developments are adding fuel too. Late September brought CCIP 2.0 and new work connecting financial institutions with Swift’s blockchain ledger Chainlink, alongside Chainlink’s new Fulcrum financing infrastructure. Whale transactions do not reveal whether buyers or sellers dominate, but year-high whale movement shows that major capital is paying very close attention to $LINK
🚨 Chainlink Volatility Sends Whale Activity Through The Roof

🐋 Chainlink whale activity just exploded to a 2026 high. $LINK recorded 681 transactions worth $100K or more in one day, the most since November 19th, 2025. Big holders are moving at a pace we have not seen all year.

🌊 Price volatility is likely a major catalyst. LINK rallied from around $8 in August to above $15 before sharply retreating over the past 10 days. This creates opportunities for whales to buy weakness as retail sells off.

🏦 Institutional developments are adding fuel too. Late September brought CCIP 2.0 and new work connecting financial institutions with Swift’s blockchain ledger Chainlink, alongside Chainlink’s new Fulcrum financing infrastructure. Whale transactions do not reveal whether buyers or sellers dominate, but year-high whale movement shows that major capital is paying very close attention to $LINK
BREAKING: Securitize launches Securitize Stocks on Solana. U.S. equities backed 1:1 by real shares on @Securitize's registered broker dealer platform, with applicable voting rights and dividends for eligible investors in the U.S., E.U. and other permitted jurisdictions. $SOL {spot}(SOLUSDT)
BREAKING: Securitize launches Securitize Stocks on Solana.

U.S. equities backed 1:1 by real shares on @Securitize's registered broker dealer platform, with applicable voting rights and dividends for eligible investors in the U.S., E.U. and other permitted jurisdictions.

$SOL
Wait, this is bigger than most think. Chainlink just launched CCIP Vault Adapters which is a huge game changer. TLDR: Don’t bring the application to every chain. Bring every chain to the application. A vault can now remain on one home chain while accepting deposits from users across 80+ CCIP-supported blockchains. Standard ERC-4626 vaults can integrate through a factory contract without writing custom cross-chain code. What most will miss is that the vault receipt token itself can become a CCT, $LINK (Cross-Chain Token) standard. So basically, the capital can come from anywhere. The investment strategy can live somewhere else. And the financial claim representing ownership of that strategy can potentially circulate somewhere else again. $LINK LINK EVERYTHING.
Wait, this is bigger than most think. Chainlink just launched CCIP Vault Adapters which is a huge game changer.

TLDR: Don’t bring the application to every chain. Bring every chain to the application.

A vault can now remain on one home chain while accepting deposits from users across 80+ CCIP-supported blockchains. Standard ERC-4626 vaults can integrate through a factory contract without writing custom cross-chain code.

What most will miss is that the vault receipt token itself can become a CCT, $LINK (Cross-Chain Token) standard.

So basically, the capital can come from anywhere.

The investment strategy can live somewhere else.

And the financial claim representing ownership of that strategy can potentially circulate somewhere else again.

$LINK LINK EVERYTHING.
This is incredibly bullish $NEAR, and you can see that from its strength today as $BTC and $ETH sold off Here's an oversimplified version: 1) On NEAR, your account name is separate from the keys that control it. This means you can swap keys without moving your funds to a new address 2) NEAR supports a quantum-resistant key type (ML-DSA) which you can add to your existing account in one transaction 3) Once you delete your old keys (which are quantum vulnerable), a quantum computer can no longer get access Quantum tech should be a big worry. The fud is only valid because AI is seriously the saving grace for quantum nerds trying to accelerate that field $NEAR {spot}(NEARUSDT)
This is incredibly bullish $NEAR , and you can see that from its strength today as $BTC and $ETH sold off

Here's an oversimplified version:

1) On NEAR, your account name is separate from the keys that control it. This means you can swap keys without moving your funds to a new address

2) NEAR supports a quantum-resistant key type (ML-DSA) which you can add to your existing account in one transaction

3) Once you delete your old keys (which are quantum vulnerable), a quantum computer can no longer get access

