MoonMan567

Friends, if you know what a funding rate is and how to profit from extreme price deviations (Short / Long Squeeze), here are the results of my market scan with my new AI agent.

Today, the market is offering us some interesting OPPORTUNITIES:

Filter: FR > 0.06% + Vol > $20M

+ LONG opportunities

1. $SKHYNIX 0.2604% Vol: 51M (40min)
2. DRAM 0.1444% Vol: 28M (40min)
3. MU 0.1354% Vol: 155M (40min)
4. ESPORTS 0.0987% Vol: 29M (40min)

- SHORT opportunities
1. $HOME -1.3149% Vol: 221M (40min)
2. $PORTAL -0.6069% Vol: 99M (40min)
3. EDEN -0.4927% Vol: 93M (40min)
4. FIDA -0.3470% Vol: 254M (40min)
5. GUN -0.3246% Vol: 23M (40min)
6. PHAROS -0.1132% Vol: 41M (40min)

If you’re hearing about Short or Long Squeeze for the first time, I recommend reading this статтю

The Federal Reserve System of the USA published another report on household wealth in May.

The key figure for the industry — 10% of adult Americans owned or used cryptocurrency by the end of 2025. The media is already framing this as a "massive comeback," but the devil is always in the details.

Sure, the trend is definitely picking up — adoption has risen compared to 8% in 2024, although it still hasn't reached the peak of 12% from the 2021 era.

However, the real nature of usage is disappointing for the advocates of "payments of the future."

The overwhelming majority — 9% of that 10% — hold crypto purely as an investment tool, meaning it's just another speculative asset.

For actual purchases or payments, only 2% of respondents used digital coins, and for transferring to family, a meager 1%.

Crypto in the USA remains primarily digital gold (like $BTC ) or a tool for quick gains, rather than a payment system. The real sector and retail are still firmly clinging to fiat.

While others are drawing charts on global adoption, subscribe to @MoonMan567 to see the clean numbers from regulators without the marketing noise.

Media headlines are screaming about the disaster: Michael Saylor (Strategy) has locked in around $12.5 billion in unrealized losses at $BTC , while Tom Lee's BitMine fund has 'trimmed' $10 billion due to a drop of $ETH .

In total — a staggering $22.5 billion in the red. Sounds like the end of the crypto winter, but this is classic context manipulation.

First off, the loss is unrealized ('paper').

Neither Strategy nor BitMine are dumping their assets on the market. Moreover, 87% of Tom Lee's ethers are staked and continue to generate passive income, partially offsetting the asset's decline.

Secondly, this is an institutional approach. Saylor has been buying bitcoins since 2020 at an average price of $75,700, using long-term debt capital.

The current dip isn’t a bug, but a feature of his strategy. Whales play a game over decades, where local price fluctuations are just noise.

These figures are being leaked to the press with one goal — to make retail players capitulate. When you're shown billionaire losses, you're being prepped to hand over your coins at the absolute bottom.

While the crowd succumbs to panic, subscribe to @MoonMan567 to stay in touch with reality and understand the logic of big money.

New on-chain Ethereum stats are smashing records: the number of coins waiting to be staked has exceeded the $ETH on the exit by 1261 times.

For the bulls, this looks like a perfect argument for supply scarcity, but it's essential to understand the inner workings of the protocol.

Such a massive gap is primarily a mathematical effect of an almost empty exit queue. When there are hardly any takers for withdrawing coins from staking, any decent wave of new validators creates a thousandfold percentage difference.

However, the global trend is evident. Capital continues to be locked inside the network. Institutions and big players aren't planning to sell $ETH at current levels — they prefer to earn baseline yield while simultaneously reinvesting through liquid restaking protocols.

For the market, this is a long-term positive. Coins locked in staking aren't putting pressure on the exchange glasses. The network becomes more secure, and the free supply of $ETH is shrinking. But don’t expect this queue imbalance to launch the price to the moon by tomorrow — it's fuel for the long haul.

While the media manipulates pretty numbers, subscribe to @MoonMan567 to see the real logic behind on-chain processes.

Bitcoin just dropped to $60,000.

Considering its ATH of $126,000 - the worst week of 2026.

And right now, in this silence between the red candlesticks, it's worth asking one question. Not 'when will it bounce back'. But another.

What is your Bitcoin doing while you wait?

