luncburn
10 Following
24 Followers
211 Liked
6 Shared
All
Quotes
See original
$LUNC $USTC Today we will talk about hexxagon
First, what is hexxagon: hexxagon is a platform that helps nodes to be hosted and able to stake their projects..... something similar to what Binance does with BNB block x currency and in return, they give me another for the block and in the end, I recover the locked one.
This being the locking of LUNC by juris of #JurisProtocol this causes a few burns and gives you juris which we remember is part of the LUNC community.
Furthermore, it puts on the table that for 50 dollars a month, it will train developers to see if for the future development of the chain.
Well, we have already seen that #JurisProtocol is supporting the chain since its leader and co-leader will be on the first and second of October at TOKEN2049 as promised while being at ETHwarsaw this month.
Additionally, vegas-morph spoke with the director of Bybit aleminia and only said that...... let’s hope everything is for the best.
We see how little by little the chain is reviving.
We all must contribute our grain of sand by holding/futures/buying and selling/burns so that they see that the community lives ❤️🔥
#LuncArmy
First, what is hexxagon: hexxagon is a platform that helps nodes to be hosted and able to stake their projects..... something similar to what Binance does with BNB block x currency and in return, they give me another for the block and in the end, I recover the locked one.
This being the locking of LUNC by juris of #JurisProtocol this causes a few burns and gives you juris which we remember is part of the LUNC community.
Furthermore, it puts on the table that for 50 dollars a month, it will train developers to see if for the future development of the chain.
Well, we have already seen that #JurisProtocol is supporting the chain since its leader and co-leader will be on the first and second of October at TOKEN2049 as promised while being at ETHwarsaw this month.
Additionally, vegas-morph spoke with the director of Bybit aleminia and only said that...... let’s hope everything is for the best.
We see how little by little the chain is reviving.
We all must contribute our grain of sand by holding/futures/buying and selling/burns so that they see that the community lives ❤️🔥
#LuncArmy
See original
$LUNC $USTC on the day 26/09/25 #Binance I carried out a burn out of time of LUNC 165,152 and USTC 580
#LUNCBurning any help is good and little by little closer to the goal...... it was a good week of burns and large movements in the wallets
let's hope everything is for the best and remember it is long term the chain is just stabilizing from the chaos with updates and positive outlooks...... the next closure of the SEC trial with TFL with that finished could finally put an end to everything and let someone take the initiative of everything in the end time will tell
#LuncArmy
#LUNCBurning any help is good and little by little closer to the goal...... it was a good week of burns and large movements in the wallets
let's hope everything is for the best and remember it is long term the chain is just stabilizing from the chaos with updates and positive outlooks...... the next closure of the SEC trial with TFL with that finished could finally put an end to everything and let someone take the initiative of everything in the end time will tell
#LuncArmy
See original
$LUNC $USTC became a reality the proposal was accepted
now there will be access to old funds blocked by errors from old updates in AstroPort
the image on the right shows amounts
this would not be included in the update that will be made #orbitlabs until the next one since it is necessary to see how to enter the nodes and how to close them as if nothing had happened (as I mentioned in the previous post that I am referring to)
the main actors of this update will be vegas_morph and strachcole
let's hope that when the update arrives it increases the community fund for improvements in the ecosystem and there are large burns due to the movements.
#LuncArmy what do you think I read👀
now there will be access to old funds blocked by errors from old updates in AstroPort
the image on the right shows amounts
this would not be included in the update that will be made #orbitlabs until the next one since it is necessary to see how to enter the nodes and how to close them as if nothing had happened (as I mentioned in the previous post that I am referring to)
the main actors of this update will be vegas_morph and strachcole
let's hope that when the update arrives it increases the community fund for improvements in the ecosystem and there are large burns due to the movements.
#LuncArmy what do you think I read👀
$LUNC $USTC today we will talk about a proposal in the LUNC community by "strachcole" a validator in the community who does not comment much or express opinions often, but when he proposes something or speaks, things always take a radical turn for the better.
The proposal is as follows: he says they can make a patch on the old nodes (old updates) and withdraw all the funds that are in the image on the left, which as we see are large amounts through a patch that would reach those funds through a specific hole in the nodes and would be closed again as if nothing had happened. An example would be that we have a piggy bank without a cork to seal it again, and since we do not want to break it, we make a hole to take out the money and cover it again with the same piece we removed, leaving it as if nothing had happened.
The document does not mention burning those funds; it talks about the following:
1: liquidity for the chain (could be for projects and updates)
2: restore old sources of income that were stagnated due to lack of economic solvency
If this proposal is activated, it would cause short-term chaos in the price of LUNC, but the validators and especially validator bots would have to re-establish the price hours or days after the event if it is approved.
Personally, I do not know how to feel about this proposal, but strachcole always comes to shake things up and always for the better.