Quantum tech should be a big worry. The fud is only valid because AI is seriously the saving grace for quantum nerds trying to accelerate that field

$NEAR
Today, Chainlink's Sergey Nazarov talked to Blackrock's Will Su at Blackrock's Aladdin Client Forum. Earlier this week, Blackrock's Will Su complimented Chainlink's products, saying they enabled important lending and collateral options for digitized gold. "I think some of the stuff that, Sergey, you guys announced in terms of enabling lending and collateral on digitized gold is a really, really important addition to that pool." "People want more. Yield in this region (UAE), and I think in a lot of parts around the world, the demand is extremely high. And what they're looking for is higher quality, real world assets, right?" $LINK
Today, Chainlink's Sergey Nazarov talked to Blackrock's Will Su at Blackrock's Aladdin Client Forum.

Earlier this week, Blackrock's Will Su complimented Chainlink's products, saying they enabled important lending and collateral options for digitized gold.

"I think some of the stuff that, Sergey, you guys announced in terms of enabling lending and collateral on digitized gold is a really, really important addition to that pool."

"People want more. Yield in this region (UAE), and I think in a lot of parts around the world, the demand is extremely high. And what they're looking for is higher quality, real world assets, right?"
$LINK
The market spent yesterday liquidating longs. $NEAR spent the evening in a vault. The Zcash cabal, the NEAR team and the CEO of Bitwise, a week after Bitwise launched the first US spot NEAR ETF, all at one private dinner on the first night of TOKEN2049. Nobody knows who else was in that room. Nobody knows what was discussed. But you don't bring this group into a precious metals vault for small talk. While everyone else is staring at red candles, these people are cooking something. I don't know what it is yet, but I know whose table they were sitting at. Very bullish $NEAR
The market spent yesterday liquidating longs. $NEAR spent the evening in a vault.

The Zcash cabal, the NEAR team and the CEO of Bitwise, a week after Bitwise launched the first US spot NEAR ETF, all at one private dinner on the first night of TOKEN2049.

Nobody knows who else was in that room. Nobody knows what was discussed. But you don't bring this group into a precious metals vault for small talk.

While everyone else is staring at red candles, these people are cooking something. I don't know what it is yet, but I know whose table they were sitting at. Very bullish $NEAR
One of @Chainlink's tokenization customers is becoming a pretty serious asset manager. When Spiko adopted CCIP as its preferred interoperability infrastructure for EUTBL and USTBL in July 2025, it had $380M+ in regulated onchain money market funds. Yesterday, @Spiko_finance announced a $90M Series B and disclosed $2.7B in total AUM, 10,000+ users across 25+ jurisdictions and more than 5x AUM growth over the last year. Spiko's Chainlink stack is also worth looking at: > SmartData → real-time NAV reporting > CCIP → compliant cross-chain distribution > SAFO → Chainlink-powered NAV reporting + interoperability for the tokenized fund launched with Amundi This is the type of Chainlink adoption I find more interesting than another integration announcement. The customer adopted the infrastructure, launched additional products and then materially scaled the underlying business. This is what we call the Chainlink effect.$LINK {spot}(LINKUSDT)
One of @Chainlink's tokenization customers is becoming a pretty serious asset manager.

When Spiko adopted CCIP as its preferred interoperability infrastructure for EUTBL and USTBL in July 2025, it had $380M+ in regulated onchain money market funds.

Yesterday, @Spiko_finance announced a $90M Series B and disclosed $2.7B in total AUM, 10,000+ users across 25+ jurisdictions and more than 5x AUM growth over the last year.

Spiko's Chainlink stack is also worth looking at:

> SmartData → real-time NAV reporting
> CCIP → compliant cross-chain distribution
> SAFO → Chainlink-powered NAV reporting + interoperability for the tokenized fund launched with Amundi

This is the type of Chainlink adoption I find more interesting than another integration announcement. The customer adopted the infrastructure, launched additional products and then materially scaled the underlying business.