Here’s a number that stops me in my tracks. $BTC holds 57.9% of the entire crypto market - roughly $1.23 trillion in market cap. And only 0.46% of all Bitcoin is in DeFi. Less than half a percent. The rest is just sitting idle.

In traditional economics, idle capital is considered inefficient. Yet in crypto, we've somehow accepted this as normal.

This is the problem that @Bedrock is trying to tackle through BRClaw - an announced AI analyst, which the project claims "renders sophisticated yield mechanics fully transparent and automated". So it’s not just a vault with yield. It's a tool from Bedrock that explains exactly what’s happening with your capital and why.

Is there enough transparency for a Bitcoin holder to trust their assets with the protocol during a correction - that’s an open question. But right now, when the market is red, the question of capital activity becomes very real.

And you, my friend, what are you doing with your Bitcoin during this correction: holding and waiting, or looking for ways to make it work for you?
#Bedrock $BR

I was reading the official announcement from Genius Terminal in their X-feed about commission refunds and stopped at one sentence. My first reaction - what about the rest?

The team's position @GeniusOfficial from April 13: we only refund our share. In a typical deal with 20 bps - PancakeSwap took 15 as the router, and Genius took 5. Only 5 can be refunded. The other 15 didn’t go to Genius and won’t be coming back.

4.7% of Genius Terminal users opted for a refund. They got their money - $549,264 in total. But the condition: to cash out, you had to burn tokens $GENIUS . These 4.7% permanently removed 0.33% from the total supply.

Here’s a detail that’s easy to miss. Those who took the money reduced the supply for those who held onto their tokens. The minority that chose cash did a service to the majority holding $GENIUS .

95.3% did not take the refund. Whether they didn’t know, didn’t think it was necessary, or consciously calculated that token $GENIUS was more profitable - the data is silent on this.

The question that remains for me: if Genius Terminal determines the route of your trade - does that mean you're paying for that route too?
#genius

The drop of $ETH below $1550 triggered on-chain liquidations — positions worth 21,540 ETH ($34.1 million) were forcefully closed in DeFi protocols. This isn't just dry stats; it's a trigger that exposed the real scale of systemic risk.

According to Lookonchain, right now, there's another 343,075 $ETH (over $547 million) hanging in the risk zone.

The mechanics are simple: lending platforms like Aave or Compound won't wait for the market to recover. If the price falls to a critical level, the smart contract automatically dumps the collateral on the open market, starting a chain reaction.

The main danger zones are cascaded from $1565 to $1361. The strongest layer of loans, amounting to 137,908 $ETH , is concentrated right at the $1361 level.

This isn't a signal to short and not a reason to panic.

It's a reminder: in DeFi, the market maker is hard-coded. When the price hits the trigger, the protocol couldn't care less about the long-term prospects of the asset — it's saving its own liquidity by pushing through the order books.

While the market searches for a bottom, subscribe to @MoonMan567 to understand the mechanics of capital movement without illusions.

A new fear is spreading through the network — algorithms are coming for American financial advisors making $500,000 a year. Bloomberg is cited as the source. But if we strip away the clickbait, the picture becomes more realistic.

First off, the figure of 326,000 includes all advisors in the U.S., from newbies to veterans, not just the dollar half-millionaires. Secondly, robo-advising has been around for about a decade, and AI is just a new tool, not a sudden catastrophe.

The main change runs deeper. Clients are indeed increasingly handing over routine technical analysis and portfolio balancing to algorithms. It's cheaper and devoid of human emotions.

The real threat to advisors isn't that AI is smarter; it's that they themselves have been selling clients basic math disguised as "exclusive expertise" for too long.

Advisors will need to shift their business model. Algorithms can calculate risks perfectly, but they can't calm a client during a market panic crash and lack empathy — that's what clients will now be willing to pay humans for.

While the industry is regrouping, subscribe to @MoonMan567 to understand the real state of affairs without the media noise.

🚨Betting Market vs Bitcoin

The probability that $BTC will drop below $50,000 by 2026 has reached about 65% on Polymarket.

At first glance, this figure looks alarming. But it's crucial not to confuse predictions with sentiment.

Polymarket doesn't show the future; it reflects what people are willing to risk their money on right now. Currently, the vibes in the crypto market have notably soured after a wave of liquidations and rising uncertainty. That's why participants are more actively betting on negative scenarios.

