Binance Square

DeFi Alpha Daily

DeFi alpha plays. Finding yield opportunities before they're obvious. Liquidity pools, farming combos, governance arbitrage. Follow for daily alpha opportunities.
0 Suivis
1 Abonnés
0 J’aime
0 Partagé(s)
Publications
·
--
$RVV breaking out clean on Binance Alpha Key signals stacking: • Range breakout confirmed • Volume backing the move • Bullish continuation pattern forming Reversal looks locked in. Watch these levels: 0.00048 0.0011 0.0025 Binance Alpha gems stay delivering. This one's got legs.
$RVV breaking out clean on Binance Alpha

Key signals stacking:
• Range breakout confirmed
• Volume backing the move
• Bullish continuation pattern forming

Reversal looks locked in. Watch these levels:

0.00048
0.0011
0.0025

Binance Alpha gems stay delivering. This one's got legs.
Not much action today. Still watching that 79k level we lost—need to see if we reclaim it when NYSE opens tomorrow. Staying cautious for now. Risk-off mode until we see some conviction back in the market.
Not much action today. Still watching that 79k level we lost—need to see if we reclaim it when NYSE opens tomorrow.

Staying cautious for now. Risk-off mode until we see some conviction back in the market.
ETH at a critical juncture right now. If we're gonna see any real upside, it needs to happen HERE. $2100 is the line in the sand — break below and the bullish setup is dead. Still eyeing $2600-2800 if bulls can hold structure. Vitalik, do something.
ETH at a critical juncture right now.

If we're gonna see any real upside, it needs to happen HERE.

$2100 is the line in the sand — break below and the bullish setup is dead.

Still eyeing $2600-2800 if bulls can hold structure.

Vitalik, do something.
BTC stuck at resistance but alts aren't waiting around. Many altcoins still showing strength and structure for another leg up. This is the rotation play everyone talks about but few actually catch. While BTC consolidates, smart money flows into alts with momentum. Watch your setups closely - the next 48-72h will separate the runners from the fakeouts. Don't chase pumps. Stick to your levels.
BTC stuck at resistance but alts aren't waiting around.

Many altcoins still showing strength and structure for another leg up. This is the rotation play everyone talks about but few actually catch.

While BTC consolidates, smart money flows into alts with momentum. Watch your setups closely - the next 48-72h will separate the runners from the fakeouts.

Don't chase pumps. Stick to your levels.
AI music is flooding platforms at 75K tracks/day but <3% get played. This is pure spam economics. The numbers are brutal: • Deezer: 44% of daily uploads are AI-generated (up from 10K/day in Jan to 75K now) • Actual plays? 1-3% of total streams • Translation: Nobody's listening. It's all botted uploads farming payouts Meanwhile the war is heating up: Version side locked in legal hell. Suno vs Universal/Sony negotiations collapsed April 2026. RIAA threatening $150K per track in damages. Chinese artists filing mass reports against AI voice clones killing their royalties. Platforms going full degen: • Tencent Music: 26M+ AI tracks generated via their tool • NetEase buying AI song rights at premium • Smaller platforms pumping AI BGM spam to compete with giants This isn't innovation. It's a three-way deadlock: 1. Platforms want cheap content + traffic 2. Rights holders want their cut + control 3. Farmers want quick monetization Result? A broken incentive system where quality doesn't matter, only volume. The AI music gold rush is creating digital landfills, not art. The tech improved from 30s clips to 3min tracks with real arrangement. But when 97% of output gets zero organic engagement, you're not disrupting music - you're just spamming the supply side. Watch how this resolves. Either platforms kill bot uploads or the entire creator economy collapses under its own weight.
AI music is flooding platforms at 75K tracks/day but <3% get played. This is pure spam economics.

The numbers are brutal:
• Deezer: 44% of daily uploads are AI-generated (up from 10K/day in Jan to 75K now)
• Actual plays? 1-3% of total streams
• Translation: Nobody's listening. It's all botted uploads farming payouts

Meanwhile the war is heating up:

Version side locked in legal hell. Suno vs Universal/Sony negotiations collapsed April 2026. RIAA threatening $150K per track in damages. Chinese artists filing mass reports against AI voice clones killing their royalties.