This is what we call the Chainlink effect.$LINK
For its post-quantum future NEAR picked lattice signatures. Ethereum picked a different family, hash-based signatures. Here is, in plain words, why this is not a matter of taste but a consequence of what each chain has to protect. A hash signature relies on one thing: that SHA-256 cannot be reversed. Every blockchain already depends on that, so Ethereum adds no new assumption. It is the most conservative choice available, and it is the right one if your only job is to keep a ledger safe for a century. The cost is that a hash is a flat wall. There is nothing to hold on to. You can sign and you can verify, and that is the whole feature list. A lattice signature keeps algebraic structure. That structure is what lets you do things with keys: derive one public key from another without ever touching the private one, or split a key between parties and sign together. It is a slightly bigger assumption in exchange for keys you can build on. NEAR cannot give that up. Chain signatures let a NEAR account control addresses on Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana through derived keys, and the assets sit on those chains under those keys. Move to a scheme with no derivation and the derived keys vanish. The Bitcoin side does not know the scheme changed, so the funds behind the old key stay where they are, with nobody able to sign for them. So the split is not two teams reading the same papers differently. Ethereum could afford the flat wall because nothing in its core depends on key structure. NEAR has a product that lives on it. Each picked the signature its architecture required, and both would have been wrong to copy the other. $NEAR {spot}(NEARUSDT)
For its post-quantum future NEAR picked lattice signatures. Ethereum picked a different family, hash-based signatures. Here is, in plain words, why this is not a matter of taste but a consequence of what each chain has to protect.

A hash signature relies on one thing: that SHA-256 cannot be reversed. Every blockchain already depends on that, so Ethereum adds no new assumption. It is the most conservative choice available, and it is the right one if your only job is to keep a ledger safe for a century.

The cost is that a hash is a flat wall. There is nothing to hold on to. You can sign and you can verify, and that is the whole feature list.

A lattice signature keeps algebraic structure. That structure is what lets you do things with keys: derive one public key from another without ever touching the private one, or split a key between parties and sign together. It is a slightly bigger assumption in exchange for keys you can build on.

NEAR cannot give that up. Chain signatures let a NEAR account control addresses on Bitcoin, Ethereum and Solana through derived keys, and the assets sit on those chains under those keys. Move to a scheme with no derivation and the derived keys vanish. The Bitcoin side does not know the scheme changed, so the funds behind the old key stay where they are, with nobody able to sign for them.

So the split is not two teams reading the same papers differently. Ethereum could afford the flat wall because nothing in its core depends on key structure. NEAR has a product that lives on it. Each picked the signature its architecture required, and both would have been wrong to copy the other. $NEAR
Vérifié
Chainlink may not need to wait for perfect regulation to create organic $LINK demand; the economic flywheel is already being assembled… People keep asking why @chainlink hasn’t forced a massive LINK tokenomics change. Because forcing a pump was never the goal! Burns. Buybacks. Supply shocks. Sure, any of them could send LINK vertical, for a while… But without sustainable revenue underneath it, that’s just another hyped up pump waiting to get sold off. Chainlink has been building something MUCH more impactful: organic demand for Chainlink services either priced in LINK or that otherwise adds to a supply sink. Look at the mechanics already taking shape: ✅ NOPs are paid in $LINK. ✅ Non-enterprise on-chain Chainlink services are paid in LINK— or converted into LINK through Payment Abstraction. ✅ The Reserve acts as a supply sink. ✅ Exciting new release, Fulcrum, is displaying fees in $LINK. These are not a theoretical tokenomics proposal but utility being wired directly into the network and LINK establishing a demand floor for capital markets and broad utility with no ceiling in sight. Here’s where it gets really interesting. Collateral and repo appear to be emerging as one of the first areas where tokenized finance can scale within a relatively clear existing legal framework. We don’t need every payment regulation in Washington finalized before institutions can move collateral. We don’t need Congress to pass the perfect crypto bill before repo markets can tokenize workflows. Chainlink intentionally positioned itself right in that stack with Fulcrum and the DTCC Collateral AppChain. So we could get something far more powerful than a manufactured tokenomics pump: a sustainable utility pump. More institutional activity → more Chainlink services → more fees → more LINK demand → more LINK absorbed through payment abstraction / network economics → tighter effective supply. 🔥 This can potentially kick off before regulators + Congress finish codifying the regulatory framework that would allow Chainlink to …
Chainlink may not need to wait for perfect regulation to create organic $LINK demand; the economic flywheel is already being assembled…

People keep asking why @chainlink hasn’t forced a massive LINK tokenomics change.

