Binance Square

LUNA Classic

T.g: z3r0wTrades
74 Following
221 Followers
483 Liked
32 Shared
All Content
--
Bullish
$LUNC {spot}(LUNCUSDT) WAKE UP LUNC COMMUNITY BECAUSE Binance have added LUNC/USDC!! – What This REALLY Means for LUNC?? Let’s break this down plainly. This isn’t just another random listing. On December 24, 2025, Binance officially opened the LUNC/USDC spot trading pair. —Who Provided the Liquidity? (The Key Point Everyone Needs to Hear) Here’s the exciting part – no known liquidity partnership or market maker came from the LUNC community side for this specific pair. • The Terra Classic community didn’t fund or organize dedicated providers. • No public announcement of a project-side deal to seed the order book. Yet the pair launched with solid depth right from day one, complete with immediate Trading Bots support for tight spreads. That liquidity had to come from external sources, orchestrated by Binance itself. —In short: Binance and its partners (like Circle) ensured strong liquidity at launch. This shows real platform-level support for $LUNC – they’re not waiting for community-funded providers; they’re making it happen to expand USDC usage and offer better options on the world’s biggest exchange. —This isn’t “charity” – Binance sees value in $LUNC’s resilience, on-chain activity, and potential. But it IS a strong vote of confidence: they’re investing infrastructure and incentives to make $LUNC more tradable and attractive. The community has been building relentlessly – upgrades, burns, utility proposals – and moves like this are the payoff. —Binance didn’t have to do this, but they did. Stay focused, keep building, and let’s drive real volume into this pair. This is bullish. #LUNC #TerraClassic #LUNCUSDC #Binance #Crypto
$LUNC
WAKE UP LUNC COMMUNITY BECAUSE
Binance have added LUNC/USDC!!

– What This REALLY Means for LUNC??
Let’s break this down plainly.

This isn’t just another random listing. On December 24, 2025, Binance officially opened the LUNC/USDC spot trading pair.

—Who Provided the Liquidity? (The Key Point Everyone Needs to Hear)

Here’s the exciting part – no known liquidity partnership or market maker came from the LUNC community side for this specific pair.

• The Terra Classic community didn’t fund or organize dedicated providers.

• No public announcement of a project-side deal to seed the order book.

Yet the pair launched with solid depth right from day one, complete with immediate Trading Bots support for tight spreads.

That liquidity had to come from external sources, orchestrated by Binance itself.

—In short: Binance and its partners (like Circle) ensured strong liquidity at launch.

This shows real platform-level support for $LUNC – they’re not waiting for community-funded providers; they’re making it happen to expand USDC usage and offer better options on the world’s biggest exchange.

—This isn’t “charity” – Binance sees value in $LUNC ’s resilience, on-chain activity, and potential. But it IS a strong vote of confidence: they’re investing infrastructure and incentives to make $LUNC more tradable and attractive.

The community has been building relentlessly – upgrades, burns, utility proposals – and moves like this are the payoff.

—Binance didn’t have to do this, but they did.

Stay focused, keep building, and let’s drive real volume into this pair.

This is bullish.
#LUNC #TerraClassic #LUNCUSDC #Binance #Crypto
LUNC
LUNC
Richard Teng
--
Growth in crypto adoption is picking up speed.

0 → 170M in 6.5 years.
170M → 300M in just 1+ year.

The community is growing faster than ever. 💛
--
Bullish
Lunc Community remember this from CZ himself back in 2022, right when the fork idea was pushed? “Reducing supply should be done via burn, not fork at an old date, and abandon everyone who tried to rescue the coin.” Straight facts. CZ called it out loud and clear: Forks don’t create value. They abandon the fighters who held through hell, trying to save the chain. And what happened? They forked anyway → Terra 2.0 ($LUNA) was born… a shiny new chain with no algo stable, airdrops to pre-crash holders, and zero respect for the post-crash warriors who bought in, staked, and defended the original. Meanwhile, the real Terra – the one Binance Labs invested in from day one – became Terra Classic ($LUNC). The chain CZ’s team never sold, still burns monthly on Binance, and keeps getting tagged in the YZi Labs Portfolio to this day (while $LUNA 2.0 gets ZERO mention on CMC). CZ hated the fork idea. History proves he was right. $LUNA should never have existed. It split the community, diluted the vision. The fork fades. #LUNC #TerraClassic #BurnNotFork #YZiLabs #Crypto {spot}(LUNCUSDT)
Lunc Community remember this from CZ himself back in 2022, right when the fork idea was pushed?

