Emperorㅤ
Frequent Trader
3.9 Years
Boundless Maverick.
0 Following
6.6K+ Followers
4.2K+ Liked
696 Shared
PINNED
Have a project, token, or market question in mind? Feel free to comment—I’ll respond or provide insights whenever possible.
$OM just hit back after its brutal 90% crash—here’s how the team plans to save the day.
CEO John Patrick Mullin is burning his own 772,000 OM tokens (about $236 million at today’s prices) and may torch up to 300 million more (16.5% of supply) to shrink the float and boost staking rewards.
They’re rolling out a full post-mortem with on-chain and off-chain data, complete with a live dashboard showing token allocations. A buyback-and-burn scheme is also in the works, though details are still TBD.
On the investigative front, #mantra is working with blockchain analysts and may hire a forensic auditor to prove insider dumping didn’t trigger the crash—Mullin maintains it was “reckless forced liquidations” by exchanges.
Since the burn announcement, #om spiked 31%—but volatility remains sky-high as investors wait to see if these moves rebuild trust or just buy more time.
CEO John Patrick Mullin is burning his own 772,000 OM tokens (about $236 million at today’s prices) and may torch up to 300 million more (16.5% of supply) to shrink the float and boost staking rewards.
They’re rolling out a full post-mortem with on-chain and off-chain data, complete with a live dashboard showing token allocations. A buyback-and-burn scheme is also in the works, though details are still TBD.
On the investigative front, #mantra is working with blockchain analysts and may hire a forensic auditor to prove insider dumping didn’t trigger the crash—Mullin maintains it was “reckless forced liquidations” by exchanges.
Since the burn announcement, #om spiked 31%—but volatility remains sky-high as investors wait to see if these moves rebuild trust or just buy more time.
“The universal question every beginner trader asks is: ‘Why does a coin turn red as soon as I buy it, even though it was in the green?’ The simple answer is: it’s your own fault, not the coin’s. Here’s why.
Many factors decide whether you make a profit or a loss. As soon as you enter a trade—setting luck aside and focusing purely on technicals—you determine the outcome. Too often, beginners chase the top 5 gainers and throw money at whatever’s already peaked in the last 24 hours. What if that peak was yesterday? Chances are you’ll get burned.
Sometimes a coin keeps rising, but that’s pure luck unless you’ve done your technical analysis and are confident in the setup. Otherwise, you’re almost guaranteed to lose.
After that point, there are no other excuses. You chose to trade in heavy green without any real analysis. If you don’t know technicals, follow this simple rule: pick coins that aren’t in the top gainers or top losers. But never invest blindly—you must research, whether that means charting or fundamental study.
Don’t go for easy money; the hard-earned trades are the ones that last. Easy wins evaporate in seconds.
#EducationalContent
Many factors decide whether you make a profit or a loss. As soon as you enter a trade—setting luck aside and focusing purely on technicals—you determine the outcome. Too often, beginners chase the top 5 gainers and throw money at whatever’s already peaked in the last 24 hours. What if that peak was yesterday? Chances are you’ll get burned.
Sometimes a coin keeps rising, but that’s pure luck unless you’ve done your technical analysis and are confident in the setup. Otherwise, you’re almost guaranteed to lose.
After that point, there are no other excuses. You chose to trade in heavy green without any real analysis. If you don’t know technicals, follow this simple rule: pick coins that aren’t in the top gainers or top losers. But never invest blindly—you must research, whether that means charting or fundamental study.
Don’t go for easy money; the hard-earned trades are the ones that last. Easy wins evaporate in seconds.
#EducationalContent
My outlook hasn’t changed for #ETH — higher timeframes always tell the real story, backed by solid facts.
With the monthly candle nearing its close, now is the critical moment to watch price action closely.
That final bar of $ETH will reveal whether the current trend holds or sets the stage for a reversal.
Stay vigilant and let the charts guide your decisions.
With the monthly candle nearing its close, now is the critical moment to watch price action closely.
That final bar of $ETH will reveal whether the current trend holds or sets the stage for a reversal.
Stay vigilant and let the charts guide your decisions.
ETH Held the Line... But Is It a Trap? $1,688 Decides the Future!
Ethereum has done an impressive job stabilizing itself after a dangerous decline. The $1,550 level was a crucial support on the weekly chart, and $ETH has managed to hold that zone for three consecutive weeks, which is a positive sign. However, it’s important not to overreact too soon. Let’s zoom out to the monthly time frame, where broader trends often tell the real story.
There’s still about a week left before the monthly candle closes. The concerning part is that if ETH closes this month below $1,634, it could trigger a drop back to $1,563. If that level fails to hold, the next leg down might be toward the $1,200 zone. Yes, it’s a big drop—but that’s what the chart suggests on the higher time frame. On the other hand, if ETH reclaims the $1,888 level, it may signal strength and open the door for a rebound toward $2,218 and possibly $2,500. So now you can see the big picture.
As for my personal take: I believe long-term traders should stay cautious. If you’re someone who holds positions for weeks or months, this may not be the best time to go long. For those trading on shorter time frames, the situation is different.
Next week is key. If the weekly candle closes below $1,688, the next level to watch is $1,634. However, if ETH closes above $1,688 this week, you can aim for $1,888 in the following week.
Now shifting to the daily chart for short-term traders: ETH is currently consolidating between $1,546 and $1,692. A daily close above $1,692 could lead to a move toward $1,802—but only if it’s not a fakeout. A stronger position becomes more clear not today, not tomorrow, but the day after tomorrow. If ETH closes above $1,692 today, and tomorrow it holds that level, the third day would be your confirmation to enter a long position. Risk-takers might choose to go early, but the safer move is waiting for that third-day candle.
One more thing: a close above $1,692 would also mean ETH breaks the 50 RSI barrier—something it hasn’t done since January 31st this year. Since then, the trend has been downward. So a break here is a significant technical shift.
To summarize:
- Monthly close below $1,634 = bearish → risk of drop to $1,200
- Weekly close below $1,688 = look for $1,634
- Weekly close above $1,688 = look toward $1,888
- Daily close above $1,692 = possible move to $1,802
- Third day after the breakout gives safest entry
- RSI break above 50 for the first time since January = momentum shift
Always do your own research. I’m just giving you a technical direction based on the charts.
⭐ Request By @kimkylanBTC To Analyze #ETH
There’s still about a week left before the monthly candle closes. The concerning part is that if ETH closes this month below $1,634, it could trigger a drop back to $1,563. If that level fails to hold, the next leg down might be toward the $1,200 zone. Yes, it’s a big drop—but that’s what the chart suggests on the higher time frame. On the other hand, if ETH reclaims the $1,888 level, it may signal strength and open the door for a rebound toward $2,218 and possibly $2,500. So now you can see the big picture.
As for my personal take: I believe long-term traders should stay cautious. If you’re someone who holds positions for weeks or months, this may not be the best time to go long. For those trading on shorter time frames, the situation is different.
Next week is key. If the weekly candle closes below $1,688, the next level to watch is $1,634. However, if ETH closes above $1,688 this week, you can aim for $1,888 in the following week.
Now shifting to the daily chart for short-term traders: ETH is currently consolidating between $1,546 and $1,692. A daily close above $1,692 could lead to a move toward $1,802—but only if it’s not a fakeout. A stronger position becomes more clear not today, not tomorrow, but the day after tomorrow. If ETH closes above $1,692 today, and tomorrow it holds that level, the third day would be your confirmation to enter a long position. Risk-takers might choose to go early, but the safer move is waiting for that third-day candle.
One more thing: a close above $1,692 would also mean ETH breaks the 50 RSI barrier—something it hasn’t done since January 31st this year. Since then, the trend has been downward. So a break here is a significant technical shift.
To summarize:
- Monthly close below $1,634 = bearish → risk of drop to $1,200
- Weekly close below $1,688 = look for $1,634
- Weekly close above $1,688 = look toward $1,888
- Daily close above $1,692 = possible move to $1,802
- Third day after the breakout gives safest entry
- RSI break above 50 for the first time since January = momentum shift
Always do your own research. I’m just giving you a technical direction based on the charts.
⭐ Request By @kimkylanBTC To Analyze #ETH
Missed the airdrop? Bought at launch? You’re lining up to watch your money sink—and here’s the brutal truth.
Everyone who snagged $SIGN tokens in that free airdrop already has free upside, and the early buyers locked in easy profits.
But if you rush in the moment SIGN goes live, you’re effectively taking a Titanic ticket straight into an iceberg of sell-pressure. Binance’s hype brings huge volume—and even bigger dumps—so your entry at launch is the perfect recipe for a swift loss.
Think of it this way: the lucky few got tokens without spending a dime, the early birds sold high, and you’re left holding the bag when whales and quick-flip traders unload.
By the time you realize, it’s too late: your balance vanishes under waves of sell orders. If you didn’t secure that airdrop or buy in early, patience is your only defense.
Wait for real stability, watch how the market shakes out, then decide—because jumping in at launch is a gamble that almost never pays off.
#EducationalContent
Everyone who snagged $SIGN tokens in that free airdrop already has free upside, and the early buyers locked in easy profits.
But if you rush in the moment SIGN goes live, you’re effectively taking a Titanic ticket straight into an iceberg of sell-pressure. Binance’s hype brings huge volume—and even bigger dumps—so your entry at launch is the perfect recipe for a swift loss.
Think of it this way: the lucky few got tokens without spending a dime, the early birds sold high, and you’re left holding the bag when whales and quick-flip traders unload.
By the time you realize, it’s too late: your balance vanishes under waves of sell orders. If you didn’t secure that airdrop or buy in early, patience is your only defense.
Wait for real stability, watch how the market shakes out, then decide—because jumping in at launch is a gamble that almost never pays off.
#EducationalContent
$MUBARAK = “Exit Liquidity”
ya! we are in the rabbit hole.
ya! we are in the rabbit hole.
𝐌𝐮𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐤 𝐋𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐝… 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐖𝐡𝐨'𝐬 𝐂𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠? 📉🔽
Seed tag? Check.
Hype? Check.
But what did investors really get?
$MUBARAK launched with a bang—but the only fireworks were in the red. Since launch, it’s been a downhill ride, and let’s be honest… most of us became the exit liquidity.
#Binance warns that seed tokens can be volatile. But what they don’t say is how hard some of these tokens dump right after listing.
Mubarak is now seeing wave after wave of dumping. Holder sentiment? Crumbling. The price? Searching for a bottom like it’s lost in the dark.
So here’s the real question:
Has it bottomed out yet—or are we just halfway down the rabbit hole?
#MUBARAKForTheEid
Seed tag? Check.
Hype? Check.
But what did investors really get?
$MUBARAK launched with a bang—but the only fireworks were in the red. Since launch, it’s been a downhill ride, and let’s be honest… most of us became the exit liquidity.
#Binance warns that seed tokens can be volatile. But what they don’t say is how hard some of these tokens dump right after listing.
Mubarak is now seeing wave after wave of dumping. Holder sentiment? Crumbling. The price? Searching for a bottom like it’s lost in the dark.
So here’s the real question:
Has it bottomed out yet—or are we just halfway down the rabbit hole?
#MUBARAKForTheEid
What if holding a meme coin could win you a dinner with Donald #TRUMP himself? That’s exactly what happened—and the result was one of the wildest surges crypto has seen this year. In April 2025, the $TRUMP token exploded over 71% in a single day after its official site announced an exclusive dinner with Trump for the top 220 holders, with a private reception for the top 25. The event triggered a frenzy, pushing $TRUMP ’s market cap to $2.7 billion and sparking a wave of FOMO-driven buying.
Unlike typical meme coin moves, this surge was fueled not just by hype but by concentrated insider control—around 80% of $TRUMP ’s supply is held by Trump’s own organization and affiliates, creating conditions perfect for extreme volatility. Past posts from January 2025 had already warned about insider-driven pumps, and the same playbook seemed active here, with rapid speculation suggesting manipulation. Chainalysis revealed Trump-linked wallets earned nearly $900,000 in trading fees within two days of the dinner announcement, bringing total insider gains to over $324 million since the token’s January launch.
Low liquidity, heavy speculation, and the broader bullish sentiment from Bitcoin’s climb past $90,000 supercharged the rally. Traders, sensing a once-in-a-lifetime bragging right—and profit—rushed in, causing a partial short squeeze that magnified the gains even further. However, critics quickly pointed out the dangers: the leaderboard’s lack of transparency, the historically violent pullbacks after prior $TRUMP rallies (like the 68% January crash), and the high risk that the dinner-driven hype could collapse just as fast as it rose.
The $TRUMP token’s April 2025 surge stands as a perfect storm of FOMO, insider leverage, market frenzy, and brand-driven speculation. It may have delivered massive short-term profits, but behind the excitement, the long-term risks remain brutally real.
Unlike typical meme coin moves, this surge was fueled not just by hype but by concentrated insider control—around 80% of $TRUMP ’s supply is held by Trump’s own organization and affiliates, creating conditions perfect for extreme volatility. Past posts from January 2025 had already warned about insider-driven pumps, and the same playbook seemed active here, with rapid speculation suggesting manipulation. Chainalysis revealed Trump-linked wallets earned nearly $900,000 in trading fees within two days of the dinner announcement, bringing total insider gains to over $324 million since the token’s January launch.
Low liquidity, heavy speculation, and the broader bullish sentiment from Bitcoin’s climb past $90,000 supercharged the rally. Traders, sensing a once-in-a-lifetime bragging right—and profit—rushed in, causing a partial short squeeze that magnified the gains even further. However, critics quickly pointed out the dangers: the leaderboard’s lack of transparency, the historically violent pullbacks after prior $TRUMP rallies (like the 68% January crash), and the high risk that the dinner-driven hype could collapse just as fast as it rose.
The $TRUMP token’s April 2025 surge stands as a perfect storm of FOMO, insider leverage, market frenzy, and brand-driven speculation. It may have delivered massive short-term profits, but behind the excitement, the long-term risks remain brutally real.
What happens when a "delisted" token refuses to die? Alpaca Finance ($ALPACA ) surged over 300% after Binance’s delisting announcement on April 24, 2025, defying every market expectation. Instead of crashing, ALPACA rocketed from $0.029 to nearly $0.24 in just two days, delivering one of the wildest rallies of the year.
Binance confirmed $ALPACA would be removed by May 2, alongside #Playdapp ($PDA), #viberate ($VIB), and #WingFinance ($WING). While those tokens collapsed, #ALPACA became a complete anomaly. After an early 20% dip, short-sellers piled in—only to get trapped in a brutal short squeeze that pushed the rally past 111%, eventually touching a 319% gain.
Speculation of market manipulation quickly surfaced. Binance’s co-founder He Yi suggested unusual forces might be creating "exit liquidity," while posts on X accused insiders of pumping the token. Meanwhile, Alpaca’s strong tokenomics played a hidden role—over 34.6 million tokens (about 18.4% of total supply) had been burned since early 2025, thinning liquidity and making sudden price explosions easier.
The broader bullish mood in April 2025 amplified everything. With Bitcoin hovering around $90,000, even delisted coins could rally if enough speculative money chased them. Some traders clung to Alpaca’s past strength—it had survived a delisting before, successfully relisting on BitMart in August 2024—but this optimism may be dangerously misplaced.
Despite the hype, caution is critical. $ALPACA ’s rally shows classic signs of speculative frenzy: alleged manipulation, thin liquidity, parabolic moves without fresh fundamentals. After May 2, liquidity will likely dry up as Binance delists it, increasing the risk of a sharp crash.
In the end, $ALPACA ’s surge reflects a chaotic cocktail: speculation, short squeezes, supply shocks, community hope—and massive risk beneath the surface. Traders betting on this rally should remember: what rises this fast in crypto often falls even faster once reality returns.
Binance confirmed $ALPACA would be removed by May 2, alongside #Playdapp ($PDA), #viberate ($VIB), and #WingFinance ($WING). While those tokens collapsed, #ALPACA became a complete anomaly. After an early 20% dip, short-sellers piled in—only to get trapped in a brutal short squeeze that pushed the rally past 111%, eventually touching a 319% gain.
Speculation of market manipulation quickly surfaced. Binance’s co-founder He Yi suggested unusual forces might be creating "exit liquidity," while posts on X accused insiders of pumping the token. Meanwhile, Alpaca’s strong tokenomics played a hidden role—over 34.6 million tokens (about 18.4% of total supply) had been burned since early 2025, thinning liquidity and making sudden price explosions easier.
The broader bullish mood in April 2025 amplified everything. With Bitcoin hovering around $90,000, even delisted coins could rally if enough speculative money chased them. Some traders clung to Alpaca’s past strength—it had survived a delisting before, successfully relisting on BitMart in August 2024—but this optimism may be dangerously misplaced.
Despite the hype, caution is critical. $ALPACA ’s rally shows classic signs of speculative frenzy: alleged manipulation, thin liquidity, parabolic moves without fresh fundamentals. After May 2, liquidity will likely dry up as Binance delists it, increasing the risk of a sharp crash.
In the end, $ALPACA ’s surge reflects a chaotic cocktail: speculation, short squeezes, supply shocks, community hope—and massive risk beneath the surface. Traders betting on this rally should remember: what rises this fast in crypto often falls even faster once reality returns.
$ALPACA stunned everyone with a 259% surge right after Binance announced its delisting. What seemed dead suddenly became the top gainer. Now with massive volume days before removal—what’s really happening?
So first — what is ALPACA? It’s the native token of Alpaca Finance, a DeFi protocol built on the Binance Smart Chain that offers leveraged yield farming. Users can borrow assets to farm with greater exposure. The platform didn’t raise VC money, didn’t have a pre-sale, and launched with a community-driven structure. #ALPACA plays a role in staking, governance, and protocol rewards. It was once one of the more recognized names in DeFi when #BSC was booming.
Now here's the weird twist. Normally, when a token is delisted, it loses value instantly. But in some rare cases, like this one, hype traders jump in to scalp quick profits from a thin liquidity market. Whales might be playing one last game to exit with volume. Shorters betting on zero might get liquidated in the process. It becomes a perfect storm — hype, low supply, no resistance, and no rules. This creates wild pumps, and the token behaves like it’s alive — right before the plug is pulled.
So what’s actually happening? ALPACA moved from $0.0438 to a high of $0.1760 within a day, with a 24h volume of 1.38 billion tokens. The delisting is confirmed for May 2, 2025, at 08:00 UTC+5. No new development, no partnerships, no roadmap update — just raw speculation. It’s a classic case of traders squeezing every bit of exit liquidity before the gates close.
If you’re thinking about jumping in, this is not the time to go in blindly. This isn’t a rebirth — it’s more like a final firework before it vanishes from the big stage. Risk is extreme, but so is the reward — and that’s exactly why everyone’s watching.
So first — what is ALPACA? It’s the native token of Alpaca Finance, a DeFi protocol built on the Binance Smart Chain that offers leveraged yield farming. Users can borrow assets to farm with greater exposure. The platform didn’t raise VC money, didn’t have a pre-sale, and launched with a community-driven structure. #ALPACA plays a role in staking, governance, and protocol rewards. It was once one of the more recognized names in DeFi when #BSC was booming.
Now here's the weird twist. Normally, when a token is delisted, it loses value instantly. But in some rare cases, like this one, hype traders jump in to scalp quick profits from a thin liquidity market. Whales might be playing one last game to exit with volume. Shorters betting on zero might get liquidated in the process. It becomes a perfect storm — hype, low supply, no resistance, and no rules. This creates wild pumps, and the token behaves like it’s alive — right before the plug is pulled.
So what’s actually happening? ALPACA moved from $0.0438 to a high of $0.1760 within a day, with a 24h volume of 1.38 billion tokens. The delisting is confirmed for May 2, 2025, at 08:00 UTC+5. No new development, no partnerships, no roadmap update — just raw speculation. It’s a classic case of traders squeezing every bit of exit liquidity before the gates close.
If you’re thinking about jumping in, this is not the time to go in blindly. This isn’t a rebirth — it’s more like a final firework before it vanishes from the big stage. Risk is extreme, but so is the reward — and that’s exactly why everyone’s watching.
Bitcoin at the Crossroads: Will BTC Break Its All-Time High or Face a Correction?
It feels good when your marked zones play out as expected. Bitcoin recently dropped to $74,500 from its peak, but now it's trading around $94,000. The big question for traders is: can BTC break its all-time high again? Let’s analyze the chart data across different time frames to find out.
Starting with the 1-day chart: BTC is facing strong resistance between $94,000 and $98,000. Two days ago, we saw a sharp 7.5% gain in a single day, and the previous week was generally bullish. However, yesterda
Starting with the 1-day chart: BTC is facing strong resistance between $94,000 and $98,000. Two days ago, we saw a sharp 7.5% gain in a single day, and the previous week was generally bullish. However, yesterda
ETH Held the Line... But Is It a Trap? $1,688 Decides the Future!
Ethereum has done an impressive job stabilizing itself after a dangerous decline. The $1,550 level was a crucial support on the weekly chart, and $ETH has managed to hold that zone for three consecutive weeks, which is a positive sign. However, it’s important not to overreact too soon. Let’s zoom out to the monthly time frame, where broader trends often tell the real story.
There’s still about a week left before the monthly candle closes. The concerning part is that if ETH closes this month belo
There’s still about a week left before the monthly candle closes. The concerning part is that if ETH closes this month belo
Mantra’s $OM token crashed over 90% in hours—from $6.30 to $0.43—wiping out billions and triggering panic. Some are calling it “the next LUNC,” but the reality is more complicated. The crash was likely caused by forced liquidations from a large investor on CEXs like OKX, where over $36M in OM was moved just before the drop. CEO John Mullin blamed reckless sell pressure and denied any team dumping, claiming their tokens remain untouched and verifiable on-chain.
Social media fueled fears, accusing the team of dumping 3.9M OM. Meanwhile, last month’s airdrop controversy—where over 50% of users were blacklisted—further eroded community trust. Add in bearish signals like March’s 20% drop and a looming death cross, and the crash appears to be the result of internal tension, weak liquidity, and sentiment panic, not necessarily a protocol failure like LUNC.
Unlike LUNC, which collapsed due to a failed stablecoin system, OM is tied to real-world asset tokenization with backing from partners like DAMAC and a Dubai VARA license. The team is still active and addressing concerns, but the lack of community momentum, major backing, and ongoing suspicion over token control leaves recovery uncertain.
OM isn’t dead, but it's at a critical point. If the team can regain trust and deliver on its promises, a rebound is possible. For now, it’s a warning—not a repeat—of $LUNC .
#om #mantra
Social media fueled fears, accusing the team of dumping 3.9M OM. Meanwhile, last month’s airdrop controversy—where over 50% of users were blacklisted—further eroded community trust. Add in bearish signals like March’s 20% drop and a looming death cross, and the crash appears to be the result of internal tension, weak liquidity, and sentiment panic, not necessarily a protocol failure like LUNC.
Unlike LUNC, which collapsed due to a failed stablecoin system, OM is tied to real-world asset tokenization with backing from partners like DAMAC and a Dubai VARA license. The team is still active and addressing concerns, but the lack of community momentum, major backing, and ongoing suspicion over token control leaves recovery uncertain.
OM isn’t dead, but it's at a critical point. If the team can regain trust and deliver on its promises, a rebound is possible. For now, it’s a warning—not a repeat—of $LUNC .
#om #mantra
$ORCA Traders Are Bleeding and Don’t Even Know It – Here’s Why Funding Fees Are Draining You!!
If you’re trading #ORCAUSDT , this is your wake-up call. The funding rate is deeply negative—over -10.84% APR, which means shorts are paying longs, not the other way around. But here’s the twist: despite shorts paying funding, the market remains heavy, with long/short ratios crashing, low taker buy volume, and a declining basis showing futures prices falling below the index. This means bearish sentiment is dominating, and even with shorts paying the fee, the price action favors downside.
In simple terms: the market is overloaded with longs trying to bottom-pick, but price action says otherwise. Funding fees alone don’t guarantee profit—if you're long and the market keeps dipping, your PnL still bleeds. Always track funding rate, volume, and basis before entering a position blindly.
#ORCA #BinanceSafetyInsights
If you’re trading #ORCAUSDT , this is your wake-up call. The funding rate is deeply negative—over -10.84% APR, which means shorts are paying longs, not the other way around. But here’s the twist: despite shorts paying funding, the market remains heavy, with long/short ratios crashing, low taker buy volume, and a declining basis showing futures prices falling below the index. This means bearish sentiment is dominating, and even with shorts paying the fee, the price action favors downside.
In simple terms: the market is overloaded with longs trying to bottom-pick, but price action says otherwise. Funding fees alone don’t guarantee profit—if you're long and the market keeps dipping, your PnL still bleeds. Always track funding rate, volume, and basis before entering a position blindly.
#ORCA #BinanceSafetyInsights
Terra Luna Classic burned 408 billion tokens—yet it’s still miles away from recovery. Can it ever return to its $116 glory? The numbers say no, but here’s exactly why, broken down in plain language.
The LUNC community is trying hard to reduce supply by burning tokens—over 408 billion so far, with Binance helping a lot. But even at this pace, it would take around 7 years just to shrink the supply to 10 billion. And even if that happens, for LUNC to reach $116 again, the total market cap would need to be over $1 trillion—more than any crypto has ever achieved except Bitcoin.
Right now, $LUNC trades at less than a cent. Its old price was tied to a stablecoin (UST), which no longer exists. That means the economic engine that powered LUNC’s price before the crash is gone. Even though developers are improving the network and burning tokens, the demand isn't growing fast enough to support a big price jump.
There’s still community support and upgrades happening, and prices might rise slowly, maybe up to $0.0001 or even $0.001 during a crypto bull run. But getting back to $116? That would require burning more than 99.9% of all tokens and somehow getting investors to pour in trillions of dollars—highly unrealistic.
So, while #LUNC isn’t dead, and there's still potential for gains, it won’t return to its all-time high. Knowing the facts can help you avoid false hope and make smarter moves in the market.
#TerraLunaClassic
The LUNC community is trying hard to reduce supply by burning tokens—over 408 billion so far, with Binance helping a lot. But even at this pace, it would take around 7 years just to shrink the supply to 10 billion. And even if that happens, for LUNC to reach $116 again, the total market cap would need to be over $1 trillion—more than any crypto has ever achieved except Bitcoin.
Right now, $LUNC trades at less than a cent. Its old price was tied to a stablecoin (UST), which no longer exists. That means the economic engine that powered LUNC’s price before the crash is gone. Even though developers are improving the network and burning tokens, the demand isn't growing fast enough to support a big price jump.
There’s still community support and upgrades happening, and prices might rise slowly, maybe up to $0.0001 or even $0.001 during a crypto bull run. But getting back to $116? That would require burning more than 99.9% of all tokens and somehow getting investors to pour in trillions of dollars—highly unrealistic.
So, while #LUNC isn’t dead, and there's still potential for gains, it won’t return to its all-time high. Knowing the facts can help you avoid false hope and make smarter moves in the market.
#TerraLunaClassic
Trump just took the “Trade War” to a whole new level—“104% tariffs on China” are now live. Stocks are tanking, iPhones might cost hundreds more, and your daily essentials could soon spike in price. But what’s really going on—and “who’s paying the price?” Let’s break it down.
In 2025, Trump revived his tariff strategy to protect the U.S. economy, target China’s trade practices, and combat fentanyl trafficking. It started with a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, quickly doubled, and expanded to all imports. By April 9, some Chinese products faced up to 104% tariffs—the most aggressive move since the 1930s.
The idea is to make Chinese goods more expensive so American-made products look better in comparison. But here’s the problem: most of what people buy—phones, clothes, furniture, electronics—comes from China. So when prices on those jump, it’s you, the consumer, who pays. Economists say this could cost the average American household up to $3,800 more every year just from price increases alone.
Meanwhile, big U.S. companies like Apple and Nike, which rely on Chinese manufacturing, are getting crushed. Apple’s stock dropped nearly 20% in three days, wiping out over $600 billion in value. On the flip side, American steel and manufacturing industries might benefit slightly, and the government earns revenue from the tariffs. But for the global economy, the news is grim—markets are sliding, supply chains are breaking, and a worldwide recession is now a serious risk.
China isn’t backing down either. It’s already placed 34% tariffs on U.S. goods like soybeans and cars, hitting U.S. farmers and exporters hard. Canada and the EU are also responding with their own tariffs. It’s a tit-for-tat trade war, and nobody seems willing to blink.
So while #TRUMP argues this is about American strength, the fallout—higher prices, job risks, and economic uncertainty—is hitting fast. The last time we saw something this big, it helped spark the Great Depression. Let’s hope history doesn’t repeat itself.
#TrumpTariffs
In 2025, Trump revived his tariff strategy to protect the U.S. economy, target China’s trade practices, and combat fentanyl trafficking. It started with a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, quickly doubled, and expanded to all imports. By April 9, some Chinese products faced up to 104% tariffs—the most aggressive move since the 1930s.
The idea is to make Chinese goods more expensive so American-made products look better in comparison. But here’s the problem: most of what people buy—phones, clothes, furniture, electronics—comes from China. So when prices on those jump, it’s you, the consumer, who pays. Economists say this could cost the average American household up to $3,800 more every year just from price increases alone.
Meanwhile, big U.S. companies like Apple and Nike, which rely on Chinese manufacturing, are getting crushed. Apple’s stock dropped nearly 20% in three days, wiping out over $600 billion in value. On the flip side, American steel and manufacturing industries might benefit slightly, and the government earns revenue from the tariffs. But for the global economy, the news is grim—markets are sliding, supply chains are breaking, and a worldwide recession is now a serious risk.
China isn’t backing down either. It’s already placed 34% tariffs on U.S. goods like soybeans and cars, hitting U.S. farmers and exporters hard. Canada and the EU are also responding with their own tariffs. It’s a tit-for-tat trade war, and nobody seems willing to blink.
So while #TRUMP argues this is about American strength, the fallout—higher prices, job risks, and economic uncertainty—is hitting fast. The last time we saw something this big, it helped spark the Great Depression. Let’s hope history doesn’t repeat itself.
#TrumpTariffs
Is it a fact or just a myth that Bitcoin pumps when China’s currency drops? The answer: “it’s a bit of both”. While there’s no hard rule, history shows a pattern—“when the RMB weakens during trade tensions, #BTC often spikes”. But how true is it today? Let’s break it down.
When the U.S. hits China with tariffs, one way China fights back is by letting its currency (the RMB) drop. That makes Chinese exports cheaper, helping offset the impact of tariffs. It’s a tactic China used in past trade wars, like in 2015 and 2019, and it’s very possible they’ll do it again now.
Whenever the RMB weakens, some Chinese investors try to protect their money by moving it into assets that can hold value—like Bitcoin. BTC is decentralized and borderless, which makes it attractive, especially when people fear their currency will keep losing value.
We’ve seen this before. In 2015 and 2019, as the RMB fell, Bitcoin surged. Some analysts believe Chinese capital was quietly flowing into BTC during those times. But today, it’s more complicated. China has strict crypto bans, making it harder to move money into Bitcoin directly. That hasn’t stopped it entirely—people still use stablecoins, VPNs, and offshore platforms.
So, is it bullish for BTC if the #RMB drops? Potentially, yes—but it depends on how much capital actually flows in, and how global markets react. The idea isn’t a guaranteed formula, but in times of uncertainty, $BTC often benefits from fear—and that fear may already be building.
#TrumpTariffs #CryptoTariffDrop
When the U.S. hits China with tariffs, one way China fights back is by letting its currency (the RMB) drop. That makes Chinese exports cheaper, helping offset the impact of tariffs. It’s a tactic China used in past trade wars, like in 2015 and 2019, and it’s very possible they’ll do it again now.
Whenever the RMB weakens, some Chinese investors try to protect their money by moving it into assets that can hold value—like Bitcoin. BTC is decentralized and borderless, which makes it attractive, especially when people fear their currency will keep losing value.
We’ve seen this before. In 2015 and 2019, as the RMB fell, Bitcoin surged. Some analysts believe Chinese capital was quietly flowing into BTC during those times. But today, it’s more complicated. China has strict crypto bans, making it harder to move money into Bitcoin directly. That hasn’t stopped it entirely—people still use stablecoins, VPNs, and offshore platforms.
So, is it bullish for BTC if the #RMB drops? Potentially, yes—but it depends on how much capital actually flows in, and how global markets react. The idea isn’t a guaranteed formula, but in times of uncertainty, $BTC often benefits from fear—and that fear may already be building.
#TrumpTariffs #CryptoTariffDrop
Trump imposes tariffs. China hits back. Everyone’s screaming “trade war!”—but do you actually know what a trade war is? What really happens when countries start this economic battle? And who ends up paying the price? Let’s break it down in simple terms.
A trade war happens when countries punish each other by raising tariffs or putting limits on imports and exports. It’s like an economic fight—one country slaps taxes on another’s products, and the other hits back. While leaders say it protects local jobs or fixes unfair trade, it usually leads to higher prices, disrupted supply chains, and slower economic growth for everyone.
This isn’t new. In 1930, the U.S. passed the Smoot-Hawley #TARIFF Act, raising taxes on over 20,000 foreign goods. Other countries responded, and global trade dropped by about 66%. Instead of helping the economy during the Great Depression, it made things worse. It’s now considered one of the clearest examples of how trade wars backfire.
Fast forward to 2018, Trump started another trade war—this time with China. The U.S. taxed hundreds of billions in Chinese goods, and China hit back. While the goal was to reduce the trade deficit and stop unfair practices, it ended up costing U.S. families more money and forcing farmers to rely on government bailouts. A deal was signed in 2020, but #china didn’t meet all its promises.
Now, in 2025, it’s happening again—but even bigger. #TRUMP has rolled out a 10% tariff on all imports and is planning up to 54% tariffs on Chinese goods. China responded with 34% tariffs. Canada and the EU are preparing their own. The stock market has taken a hit, and products like iPhones, cars, and everyday goods could get much more expensive. Some experts say American families could pay up to $3,800 more a year.
History shows trade wars rarely end in clear victory. They cause more pain than progress and often push the world closer to recession. Whether this one ends in another deal—or more damage—depends on what happens next. But one thing is clear: the cost will fall on ordinary people.
A trade war happens when countries punish each other by raising tariffs or putting limits on imports and exports. It’s like an economic fight—one country slaps taxes on another’s products, and the other hits back. While leaders say it protects local jobs or fixes unfair trade, it usually leads to higher prices, disrupted supply chains, and slower economic growth for everyone.
This isn’t new. In 1930, the U.S. passed the Smoot-Hawley #TARIFF Act, raising taxes on over 20,000 foreign goods. Other countries responded, and global trade dropped by about 66%. Instead of helping the economy during the Great Depression, it made things worse. It’s now considered one of the clearest examples of how trade wars backfire.
Fast forward to 2018, Trump started another trade war—this time with China. The U.S. taxed hundreds of billions in Chinese goods, and China hit back. While the goal was to reduce the trade deficit and stop unfair practices, it ended up costing U.S. families more money and forcing farmers to rely on government bailouts. A deal was signed in 2020, but #china didn’t meet all its promises.
Now, in 2025, it’s happening again—but even bigger. #TRUMP has rolled out a 10% tariff on all imports and is planning up to 54% tariffs on Chinese goods. China responded with 34% tariffs. Canada and the EU are preparing their own. The stock market has taken a hit, and products like iPhones, cars, and everyday goods could get much more expensive. Some experts say American families could pay up to $3,800 more a year.
History shows trade wars rarely end in clear victory. They cause more pain than progress and often push the world closer to recession. Whether this one ends in another deal—or more damage—depends on what happens next. But one thing is clear: the cost will fall on ordinary people.
#TRUMP has threatened a “50% tariff on China” unless they back down by tomorrow. Musk is pushing back, calling for “zero tariffs”, while “China promises retaliation”—here’s what’s actually unfolding.
Donald Trump has doubled down on his aggressive trade stance. After launching a 10% blanket tariff on all countries this weekend, he’s now targeting China directly, warning of a 50% #TARIFF on Chinese imports starting April 9 unless China withdraws its new 34% retaliatory tariff on U.S. goods. Trump shows no signs of slowing down, despite global concern. This move has triggered strong reactions in markets, with Asian and U.S. stocks swinging sharply.
Elon Musk, Tesla CEO and a Trump adviser, has called for a “zero-tariff” trade agreement between the U.S. and Europe to promote open trade. His statement reflects growing discomfort among business leaders, especially as Tesla relies on Chinese parts and could be hit hard by rising costs. Musk’s comments may be an effort to steer Trump toward a less confrontational approach.
China has made its stance clear. Its Ministry of Commerce vowed to take firm countermeasures if the U.S. escalates, while state media framed the tariffs as a challenge that will ultimately strengthen the Chinese economy. Neither side appears willing to compromise, and the situation is escalating into a wider economic standoff.
Meanwhile, the S&P 500 briefly entered bear market territory, and the Dow dropped 900 points before a partial recovery. Canada has joined the conflict by filing a WTO complaint over Trump’s 25% auto tariffs. In the U.S., anti-Musk protests continue at #Tesla showrooms, as part of the “Tesla Takedown” movement targeting his political involvement.
Today’s events show that this isn’t just political noise—it’s a major shift in global trade dynamics, with high stakes for markets, economies, and businesses worldwide.
#TrumpTariffs #CryptoTariffDrop
Donald Trump has doubled down on his aggressive trade stance. After launching a 10% blanket tariff on all countries this weekend, he’s now targeting China directly, warning of a 50% #TARIFF on Chinese imports starting April 9 unless China withdraws its new 34% retaliatory tariff on U.S. goods. Trump shows no signs of slowing down, despite global concern. This move has triggered strong reactions in markets, with Asian and U.S. stocks swinging sharply.
Elon Musk, Tesla CEO and a Trump adviser, has called for a “zero-tariff” trade agreement between the U.S. and Europe to promote open trade. His statement reflects growing discomfort among business leaders, especially as Tesla relies on Chinese parts and could be hit hard by rising costs. Musk’s comments may be an effort to steer Trump toward a less confrontational approach.
China has made its stance clear. Its Ministry of Commerce vowed to take firm countermeasures if the U.S. escalates, while state media framed the tariffs as a challenge that will ultimately strengthen the Chinese economy. Neither side appears willing to compromise, and the situation is escalating into a wider economic standoff.
Meanwhile, the S&P 500 briefly entered bear market territory, and the Dow dropped 900 points before a partial recovery. Canada has joined the conflict by filing a WTO complaint over Trump’s 25% auto tariffs. In the U.S., anti-Musk protests continue at #Tesla showrooms, as part of the “Tesla Takedown” movement targeting his political involvement.
Today’s events show that this isn’t just political noise—it’s a major shift in global trade dynamics, with high stakes for markets, economies, and businesses worldwide.
#TrumpTariffs #CryptoTariffDrop
Everyone’s talking about the Fed’s closed-door meeting today—but what if it’s not just routine? With sweeping tariffs about to hit and markets on edge, this timing isn’t random. Why the secrecy? What are they preparing for? Something’s brewing—and it could shake the entire economy. Keep reading.
Earlier today, the Federal Reserve Board met in private at 11:30 a.m. EDT—something they’re allowed to do under special rules when discussing sensitive topics like lending rates and emergency actions. These meetings are normal in structure but rare in timing, especially when big economic changes are brewing.
The likely focus was on advance and discount rates, which are interest rates the #Fed sets for banks to borrow money. These influence how much money flows through the economy. With Trump’s sweeping tariffs starting in just two days, prices on imported goods could rise fast. That means inflation could spike again—and the Fed may be quietly preparing a strategy.
Chairman Jerome #Powell has already said he won’t rush decisions unless the data demands it. That’s probably why this meeting happened in private—to explore ideas without causing panic in the markets. It gives them time to plan, not react.
Although President #TRUMP hasn’t officially commented on the meeting, he’s been pushing hard for lower interest rates online, blaming the Fed for inflation. While the Fed is supposed to stay independent, the political pressure is clearly building—and Powell is caught in the middle.
In simple terms, this wasn’t an emergency meeting, but it also wasn’t business as usual. The Fed is likely reviewing all its options quietly, just in case the economic fallout from tariffs hits harder than expected.
#TrumpTariffs #PowellRemarks
Earlier today, the Federal Reserve Board met in private at 11:30 a.m. EDT—something they’re allowed to do under special rules when discussing sensitive topics like lending rates and emergency actions. These meetings are normal in structure but rare in timing, especially when big economic changes are brewing.
The likely focus was on advance and discount rates, which are interest rates the #Fed sets for banks to borrow money. These influence how much money flows through the economy. With Trump’s sweeping tariffs starting in just two days, prices on imported goods could rise fast. That means inflation could spike again—and the Fed may be quietly preparing a strategy.
Chairman Jerome #Powell has already said he won’t rush decisions unless the data demands it. That’s probably why this meeting happened in private—to explore ideas without causing panic in the markets. It gives them time to plan, not react.
Although President #TRUMP hasn’t officially commented on the meeting, he’s been pushing hard for lower interest rates online, blaming the Fed for inflation. While the Fed is supposed to stay independent, the political pressure is clearly building—and Powell is caught in the middle.
In simple terms, this wasn’t an emergency meeting, but it also wasn’t business as usual. The Fed is likely reviewing all its options quietly, just in case the economic fallout from tariffs hits harder than expected.
#TrumpTariffs #PowellRemarks
$EDU just pumped 49% in a single day. But what if this isn't a rally—what if it's bait? Big wallets may already be leaving while everyone else rushes in. The numbers tell a different story than the hype.
The total money inflow shot past 3.8 million, which looks bullish on the surface. But the funding rate flipped sharply negative to -0.8714%, meaning long traders are now paying heavily to stay in position. This usually happens when the long side is overcrowded and the market starts tipping against them.
At the same time, the long/short ratio spiked above 2.8 recently, showing that over 70% of traders were positioned long. That’s a dangerous imbalance. After the pump, sell volume began to rise and the futures price dropped below the spot price—a bearish sign that confidence is fading fast.
All this suggests the move could be driven more by hype than substance. It’s the kind of setup where smart money pumps, attracts late buyers, and exits while retail traders get trapped at the top.
Be cautious and don’t let FOMO override your risk management.
#EDU
The total money inflow shot past 3.8 million, which looks bullish on the surface. But the funding rate flipped sharply negative to -0.8714%, meaning long traders are now paying heavily to stay in position. This usually happens when the long side is overcrowded and the market starts tipping against them.
At the same time, the long/short ratio spiked above 2.8 recently, showing that over 70% of traders were positioned long. That’s a dangerous imbalance. After the pump, sell volume began to rise and the futures price dropped below the spot price—a bearish sign that confidence is fading fast.
All this suggests the move could be driven more by hype than substance. It’s the kind of setup where smart money pumps, attracts late buyers, and exits while retail traders get trapped at the top.
Be cautious and don’t let FOMO override your risk management.
#EDU
Login to explore more contents