$VELVET Update 👀 Tracked another major move: • 3M $VELVET moved from Bitget cold → hot wallet • Split across 5 fresh wallets • 1.66M $VELVET (~$2.6M) deposited to Gate Classic distribution structure. Not a confirmed dump yet—but I'm watching: • Whale longs fading • Open Interest dropping • More exchange inflows Something is brewing. Stay alert. 🔥
Tell me one name who is making more money than me by meme coins❓Over💲2 Million profit done from $SIREN ____&____$STO My whale calls never fail , Join my Chatroom for whale calls ..🐋🐳..My CHATROOM ...👈🏻
Who’s Really Behind $LAB ? Here’s What I Found. 🧵 After digging through founder history, investor disclosures, on-chain data, and public reports, here’s a breakdown of what stands behind $LAB . The project was founded by Vova Sadkov and Mark, the team previously behind the NFT/SocialFi project Eesee ($ESE). Before launching LAB, they were already active in the crypto startup ecosystem. According to the founders' public statements, LAB received backing or support from several major industry players, including: • Animoca Brands • OKX • Lemniscap • GSR • Amber Group • Mirana Ventures • Gate • KuCoin These names were presented as institutional supporters during the project's growth. Then came the explosive rally: 📈 Launched around $0.07–$0.10 📈 Rallied to nearly $27 📈 More than 270× from $0.10 📈 Around 370× from its all-time low 📈 Reached a multi-billion-dollar valuation at its peak But after the meteoric rise, $LAB became one of the most controversial tokens of the year. On-chain investigator ZachXBT published multiple reports alleging: • Insiders controlled more than 95% of the token supply • Token allocation lacked transparency • Private OTC deals and loan agreements existed • Vesting terms were changed after launch • Large insider wallets moved tokens ahead of major price swings These are public allegations, not proven facts. The LAB team has disputed or has not publicly accepted many of these claims, and none have been established in court. One thing is certain: $LAB 's rise was extraordinary—but so was the controversy surrounding it. Whether it becomes a long-term success story or a cautionary tale will depend on what happens next.
🚨 UPDATE: The wallet I flagged earlier today after receiving just 1,000 $BASED has now been sent an additional 5,000,000 $BASED 👀 This is no longer looking like a random transfer. Something is clearly unfolding behind the scenes. I'm tracking every on-chain move in real time. Stay tuned. 🔍
🚨 JUST IN: 3,995,950 $GWEI (≈ $491.3K) has just been deposited into MXC from the wallet that received the tokens only minutes earlier. The flow is accelerating. 👀
If you invested $1,000 in $DOT at the peak 5 years ago, you'd have just $13 today. 💀 $DOT That's not a portfolio it's a museum exhibit. What happened here? 😂
Interesting on-chain activity on $SKYAI 👀 The flow begins from a Bitgget Hot Wallet holding roughly $19.7M worth of $SKYAI . From there, the tokens were moved to an intermediate wallet before being split across multiple fresh wallets, each receiving strikingly similar allocations. Several of those wallets then interacted with the Pancake swap Router.
$HEI Insight 👀 See this candle? In my experience, it's often the kind of setup that appears before the real manipulation begins $HEI With nearly 90% of traders in futures, highly manipulated tokens often go through multiple pump-and-dump cycles first—designed to wipe out both longs and shorts before the actual move unfolds. That's exactly why I avoid trading high-manipulation tokens on future trades. I prefer buying and holding them on the spot market, where I don't have to worry about getting liquidated by volatility.
Just my personal observation, not financial advice.