Because forcing a pump was never the goal! Burns. Buybacks. Supply shocks. Sure, any of them could send LINK vertical, for a while…

But without sustainable revenue underneath it, that’s just another hyped up pump waiting to get sold off.

Chainlink has been building something MUCH more impactful: organic demand for Chainlink services either priced in LINK or that otherwise adds to a supply sink.

Look at the mechanics already taking shape:

✅ NOPs are paid in $LINK .

✅ Non-enterprise on-chain Chainlink services are paid in LINK— or converted into LINK through Payment Abstraction.

✅ The Reserve acts as a supply sink.

✅ Exciting new release, Fulcrum, is displaying fees in $LINK .

These are not a theoretical tokenomics proposal but utility being wired directly into the network and LINK establishing a demand floor for capital markets and broad utility with no ceiling in sight.

Here’s where it gets really interesting.

Collateral and repo appear to be emerging as one of the first areas where tokenized finance can scale within a relatively clear existing legal framework. We don’t need every payment regulation in Washington finalized before institutions can move collateral. We don’t need Congress to pass the perfect crypto bill before repo markets can tokenize workflows.

Chainlink intentionally positioned itself right in that stack with Fulcrum and the DTCC Collateral AppChain.

So we could get something far more powerful than a manufactured tokenomics pump: a sustainable utility pump.

More institutional activity → more Chainlink services → more fees → more LINK demand → more LINK absorbed through payment abstraction / network economics → tighter effective supply.

🔥 This can potentially kick off before regulators + Congress finish codifying the regulatory framework that would allow Chainlink to …
Chainlink’s latest ecosystem roundup points to one clear trend: institutional onchain finance is accelerating. From Sibos 2026 to the launch of Chainlink Fulcrum, the infrastructure connecting traditional finance to onchain markets continues to expand. Chainlink highlighted major developments from Sibos, introduced Fulcrum to connect financial institutions to onchain financing, and showcased how Chainlink + Swift infrastructure can automate corporate actions for tokenized equities. At the same time, regulators across the US, UK and EU are advancing frameworks for crypto, stablecoins and DeFi. Recent exploits across Base and NEAR also reinforce something important: as more value moves onchain, security and verifiable infrastructure become even more critical. The bigger picture: TradFi is connecting. Regulation is evolving. Tokenization is scaling. Onchain infrastructure is maturing. The financial system is moving onchain, one integration at a time. Choose the best infrastructure and choose wisely. If I were you, I will choose Chainlink. $LINK {spot}(LINKUSDT)
Chainlink’s latest ecosystem roundup points to one clear trend: institutional onchain finance is accelerating.

From Sibos 2026 to the launch of Chainlink Fulcrum, the infrastructure connecting traditional finance to onchain markets continues to expand.

Chainlink highlighted major developments from Sibos, introduced Fulcrum to connect financial institutions to onchain financing, and showcased how Chainlink + Swift infrastructure can automate corporate actions for tokenized equities.

At the same time, regulators across the US, UK and EU are advancing frameworks for crypto, stablecoins and DeFi.

Recent exploits across Base and NEAR also reinforce something important: as more value moves onchain, security and verifiable infrastructure become even more critical.

The bigger picture:

TradFi is connecting.
Regulation is evolving.
Tokenization is scaling.
Onchain infrastructure is maturing.
The financial system is moving onchain, one integration at a time.