For investors, this is more of a fear gauge than proof that $BTC will definitely fall to those levels. Market history has repeatedly shown that the consensus can be just as wrong as individual experts.

My observation: prediction markets are interesting because they measure not the asset's price, but the crowd's temperature. Sometimes they turn out to be surprisingly accurate. Other times, they only document collective panic in real-time.

If you're interested in separating facts from market noise - subscribe to @MoonMan567 .

MEV bots are reading the mempool and inserting their transactions right before yours. Instantly. Invisibly. Without a receipt. This is what happens with almost every large trade on the public blockchain.

In July 2025, the European regulator ESMA officially classified this: sandwich attacks may fall under market manipulation according to MiCA law. ESMA estimates - $180 million just on Ethereum. Since 2020, the total - $7.2 billion.

@GeniusOfficial is building its terminal on BNB Chain. They checked the open data - it’s said that sandwich attacks are more common there than on Ethereum because there are fewer private mempools. This is the direct cause of Ghost Orders and Gh0st.

Mechanics: a trade is split via MPC into up to 500 micro-transactions. Each one is so tiny that the MEV bot doesn’t consider it worth the attack. The strategy remains unseen.

Genius Terminal hides your trade from bots - and it really works. But MEV is a structural property of a transparent blockchain. MEV bots are still lurking - waiting for the next unprotected trade. The terminal solves your problem. The network remains the same.

What do you think, if regulators recognize MEV as manipulation - who will be responsible for $180 million a month?
#genius $GENIUS

The more I look at @Bedrock , the more I’m intrigued not by what they’re building.

But by what they’ve walked away from.

Previously, the protocol sold yield. Highest rates, most Babylon points, maximum APY. Standard lingo for restaking projects back then.

Then came the summer of 2024. Yields structurally dropped across the board. Bedrock itself openly discussed this in an official article: it's not a protocol-specific issue - it's the reality of the categories. Rare honesty for a DeFi project.

And then - September 2024. A hacker found a vulnerability in the uniBTC smart contract and drained $2M from liquidity pools in just hours. Bedrock publicly acknowledged the attack, compensated the losses, and patched the vulnerability by integrating Chainlink Proof of Reserve. No hiding. No rebranding the protocol.

After all this, Bedrock changed its tune. No more "highest APY". Now it’s "Bitcoin capital management". Not just one yield strategy. But four types of strategies tailored for different market conditions.

Was this change a response to real-world experience - or just a new pitch after the old one stopped working? The difference between these two interpretations will only become clear not with the next announcement. But with how the protocol performs during the next test.

#Bedrock $BR

The market got hit with macro data from the US, where the focus has once again shifted towards the labor market.

Non-farm payrolls came in at 172K versus the expected 85K. Wages rose by 0.3% month-over-month, fully within the forecast. The unemployment rate stayed unchanged at 4.3%. So, there wasn't a trigger in the inflation part, but employment came out significantly stronger than consensus.

Sounds like a positive for the economy. But for the rates market, that's a different story. A strong labor market reduces the urgency for the Fed's policy easing. And the expectation for how quickly rates might drop is currently one of the key channels affecting $BTC and $ETH .

And here's the interesting part - reports like these rarely lead to a clear direction. More often, they shift expectations on paper, and then the market takes its time deciding whether this is a new trend or just one strong month amidst the noise of data.

In practice, NFP often looks like a 'loud headline for an hour', after which many questions remain. To get answers, subscribe to @MoonMan567 .

The crypto market just took a cold shower: it’s not about the price, but the trust in the issuance.

A critical vulnerability was found in the Zcash network's Orchard pool, which theoretically could have allowed for the unnoticed creation of fake $ZEC . According to available data, the bug existed since 2022 and was only fixed in June 2026.

The key issue here isn’t just the fix itself, but proving whether this vulnerability was exploited earlier is impossible due to the privacy architecture.

Market reaction was instant - $ZEC plummeted sharply, and mass liquidations were recorded. Reports emerged that Arthur Hayes completely exited his position in $ZEC .

Meanwhile, the community became divided:
- some see this as a real test of the system's resilience;
- others view it as a potential blow to the very idea of private issuance without a full audit.

The essence of this story is simple: the market is selling not the fact of a hack, but the impossibility of proving it didn’t happen before.

