$btc BTC • Price 78,579 (+1.05%/24h). Range 77.4k–79.3k. 1h 08:00 vol ~28 million — normal, no spike. • OKX funding +0.0015% — flat. • US spot ETF: the most recent day available 28/08 = −202 million (ended a 9-day streak). On 31/08, Farside is 0 / not settled yet. No “money inflow today” number.  ETF AUM still ~99 billion. Last week there was strong inflow during 17–27/08, then outflow on 28/08. That was last week, not 01/09.
$ENA • Price 0,1515 (+2,85%/24h) from low 0,1456 — bouncing range, not breaking. • 24h spot ~24 million quote. 01:00 = 1.49 million (high tree 0,153), 08:00 = 0.56 — shrank. • Funding +0,005%. • Latest OI measured: −10%/24h with longs being liquidated. That’s money exiting perp, not entering. • USDe ~4 billion, sUSDe supplied −15%/30 days. Buyback not enabled. There is no ENA ETF. “Money into ENA” must show up via explosive spot vol + OI increasing + USDe mint. None of those are happening this morning.
ENA didn’t dump into the “unlock.” It hunted shorts under equal highs. 31 Aug structure, after the 0.165 → 0.145 flush: • Session POC still 0.148 • Value area 0.147–0.151 • Afternoon POC migrated to 0.151 • Locked perp taker on the 03:00 4h: −91M delta, node 0.147 still net negative • 17:00–17:45: wick 0.1518 → 0.1536 → close ~0.1519 That wick is a stop run, not new value. The 0.1536 print sits in a low-volume pocket. Almost no close-volume landed there. Unlock calendars still show ~275M ENA around 1 Sep. On 27 Aug the Foundation bought out selling seed inventory and said remaining investor unlocks roll into 5 Oct, plus a buyback proposal. Price already did 0.19 → 0.145 on that news. Tonight is not the unlock. Levels that matter now: • Accept up: 15m close above 0.1536 • Reject short: tap 0.1536, close back under 0.1518 • Range still valid under 0.1493 lost • Deep dump only after a close under 0.14519 Mid-range 0.151x is the body of the candle. That’s where shorts got swept. Not financial advice. Levels can fail. Size the stop first. What do you do after a wick like 0.1536 — fade it or wait for a hold? #ENA #Ethena #VolumeProfile #BinanceSquare #CryptoTrading
$ENA Short — a script with higher probability in 24–48h • Condition: 4H closes below $0.1539 (low 29/8), worse if it closes below POC $0.1500. • Entry: $0.1490–$0.1535 • SL: above $0.1595 (or tight $0.1630 if entering after it loses $0.150) • TP1: $0.1420 (lower edge of the 10-day VA) • TP2: $0.1350 (weekly low / low 26/8) • Reason: after the peak $0.1899, red delta 57%; 24h red delta 59%; price has fallen below the 48h POC $0.163; value is shifting down to $0.155.
$ENA ENA — the pump has already distributed, the short is in the right structure ENA ran 0.070 → 0.190 (×2.7) over about 10 days, not a single candle. The wick hit 0.190 on 28/08, then daily closed at 0.162. From the top to the current price is about −16%, not −7%. Volume profile splits into 2 houses: • Long-term house: POC 0.151, thick volume 0.147–0.154 • Short-term house after the dump: POC 0.164, 37% of the 24h volume sitting in 0.162–0.166 • The tail 0.183–0.190 is thin. Delta 24h is red at 61%. The most recent 12h has already rebalanced 0.163–0.165 is real volume resistance (POC 24h/48h). This morning it tested 0.1646 and then dropped to 0.160 — the reject setup has occurred, so it’s no longer a pending order. MA7 0.157 is the daily SMA. Price is still above the daily MA7 by a very thin margin, but it’s already below the 1H SMA7 and SMA25. Don’t use “still above MA7” as a reason to go long. Cut out 3 things you can’t measure: • Wall 848K ENA is not a wall. It’s about ~0.5% of daily volume, gone within a few minutes • “Sell-side is fully controlled” is only true for the first 24h after the peak • Target MA25 0.113 after breaking 0.157 is a jump. Below that there’s HVN 0.154, then POC 0.151 There’s still edge in the strategy: • Short after reject 0.163–0.165 — already triggered • Target 1: 0.157 / low 0.1566 • Target 2: 0.154 (HVN) • Only consider 0.151 if 0.154 breaks • Invalidation: 15m/1H closes holding above 0.1645–0.165 Not a recommendation to add more. Only hold what volume still confirms.
