Evgenia Crypto

Never use leverage above tenfold; high leverage accelerates capital loss;
2. The best way to start trading is with U.S. stocks at 9:40. Before the market opens, volatility is high, so don’t make hasty decisions;
3. Never mess with SanDisk and Hynix!
4. Don’t touch meme coins—they’re all a scam!
5. Frequent switching of stocks and frequent trades are a taboo!
6. Trade only with Hong Kong and U.S. stocks—don’t trade on the Chinese stock market (A-shares);
7. Don’t stubbornly hold long or short positions. Sometimes it’s better to take profit and exit;
8. Don’t play with new coins. After you’ve made money on one coin, it’s better not to look at it for half an hour—an extra glance can lead to loss;
9. After a big profit or exiting at break-even, you need to rest—follow the market less and trade less;
10. If there are U.S. stocks, don’t trade with Korean ones. If there are Korean stocks, don’t trade with Hong Kong ones. If there are Hong Kong stocks, don’t trade with A-shares. Koreans have a habit of driving down prices right at the opening of A-share and Hong Kong markets—be careful;
11. For U.S. stocks, it’s best to place orders at 7 a.m. before the market opens!
$SNDK $BTC

$BTC can’t be preparing not a rocket but first a small shake.

Coinbase Premium Z-Score continues to stay in positive territory since August 26 — institutions are still showing interest.

But volumes no longer confirm the previous level of aggression.

If big players start taking profits, the market can easily get a chain of liquidations.

The irony is that such a sell-off might not be the end of the move, but a window for those waiting for a more favorable entry.

$DOGE begins to approach the border that sellers will soon have to defend.

The descending triangle is nearing its resolution. With an confirmed breakout upward, the reference point is $0.106 — about +11% from the current price of $0.09524.

But I wouldn't rush to celebrate the first green candle. For me, the key signal is whether $DOGE can hold above resistance and turn it into support.

$5 000 for $ETH might turn out to be more than just another level.

Tom Lee says that after a confident breakout above this mark, Ethereum could potentially grow 10x.

That sounds aggressive, but his logic is that in a long consolidation, ETH — supposedly already about 5 years into preparing its next major cycle.

I’m more interested in this—will $5 000 be the very point after which the market will start looking at ETH completely differently?

$FET as if finally breaking out of a months-long cell.

The down-sloping wedge break has occurred, but right now I’d be looking not at the fact of the break itself, but at what happens after it: the price holds and has not yet returned inside the structure.

If this force holds, the potential really could be enormous. A return to $2 would give about +663% from current levels—and it may not be the limit yet.

You shouldn’t look at the crypto market only from the perspective of charts—raise your gaze and look at the oil market.

This morning, two pieces of news together provide a complete picture: Iran’s oil minister submitted his resignation under pressure from the war between the USA and Iran, and in the Strait of Hormuz area, several explosions occurred again near tankers.

On the one hand, there are internal political changes in an oil-producing country; on the other, there is a real threat to transport routes. Both factors add a premium to the oil price$CL

How is this related to $BTC ? The chain is very simple: rising oil prices lead to entrenching inflation, to the return of expectations of rate hikes, and risk assets suffer together.

This logic has been repeatedly confirmed this year—oil is an invisible hand that weighs on the crypto market.

That’s why I follow the Middle East, not news headlines that may be noisy or may not be. I’m looking to see whether oil prices and the yields on US government bonds are actually changing. And are you tracking oil this week?

$FLOKI shows its character again.

The $0.00002655 level has done its job as support — the buyer here clearly isn’t willing to give up the price just like that. The chart looks constructive overall: if $BTC doesn’t start pulling the market down, then $FLOKI has every chance to continue moving higher.

I would keep an eye on it in the near-term. There could be an interesting continuation here.

$SOL got stuck under $120, and this is where the next breakout is being decided right now.

The price has approached the level several times, but the sellers still aren’t giving it up without a fight. At the same time, I still like the structure—especially if $BTC doesn’t start breaking the market down.

If $120 finally turns from a ceiling into support, I would be looking at $140 as the next stop.

And right there, the first serious pullback could very well appear.

$FET is starting to look even more interesting against the backdrop of renewed activity in the AI sector.

Many AI coins have already received a strong boost, and $FET , compared to them, still looks as if it’s just starting to wake up. At the same time, the token itself is still one of the notable bets on decentralized AI. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

These are exactly the lagging charts I usually keep an eye on.

If the AI narrative continues to gather momentum, $FET may still catch up to the sector.

$XLM begins rewriting history, but it's still a long way off.

After recovering from $0.14–$0.16, I'd like to see a proper ladder of levels: holding $0.17–$0.20, then breaking through $0.25–$0.30 and a descending trend.

If resistance starts turning into support, the path opens to $0.45–$0.52, then $0.64.