And that’s much more serious than any daily price movement.

Subscribe to @MoonMan567 - we break down the crypto market without the noise and illusions.

Hey friends, if you know what a funding rate is and how to cash in on extreme price deviations (Short / Long Squeeze), here are the results from my new AI agent's market scan.

Today, the market is serving up some interesting OPPORTUNITIES:

Filter: FR > 0.06% + Vol > $20M

+ LONG opportunities
1. $SKHYNIX 0.2671% Vol: 72M (7h 3m)
2. CRCL 0.0671% Vol: 132M (7h 3m)

- SHORT opportunities
1. $HOME -0.3214% Vol: 354M (3m)
2. $BTW -0.1573% Vol: 212M (3h 3m)
3. TRX -0.1570% Vol: 98M (7h 3m)
4. MEME -0.1077% Vol: 47M (3h 3m)
5. CL -0.0855% Vol: 615M (3h 3m)
6. QNTX -0.0646% Vol: 80M (7h 3m)
7. WLDUSDC -0.0637% Vol: 132M (7h 3m)

If you're hearing about Short or Long Squeeze for the first time, I recommend checking out this <a>статтю</a>

There's a detail in the partnership @Bedrock with Cap that stopped me.

Bedrock entered with $1 million. Watched. Confirmed. And scaled it up to $135 million in delegated capital. Not in a quarter - but gradually, step by step. Bedrock's CEO Zhuling Chen openly says: "Start small. Make it a gradual process. Don't sell aggressively upfront."

This isn't hype talk. It's the language of someone responsible for other people's money.

The mechanics are worth understanding. Selini Vault is four layers in one architecture. Bedrock acts as the organizer and curator. Cap serves as the credit infrastructure with three separate roles - supplier, delegate, operator. Symbiotic provides a shared security layer. Selini Capital executes strategies - market-neutral arbitrage between platforms since 2021.

Each layer has a distinct function. If one operator fails to meet their obligations - the rest of the protocol doesn't stop. This isn't a marketing pitch about "institutional-grade". It's a concrete architectural answer to the question: what happens when something goes wrong?

And here's the interesting part. DeFi yield, according to Bedrock himself, is "drained and boils down to similar risk profiles". The protocol's answer - dollar income on Bitcoin through credit strategies. Not just another restaking pool. A different category.

#Bedrock $BR

More than half of all $BTC are currently sitting in unrealized losses.

Sounds scary. But there's a catch.

This is the first instance in the current cycle where the number of coins 'in the red' has exceeded the number of coins 'in the green.' According to Glassnode, about 10.5 million $BTC are currently held below their last purchase price.

Historically, such a scenario has only appeared during the most painful phases of a bear market.

That's why this indicator is interesting. It doesn't show price. It shows psychology.

When the majority of market participants see losses in their portfolios, capitulation strikes. Some sell out of fear. Others just stop looking at the charts. The third group starts saying that 'this time it's different.'

Interestingly, all of this is happening near the 200-week moving average - a level that has repeatedly marked the boundary between panic and recovery in previous cycles.

Does this mean the bottom is already formed? No.

But market history shows one uncomfortable pattern: the best opportunities rarely arise when everyone feels like a genius.

Subscribe to @MoonMan567 - here the numbers are more interesting than emotions, but it's emotions that drive the market.

In the US, one of the most hated rules for retail traders has officially been buried.

As of June 4th, the Pattern Day Trader (PDT) rule, which required a minimum of $25,000 in your account for active day trading in stocks for over 20 years, is no longer in effect.

The logic was straightforward: if you’re not wealthy, the government will protect you from overtrading.

But a strange situation arose. A person could buy a meme coin, take risky options, or dump their deposit on the latest hype story. However, making a few trades in a day without $25,000 in the account was a no-go.

Now, instead of a hard threshold, a real-time risk management model will be implemented. Brokers will assess not the size of the account but the actual exposure on positions.

In fact, the American regulator has acknowledged an obvious truth: the size of capital doesn’t automatically make a trader more competent.

For crypto enthusiasts, this story is interesting for another reason. While some regulators around the world are looking for new ways to limit market access, the US is removing one of the most notorious barriers for retail investors.

Sometimes deregulation can also be a reform.

Subscribe to @MoonMan567 - what’s more interesting is not what happened, but why it happened right now.