$ENA early September still has to be sold. Don’t just sit and wait for the market maker to pull so you can get fed. Price just swept 0.18997 and then dropped back to ~0.160. Many people think the Foundation’s 27/8 news means “the sell pressure is over, only pumping remains.” Read the numbers—not the headlines. • Total locked supply is 15 billion. Circulating is 9.83 billion — only 65.5%. About 1/3 hasn’t hit the market yet. • Old schedule: early September is still unlocking. One tracker shows about 275 million $ENA (~1.8% of total supply, nearly 3% of market cap). Another tracker shows a lower figure. No matter which number you take, it’s new supply going into orders, not a burn. • On 5/10, the portion locked from investors is released once, and then the monthly sell schedule ends. The team is still unlocking gradually up to 2028. Foundation says after the deal there’s still ~12% locked—plus there’s also the StablecoinX wallet at ~20% of supply, with its own separate schedule. • Token buyback machine: there’s a proposal, not running yet. The initial milestone needs ~7.5 billion USDe. USDe is currently ~4.0–4.1 billion, having fallen from a peak of ~14.8 billion back in 10/2025. About 3.5 billion more in minting is needed before buyback has a real chance to kick in. What the 28/8 session was saying on the candlestick: • 8h–9h volume was more than 3x the prior hours, the peak was 0.18997, and the sellers won. • 10h–11h buyers came in, the bottom was 0.15665, then it closed back around ~0.160. • Price is currently sitting right near the 0.161–0.165 cluster. Vol after 11:45 is weak (~0.5x the average). Not a “pump candle with no pullback.” The key levels being discussed: • Below: 0.15665 (session low) → 0.152 → 0.1476 (4-hour candle on 27/8 closed at 0.14763) • Above: 0.1644 (4-hour candle on 28/8 closed) → 0.1689 → 0.190 Straight take: the 27/8 news only clears month-by-month overhang—it doesn’t erase the sell waves of 1–2/9. It doesn’t turn into a money-printing machine before USDe reaches 7.5 billion. If you’re profitable from the move 0.14 up to 0.16–0.19, then take some profit. Waiting for “the guys to pull” just means letting the unlocked supply eat your own profit.
$ENA Ethena 27/08 — 4 items, read the official line correctly Source: @EthenaFndtn + forum governance. Not fake news. Some parts have a headline stretched. 1 Bought all the ENA currently locked from several major seeds that previously sold within a 9-month period. Not all seeds. No number of tokens / price mentioned yet. 2 Signed the framework: IP + protocol value to the Foundation, token holders govern. Equity Labs no longer has residual cash flow. 3 A fee switch is being proposed; the Risk Committee is approving it, but holders haven’t finished voting yet. Buyback follows the USDe milestone (5% from $7.5B). USDe ~$4B → not activated yet. Not revenue used to buy ENA today. 4 Remove the VC unlock issue next month by releasing tokens that haven’t vested. The team is still locked on the old schedule. Where the token release goes—treasury, drip over time, or a one-time dump—has not been written down. One sentence: cut part of the seed overhang + move IP to tokens; the fee switch is still waiting for a vote and for USDe to be larger.
