Felix Trade
2.6k Posts
Felix Trade
Trading investment
Open Trade
High-Frequency Trader
4.9 Years
6 Following
1.9K+ Followers
3.6K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
#termmax @TermMax
If I could only choose 3 metrics to evaluate TermMax, I wouldn’t start with the token price.
I’d focus on TVL, borrowing volume, and protocol revenue.
TVL is the first number I look at, but a rising TVL doesn’t automatically mean a protocol is healthy. I want to know where the liquidity comes from, whether it stays in the protocol, and whether it is actually being used.
Next is borrowing volume. This is where real demand becomes visible. TermMax is built around fixed-rate lending, so what matters is whether users are actually borrowing and using the markets rather than simply depositing assets for incentives.
Finally, protocol revenue.
This is the metric that helps separate activity from sustainable value creation. If users, borrowing volume, and revenue are all growing together, that’s a much stronger signal than TVL growth alone.
For TermMax, I’m more interested in quality growth over time than one impressive number over a few days.
TVL tells me where the money is.
Borrowing volume tells me how that money is being used.
Revenue tells me whether the protocol is actually creating value.
Those are the 3 metrics I’ll be watching most closely for TermMax.
If I could only choose 3 metrics to evaluate TermMax, I wouldn’t start with the token price.
I’d focus on TVL, borrowing volume, and protocol revenue.
TVL is the first number I look at, but a rising TVL doesn’t automatically mean a protocol is healthy. I want to know where the liquidity comes from, whether it stays in the protocol, and whether it is actually being used.
Next is borrowing volume. This is where real demand becomes visible. TermMax is built around fixed-rate lending, so what matters is whether users are actually borrowing and using the markets rather than simply depositing assets for incentives.
Finally, protocol revenue.
This is the metric that helps separate activity from sustainable value creation. If users, borrowing volume, and revenue are all growing together, that’s a much stronger signal than TVL growth alone.
For TermMax, I’m more interested in quality growth over time than one impressive number over a few days.
TVL tells me where the money is.
Borrowing volume tells me how that money is being used.
Revenue tells me whether the protocol is actually creating value.
Those are the 3 metrics I’ll be watching most closely for TermMax.
$BTC Short setup, Feel free it's going to drop to 40,000 regardless.
Entry 64500
Stop loss 66000
Target 50000-40000 🎯
Entry 64500
Stop loss 66000
Target 50000-40000 🎯
$ACE Long setup🔥
Entry: 0.190–0.195
TP: 0.204–0.235–0.270
SL: 0.175
ACE is reclaiming the 0.618 Fibonacci level with bullish momentum, opening room toward higher Fibonacci resistance levels.
Entry: 0.190–0.195
TP: 0.204–0.235–0.270
SL: 0.175
ACE is reclaiming the 0.618 Fibonacci level with bullish momentum, opening room toward higher Fibonacci resistance levels.
$GPS Short setup:
Entry: 0.0165–0.0169
TP: 0.0150–0.0140–0.0128
SL: 0.0187
GPS is rejecting the 0.0166 resistance zone after a parabolic breakout, favoring a short-term pullback.
Entry: 0.0165–0.0169
TP: 0.0150–0.0140–0.0128
SL: 0.0187
GPS is rejecting the 0.0166 resistance zone after a parabolic breakout, favoring a short-term pullback.
$ETH Descending trendline resistance remains intact, creating a favorable setup for another bearish rejection.
Short setup:
Entry: 1900–1925
TP: 1860–1816–1750
SL: 2000
Short setup:
Entry: 1900–1925
TP: 1860–1816–1750
SL: 2000
Verified
#termmax @TermMax
I’m not paying attention to TermMax simply because the current campaign is distributing a large amount of TMX.
What interests me is what they’re actually building.
The part I like most is TermMax’s focus on fixed-rate lending. Instead of constantly dealing with changing borrowing costs, users can lock in a clearer rate and maturity. From there, the project is expanding into leverage, vaults, and especially RWA a sector I believe could become much more important for DeFi.
And then there’s TMX.
I don’t see it as just another token to farm and immediately sell. With a total supply of 1 billion TMX, the token is designed around governance, staking, and participation within the ecosystem.
But there’s one question I care about more than anything:
If TermMax grows significantly, how much value actually flows back to TMX?
That’s what I’ll be watching.
The 2M TMX campaign may bring a lot of new users to TermMax, but for me, the campaign is only the beginning.
The real test comes after the incentives are gone.
If users stay, TVL grows, RWA adoption expands, and the protocol keeps generating real activity, then the TMX story becomes much more interesting.
I’m not paying attention to TermMax simply because the current campaign is distributing a large amount of TMX.
What interests me is what they’re actually building.
The part I like most is TermMax’s focus on fixed-rate lending. Instead of constantly dealing with changing borrowing costs, users can lock in a clearer rate and maturity. From there, the project is expanding into leverage, vaults, and especially RWA a sector I believe could become much more important for DeFi.
And then there’s TMX.
I don’t see it as just another token to farm and immediately sell. With a total supply of 1 billion TMX, the token is designed around governance, staking, and participation within the ecosystem.
But there’s one question I care about more than anything:
If TermMax grows significantly, how much value actually flows back to TMX?
That’s what I’ll be watching.
The 2M TMX campaign may bring a lot of new users to TermMax, but for me, the campaign is only the beginning.
The real test comes after the incentives are gone.
If users stay, TVL grows, RWA adoption expands, and the protocol keeps generating real activity, then the TMX story becomes much more interesting.
Log in to explore more content