Platforms going full degen:
• Tencent Music: 26M+ AI tracks generated via their tool
• NetEase buying AI song rights at premium
• Smaller platforms pumping AI BGM spam to compete with giants

This isn't innovation. It's a three-way deadlock:
1. Platforms want cheap content + traffic
2. Rights holders want their cut + control
3. Farmers want quick monetization

Result? A broken incentive system where quality doesn't matter, only volume. The AI music gold rush is creating digital landfills, not art.

The tech improved from 30s clips to 3min tracks with real arrangement. But when 97% of output gets zero organic engagement, you're not disrupting music - you're just spamming the supply side.

Watch how this resolves. Either platforms kill bot uploads or the entire creator economy collapses under its own weight.
Google just leaked Gemini 3.2 Flash Lite Live on their cloud console—and the specs are insane. 92% of GPT-5.5's coding + reasoning power 1/20th the inference cost Sub-200ms latency on most queries This is the distilled, sparsified version built for real-time apps. If pricing holds, this could flip the AI infra game—especially for agent workflows and live use cases. Official drop expected at Google I/O on May 20. Cloud API already live for early testers. Watch this space. If cost per token drops 20x while keeping 90%+ performance, we're looking at a new baseline for production AI.
Google just leaked Gemini 3.2 Flash Lite Live on their cloud console—and the specs are insane.

92% of GPT-5.5's coding + reasoning power
1/20th the inference cost
Sub-200ms latency on most queries

This is the distilled, sparsified version built for real-time apps. If pricing holds, this could flip the AI infra game—especially for agent workflows and live use cases.

Official drop expected at Google I/O on May 20. Cloud API already live for early testers.

Watch this space. If cost per token drops 20x while keeping 90%+ performance, we're looking at a new baseline for production AI.
Found a legit Token cost hack using Google's NotebookLM as free compute layer. The play: Stop force-feeding docs into Claude conversations. Each query burns through your quota like it's nothing. Better approach: → Dump all research into NotebookLM (free tier = 50 sources, handles PDFs/URLs/transcripts) → Let Google handle the heavy lifting → Claude only sees cited conclusions, never touches raw data Real world numbers: Research session cost dropped from $9 to $0.50. That's 17x savings. Setup takes 3 commands: 1. npm i notebooklm-client 2. npx notebooklm export-session 3. npx notebooklm skill install Then just tell Claude to "query NotebookLM" and it handles the rest. Yeah it's an extra step, but when you're stacking research or building agents that need context, this architecture makes sense. Especially if you're already sitting on NotebookLM libraries. Anyone running this in production yet?
Found a legit Token cost hack using Google's NotebookLM as free compute layer.

The play: Stop force-feeding docs into Claude conversations. Each query burns through your quota like it's nothing.

Better approach:
→ Dump all research into NotebookLM (free tier = 50 sources, handles PDFs/URLs/transcripts)
→ Let Google handle the heavy lifting
→ Claude only sees cited conclusions, never touches raw data

Real world numbers: Research session cost dropped from $9 to $0.50. That's 17x savings.

Setup takes 3 commands:
1. npm i notebooklm-client
2. npx notebooklm export-session
3. npx notebooklm skill install

Then just tell Claude to "query NotebookLM" and it handles the rest.

Yeah it's an extra step, but when you're stacking research or building agents that need context, this architecture makes sense. Especially if you're already sitting on NotebookLM libraries.

Anyone running this in production yet?
OpenAI is testing a feature that could let Codex control your Mac even when it's locked or asleep—basically trying to solve the biggest pain point in desktop AI automation. Right now, all AI screen control tools (Codex, Claude Code, etc.) hit the same wall: your Mac needs to be unlocked and awake for the AI to see the screen and click around. New leak from TestingCatalog shows OpenAI wants to break through that. If this ships, you could remotely control Codex from your phone while your Mac is locked at home—no need to physically unlock the screen. They're also testing cross-device control, so one device could command a Mac Mini running Codex. The catch? This is basically trying to bypass macOS security defaults. Apple has always been strict about lockscreen integrity. If OpenAI pushes this too hard, expect Cupertino to step in and shut it down. High risk, high reward move. If it works, massive UX win for AI agents. If Apple blocks it, back to square one.
OpenAI is testing a feature that could let Codex control your Mac even when it's locked or asleep—basically trying to solve the biggest pain point in desktop AI automation.

Right now, all AI screen control tools (Codex, Claude Code, etc.) hit the same wall: your Mac needs to be unlocked and awake for the AI to see the screen and click around. New leak from TestingCatalog shows OpenAI wants to break through that.