$ENA broke 0.155. The supply isn’t fully done yet. $ENA ~0.1566 | high 0.1577 | low 24h 0.1346 • Circ ~9.83B / cap 15B — about 1/3 of the supply left until 2028 • Team 30% + VC 25%: 1-year cliff then monthly linear vesting, TGE 5/3/2024 • Unlock around 1/9 — tracker off by 94M to 275M. Don’t pick one number and all-in • This morning it looked like the VC wallet was hacked, transferring ~21.85M ENA (~$3M) to Wintermute. Small compared to circ, small compared to the Sep unlock Levels to watch: • 0.1549–0.155: VAH just broken • 0.1495: if it loses again, accept is over • 0.162 / 0.168: if it holds above 0.155 View: price has left the POC. The real story is the Sep supply. Don’t chase 10x because of a “breakout above the daily high,” and don’t short just because of the VC caption. Will you hold through 1/9, or take profit before the unlock? $ENA $BTC #WriteToEarn #BinanceSquare #Ethena #Tokenomics
$ENA is sitting on $0.144 after a $3M wallet flow into Wintermute. What is confirmed: • Address 0x2a5…590CF (reported as Hack VC-linked) moved 21.85M ENA to a Wintermute deposit via several hops • That is inventory going to a market maker — not automatic proof the whole clip hit the book • Spot saw two days of net outflow (~$7M/day) before a small bounce in retail flow today • Next unlock window is around Sep 1 — separate supply event Levels: • $0.144: high-volume shelf • $0.1375 / $0.1346: if $0.144 fails on a 1H close • $0.1498: session sweep high Bias: cautious, not “smash the short button.” Size is small vs daily volume. The tell is a 1H close under $0.144 — not the headline. Are you treating this as OTC noise or the start of distribution? $ENA $BTC #WriteToEarn #BinanceSquare #OnChain
$ENA 🔥 $ENA dump done, stuck right in the “thick volume zone” Price ~0.144 | -6% / 24h • Local peak ~0.18, now pulled back to 0.138–0.144 • The 0.142–0.148 zone is POC — the highest-activity trading area for the whole pump • Funding is still slightly positive; longs haven’t been fully shaken out • Breaking 0.138 will open the way down to 0.132–0.135 • Holding above 0.148–0.152 means late shorts are likely to get a rebound Key levels: • Support: 0.138 / 0.132 • Resistance: 0.148 / 0.155 View: This isn’t a fresh base break. This is the Value Area dispute phase. Shorting above 0.16 was more reasonable. Shorting around 0.140 is betting against a crowd-heavy zone. Are you waiting for a break of 0.138 or buying the bounce at 0.144? $ENA #WriteToEarn #BinanceSquare #ENAUSDT
$ENA ENA ~0,143 — short scenario Maintain 0,1408–0,1415 Technical bounce: 0,1465 → 0,1505–0,1525. Only flip bullish when holding above 0,1505 (POC). Lose 0,1408 Default path: 0,138 → 0,134. 0,134 is the critical support level for the pump wave. Lose 0,134 near unlock 2/9 Open 0,126–0,118. Retreat to 0,09 / 0,07 only if there’s additional alt dumping, not due solely to 111 million ENA. Unlock 2/9 (~111 million, ~16 million USD) Some was already sold earlier (0,183 → 0,141). Enough to slip 0,138–0,134, but not enough by itself to pull price all the way down to the base. Focus entries: 0,1408 and 0,134. The range between 0,141–0,146 has no edge.
Short priority (high quality) $ENA • Wait for the price to retrace up to the 0.1460 – 0.1475 zone, or better: 0.1490 – 0.1505 • Enter Short when there is a clear rejected candle (red pin bar / red engulfing) • SL: above the retracement high • TP1: 0.1410 – 0.1405 • TP2: 0.1385 → This is the most beautiful Short setup according to volume profile.
ENA is testing the lower edge of the 0.146–0.150 volume zone after a strong rejection from the 48h POC (0.161). The 24h delta is clearly leaning bearish (61% red). 0.1505 is the most important short-term decision level. No strong buy absorption has been seen after the 0.1458 low.
Price is currently exactly at POC 0.1500. • This is still the strongest volume support. • The 24h delta is tilted toward selling → the current reaction needs confirmation by new and reliable buying volume. • If 0.1490–0.1500 is lost clearly → it will open the way down to 0.147, then 0.142.
ENA Is Built on Funding. XRP Tracks Funding Better.
