努力买法拉利

In fact, this alpha simply means that there are more participants. How can there be so many studios? As you said, with the 50/50 split and buying those verifications, they are not fools. They can learn and make money themselves. Their identity information is their own, so why would they work with you? Paying salaries is not realistic; the earnings are not fixed. If there are fewer people, no one will do it, and if there are more, they will be countered. Verification can be done during score brushing, but do not limit it to fingerprints and facial recognition. It can be random checks while also detecting whether other script apps are running in the background of the phone, and conducting risk assessments of the system environment. However, try to change it to verify at the time of purchase, meaning verification must happen before buying, not at the time of selling, as this can easily lead to users being caught. @Yi He
Returning to the essence of the problem, the core issue of the increased threshold is that there are more participants in October and fewer airdrops. These two reasons lead to many people unable to get in. If they cannot accumulate points, the threshold will rise again. More airdrops of old coins should be done to consume points. Projects unwilling to provide airdrops are just cutting leeks, so it’s crucial to drop them early. This is the key. What’s being discussed in the square is not really the core issue; the key is that there are too few projects. Project parties are also afraid to launch because they cannot make money. The market is not good now. Focus on the observation area and those projects that are essentially dead fish, and issue airdrops to boost platform user activity.
The essence of many projects is that they are making too much money just for infinite unlocks and shipments. Even if the price continues to fall, they can still profit by unlocking new tokens while ensuring a decent market value, such as $DOGE . When the highest price was 0.71, the market value was only that much. Now it hovers near the top ten; besides consensus, it’s more about the community’s inaction plus the unlocking and issuance volume.
Therefore, risk control must be tightened, and projects should be followed up. If there are not so many new projects, we have to keep an eye on old projects. Currently, they are speculating on new and not old; the fundamental reason is that they have too many trapped positions, with basically no fluctuations, and they are not doing anything, or they keep releasing good news but do not pump the market.