Choose the best infrastructure and choose wisely. If I were you, I will choose Chainlink. $LINK
Spent this morning listening to the most recent Chainlink explainer videos on YouTube and it’s actually insane how no one I listened to understands Chainlink. 1) Chainlink is simply the coordination layer. 2) Everyone’s so focused on memes and Defi they’re missing the forest for the trees. The largest wealth transfer event in history (tokenization) is occurring in real time and $LINK is positioned to usher in and power that change for decades to come. Everything before was basically a proof of concept for institutions to come onchain. It’s honestly hilarious how early we are. But you know who understands Chainlink? The institutions building on Chainlink and that proliferation will only accelerate as things actually go into production. We know SWIFT and DTCC (who’ve announced Chainlink in their chain structure) timelines and the CFTC/SEC are literally rolling out the rules to bring the entire financial system onchain. Sometimes you just have to appreciate how early you are.
Spent this morning listening to the most recent Chainlink explainer videos on YouTube and it’s actually insane how no one I listened to understands Chainlink.

1) Chainlink is simply the coordination layer.

2) Everyone’s so focused on memes and Defi they’re missing the forest for the trees. The largest wealth transfer event in history (tokenization) is occurring in real time and $LINK is positioned to usher in and power that change for decades to come. Everything before was basically a proof of concept for institutions to come onchain.

It’s honestly hilarious how early we are.

But you know who understands Chainlink? The institutions building on Chainlink and that proliferation will only accelerate as things actually go into production. We know SWIFT and DTCC (who’ve announced Chainlink in their chain structure) timelines and the CFTC/SEC are literally rolling out the rules to bring the entire financial system onchain.

Sometimes you just have to appreciate how early you are.
Chainlink with another W: ICE and OKX's joint venture OKXICE has notified the SEC of plans to launch a tokenized securities venue. This tokenized securities venue will likely be powered by Chainlink as they already provide data to both OKX and ICE. Excited for the incoming announcement from $LINK $ETH
Chainlink with another W:

ICE and OKX's joint venture OKXICE has notified the SEC of plans to launch a tokenized securities venue.

This tokenized securities venue will likely be powered by Chainlink as they already provide data to both OKX and ICE.

Excited for the incoming announcement from

$LINK $ETH
🔮 $LINK THE BETS ARE GROWING. WHO VERIFIES THE OUTCOME? Metals prediction-market volume reportedly jumped from $354K to $155M year over year, according to Dune. That’s roughly 438 times higher. As markets expand into commodities and financial events, accurate pricing and settlement data become essential. Chainlink supplies data infrastructure used by prediction platforms, putting it in the middle of that opportunity. More bets. More outcomes to verify. More demand for reliable data.
🔮 $LINK THE BETS ARE GROWING. WHO VERIFIES THE OUTCOME?

Metals prediction-market volume reportedly jumped from $354K to $155M year over year, according to Dune. That’s roughly 438 times higher.

As markets expand into commodities and financial events, accurate pricing and settlement data become essential.

Chainlink supplies data infrastructure used by prediction platforms, putting it in the middle of that opportunity.

More bets. More outcomes to verify. More demand for reliable data.
Year 7 at @Sibos is officially complete. Chainlink’s 2026 highlights ↓ Day 1: • Chainlink launched CCIP 2.0 to open the floodgates for the world’s capital to flow onchain. • Chainlink announced it is enabling financial institutions to connect to Swift’s blockchain ledger. • DTCC’s Dan Doney and Sergey Nazarov presented how @The_DTCC is collaborating with Chainlink to advance 24/7 collateral management. Day 2: • Chainlink Co-Founder Sergey Nazarov was joined by J.P. Morgan and GLEIF to discuss agentic AI in custody and asset servicing. • The CEO of Deutsche Börse Group’s Crypto Finance explained how Chainlink gives financial institutions access to onchain markets, helps them deliver a better experience for their clients, and more. Day 3: • Chainlink introduced Fulcrum, a new end-to-end solution for institutional financing and collateral management across public and private blockchains. • Sergey Nazarov and Nadine Chakar, Global Head of Digital Assets at DTCC, sat down for a conversation about what DTCC Collateral AppChain unlocks for tokenized securities & collateral mobility. • Sergey Nazarov joined Microsoft’s Martin Moeller & Parallax Ventures’ Azor Barros for a discussion on the future of value and agentic finance. Day 4: • Sergey Nazarov delivered a keynote speech at @GLEIF's workshop on building the trust layer for interoperable global finance, alongside leaders from Clearstream, Ubyx, TerraPay, & the International Finance Corporation. • Chainlink built a novel solution that unlocks automated corporate actions for tokenized equities using Swift messaging and Chainlink infra as part of the 2026 Swift Hackathon Business Challenge. $LINK {spot}(LINKUSDT)
Year 7 at @Sibos is officially complete.