And only after that should we seriously look at the old ATH of $0.8756.

From the current $0.2136 that’s about +309.9%. But first, the market has to prove it can build higher lows.

$BTC In the past 2 weeks there has been little movement after breaking above the May highs.

Price has stalled and is unable to sustain any directional move. Mostly longs and shorts just cut each other up.

Musk has again poured oil on the fire of the AI narrative: SpaceX is not only working on rockets, but also aims to create a “superintelligence”.
On October 4, Musk said that SpaceX is a superintelligence company and renamed SpaceXAI to SpaceXSI.
This change seems like a simple renaming, but the signal behind it deserves more attention.
AI is moving beyond simple competition between large models and into a comprehensive battle of AI + computing power + robots + satellites + space.
SpaceX itself has rockets, satellite internet, huge volumes of real data, and a global infrastructure—and if in the future AI is integrated into these areas, its potential clearly goes beyond just chatbots.
In particular, the global Starlink network could become an important infrastructure for connecting AI agents to the real world.
However, it’s worth noting that superintelligence is still more of a strategic narrative, and real commercial revenue is still far off.
My view: the key signal that this renaming of SpaceX conveys is that Musk is expanding AI from the software level into the physical world.
In the future, it will indeed be important not only how powerful the model is, but also who controls the computing power.$SPCX $SPCXB

$ENA — here I wouldn’t rush to react to headlines at all.

For tomorrow’s unlock, there are two completely different numbers circulating: 1.4 billion tokens and about 171 million. The difference is almost 8x—so the impact on supply and the potential pressure on the price will be completely different.

The screenshot by itself doesn’t confirm which number is correct.

So for me, the main question right now isn’t “will the unlock pressure $ENA ,” but how many tokens will actually come to the market.

$NVDA looks like the market has pressed the FOMO button again.

Nvidia has already reached a new all-time high, and the fundamentals behind the move don't yet look weak: quarterly revenue $96.2B, up 106% year over year.

And if the main player in the AI sector keeps setting new highs, money could start flowing into the entire AI complex.

The most interesting question is how far this new wave will go.

In $UNI , a direction appears that I would definitely not stop keeping track of.

In Q3, Uniswap V4 handled $11.7B in volume for tokenized stocks. That's more than PancakeSwap with $6.1B and Uniswap V3 with $5.3B.

Moreover, these three venues accounted for most of the segment’s growth.

While the market argues about which DeFi token will deliver the next momentum, the infrastructure for trading tokenized assets is already starting to rack up real volumes.

POLYMARKET found itself at the center of a very unpleasant story.

According to an WSJ investigation, via the platform, an alleged fraud scheme was attempted involving approximately $10M in stolen cards → account top-ups → bets → withdrawals to “clean” cards and accounts.

The most alarming moment is that at some point, at the payment provider, more than 80% of deposits were rejected as fraudulent, compared with roughly 1% usually across the industry.

Polymarket denies that it ignored requirements and says it has strengthened its antifraud controls.

But if the allegations are confirmed, the issue is no longer just the fraudsters—it’s also how quickly the platform responded to its own red flags.

If you are a U.S. citizen, then Trump’s promises sounded as if, one day, every American would simply have $12,000 put in their pocket.

But if you apply this arithmetic to everyone to whom such payments were promised, the total comes out to a completely different scale—at least $2.4 trillion.

And this is where it gets really interesting: $12,000 for one person sounds like huge help. $2.4 trillion for the state is a whole different story.

When political promises turn into real numbers, the scale becomes much more apparent.
$TRUMP

$ASTER for the first year achieved what many protocols take years to do.

About $479M in fees and $1.49T in accumulated perpetuals volume—according to DefiLlama. Right now, Aster is already the second-highest perp DEX by fees, trailing only Hyperliquid.

And this is where it gets really interesting: the on-chain derivatives market is no longer a game dominated by a single leader.

Hyperliquid is still ahead by a huge margin. But if Aster keeps capturing volume and liquidity, the question won’t be whether it can compete.

The question is how close it can get to the leader?

$INJ — here the most interesting may not be what has already happened, but what the market still hasn’t noticed.

From the ATH of around $53, the price fell -92% and practically lost attention. After that, $INJ built a base at the bottom for months, and now it’s starting to come out of it.

If the awakening turns out to be a real reversal, I have $60 in mind as a major target — about +1,400% from the lows.

The crowd loves buying stories after 10x. I prefer to look for it when the chart still looks boring.

⁰$LUNC is currently in a fairly clean crossroads.

The 2H downtrend channel hasn’t been broken yet, so I wouldn’t guess a reversal in advance. Let the market first show its strength.

For me, the trigger is simple: a confident breakout above the top boundary of the channel and confirmation after a retest. Only then will the upward move look truly interesting.