“Reducing supply should be done via burn, not fork at an old date, and abandon everyone who tried to rescue the coin.”

Straight facts.

CZ called it out loud and clear: Forks don’t create value.

They abandon the fighters who held through hell, trying to save the chain.

And what happened? They forked anyway → Terra 2.0 ($LUNA) was born… a shiny new chain with no algo stable, airdrops to pre-crash holders, and zero respect for the post-crash warriors who bought in, staked, and defended the original.

Meanwhile, the real Terra – the one Binance Labs invested in from day one – became Terra Classic ($LUNC).

The chain CZ’s team never sold, still burns monthly on Binance, and keeps getting tagged in the YZi Labs Portfolio to this day (while $LUNA 2.0 gets ZERO mention on CMC).

CZ hated the fork idea.
History proves he was right.

$LUNA should never have existed.
It split the community, diluted the vision.
The fork fades.

#LUNC #TerraClassic #BurnNotFork #YZiLabs #Crypto
Lunc Community, let’s connect some serious dots for Terra Classic & Binance—Many keep saying “Binance sold all their LUNC after the 2022 crash — they have zero holdings now.” But look at this: Even in late 2025, CoinMarketCap STILL tags $LUNC under the YZi Labs Portfolio (the rebranded former Binance Labs — CZ & Yi He’s family office). YZi Labs Portfolio is treated as its own massive sector on CMC, dominating billions in market cap… and $LUNC is right there in the mix, often popping as a top performer (like +33% gainer recently). If Binance/YZi had truly dumped everything and washed their hands, why would CMC keep this legacy tag active years later — through the crash, the fork, the rebrand, and all the noise? CZ himself said back then: Binance held onto their original LUNC tokens, never sold, even as the value cratered. And here we are in 2025 — ongoing monthly burns by Binance (billions torched), full support for upgrades, and this persistent portfolio association. This isn’t just outdated data. It’s a signal: The ties run deeper than people think. The original investment might be tiny in dollar terms now, but keeping $LUNC in the YZi ecosystem spotlight? That could hint at bigger belief — or even renewed positioning — in Terra Classic’s comeback. $LUNC isn’t dead — it’s reloading.  

Lunc Community, let’s connect some serious dots for Terra Classic & Binance

—Many keep saying “Binance sold all their LUNC after the 2022 crash — they have zero holdings now.”
But look at this: Even in late 2025, CoinMarketCap STILL tags $LUNC under the YZi Labs Portfolio (the rebranded former Binance Labs — CZ & Yi He’s family office).
YZi Labs Portfolio is treated as its own massive sector on CMC, dominating billions in market cap… and $LUNC is right there in the mix, often popping as a top performer (like +33% gainer recently).
If Binance/YZi had truly dumped everything and washed their hands, why would CMC keep this legacy tag active years later — through the crash, the fork, the rebrand, and all the noise?
CZ himself said back then: Binance held onto their original LUNC tokens, never sold, even as the value cratered.
And here we are in 2025 — ongoing monthly burns by Binance (billions torched), full support for upgrades, and this persistent portfolio association.
This isn’t just outdated data.
It’s a signal: The ties run deeper than people think. The original investment might be tiny in dollar terms now, but keeping $LUNC in the YZi ecosystem spotlight?
That could hint at bigger belief — or even renewed positioning — in Terra Classic’s comeback.
$LUNC isn’t dead — it’s reloading.
 
--
Bullish
@stablekwon was a danger for the system!! TerraSDR (SDT) is a stablecoin within the Terra blockchain ecosystem. It's designed to maintain a stable value by pegging to the International Monetary Fund's Special Drawing Rights (SDR)—a basket of major fiat currencies (USD, EUR, CNY, JPY, GBP)—rather than a single currency like the USD. - Peg Mechanism: Its price is algorithmically stabilized using Terra's oracle system and collateralized by LUNA tokens. This allows it to track the SDR's value, which fluctuates slightly based on the basket's exchange rates. - Use Cases: Primarily for cross-border payments, DeFi applications, and as a base asset in Terra's stablecoin system. It's one of several Terra stablecoins, alongside UST (USD-pegged, which famously depegged) and others like TerraKRW. - Token Symbol: SDT. - TerraSDR operates on Terra Classic (LUNC chain).$USTC $LUNC #MarketRebound #StablecoinLaw
@stablekwon was a danger for the system!!