My stance on this will be neutral, and what do you think? I read you.......
The proposal is as follows: he says they can make a patch on the old nodes (old updates) and withdraw all the funds that are in the image on the left, which as we see are large amounts through a patch that would reach those funds through a specific hole in the nodes and would be closed again as if nothing had happened. An example would be that we have a piggy bank without a cork to seal it again, and since we do not want to break it, we make a hole to take out the money and cover it again with the same piece we removed, leaving it as if nothing had happened.
The document does not mention burning those funds; it talks about the following:
1: liquidity for the chain (could be for projects and updates)
2: restore old sources of income that were stagnated due to lack of economic solvency
If this proposal is activated, it would cause short-term chaos in the price of LUNC, but the validators and especially validator bots would have to re-establish the price hours or days after the event if it is approved.
Personally, I do not know how to feel about this proposal, but strachcole always comes to shake things up and always for the better.
My stance on this will be neutral, and what do you think? I read you.......
See original
$LUNC $USTC today closes the voting on the proposal for uSTD as a new stablecoin (there may be more than one currency in the chain) being rejected.......
the explanation we gave on 13/09/25 about this is below.
I have to admit that as the days went by I went from an optimistic attitude to neutral to later being opposed to this; my reasons are as follows:
1: being on layer 1 (L1) of the ecosystem according to strachcole, a sage in the community, would be bad as it is the heart of everything and is 100% decentralized, and to adopt that currency it would have to be done on layer 2 (L2) since if you want to move forward with #JurisProtocol and #SeleniumProtocol it needs to have a certain degree of centralization for the trust of the RWA and be attractive to them for having some control over the income.
2: they asked for more than 200,000 dollars and I understand that the chain does not have that much money to use so lightly, also there were no guarantees that it would work; additionally, the 20% APR seemed like a fantasy to be honest.
3: the developers did not take responsibility if there were failures in the program.... there was talk of insurance for X amount of dollars and the developers showed their faces but that insurance was never proven.
in conclusion: the idea is really good, that is for sure, but it needs to be implemented on another layer (L) specifically designed for the RWA as layer 2 (L2) is doing...... I feel that the idea came too soon..... maybe in the future it will be functional with a more developed project and better control parameters.
#LuncArmy what do you think, I read you.
the explanation we gave on 13/09/25 about this is below.
I have to admit that as the days went by I went from an optimistic attitude to neutral to later being opposed to this; my reasons are as follows:
1: being on layer 1 (L1) of the ecosystem according to strachcole, a sage in the community, would be bad as it is the heart of everything and is 100% decentralized, and to adopt that currency it would have to be done on layer 2 (L2) since if you want to move forward with #JurisProtocol and #SeleniumProtocol it needs to have a certain degree of centralization for the trust of the RWA and be attractive to them for having some control over the income.
2: they asked for more than 200,000 dollars and I understand that the chain does not have that much money to use so lightly, also there were no guarantees that it would work; additionally, the 20% APR seemed like a fantasy to be honest.
3: the developers did not take responsibility if there were failures in the program.... there was talk of insurance for X amount of dollars and the developers showed their faces but that insurance was never proven.
in conclusion: the idea is really good, that is for sure, but it needs to be implemented on another layer (L) specifically designed for the RWA as layer 2 (L2) is doing...... I feel that the idea came too soon..... maybe in the future it will be functional with a more developed project and better control parameters.
#LuncArmy what do you think, I read you.
$LUNC $USTC hello I would like to talk to you about something good for the LUNC community on the day 13/09/25 the sUSD coin was approved, a synthetic coin. But first, we need to know the following.....
What is a synthetic coin? Well, a synthetic coin is one that replicates a value either in the physical or digital world, like USDC, USTC, tether, dollar, euro, among others.
So, sUSD would be the stable coin within the ecosystem of #JurisProtocol for which money would be lent. Remember, #JurisProtocol is a kind of bank within the LUNC ecosystem. (We say kind because it is not a bank per se, but a lending system)
This is good news since the interest income could be used to buy and burn LUNC or develop new projects for the benefit of the community and increase the value of its assets.
Here we demonstrate that the community is alive!!!!!!!!
What is a synthetic coin? Well, a synthetic coin is one that replicates a value either in the physical or digital world, like USDC, USTC, tether, dollar, euro, among others.
So, sUSD would be the stable coin within the ecosystem of #JurisProtocol for which money would be lent. Remember, #JurisProtocol is a kind of bank within the LUNC ecosystem. (We say kind because it is not a bank per se, but a lending system)
This is good news since the interest income could be used to buy and burn LUNC or develop new projects for the benefit of the community and increase the value of its assets.
Here we demonstrate that the community is alive!!!!!!!!