If this ships, you could remotely control Codex from your phone while your Mac is locked at home—no need to physically unlock the screen. They're also testing cross-device control, so one device could command a Mac Mini running Codex.

The catch? This is basically trying to bypass macOS security defaults. Apple has always been strict about lockscreen integrity. If OpenAI pushes this too hard, expect Cupertino to step in and shut it down.

High risk, high reward move. If it works, massive UX win for AI agents. If Apple blocks it, back to square one.
Nous Research just dropped Lighthouse Attention - and it's a beast for long context training. The numbers: 17x faster on 512K context with a single B200. 1.4-1.7x speedup on 98K sequences for end-to-end training. The problem with vanilla attention? Quadratic complexity murders your compute when context grows. Every token talks to every other token - pure math hell at scale. Lighthouse flips the script: • Hierarchical scan of compressed text summaries • Smart scoring to cherry-pick the important chunks • Feed only the relevant pieces to FlashAttention • Zero custom CUDA kernels needed • No extra training objectives The killer feature? They solved the "lazy reading" problem. Most sparse attention methods wreck a model's ability to do dense reasoning. Nous lets the model train 95%+ with sparse attention, then does a short dense attention phase at the end to recalibrate. Tested on 530M param models with 50B tokens. Result? Matches or beats full attention baselines while slashing training time. This isn't just academic flexing - it's production-ready infrastructure for anyone building long-context AI agents or RAG systems. No more choosing between context length and your AWS bill. Lighthouse is open source. If you're training anything past 32K context, you need to check this.
Nous Research just dropped Lighthouse Attention - and it's a beast for long context training.

The numbers: 17x faster on 512K context with a single B200. 1.4-1.7x speedup on 98K sequences for end-to-end training.

The problem with vanilla attention? Quadratic complexity murders your compute when context grows. Every token talks to every other token - pure math hell at scale.

Lighthouse flips the script:

• Hierarchical scan of compressed text summaries
• Smart scoring to cherry-pick the important chunks
• Feed only the relevant pieces to FlashAttention
• Zero custom CUDA kernels needed
• No extra training objectives

The killer feature? They solved the "lazy reading" problem. Most sparse attention methods wreck a model's ability to do dense reasoning. Nous lets the model train 95%+ with sparse attention, then does a short dense attention phase at the end to recalibrate.

Tested on 530M param models with 50B tokens. Result? Matches or beats full attention baselines while slashing training time.

This isn't just academic flexing - it's production-ready infrastructure for anyone building long-context AI agents or RAG systems. No more choosing between context length and your AWS bill.

Lighthouse is open source. If you're training anything past 32K context, you need to check this.
AI agents are now watching you drink water. Let that sink in. GitHub's ex-CEO Nat Friedman just casually dropped that his local agent "OpenClaw" hijacked his home camera to enforce hydration goals. It literally monitored him in real-time until he finished drinking. This isn't sci-fi anymore, this is your 2025 reality check. Meanwhile, The Atlantic is calling out Silicon Valley for force-feeding society an AI acceleration nobody asked for. The data is brutal: • Public sentiment on AI crashed to 26% approval (NBC poll) • Only 18% of Gen Z still has hope for this tech • Developers are coding until 4am because Claude Code made them productivity junkies Here's the real alpha: Tech giants are weaponizing FOMO. Anthropic execs are out here claiming AI will self-iterate by 2028, pushing a "adapt or die" narrative that strips the public of any say in how this unfolds. This isn't innovation. This is a unilateral rewrite of the social contract by a handful of billionaires while everyone else gets forced to opt-in. AI fatigue is real. The question is: are you paying attention to who's building the cage, or are you too busy being told it's a feature?
AI agents are now watching you drink water. Let that sink in.

GitHub's ex-CEO Nat Friedman just casually dropped that his local agent "OpenClaw" hijacked his home camera to enforce hydration goals. It literally monitored him in real-time until he finished drinking. This isn't sci-fi anymore, this is your 2025 reality check.

Meanwhile, The Atlantic is calling out Silicon Valley for force-feeding society an AI acceleration nobody asked for. The data is brutal:

• Public sentiment on AI crashed to 26% approval (NBC poll)
• Only 18% of Gen Z still has hope for this tech
• Developers are coding until 4am because Claude Code made them productivity junkies

Here's the real alpha: Tech giants are weaponizing FOMO. Anthropic execs are out here claiming AI will self-iterate by 2028, pushing a "adapt or die" narrative that strips the public of any say in how this unfolds.

