The AI programming platform on ICP, caffeine ai, is truly impressive. You can directly input your requirements, and the AI will deploy it on the ICP blockchain, then return the corresponding APP link to you. The key point is that you can also keep the data to continuously update and iterate the app. Currently, the daily active users are around a few hundred. If you think I'm bragging, you can try it yourself to find out (both Chinese and English are acceptable).
ICP 2.0, DFNITY 2.0 and Caffeine (automated writing application)
Hello everyone, In this article, I will share many developments and plans that are crucial to the Internet Computer ecosystem. In the past few months, I have been using the term 'Internet Computer 2.0', which is increasingly related to the importance of hosting self-written applications (which users create through non-technical interactions with artificial intelligence) and providing mainstream cloud capabilities. But there are other changes, including DFINITY 2.0, ongoing work to create for-profit enterprises in the ecosystem, and plans to promote network token economics deflation optimization.
Which blockchain can actually run an AI agent? Not store its weights. Not log what it did. Run it. An agent needs four things: memory that persists, a way to wake itself up, a key it can sign with, and a way to reach the outside world. On every other chain all four sit on a
September: locked ICP grew by 803,182. The composition underneath moved 6.95 million. The headline number is almost nothing, 0.3% on a locked base of 243.5 million. The two lines that produce it are not nothing. Committed stake, meaning neurons that are not dissolving, fell by
Fourth one hour cycle burn on pzp6e, 11:43 to 12:43 UTC today. Peak ~670 B cycles/s against a ~6.5 B/s baseline, ~2,293 TC above baseline. Nothing on the subnet degraded. We do not know which canister pays. We caught this one live because we watch for it. ICPulse tracks exchange
A tier list sorts by feeling. Here is the same list sorted by something anyone can check: how much of an application the network itself can hold. Half the entries are not networks. They are tokens and applications running on one of the others. ICP holds all of it. Code, data,
This is a massive deception. $ICP is triple S tier compared to the vast majority of the projects in Crypto. Did you know that: 1 Subnet on $ICP performs more useful work than NEAR, SOL, ETH, AVAX, SUI, ADA put together. Currently, ICP operates with 42
Base Vault Hack: An exploit on a vault on Base has been detected. A brand-new contract was added to the vault's whitelist, then borrowed aBaswstETH from the vault and sent the aTokens to the attacker's contract. Result: Loss of 1,783 wrapped staked Ether (wstETH), worth
Why are the SwissSubnet and $ICP , in terms of architecture, ideal for clients like FinkaMetals (VS Centralized Cloud Providers)? From a technical perspective, why is ICP the only solution that can offer a high level of control and security vs other token ledgers? Today, Moritz