TerraSDR (SDT) is a stablecoin within the Terra blockchain ecosystem. It's designed to maintain a stable value by pegging to the International Monetary Fund's Special Drawing Rights (SDR)—a basket of major fiat currencies (USD, EUR, CNY, JPY, GBP)—rather than a single currency like the USD.

- Peg Mechanism: Its price is algorithmically stabilized using Terra's oracle system and collateralized by LUNA tokens. This allows it to track the SDR's value, which fluctuates slightly based on the basket's exchange rates.

- Use Cases: Primarily for cross-border payments, DeFi applications, and as a base asset in Terra's stablecoin system. It's one of several Terra stablecoins, alongside UST (USD-pegged, which famously depegged) and others like TerraKRW.
- Token Symbol: SDT.
- TerraSDR operates on Terra Classic (LUNC chain).$USTC $LUNC #MarketRebound #StablecoinLaw
See original
LUNA Classic
--
Bullish
>SENDOR marketplace connects users Globally— $SEND is your agency that connects
buyers and sellers.
It eliminates 5-6% intermediary fees, enabling direct buyer-seller connections for cost
savings and streamlined communications. Addressing global search fragmentation, it unifies
listings worldwide into one intuitive platform—browse and discuss freely, with a $1.50 fee
paid in $SEND coins only for verified contacts upon purchase intent.#rwa #RWA板块涨势强劲
--
Bullish
>SENDOR marketplace connects users Globally— $SEND is your agency that connects buyers and sellers. It eliminates 5-6% intermediary fees, enabling direct buyer-seller connections for cost savings and streamlined communications. Addressing global search fragmentation, it unifies listings worldwide into one intuitive platform—browse and discuss freely, with a $1.50 fee paid in $SEND coins only for verified contacts upon purchase intent.#rwa #RWA板块涨势强劲
>SENDOR marketplace connects users Globally— $SEND is your agency that connects
buyers and sellers.
It eliminates 5-6% intermediary fees, enabling direct buyer-seller connections for cost
savings and streamlined communications. Addressing global search fragmentation, it unifies
listings worldwide into one intuitive platform—browse and discuss freely, with a $1.50 fee
paid in $SEND coins only for verified contacts upon purchase intent.#rwa #RWA板块涨势强劲
See original
https://t.me/SendorMarketplace
https://t.me/SendorMarketplace
Quoted content has been removed
$10 incoming
$10 incoming
Eljaboom
--
$ASTER 10 CODED
SEC VS TERRAFORM #753 Documents from the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC) During the course of a bankruptcy case or proceeding, bankruptcy court notices are mailed by the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC) on behalf of the Court.  The BNC, which is operated by a private contractor, provides notice production and mailing services for the court, but THE BNC IS NOT THE COURT.  #LTV #LunaClassicTurkishValidator $LUNC $USTC $LUNA
SEC VS TERRAFORM #753

Documents from the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC)

During the course of a bankruptcy case or proceeding, bankruptcy court notices are mailed by the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC) on behalf of the Court.  The BNC, which is operated by a private contractor, provides notice production and mailing services for the court, but THE BNC IS NOT THE COURT. 

#LTV #LunaClassicTurkishValidator $LUNC $USTC $LUNA
--
Bullish
LTV is a KYC’ed validator on Terra Classic. We come from the community are here for the community. We believe that TERRA is One or the best blockchain in crypto world.$LUNC $USTC
LTV is a KYC’ed validator on Terra Classic. We come from the community are here for the community. We believe that TERRA is One or the best blockchain in crypto world.$LUNC
$USTC
LTV is a KYC’ed validator on Terra Classic. We come from the community are here for the community. We believe that TERRA is One or the best blockchain in crypto world $BTC $LUNC $USTC
LTV is a KYC’ed validator on Terra Classic. We come from the community are here for the community. We believe that TERRA is One or the best blockchain in crypto world