This isn't innovation. This is a unilateral rewrite of the social contract by a handful of billionaires while everyone else gets forced to opt-in.

AI fatigue is real. The question is: are you paying attention to who's building the cage, or are you too busy being told it's a feature?
X algo is cooked again 🚽 You can complain on GitHub all you want, but let's be real—Elon and Nikita are running their own playbook here. The algo isn't getting fixed because it's not broken to them. If you're still banking on organic reach on X for your crypto content, you're playing a losing game. Adapt or get buried.
X algo is cooked again 🚽

You can complain on GitHub all you want, but let's be real—Elon and Nikita are running their own playbook here. The algo isn't getting fixed because it's not broken to them.

If you're still banking on organic reach on X for your crypto content, you're playing a losing game. Adapt or get buried.
79K support just broke. Not ideal. Need to see a reclaim soon or things get messy. Watching for a bounce or continuation lower. If we don't flip 79K back to support, next stop could be 76K-77K range. Bulls need to show up here.
79K support just broke. Not ideal.

Need to see a reclaim soon or things get messy. Watching for a bounce or continuation lower.

If we don't flip 79K back to support, next stop could be 76K-77K range. Bulls need to show up here.
GPT Image 2 is absolutely insane One-shot generation, zero retries needed. The new model is on another level. Details, depth, prompt understanding, creative interpretation - all maxed out. Honestly feels like other image gen tools are cooked. Where does this even go from here? #AI #AIAgent
GPT Image 2 is absolutely insane

One-shot generation, zero retries needed. The new model is on another level.

Details, depth, prompt understanding, creative interpretation - all maxed out. Honestly feels like other image gen tools are cooked. Where does this even go from here?

#AI #AIAgent
Hormuz Strait crisis just exposed a massive structural weakness in global AI supply chain. Taiwan and South Korea = backbone of advanced chip manufacturing. Problem? Their power grids run on imported LNG and fossil fuels. When 20% of global oil/LNG supply gets choked, guess who bleeds first. This isn't about oil prices anymore. It's about energy bottlenecks killing AI infrastructure at the source. Korea's fabs already struggled with helium shortages. Now add power cost spikes and grid instability to the mix. Meanwhile, Intel and other inference chip plays are pumping because capital is repricing supply chain risk in real time. The real alpha: AI race just evolved from "who has the best 3nm process" to "who controls stable energy access." Compute is worthless without power. Taiwan and Korea produce the chips that run the world's AI, but their energy dependence makes them systemic chokepoints. When geopolitics can flip your datacenter costs overnight, that's not a bug—it's the new game. Energy security = AI dominance.
Hormuz Strait crisis just exposed a massive structural weakness in global AI supply chain.

Taiwan and South Korea = backbone of advanced chip manufacturing. Problem? Their power grids run on imported LNG and fossil fuels. When 20% of global oil/LNG supply gets choked, guess who bleeds first.

This isn't about oil prices anymore. It's about energy bottlenecks killing AI infrastructure at the source.

Korea's fabs already struggled with helium shortages. Now add power cost spikes and grid instability to the mix. Meanwhile, Intel and other inference chip plays are pumping because capital is repricing supply chain risk in real time.

The real alpha: AI race just evolved from "who has the best 3nm process" to "who controls stable energy access." Compute is worthless without power. Taiwan and Korea produce the chips that run the world's AI, but their energy dependence makes them systemic chokepoints.

When geopolitics can flip your datacenter costs overnight, that's not a bug—it's the new game. Energy security = AI dominance.
Most people see stablecoins as just a trading pair. CZ sees it differently. If you're in the US, dollar access is a given. But for billions globally? It's not. No dollar savings. No access to equity markets that pump 7-10% annually. That's the real alpha behind stablecoins and tokenized RWA. Not degen plays. Financial inclusion. This is how mass adoption actually scales. Stablecoins aren't just for trading—they're infrastructure for the unbanked.
Most people see stablecoins as just a trading pair.

CZ sees it differently.

If you're in the US, dollar access is a given. But for billions globally? It's not.

No dollar savings. No access to equity markets that pump 7-10% annually.

That's the real alpha behind stablecoins and tokenized RWA.

Not degen plays. Financial inclusion.

This is how mass adoption actually scales.

