ERIIKA NOVA

Dusk Network was founded in 2018 with a very specific idea in mind: most blockchains are either too open for real finance, or too closed to work with regulation. Dusk was created to sit in the middle. It is a Layer-1 blockchain designed for regulated and privacy-focused financial infrastructure, where privacy and auditability are not enemies, but parts of the same system.
To understand why Dusk exists, you have to look at the problem with most blockchains today. Public blockchains are extremely transparent. Anyone can see transactions, balances, and flows. This openness is powerful, but it creates serious issues for real financial use cases. In traditional finance, privacy is not about hiding wrongdoing. It is about protecting sensitive information. Banks cannot expose client balances. Funds cannot reveal trading strategies in real time. Companies do not want the world watching their treasury movements. On a fully public blockchain, all of this information leaks by default.
On the other side, fully private systems solve visibility, but they create a different problem. Regulators, auditors, and institutions need proofs. They need to know that rules were followed, that only eligible participants took part, and that reports are accurate. Total opacity makes that difficult. This is where Dusk’s core philosophy comes in. Instead of choosing transparency or privacy, Dusk tries to design a system where transactions can be private, but still provable and auditable when required. Privacy is the default, but compliance is built into the foundation.
At its core, Dusk is not just another smart contract chain. It is closer to financial infrastructure. The goal is to support things like tokenized real-world assets, regulated securities, compliant DeFi applications, and institutional-grade settlement. Dusk treats blockchain not as a playground for experiments, but as a potential replacement for parts of today’s financial plumbing.
Technically, Dusk is built using a modular approach. Rather than forcing everything into one single layer, the network separates responsibilities. The base layer, called DuskDS, handles consensus, staking, data availability, and settlement. This is the layer that decides what is final and what is not. For financial markets, this is extremely important. Once something settles, it must stay settled. Dusk focuses heavily on deterministic finality, meaning that once a block is finalized, it should not be reversed under normal conditions.
On top of this settlement layer, Dusk provides execution environments. One of them is DuskEVM, which is compatible with Ethereum-style smart contracts. This allows developers to use familiar tools and languages while still benefiting from Dusk’s settlement and privacy design. Another execution environment is DuskVM, which is based on WASM. This gives the network flexibility to support more specialized and performance-sensitive applications, especially those involving advanced cryptography.
Consensus on Dusk uses a proof-of-stake model called Succinct Attestation. Validators are called provisioners, and they are selected in committees to propose and validate blocks. This design helps keep the network fast and efficient while still being decentralized. For markets and institutions, speed and predictability matter more than flashy throughput numbers. They want to know when something is final and how long it will take.
Privacy is where Dusk really tries to stand apart. Instead of treating privacy as a single feature, Dusk builds it at multiple levels. On the settlement layer, Dusk supports privacy-preserving transaction models that can hide amounts and balances while still allowing verification. On the smart contract side, Dusk introduced a system called Hedger, which brings confidential transactions to the EVM environment. Hedger uses a mix of zero-knowledge proofs and advanced encryption techniques so that contracts can operate on sensitive data without exposing it publicly.
The important thing here is intent. Dusk does not frame privacy as a way to avoid rules. It frames privacy as a way to protect participants while still respecting regulation. This idea shows up again in Dusk’s approach to identity and compliance. Through a framework called Citadel, users can prove that they meet certain requirements, like KYC or eligibility rules, without revealing unnecessary personal information. Instead of uploading documents everywhere, users can present cryptographic proofs that say “I qualify,” without showing why in detail.
When it comes to tokenization, Dusk focuses heavily on regulated assets rather than collectibles or speculative tokens. One example is its Confidential Security Contract standard, designed for issuing privacy-enabled tokenized securities. The idea is that issuers can create regulated instruments on-chain, enforce rules programmatically, and still respect investor privacy. This approach treats tokenization as a serious financial tool, not just a wrapper around existing assets.
Dusk’s mainnet rollout also reflects its infrastructure mindset. Instead of rushing to launch, the network went through long devnet and testnet phases, followed by a staged mainnet activation. The first immutable mainnet block was finalized in early January 2025. This slow and structured approach is not exciting from a hype perspective, but it is exactly how institutions prefer systems to be launched.
The DUSK token plays a functional role in the network. It is used for staking, securing the network, and participating as a provisioner. It also acts as the native currency of the protocol. According to Dusk’s published tokenomics, the initial supply was set at 500 million tokens, with another 500 million planned to be emitted gradually over several decades as staking rewards. This brings the maximum supply to one billion tokens. The long emission schedule is designed to fund network security over time rather than relying on short-term incentives.
Staking on Dusk requires a minimum amount of DUSK to participate as a provisioner, and there are defined rules around stake maturity and slashing. Dusk has taken a relatively cautious approach to slashing, aiming to penalize bad behavior without making participation overly risky. This again reflects the network’s preference for stability and predictability.
The ecosystem around Dusk is strongly aligned with its regulated finance vision. Instead of chasing dozens of consumer apps, Dusk has focused on partnerships related to exchanges, payments, and market infrastructure. These partnerships are meant to show that the technology can integrate with real financial systems, not just crypto-native experiments. The network also supports bridges to other chains to improve access and liquidity, while acknowledging that bridges always introduce additional risk.
Looking forward, Dusk’s roadmap continues in the same direction it started. The focus is on strengthening the modular stack, improving privacy for smart contracts, expanding compliance tooling, and supporting real asset issuance and trading. Dusk is not trying to be everything for everyone. It is deliberately choosing a narrow and difficult path: regulated, privacy-preserving finance on-chain.
Of course, this path comes with challenges. Institutions move slowly. Regulatory clarity changes by region. Privacy technology is complex and hard to get right. Competition in areas like real-world assets and zero-knowledge systems is intense. And there is always the risk that a chain built for institutions struggles to attract enough activity early on.