$BTC $LUNC $USTC
--
Bullish
See original
🚀Terraform Labs and Do Kwon agree to temporarily resolve SEC fraud case $LUNA $LUNC
🚀Terraform Labs and Do Kwon agree to temporarily resolve SEC fraud case

$LUNA $LUNC
--
Bullish
See original
Here are some important points you need to know about Terra Classic: Purpose: Terra Classic was initially designed as a platform for creating stablecoins (cryptocurrencies whose price is pegged to a fixed asset, usually the US dollar). These stablecoins aimed to reduce the price volatility of cryptocurrencies, allowing them to be used in a similar way to traditional currencies. Collapse: In May 2022, the Terra ecosystem suffered a major collapse as the algorithmic stablecoin called TerraUSD (USTC) lost its peg to the US dollar. This event led to significant losses in the cryptocurrency market. Current Situation: After the crash, investors in the Terra Classic chain received tokens via airdrop to the new Terra chain (LUNA). Although Terra Classic still hosts some applications and projects, it is far from its former popularity. Some features of the Terra Classic blockchain include: Smart contracts: Supports smart contracts with standards such as cw20. This allows developers to build complex applications on the blockchain. Proof-of-Stake (PoS): Uses the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism to secure the block verification process. In this mechanism, validators stake their tokens and earn rewards for their contributions to the network. Remember: Cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology are still developing fields and involve high risk. Be sure to do your own research before investing.$LUNC
Here are some important points you need to know about Terra Classic:

Purpose: Terra Classic was initially designed as a platform for creating stablecoins (cryptocurrencies whose price is pegged to a fixed asset, usually the US dollar). These stablecoins aimed to reduce the price volatility of cryptocurrencies, allowing them to be used in a similar way to traditional currencies.
Collapse: In May 2022, the Terra ecosystem suffered a major collapse as the algorithmic stablecoin called TerraUSD (USTC) lost its peg to the US dollar. This event led to significant losses in the cryptocurrency market.
Current Situation: After the crash, investors in the Terra Classic chain received tokens via airdrop to the new Terra chain (LUNA). Although Terra Classic still hosts some applications and projects, it is far from its former popularity.
Some features of the Terra Classic blockchain include:

Smart contracts: Supports smart contracts with standards such as cw20. This allows developers to build complex applications on the blockchain.
Proof-of-Stake (PoS): Uses the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism to secure the block verification process. In this mechanism, validators stake their tokens and earn rewards for their contributions to the network.
Remember: Cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology are still developing fields and involve high risk. Be sure to do your own research before investing.$LUNC
--
Bullish
Remove $USTC for XXXX COIN Addressing USTC's Peg Issue: XXXX wouldn't directly aim to repeg USTC. Instead, it would offer USTC holders a way to: * Exit USTC and potentially earn rewards in a stablecoin with a reliable peg. * Participate in the Terra Classic blockchain ecosystem through XXXX's governance and fee discounts. **-Make a new coin named (XXXX)** Mechanism: • Minting XXXX: Users would mint XXXX by burning USTC at a predetermined rate (e.g., 1 USTC per 1 XXXX). This permanently removes USTC from circulation. • Utility: early XXXX coin holders would get a good % of $Lunc who have staked them, to make it attractive for USTC holders. ◦ Staking Rewards: Users can stake XXXX to earn $LUNC rewards Against that a reliable peg XXXX coin. Why rewarding people who own USTC with LUNC? ◦ Lunc because we can have enjoy Lunc by minting. I really dont like minting lunc but, At first place its needs minting, people dont have to be worried about minting lunc for long term because with **PEGGING** XXXX coin back to Lunc there will be massive burns again). ◦ Governance Rights: XXXX coin holders can vote on proposals to improve the protocol, including adjusting burn rates or adding new features. ◦ Discount Fees: XXXX coin holders can enjoy, fee discounts , hodler gains, on future Terra Classic blockchain transactions. Attracting Users: • Stablecoin Rewards: The allure of earning rewards in a stablecoin with a reliable peg can incentivize users to switch from USTC. • Staking Flexibility: Consider offering flexible and fixed staking terms to cater to different user preferences. • Community Building: Foster a community around XXXX that emphasizes its role in reviving the Terra Classic ecosystem and creating a path forward for USTC holders. Overall, the USTC Repurpose XXXX coin concept presents an attractive alternative for USTC holders by offering them a way to potentially recoup
Remove $USTC for XXXX COIN

Addressing USTC's Peg Issue:
XXXX wouldn't directly aim to repeg USTC. Instead, it would offer USTC holders a way to:
* Exit USTC and potentially earn rewards in a stablecoin with a reliable peg.