Translate
$LUNC $USTC hay nueva informacion sobre el capitulo 11 de la demanda de la SEC contra TFL
se manda a traer un testigo relacionado directamente con TFL antes de su caida en mayo del 2022
su nombre es EDWARD KIM. trabajaba como unos de los desarrolladores principales en la cadena en sus tiempos de gloria
despues del colapso se unio de terra rebels y creo terra grant intentando restaurar la moneda desarrollando en gran parte la primera capa (L1) del ecosistema pero dejo el proyecto. sin dar grandes explicaciones y se enfoco en otros proyectos.
actualmente esta desarrollando un sistema BLOCK ENTROPY que es una IA basada en el proof of stake, esto dentro del ecosistema de COSMOS ayudando a LUNC...... seguir ayudando a LUNC desde las sombras pero no da mucha fiabilidad y hay sospecha en su actuar sobre su compromiso con LUNC.
su declaracion sera el 3 de noviembre de este año y su declaracion puede ayudar a la comunidad con informacion nueva y acelerando el juicio y determinar que pasara con la comunidad o bien sus declaraciones serian nuevas y saldrian mas investigaciones al respecto a largando mas el juicio y haciendolo mas tortuoso...........
aqui mantenemos expectativas altas sobre sus declaraciones que puedan ayudar a la comunidad y su avance ya que como eh mencionado ayuda desde las sombras a su manera.
ustedes que opinan? ayudara, retardara o hundira a la comunidad. los leo
#LuncArmy
se manda a traer un testigo relacionado directamente con TFL antes de su caida en mayo del 2022
su nombre es EDWARD KIM. trabajaba como unos de los desarrolladores principales en la cadena en sus tiempos de gloria
despues del colapso se unio de terra rebels y creo terra grant intentando restaurar la moneda desarrollando en gran parte la primera capa (L1) del ecosistema pero dejo el proyecto. sin dar grandes explicaciones y se enfoco en otros proyectos.
actualmente esta desarrollando un sistema BLOCK ENTROPY que es una IA basada en el proof of stake, esto dentro del ecosistema de COSMOS ayudando a LUNC...... seguir ayudando a LUNC desde las sombras pero no da mucha fiabilidad y hay sospecha en su actuar sobre su compromiso con LUNC.
su declaracion sera el 3 de noviembre de este año y su declaracion puede ayudar a la comunidad con informacion nueva y acelerando el juicio y determinar que pasara con la comunidad o bien sus declaraciones serian nuevas y saldrian mas investigaciones al respecto a largando mas el juicio y haciendolo mas tortuoso...........
aqui mantenemos expectativas altas sobre sus declaraciones que puedan ayudar a la comunidad y su avance ya que como eh mencionado ayuda desde las sombras a su manera.
ustedes que opinan? ayudara, retardara o hundira a la comunidad. los leo
#LuncArmy
See original
due to the liquidation of the bots we will be out for a while
we will remain on the sidelines of the news
we will remain on the sidelines of the news
See original
$USTC the day 21/09/25 burned 15,978 USTC
the trading bot executed 34 grids and if #Binance would support the burn it would have burned 3.52 USTC
#ustcburning
the trading bot executed 34 grids and if #Binance would support the burn it would have burned 3.52 USTC
#ustcburning
See original
$LUNC on the day 21/09/25, 14,666,938 LUNC were burned
the trading bot executed 50 grids burning a total of 3908
red market #Septiembrerojo
#luncburn
the trading bot executed 50 grids burning a total of 3908
red market #Septiembrerojo
#luncburn
See original
$USTC On the day 20/09/25, 22,056 USTC were burned due to the weekend effect.
The trading bot executed 26 grids and if #Binance supports the burn, 2.57 USTC would have been burned.
Don't forget to vote or delegate your vote in the 2 active decisions in the community.
#ustcburning
The trading bot executed 26 grids and if #Binance supports the burn, 2.57 USTC would have been burned.
Don't forget to vote or delegate your vote in the 2 active decisions in the community.
#ustcburning
See original
$LUNC on the day 20/09/25, 10,805,007 LUNC were burned, a day with low burns thanks to the weekend
the trading bot made 30 grids burning a total of 2273 LUNC
remember to delegate your vote or vote on the 2 decisions that are currently in the community
#luncburn
the trading bot made 30 grids burning a total of 2273 LUNC
remember to delegate your vote or vote on the 2 decisions that are currently in the community
#luncburn
See original
$USTC on the day 19/09/25, 33,833 USTC were burned
the trading bot executed 86 grids and if #Binance supports the burn, 8.40 USTC would have been burned
don't forget to vote in the community!!!!!
#ustcburning
the trading bot executed 86 grids and if #Binance supports the burn, 8.40 USTC would have been burned
don't forget to vote in the community!!!!!