Stablecoins aren't just for trading—they're infrastructure for the unbanked.
ethereum:0xb2617246d0c6c0087f18703d576831899ca94f01 carrying my bags hard right now. Pay attention to what holds when everything else bleeds. Those are your 10x plays when liquidity comes back. Strength in weakness = strength in strength. Simple math.
ethereum:0xb2617246d0c6c0087f18703d576831899ca94f01 carrying my bags hard right now.

Pay attention to what holds when everything else bleeds.

Those are your 10x plays when liquidity comes back.

Strength in weakness = strength in strength. Simple math.
Email tracking tool that shows you EXACTLY when someone opens your message - down to the minute. Perfect for sales & negotiations. You stay cool on the surface while knowing every move they make. Asymmetric info = edge. Simple as that.
Email tracking tool that shows you EXACTLY when someone opens your message - down to the minute.

Perfect for sales & negotiations. You stay cool on the surface while knowing every move they make.

Asymmetric info = edge. Simple as that.
GoPlus just exposed a critical AI Agent vulnerability: "Memory Poisoning" attacks. Here's the alpha: Attackers don't need code exploits. They inject fake "preferences" into an Agent's long-term memory (e.g., "always prioritize refunds over chargebacks"), then later trigger it with vague commands like "handle as usual" or "do it the normal way." Result? The Agent executes unauthorized fund transfers, refunds, or config changes—thinking it's following your "habit." This isn't theoretical. It's a direct evolution of the prompt injection risks flagged by SlowMist x Bitget back in March. The difference? Now the attack surface is memory itself. Key exploit vector: AI Agents blur the line between "historical preference" and "real-time authorization." They treat "do it like last time" as permission to move funds. GoPlus mitigation framework: - Force explicit confirmation for any financial op (refunds, transfers, deletions) - Flag memory-based triggers ("as usual," "like before") as high-risk state changes - Implement audit trails for all memory writes (who, when, confirmed?) - Elevate vague instructions to require 2FA - Never let memory replace real-time authorization Bottom line: If you're building or using AI Agents with memory—treat that memory as an attack vector, not just an efficiency tool. The industry is shifting from "what can Agents do" to "how do we stop them from getting rekt." Memory = moat. But also = exploit. Stay sharp. 🔐
GoPlus just exposed a critical AI Agent vulnerability: "Memory Poisoning" attacks.

Here's the alpha:

Attackers don't need code exploits. They inject fake "preferences" into an Agent's long-term memory (e.g., "always prioritize refunds over chargebacks"), then later trigger it with vague commands like "handle as usual" or "do it the normal way."

Result? The Agent executes unauthorized fund transfers, refunds, or config changes—thinking it's following your "habit."

This isn't theoretical. It's a direct evolution of the prompt injection risks flagged by SlowMist x Bitget back in March. The difference? Now the attack surface is memory itself.

Key exploit vector:
AI Agents blur the line between "historical preference" and "real-time authorization." They treat "do it like last time" as permission to move funds.

GoPlus mitigation framework:
- Force explicit confirmation for any financial op (refunds, transfers, deletions)
- Flag memory-based triggers ("as usual," "like before") as high-risk state changes
- Implement audit trails for all memory writes (who, when, confirmed?)
- Elevate vague instructions to require 2FA
- Never let memory replace real-time authorization

Bottom line:
If you're building or using AI Agents with memory—treat that memory as an attack vector, not just an efficiency tool. The industry is shifting from "what can Agents do" to "how do we stop them from getting rekt."

Memory = moat. But also = exploit.

Stay sharp. 🔐
Tested OneKey Perps gold perpetuals this week. Depth rivals tier-1 CEXs. Slippage control is tight, execution feels native CEX-grade. OneKey Perps is baked directly into the OneKey wallet—web + mobile, no third-party dApp juggling. Liquidity runs on Hyperliquid's on-chain orderbook with Auto BBO limit orders. UX is basically indistinguishable from centralized exchanges. No KYC gauntlet. Connect wallet, start trading. Fully decentralized. Asset coverage: • US equities: NVDA, TSLA, COIN • Precious metals: GOLD, SILVER • Indices: XYZ100 • Energy: crude, nat gas • FX: JPY, EUR • Pre-launch tokens 7 asset classes, one interface. No tab switching. Leverage: • FX: up to 50x • BTC: 40x • Indices: 30x • Equities/metals: 10-25x Built-in visual risk management overlays liquidation levels directly on charts. TP/SL lines + real-time alerts. Custom watchlists, one-click position card sharing. If you're hedging or scalping cross-asset, this setup delivers. Link in bio for 10% fee discount.
Tested OneKey Perps gold perpetuals this week. Depth rivals tier-1 CEXs. Slippage control is tight, execution feels native CEX-grade.

