The Truth About Token Burns - And Why Prices Sometimes Jump #learnwithsame_gul #binanc #BinanceSquareTalks $BTC $BNB | Same Gul sur Binance Square

Articles populaires

Favoris et mentions J’aime

Centre pour créateur

--

The Truth About Token Burns - And Why Prices Sometimes Jump#learnwithsame_gul #binanc #BinanceSquareTalks $BTC $BNB 

Avertissement : comprend des opinions de tiers. Il ne s’agit pas d’un conseil financier. Peut inclure du contenu sponsorisé. Consultez les CG.

BTC

92,178.65

+1.92%

BNB

891.89

-0.50%

882

0

Découvrez les dernières actus sur les cryptos

⚡️ Prenez part aux dernières discussions sur les cryptos

💬 Interagissez avec vos créateurs préféré(e)s

👍 Profitez du contenu qui vous intéresse

Adresse e-mail/Nº de téléphone

Créateur pertinent

@same_gul

Découvrez-en plus sur le créateur

CRACKING THE MACRO CODE: Asia's Power Play is Changing the $BTC Game. Traders, the geopolitical landscape is RATTING the traditional markets! 🚨 Macron's recent China visit, coupled with mounting trade imbalances and a stark warning about Europe's industrial core, has solidified a profound economic power shift toward the East. This isn't just politics; it's a global liquidity move. The Asia Effect on Crypto is UNDENIABLE: Japan & Institutional Flow: Japan's new stimulus package and plans for pro-crypto tax reforms signal a major green light for institutional adoption and sector growth. They are building regulated stablecoin frameworks ($JPYC) that professionalize the market. South Korea's Regulatory Maturation: While stringent new rules like 'no-fault liability' are squeezing smaller exchanges and causing a temporary retail investor retreat, this move is building one of the world's most robust and compliant financial frameworks. Regulatory certainty is the bedrock for the next institutional wave. China's Silent Money: Despite the government's cautious stance on virtual currencies, demand for crypto (OTC/P2P) in China remains robust as wealth preservation tools against domestic economic uncertainty. The Trader’s Takeaway: When global economic stability wavers—especially in traditional Western economies—the non-sovereign store of value narrative for Bitcoin strengthens. Short-term turbulence might trigger a 'risk-off' move, but the long-term fundamentals are being reinforced by a world desperate for an alternative hedge against fiat and geopolitical uncertainty. This macro divergence is the biggest catalyst you're not paying attention to. #GeoBTC #CryptoMacro #BinanceSquare #Geopolitics $BTC $ETH Which Asian market do you think will lead the next bull run? Drop your thoughts below! 👇

--

CYCLE DECODED: Is the $BTC 47-Month Peak Theory Officially BUSTED? 🤯 As professional traders, we know the historical power of the Bitcoin 4-Year Cycle. Traditionally, a macro peak hits roughly 1050-1070 days from the bear market low, placing the expected top in the recent window. But this is not a historical cycle. This is a Liquidity-Driven Extension. The structural shifts are undeniable, and they're challenging the old clock: The MVRV Reality Check: Key on-chain indicators like the MVRV Z-Score are flashing mid-cycle signals (sitting around 2.5-3.0), nowhere near the 'Euphoria' zone (7+) that defined past macro tops. The emotional peak hasn't even registered yet. Institutional Supply Shock: Spot ETF inflows are providing a constant, structural bid, effectively absorbing the long-term holder supply that is being sold. This fundamental demand is extending the cycle duration and raising the floor for $BTC. Correction vs. Crash: Analysts are increasingly calling the recent pullback (from the $126K ATH) a shallow correction, not the 60-70% catastrophic drawdown that signals a cycle end. Insight: The focus is shifting from a programmed supply shock (Halving) to a sustained, multi-year demand wave (Institutional Capital and Global Liquidity). We are no longer trading only the halving; we are trading global balance sheets. #CryptoCycles #BTC #GlobalLiquidity #BinanceSquare Drop your favorite on-chain metric and tell me: Is the 4-year cycle officially dead, or is the final blow-off top still ahead?