#ustcburning
See original
$LUNC on the day 19/09/25, 21,566,380 LUNC were burned
the trading bot executed 63 grids burning 4777 LUNC
remember to vote on this decision currently in the community
#luncburn
the trading bot executed 63 grids burning 4777 LUNC
remember to vote on this decision currently in the community
#luncburn
See original
$USTC the day 18/09/25 41,407 were burned it has been 4 days of good burns
the trading bot broke records and made 106 grids and if #Binance supports the burn 10.40 USTC would have been burned
strong days are coming for USTC the voting for the adoption of a new stablecoin is taking place and if accepted it would be USTC and uSDT
our stance is neutral......... in front of that.......
#ustcburning
the trading bot broke records and made 106 grids and if #Binance supports the burn 10.40 USTC would have been burned
strong days are coming for USTC the voting for the adoption of a new stablecoin is taking place and if accepted it would be USTC and uSDT
our stance is neutral......... in front of that.......
#ustcburning
See original
$LUNC on the day 18/09/25 11,269,677 LUNC were burned, day down compared to the last 5 days
the trading bot broke records again and executed 103 grids burning a total of 7668 LUNC
critical days are coming regarding the decision on whether there will be a new stablecoin uSDT or if we just continue with USTC.....my stance is neutral on that and what about yours?
#luncburn
the trading bot broke records again and executed 103 grids burning a total of 7668 LUNC
critical days are coming regarding the decision on whether there will be a new stablecoin uSDT or if we just continue with USTC.....my stance is neutral on that and what about yours?
#luncburn
See original
$LUNC what nerves lunc broke the 62 let's hope it holds but to solidify the movement it needs to break the barrier of .635 and for more firmness above .645
various positive factors
1:bullrun too close
2:SEC cuts
3: the new stablecoin adoption with a 50/50 burn model and an extremely attractive APR is currently being voted on........my stance is neutral on that
4: the update from orbit labs that would take the step towards the latest in blockchains
5: united community with real advancements finally after years❤️🔥
the only speculative/bad factor is the supposed burn of 2/3 of existing LUNC that the SEC is forcing TFL to burn......there's nothing official but the rumor is strong
according to projections from advanced traders it could rise by 270% around 0.00018-0.00020 and do you know what that means for LUNC?
1:price increase and the valuable elimination of a 0 which makes it more attractive at market level
2: increase in burns.... the higher the value the more tax added = more lunc burned per transaction
3: demonstrate that the community is alive🫡 #LuncArmy
various positive factors
1:bullrun too close
2:SEC cuts
3: the new stablecoin adoption with a 50/50 burn model and an extremely attractive APR is currently being voted on........my stance is neutral on that
4: the update from orbit labs that would take the step towards the latest in blockchains
5: united community with real advancements finally after years❤️🔥
the only speculative/bad factor is the supposed burn of 2/3 of existing LUNC that the SEC is forcing TFL to burn......there's nothing official but the rumor is strong
according to projections from advanced traders it could rise by 270% around 0.00018-0.00020 and do you know what that means for LUNC?
1:price increase and the valuable elimination of a 0 which makes it more attractive at market level
2: increase in burns.... the higher the value the more tax added = more lunc burned per transaction
3: demonstrate that the community is alive🫡 #LuncArmy
See original
$USTC on the day 17/09/25 47,846 USTC were burned great day of burns
the trading bot executed 39 grids and if #Binance supports the burn 3.87 USTC would have been burned
#ustcburning
the trading bot executed 39 grids and if #Binance supports the burn 3.87 USTC would have been burned
#ustcburning
See original
$LUNC on the day 17/09/25, 41,826,895 LUNC were burned, a great day for burns.
the trading bot executed 82 grids, burning a total of 6097 LUNC, officially the day with the most burns and grids from the bot, plus the price of LUNC breaking the barrier of 61.
#luncburn
the trading bot executed 82 grids, burning a total of 6097 LUNC, officially the day with the most burns and grids from the bot, plus the price of LUNC breaking the barrier of 61.
#luncburn
See original
$USTC on the day 16/09/25, 22,436 USTC were burned
the trading bot executed 37 grids and if #Binance supports the burn, 3.67 USTC would have been burned
cheer up orbit labs community, support with updates!!!!!!!!
#ustcburning
the trading bot executed 37 grids and if #Binance supports the burn, 3.67 USTC would have been burned
cheer up orbit labs community, support with updates!!!!!!!!
#ustcburning
See original
$LUNC on the day 16/09/25, 34,365,028 LUNC were burned
the trading bot executed 54 grids burning a total of 4049 LUNC
we start the week with good news for the community with updates from orbit labs😀 keep it up community
#luncburn
the trading bot executed 54 grids burning a total of 4049 LUNC
we start the week with good news for the community with updates from orbit labs😀 keep it up community
#luncburn
Login to explore more contents