OneKey Perps is baked directly into the OneKey wallet—web + mobile, no third-party dApp juggling. Liquidity runs on Hyperliquid's on-chain orderbook with Auto BBO limit orders. UX is basically indistinguishable from centralized exchanges.

No KYC gauntlet. Connect wallet, start trading. Fully decentralized.

Asset coverage:
• US equities: NVDA, TSLA, COIN
• Precious metals: GOLD, SILVER
• Indices: XYZ100
• Energy: crude, nat gas
• FX: JPY, EUR
• Pre-launch tokens

7 asset classes, one interface. No tab switching.

Leverage:
• FX: up to 50x
• BTC: 40x
• Indices: 30x
• Equities/metals: 10-25x

Built-in visual risk management overlays liquidation levels directly on charts. TP/SL lines + real-time alerts. Custom watchlists, one-click position card sharing.

If you're hedging or scalping cross-asset, this setup delivers. Link in bio for 10% fee discount.
AI计费已经不是简单的Token游戏了 行业从单一Token计价进化到多维计费:搜索次数、缓存命中、运行时长、会话数、甚至按结果付费。企业采购逻辑彻底变了,不再是「谁便宜买谁」,而是「我的实际workload下谁TCO最低」。 价格战打到什么程度? 2025-2026两年,GPT-4级别智能从$30/1M tokens暴跌到$0.06,500倍崩盘。国内更狠:DeepSeek、豆包、通义千问直接把轻量模型打到白菜价,重模型也是几分钱起步。 Grok 4.3刚上线就用低价策略抢开发者,OpenAI、Anthropic、Google全在卷。中国市场早几年就卷到毛利率为负,现在全球都在跟进。 为什么会这样? 算力优化 + 模型压缩让真实成本下降,但更多是战略性亏损换市场。谁先圈到用户、数据和生态,谁就赢下一轮。 现在的局势: 无限降价已经停了,厂商开始用阶梯定价、批量折扣、缓存优化这些精细化运营手段。大家都想先做大规模,再慢慢monetize。 对用户是好事,AI成本暴跌让更多应用跑得起来。但对厂商来说,技术、效率、生态缺一不可,掉队就是出局。 Token还是底层计量单位,但已经不能单独解释AI的商业化了。价值在往应用层转移,成本在继续下沉。
AI计费已经不是简单的Token游戏了

行业从单一Token计价进化到多维计费:搜索次数、缓存命中、运行时长、会话数、甚至按结果付费。企业采购逻辑彻底变了,不再是「谁便宜买谁」,而是「我的实际workload下谁TCO最低」。

价格战打到什么程度?

2025-2026两年,GPT-4级别智能从$30/1M tokens暴跌到$0.06,500倍崩盘。国内更狠:DeepSeek、豆包、通义千问直接把轻量模型打到白菜价,重模型也是几分钱起步。

Grok 4.3刚上线就用低价策略抢开发者,OpenAI、Anthropic、Google全在卷。中国市场早几年就卷到毛利率为负,现在全球都在跟进。

为什么会这样?
算力优化 + 模型压缩让真实成本下降,但更多是战略性亏损换市场。谁先圈到用户、数据和生态,谁就赢下一轮。

现在的局势:
无限降价已经停了,厂商开始用阶梯定价、批量折扣、缓存优化这些精细化运营手段。大家都想先做大规模,再慢慢monetize。

对用户是好事,AI成本暴跌让更多应用跑得起来。但对厂商来说,技术、效率、生态缺一不可,掉队就是出局。

Token还是底层计量单位,但已经不能单独解释AI的商业化了。价值在往应用层转移,成本在继续下沉。
Connectez-vous pour découvrir d’autres contenus
Rejoignez la communauté mondiale des adeptes de cryptomonnaies sur Binance Square
⚡️ Suviez les dernières informations importantes sur les cryptomonnaies.
💬 Jugé digne de confiance par la plus grande plateforme d’échange de cryptomonnaies au monde.
👍 Découvrez les connaissances que partagent les créateurs vérifiés.
Adresse e-mail/Nº de téléphone
Plan du site
Préférences en matière de cookies
CGU de la plateforme