* Participate in the Terra Classic blockchain ecosystem through XXXX's governance and fee discounts.

**-Make a new coin named (XXXX)**

Mechanism:
• Minting XXXX: Users would mint XXXX by burning USTC at a predetermined rate (e.g., 1 USTC per 1 XXXX). This permanently removes USTC from circulation.

• Utility: early XXXX coin holders would get a good % of $Lunc who have staked them, to make it attractive for USTC holders.

◦ Staking Rewards: Users can stake XXXX to earn $LUNC rewards Against that a reliable peg XXXX coin.

Why rewarding people who own USTC with LUNC?

◦ Lunc because we can have enjoy Lunc by minting. I really dont like minting lunc but, At first place its needs minting, people dont have to be worried about minting lunc for long term because with **PEGGING** XXXX coin back to Lunc there will be massive burns again).

◦ Governance Rights: XXXX coin holders can vote on proposals to improve the protocol, including adjusting burn rates or adding new features.

◦ Discount Fees: XXXX coin holders can enjoy, fee discounts , hodler gains, on future Terra Classic blockchain transactions.

Attracting Users:

• Stablecoin Rewards: The allure of earning rewards in a stablecoin with a reliable peg can incentivize users to switch from USTC.

• Staking Flexibility: Consider offering flexible and fixed staking terms to cater to different user preferences.

• Community Building: Foster a community around XXXX that emphasizes its role in reviving the Terra Classic ecosystem and creating a path forward for USTC holders.

Overall, the USTC Repurpose XXXX coin concept presents an attractive alternative for USTC holders by offering them a way to potentially recoup
--
Bearish
See original
Relationship between IMF and Terra: The IMF has expressed concerns about Terra's algorithmic fixing mechanism. The IMF argued that the mechanism could be fragile, causing the value of the IHR to fall sharply. The IMF also argued that Terra's DeFi applications could pose risks to financial stability. Terra has taken steps to address the IMF's concerns. Terra added more reserves to stabilize the UST and developed risk management protocols for DeFi applications. The relationship between the IMF and Terra is complex. While the IMF recognizes Terra's potential risks, it also sees its potential to promote financial inclusion and innovation using blockchain technology. Some of the IMF's concerns regarding Terra are: The algorithmic fixing mechanism may be fragile and cause the value of the UST to drop sharply. Terra's DeFi applications may pose risks to financial stability. Terra's governance may be centralized. Terra has taken steps to address the IMF's concerns: It added more reserves to stabilize the UST. Developed risk management protocols for DeFi applications. It is working to make governance more decentralized. The relationship between the IMF and Terra continues to develop. The IMF continues to monitor Terra's potential risks, while Terra continues to take steps to address concerns.
Relationship between IMF and Terra:

The IMF has expressed concerns about Terra's algorithmic fixing mechanism. The IMF argued that the mechanism could be fragile, causing the value of the IHR to fall sharply. The IMF also argued that Terra's DeFi applications could pose risks to financial stability.

Terra has taken steps to address the IMF's concerns. Terra added more reserves to stabilize the UST and developed risk management protocols for DeFi applications.

The relationship between the IMF and Terra is complex. While the IMF recognizes Terra's potential risks, it also sees its potential to promote financial inclusion and innovation using blockchain technology.

Some of the IMF's concerns regarding Terra are:

The algorithmic fixing mechanism may be fragile and cause the value of the UST to drop sharply.
Terra's DeFi applications may pose risks to financial stability.
Terra's governance may be centralized.
Terra has taken steps to address the IMF's concerns:

It added more reserves to stabilize the UST.
Developed risk management protocols for DeFi applications.
It is working to make governance more decentralized.
The relationship between the IMF and Terra continues to develop. The IMF continues to monitor Terra's potential risks, while Terra continues to take steps to address concerns.
--
Bullish
$BTC I am feeling a bullish weekend, NFA
$BTC

I am feeling a bullish weekend, NFA
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number

Latest News

--
View More

Trending Articles

Mr Ghazi 009
View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs