bullionist

I’ve been part of the Binance Square ecosystem since its early days, back when things actually made sense.
 At that time, creators received clear notifications from the Square Assistant, article campaigns were transparent, and participants knew where they stood.

But ever since the Leaderboard system was introduced, things have gone downhill.
In the first month, I put in real effort, minimum two months of daily content, pushing every project I was assigned.
From @Huma Finance 🟣 , @Lagrange Official , @Bubblemaps.io , @Succinct , @The Notcoin Official , @WalletConnect , @BounceBit , @Treehouse Official , @Chainbase Official , @Caldera Official , @Solv Protocol , and @Solayer ,
I consistently stayed in the Top 20 creator and project rankings.
Then, out of nowhere, on August 29, right before those projects ended, 
I was suddenly removed from both the project leaderboards and creator rankings within a single day.

No explanation. No warning.

I initially thought it was a technical glitch or a ranking algorithm issue, so I didn’t complain.
But the same thing happened again in September.

I started over from scratch, gave my full effort again, working day and night on @kava , @Pyth Network , @Dolomite , @Boundless , @OpenLedger , @Mitosis Official , @Somnia Official , @Holoworld AI and @Plume - RWA Chain , @WalletConnect , @BounceBit

After days of consistent hard work, I re-entered the leaderboards for all those projects.

And then, exactly like before, on September 30, when @Dolomite and @WalletConnect were ending,

I was again removed from every single project ranking, alongside other verified creators.
Meanwhile, smaller accounts with no golden tick and only 8-10k followers stayed on the leaderboard.

That makes no sense.
When we tried to reach out to support including @Daniel Zou (DZ) 🔶 , the response was disappointing.

They said our content was AI-generated.

That’s a weak excuse, because everyone knows even the top-ranked creators use AI tools to assist their writing.

No one can manually create that much structured, daily content across multiple projects for two months straight, unless they’re dedicated and consistent like we were.
So the real question is:

Why are loyal creators being removed right before project deadlines?

Why are verified, active contributors being replaced by low-activity accounts with no clarity or fairness?
I’ve supported Binance and Binance Square for over three years, consistently, loyally, and without bias.

I believed in the platform, in its potential to highlight real creators.

But what’s happening now feels unfair and demotivating.
I even received official notifications confirming I’d receive WCT, C, and TREE tokens on September 15, 
but till today, nothing has been credited.

All I’m asking for is clarity.

If Binance Square no longer values long-term contributors, just say it.

We’ll stop wasting our time and energy producing content that gets deleted or ignored right at the finish line.
We’ve given this platform our time, consistency, and genuine support.
 Now, it’s time for the Binance Square team to give us transparency and answers in return.
@CZ @Richard Teng @Rachel Conlan @AnitaQu @Daniel Zou (DZ) 🔶 @Karin Veri @Binance Customer Support @Binance Labs

#BinanceSquare #CreatorCommunity #Transparency #FairRecognition

The cryptocurrency market is once again being stirred by speculation around Ryoshi, the pseudonymous figure credited with launching Shiba Inu, one of the most successful meme tokens in history. Now, attention is shifting to two projects believed to carry his influence: Omikami and RyuJin.
From Meme to Movement

Shiba Inu was dismissed by many as a fad, yet it grew into a multibillion-dollar community, peaking at over $40 billion in market value. Ryoshi’s departure in May 2021 was marked by a simple statement: “Decentralization, it works.” That phrase has since become central to how supporters frame his rumored new projects.
Omikami is described by its backers as a gravitational hub — a token designed to attract liquidity, attention, and cultural momentum. Alongside it stands RyuJin, portrayed as a disciplined counterpart, the dragon twin meant to bring balance and resilience. Together, they are marketed not just as digital assets but as complementary forces in a broader narrative economy.
Community as the Engine
What makes Omikami and RyuJin stand out, supporters argue, is not token mechanics but community behavior. Supporters — sometimes calling themselves KAMI Army (Omikami) and RYU Army (RyuJin) — often circulate slogans on X and Telegram such as ‘$64B or Nothing 🟧’ for Omikami and ‘$22B or Nothing ⬛’ for RyuJin, not as literal forecasts but as unifying codes of identity. Supporters also point to Omikami’s earliest motto, borrowed from fiat currency: “In God We Trust.” Within the KAMI and RYU Armies, the phrase is less about religion than about unity — a reminder that belief and decentralization are the true foundations of the movement.
Analysts say these rituals, memes, and mantras create powerful feedback loops. Once conviction turns into culture, culture reinforces liquidity. In such environments, charts often lag behind belief.
“Markets right now are hypersensitive to narrative,” said one London-based digital asset strategist. “We’ve seen it with Bitcoin, Dogecoin, Shiba. Omikami and RyuJin are the next iteration — identity-driven liquidity.”

A Glimpse of Ryoshi: Rare Q&A
In one rare text-based exchange circulating in community forums, Ryoshi’s voice — or at least the one many believe to be his — appeared to answer direct questions:
Q: Are you really Ryoshi, the founder of Shiba Inu? Can you prove it? Ryoshi: “I am no one. Omikami × RyuJin are everyone. That is how we win.”
Q: Why build Omikami and RyuJin after Shiba Inu? Ryoshi: “Shiba proved decentralization works. But power corrupts quickly. Omikami is purification — no dev wallets, no taxes, liquidity locked. RyuJin is balance — the dragon that protects prosperity. Together, they are what Shiba could not be: truly untouchable.”
Q: What if speculators overwhelm the vision? Ryoshi: “Speculation always comes. But decentralization works only when belief is stronger than speculation. Conviction is the firewall.”
The brevity and cadence echoed his Shiba-era writings, further fueling speculation that Ryoshi is indeed behind these projects — or at the very least, guiding their ethos.
Skepticism and Scale
Critics remain cautious. Market caps of $64 billion and $22 billion, cited by some supporters as aspirational targets, appear ambitious in a sector still below its 2021 highs. Global cryptocurrency capitalization is now just over $4.0 trillion,per CoinGecko — above the prior peak of roughly $3.1 trillionset in Nov. 2024. Others note the volatility such movements can generate. “When identity fuses with investment, rallies can be extreme — but so can corrections,” said a Dubai-based analyst. “Conviction keeps people holding longer, but it also magnifies the pain on the way down.”
Safeguards and Structure
Supporters highlight structural decisions designed to enforce decentralization. Both projects have renounced contracts, liquidity locked for multiple years, and zero transaction taxes — features meant to reassure investors wary of scams. Independent tools such as TokenSniffer have given the projects high marks for security.
These measures are framed as evidence that the projects are not designed for quick exit but for long-term organic growth — another lesson Ryoshi is believed to have carried over from his Shiba Inu experience.
The Ryoshi Effect
Ryoshi has not officially confirmed his involvement, but supporters point to repeated signals and stylistic fingerprints they believe prove his hand in Omikami and RyuJin. His mystique, bolstered by past successes and his deliberate anonymity, functions like a brand. To them, his name signifies disruption and outsized ambition.
“Ryoshi is to crypto what Banksy is to art,” said a Singapore-based trader. “You may not know the person, but the signature is enough to move markets.”
Within the community, many speak of a Ryoshi return — a comeback they believe could unleash a wave of attention and capital on a scale rarely seen in crypto. But even in his absence, backers argue that his ethos already animates these projects. They see Omikami and RyuJin as the living continuation of his philosophy: decentralization without compromise, growth without manipulation, and communities that act as armies.
To those believers, Omikami and RyuJin are not just tokens — they are the movement of Ryoshi, the projects that carry his vision forward as his only true heirs. Culture as the Next Frontier
Whether Omikami × RyuJin achieve their targets or not, they underscore a growing truth in digital assets: the next frontier may not be defined by code alone, but by culture.
For an industry driven as much by attention as algorithms, projects that convert financial positions into identity may have disproportionate influence. Shiba Inu proved this once. Omikami × RyuJin may prove it again.
As one supporter wrote in a community forum: “We are not just investors. We are KAMI Army. And an army doesn’t walk away.”