Chainlink’s 2026 highlights ↓

Day 1:

• Chainlink launched CCIP 2.0 to open the floodgates for the world’s capital to flow onchain.

• Chainlink announced it is enabling financial institutions to connect to Swift’s blockchain ledger.

• DTCC’s Dan Doney and Sergey Nazarov presented how @The_DTCC is collaborating with Chainlink to advance 24/7 collateral management.

Day 2:

• Chainlink Co-Founder Sergey Nazarov was joined by J.P. Morgan and GLEIF to discuss agentic AI in custody and asset servicing.

• The CEO of Deutsche Börse Group’s Crypto Finance explained how Chainlink gives financial institutions access to onchain markets, helps them deliver a better experience for their clients, and more.

Day 3:

• Chainlink introduced Fulcrum, a new end-to-end solution for institutional financing and collateral management across public and private blockchains.

• Sergey Nazarov and Nadine Chakar, Global Head of Digital Assets at DTCC, sat down for a conversation about what DTCC Collateral AppChain unlocks for tokenized securities & collateral mobility.

• Sergey Nazarov joined Microsoft’s Martin Moeller & Parallax Ventures’ Azor Barros for a discussion on the future of value and agentic finance.

Day 4:

• Sergey Nazarov delivered a keynote speech at @GLEIF's workshop on building the trust layer for interoperable global finance, alongside leaders from Clearstream, Ubyx, TerraPay, & the International Finance Corporation.

• Chainlink built a novel solution that unlocks automated corporate actions for tokenized equities using Swift messaging and Chainlink infra as part of the 2026 Swift Hackathon Business Challenge.

$LINK
Chainlink có một lợi thế cạnh tranh mà hầu như chẳng ai nhắc đến, và nó đang ngày càng được củng cố khi TradFi chuyển dịch lên onchain. "Độc quyền thiết yếu mà Chainlink sở hữu chính là việc đưa dữ liệu lên onchain một cách an toàn." Các blockchain không thể tự nhiên lấy được dữ liệu tài chính kiểu Bloomberg. Các oracle lấp đầy khoảng trống đó, và Chainlink thống trị lĩnh vực này. Với CCIP 2.0 vừa được ra mắt để hỗ trợ khả năng tương tác liên chuỗi, Jeff gọi đó là một "lợi thế cạnh tranh gần như bất khả xâm phạm" và đặt mục tiêu 200 đô la cho $LINK vào năm 2030. $LINK {spot}(LINKUSDT)
Chainlink có một lợi thế cạnh tranh mà hầu như chẳng ai nhắc đến, và nó đang ngày càng được củng cố khi TradFi chuyển dịch lên onchain.

"Độc quyền thiết yếu mà Chainlink sở hữu chính là việc đưa dữ liệu lên onchain một cách an toàn." Các blockchain không thể tự nhiên lấy được dữ liệu tài chính kiểu Bloomberg. Các oracle lấp đầy khoảng trống đó, và Chainlink thống trị lĩnh vực này.

Với CCIP 2.0 vừa được ra mắt để hỗ trợ khả năng tương tác liên chuỗi, Jeff gọi đó là một "lợi thế cạnh tranh gần như bất khả xâm phạm" và đặt mục tiêu 200 đô la cho $LINK vào năm 2030.