--

🎤 $BTC vs. Gold: The CZ vs. Schiff Showdown – Has Digital Scarcity Already Won? The 'store of value' debate just went nuclear at Binance Blockchain Week! Our digital future is clashing head-on with tradition, and as an expert trader, here are the three critical takeaways from the CZ vs. Peter Schiff debate you need for your portfolio strategy: The Scarcity Showdown: The core debate remains finite vs. finite. CZ highlighted $BTC's perfectly verifiable 21 million supply cap, arguing it fundamentally crushes Gold's 'unknowable' supply, which increases through mining. This predictable, absolute scarcity is Bitcoin's superpower in an inflationary world. Tokenization Tsunami: The biggest surprise? Peter Schiff unveiled his own gold tokenization project, TGold! Even the most hardened Gold Bug is proving that they can't ignore the blockchain's utility for divisibility and transferability. The market is demanding digitization, and tokenized Gold is the physical asset's response. Verification is Utility: CZ's mic-drop moment was on verifiability: $BTC is instantly verifiable by anyone running a node. Schiff admitted he couldn't confirm the authenticity of a physical bar on the spot. If an asset requires a "destructive" fire assay for 100% proof, it's a relic compared to crypto's trustless ledger. Market Insight: Current data shows $BTC's correlation with Gold is negative (~-0.5), confirming that continues to act more like a high-beta growth asset than a safe-haven hedge. Gold is stability; $BTC is explosive growth potential. I'm playing a balanced game: Gold for defense and tail-risk hedging; BTC for long-term offensive capital appreciation. The Question for the Square: With the market flashing Extreme Fear (Fear & Greed Index in the low 20s)—are you rotating into the time-tested Gold or doubling down on $BTC? Let me know your current conviction! 👇 #DigitalGold #CZvsSchiff #MacroTrading #CryptoAnalysis #BinanceSquare

--

South Korea's $XRP Engine Revs Up: Is the Kimchi Premium Back or is this Altcoin Madness? In this choppy market, while $BTC consolidates, all eyes are on Seoul! 📈 Recent data confirms Upbit volume for $XRP is once again outpacing Bitcoin and Ethereum, driven primarily by aggressive Korean retail buying. The Pro Trader Take: This isn't just retail FOMO. Korea’s highly speculative, tech-savvy trading culture and $XRP's relative local regulatory clarity are fueling this trend. Upbit alone recently drove ~70% of the net spot buy pressure for $XRP. This localized demand is a powerful short-term catalyst, but it also creates thin liquidity globally. ⚠️ Strategy Alert: The "Kimchi Premium" can mean massive upside, but extreme volume dominance on a single exchange like this carries a high risk of fast reversals if global selling pressure returns. Remember to use strict position sizing and always set your Stop-Loss! Consistency over conviction! #XRP #Ripple #KimchiPremium #CryptoAnalysis #BinanceSquare Call to Action: Are these Korean traders signaling a true $XRP breakout, or is this a liquidity trap? What's your next target for $XRP? Let me know below!

--

🐋 WHALE ALERT: Institutional Exodus? $17M+ Fireblocks Custody Move Sparks Debate! Fellow Traders, Expert Crypto Trader here. You need to focus on this on-chain signal right now. Data confirms a repeated pattern of significant $SOL leaving enterprise-grade custody. Most recently, a transfer of 17,000 $SOL (worth over $2.3 million) moved OUT of a Fireblocks Custody wallet to an anonymous address. This follows a larger 110,000 $SOL movement observed just last week. The Expert Breakdown: Fireblocks is the secure vault for institutional players—hedge funds, trading desks, and major enterprises. Funds moving into Fireblocks are a bullish signal of long-term conviction and secure holding. However, movement out to an untagged wallet is where the market uncertainty lies. What could this Whale be planning? Liquidity Prep (Bearish): Shifting to an exchange or OTC desk for a potential block sale, injecting selling pressure into the market. Staking Strategy (Bullish Utility): Moving SOL from a custodial vault to a self-managed address to participate in high-yield DeFi staking protocols (Fireblocks supports native SOL staking). Institutional Rebalance: Simply moving assets between different custody solutions or internal wallets. SOL has shown strong technical resilience and continues to see fundamental adoption (RWA consortiums, new cross-chain bridges), making this whale move the critical short-term data point to watch. Is this institutional profit-taking, or a massive strategic utility play? Drop your on-chain thesis below! 👇 What's the next price target if this whale is selling vs. staking? #Solana #OnChain #WhaleAlert #CryptoNews

--

Dernières actualités

U.S. Senators Call for Public Hearing Before Advancing Market Structure Legislation

--

Zcash's Privacy Design Balances Transparency and Regulation

--

Large Transfer of ENA Tokens from Ethena to Anonymous Address

--

SEC Chair Advocates for Limited ICO Regulation

--

Ethereum's Recent Surge Boosts Trader's Profits

--

Préférences en matière de cookies

CGU de la plateforme

CGU de la plateforme

Préférences en matière de cookies