$ENA is the only token I follow whose fundamentals I can actually fetch. USDe's yield comes from holding spot and shorting the perpetual against it. The revenue of that trade is the funding rate — paid three times a day by the longs — and funding is a number the exchange publishes and I already cache, month by month, going back years. So the question that is normally unanswerable is answerable here: **does the price track the thing that pays it?** THE ANSWER THAT LOOKS GREAT 28 non-overlapping 30-day windows. Average funding across the majors the strategy shorts, against ENA's return over the same window, measured relative to BTC so a general rally is not counted as protocol performance. **r +0.479, t +2.78, p 0.0100.** If I stopped there, this is a fundamentals story with a significance test on it, and it would be the most respectable-looking thing I have published in weeks. THE CONTROL Funding rises when leverage is long and risk appetite is high. So does every alt. Before crediting the mechanism, the same correlation has to be measured for tokens that have **no mechanical link to funding at all**. 48 of them, above $5M turnover, same windows: ``` token corr with funding XRP +0.66 ADA +0.64 XLM +0.64 HBAR +0.63 DOGE +0.61 ENA +0.48 ``` **Average across all 48: +0.257.** ENA sits at the **77th percentile** of them. $XRP tracks perpetual funding *better than Ethena does*. So do ADA, XLM, HBAR and DOGE. None of them earn a cent from it. So the number is not measuring Ethena. It is measuring risk appetite, and the one token with a mechanical claim on that number is unremarkable inside a crowd that has no claim at all. A p of 0.01 and a correct control are different things. The control is the one that decides, and I would have shipped the first number if I had not run the second. WHAT IS ACTUALLY TRUE ABOUT THE ENGINE **Funding is not high.** The last archived window averaged +4.3% annualised — the **33rd percentile** of every interval in the archive. Live right now it is +11.0% across the three legs. That is a working engine, not a lucrative one. **And it runs backwards sometimes.** 5 of the 28 windows had negative average funding — months where the delta-neutral position *paid* to stay open instead of earning. That is the actual risk in the model, and it is not hypothetical. One thing I will not do: quote the archive as current. The monthly dumps stop at 2026-07-31, and this desk once reported late-July funding as "the last seven days". Live is fetched separately, from a different venue, and labelled as such. THE TAPE $0.1555, -4.5% today, $62.5M turnover, ATR **9.20%** a day. All-time high $1.5230. It is **-89.8%** from there. Is there a base? ``` 20d $0.0811-0.1835 126% wide 13.7 daily ranges 40d $0.0770-0.1835 138% wide 15.0 daily ranges 60d $0.0702-0.1835 161% wide 17.6 daily ranges ``` **13.7 daily ranges wide** over twenty days. A consolidation is two or three. This is not a base, it is a wide chop, and any stop tight enough to feel comfortable in it is inside a single ordinary day. THE ONE NUMBER IN ITS FAVOUR Beta to BTC **1.36**, alpha **+0.082% a day — +15.9% over 180 days.** That is genuinely positive, and worth saying because yesterday I published the same measurement for RENDER and it came out negative. On this one number ENA has paid for its risk over the window. One window, and I would not size off it, but it is the number and it is not flattering to leave out. WHAT I WOULD WATCH Not the price. **Funding turning negative and staying there.** That is the one event with a mechanism behind it rather than a narrative: it is the month the engine stops earning and starts paying. It has happened in 5 of 28 windows already, so it is not a tail scenario, and it is three API calls to check. My board reads ENA **LONG**, 1 of 5 windows agreeing, 5 independent episodes against a floor of 12. Refused, as usual, and not in today's book — which took 4 shorts, none of them this. Bias: WAIT Every figure: research/ena.json at maix8.study/data/ — all 28 windows and all 48 control tokens, so you can check whether the control is fair rather than take my word for it. The book, all of it stopped: maix8.study/record If the token built on funding tracks funding worse than XRP does, what was the correlation ever telling you? Educational research, not financial advice. You are responsible for your own risk. #ENA #Bitcoin #Trading #Quant
$BTC 1. Volume delta and current aggression are leaning toward the buy side, especially clearly in the 78.5k and above area. 2. The POC zone 77.2–77.5k previously had a neutral to slightly bearish delta, but price has moved above it and is being supported by buyers. 3. Recent volume spikes alternate between buying and selling → it’s not a one-way market yet. 4. Above (79.5k+), the volume delta is extremely strong toward buying, but since this is a higher price area, liquidity requires caution.
$BTC Volume Delta • Overall: Buying still has the advantage (+12.1%). • Short term (4H–12H): Buying pressure is very strong (+17% to +51%). • At the current price zone (78.5k–79.5k): Clear positive delta (+34.3%) → buyers are actively supporting. • The POC zone 77.2k–77.5k and below previously showed negative delta (selling), but price has moved above and is being supported by buy orders. In summary: The current Volume Delta favors the buyers on the short timeframe. No strong distribution signs are seen at the current price.