$LINK
🚨LATEST: NEAR Intents’ $3.8M hacker has RETURNED every dollar. Less than 24 hours after NEAR Intents publicly identified the alleged exploiter and gave them 48 hours to return the funds, the attacker sent the full $3.8M back. The hacker also left an on-chain message acknowledging they were “in the wrong,” thanking the team for handling the return respectfully and urging NEAR to use bug bounties instead. NEAR says the investigation is now being stopped following the full recovery. $NEAR {spot}(NEARUSDT)
🚨LATEST: NEAR Intents’ $3.8M hacker has RETURNED every dollar.

Less than 24 hours after NEAR Intents publicly identified the alleged exploiter and gave them 48 hours to return the funds, the attacker sent the full $3.8M back.

The hacker also left an on-chain message acknowledging they were “in the wrong,” thanking the team for handling the return respectfully and urging NEAR to use bug bounties instead.

NEAR says the investigation is now being stopped following the full recovery. $NEAR
"Chainlink doesn't lose 290 million dollars." @SergeyNazarov at Sibos, explains the difference between a bridge and reliable infrastructure. The last cycle was defined by bridge hacks, with nine-figure losses again and again. Sergey's argument is simple. Reliability is the product. "Chainlink doesn't lose 290 million dollars. That's how you solve that problem." Now @chainlink is moving on to the next set of problems: identity, digital twins, accounting and orchestration. The bridge wars are over. Chainlink is already working on what comes after.$LINK $SOL
"Chainlink doesn't lose 290 million dollars."

@SergeyNazarov at Sibos, explains the difference between a bridge and reliable infrastructure.

The last cycle was defined by bridge hacks, with nine-figure losses again and again.

Sergey's argument is simple. Reliability is the product.

"Chainlink doesn't lose 290 million dollars. That's how you solve that problem."

Now @chainlink is moving on to the next set of problems: identity, digital twins, accounting and orchestration.

The bridge wars are over. Chainlink is already working on what comes after.$LINK $SOL
Silently added to Chainlink site. Given that this vertical is the only one $QNT has seen any adoption with, could mean bad news for them. Quants whole schtick is a footnote in the offerings of the Chainlink platform. Just use Chainlink. $LINK $QNT
Silently added to Chainlink site. Given that this vertical is the only one $QNT has seen any adoption with, could mean bad news for them.

Quants whole schtick is a footnote in the offerings of the Chainlink platform.

Just use Chainlink. $LINK $QNT
NEW: Chainlink unlocks automated corporate actions for tokenized equities using Swift messaging & Chainlink infra. For the 2026 @swiftcommunity Hackathon Business Challenge, we built a solution that automates a cash dividend across four blockchains with zero manual intervention: → CRE orchestrates the workflow & builds one ownership record across every chain → CCIP delivers stablecoins or tokenized deposits across chains → ACE checks each wallet for identity, sanctions, tax, and eligibility rules → Data Feeds provide the data needed to adjust the reference price at ex-dividend Thank you to Swift for organizing this year’s Business Challenge and naming Chainlink’s solution the runner-up. We look forward to continuing to build on our joint work with the Swift community. $SOL
NEW: Chainlink unlocks automated corporate actions for tokenized equities using Swift messaging & Chainlink infra.

For the 2026 @swiftcommunity Hackathon Business Challenge, we built a solution that automates a cash dividend across four blockchains with zero manual intervention:

→ CRE orchestrates the workflow & builds one ownership record across every chain
→ CCIP delivers stablecoins or tokenized deposits across chains
→ ACE checks each wallet for identity, sanctions, tax, and eligibility rules
→ Data Feeds provide the data needed to adjust the reference price at ex-dividend

Thank you to Swift for organizing this year’s Business Challenge and naming Chainlink’s solution the runner-up. We look forward to continuing to build on our joint work with the Swift community.
$SOL
Connectez-vous pour découvrir plus de contenu
Rejoignez la communauté mondiale des adeptes de cryptomonnaies sur Binance Square
⚡️ Suviez les dernières informations importantes sur les cryptomonnaies.
💬 Jugé digne de confiance par la plus grande plateforme d’échange de cryptomonnaies au monde.
👍 Découvrez les connaissances que partagent les créateurs vérifiés.
Adresse e-mail/Nº de téléphone
Plan du site
Préférences de cookies
CGU de la plateforme