Still, Dusk’s value lies in its clarity. It is not pretending that all finance can be public, and it is not pretending that regulation can be ignored. It is trying to build a system where privacy feels normal, compliance feels natural, and settlement feels final. If blockchain is ever going to support real financial markets at scale, systems like Dusk are likely to be part of that story.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Founded in 2018, Dusk is a Layer 1 blockchain that was never really built for hype cycles, fast memes, or short-term speculation. It was built around a much slower, harder question: how do you put real, regulated finance on a public blockchain without destroying privacy or breaking the rules that finance must follow?
Most blockchains start from a simple idea: everything is public, everyone can see everything, and anyone can interact. That works well for open experiments, but it breaks down the moment you try to run serious financial activity. Banks, funds, companies, and institutions cannot operate in an environment where every balance, trade, and position is visible to competitors or the general public. At the same time, regulators and auditors still need visibility, proof, and accountability. Dusk exists in that tension.
At its core, Dusk is a Layer 1 blockchain designed for regulated and privacy-focused financial infrastructure. That means things like compliant DeFi, institutional financial applications, and tokenized real-world assets such as securities, funds, or debt instruments. Instead of treating privacy as something optional or something added later, Dusk treats privacy and auditability as part of the foundation.
The reason this matters is simple. Finance does not work in a fully transparent world, and it also does not work in a completely opaque one. Real markets require selective visibility. You may want to hide transaction amounts from the public while still proving that rules were followed. You may want regulators to verify compliance without exposing private business data. Most blockchains force you to choose between transparency and privacy. Dusk is trying to support both at the same time.
To do this, Dusk is built with a modular architecture. Rather than placing everything into one giant system, the network separates settlement and data from smart contract execution. One part of the network is responsible for consensus, data availability, settlement, and transaction logic, while another part focuses on running smart contracts in an Ethereum-compatible environment. This separation allows the base layer to focus on security, privacy, and finality, while developers can still build applications using familiar tools.
The execution layer is EVM-equivalent, which is an important design choice. It means developers can deploy smart contracts using the same logic, languages, and tooling they already know from Ethereum. For adoption, this is critical. Most teams will not rewrite entire systems just to use a new chain. Dusk’s approach lowers that barrier while still offering features that Ethereum itself does not provide natively, especially around privacy and regulated workflows.
Privacy on Dusk is not an all-or-nothing concept. The network supports different transaction models depending on what the situation requires. Some transactions can be transparent and account-based, which is useful for compliance, reporting, and high-throughput needs. Others can be shielded using zero-knowledge proofs, allowing value to move without revealing sensitive details. This dual approach reflects how finance actually works in the real world. Not everything needs to be private, but when privacy is required, it must be reliable and native.
Dusk’s privacy model is built using advanced cryptography, including zero-knowledge proofs. These tools allow the network to verify that transactions are valid without revealing the underlying data. In simple terms, the system can prove that rules were followed without showing private information. This is especially important for financial products that have legal requirements attached to them.
One of the ideas that has emerged from Dusk’s research is the concept of hybrid privacy models designed specifically for regulated assets. These models aim to protect sensitive information while still allowing regulators and auditors to access proofs when necessary. This is very different from privacy systems that focus purely on anonymity. The goal here is not to hide from oversight, but to control who can see what, and when.
On the consensus side, Dusk uses a proof-of-stake system designed for fast and deterministic settlement. Financial systems care deeply about finality. When a transaction is confirmed, it needs to be final, not something that might be reversed later due to a chain reorganization. Dusk’s consensus design focuses on committee-based validation and rapid agreement, which helps create the kind of settlement guarantees that financial infrastructure expects.
The DUSK token plays a central role in the network. It is used for staking, securing the network, paying transaction fees, and rewarding participants who help maintain consensus. The token supply is capped at one billion DUSK. Half of that supply was created at genesis, and the other half is released gradually over a long emissions schedule that spans decades. This slow release is designed to fund network security over time without overwhelming the economy with inflation.
Transaction fees on Dusk work through a gas model, similar in concept to other smart contract platforms. Fees are paid in very small units of DUSK, allowing fine-grained pricing for computation and network usage. From a user perspective, this feels familiar if you have used other EVM-based networks.
Staking on Dusk is relatively accessible compared to some networks. Participants stake DUSK to help secure the chain and earn rewards. The system also includes slashing mechanisms designed to discourage bad behavior. There are lighter penalties for reliability issues, such as missing duties, and heavier penalties for clearly malicious actions like double signing or producing invalid blocks. This balance is important. A financial network must be strict enough to protect itself, but not so harsh that honest participants are constantly at risk.
When it comes to the ecosystem, Dusk is not trying to attract thousands of unrelated applications. Its focus is narrower and more deliberate. The network is positioned as infrastructure for regulated markets, asset issuance, and compliant trading environments. That means the most important applications are those that help issue, trade, and settle real-world assets in a legally sound way. Interoperability and data standards also play a role, because regulated assets do not exist in isolation. They need to move between systems, be priced accurately, and integrate with existing financial tooling.
Dusk reached a major milestone when its mainnet went live in early 2025. For the team, this was not the end goal but the beginning of a new phase. Mainnet allows the project to move from theory and testing into real usage. From here, the focus shifts toward expanding the ecosystem, improving privacy tooling for smart contracts, refining staking and consensus mechanics, and supporting real financial products built on top of the network.
The roadmap direction suggests continued work on privacy for smart contracts, further modularization of the stack, and deeper support for tokenized assets and compliant financial workflows. These are not flashy upgrades, but they are the kind of improvements that matter if the goal is long-term infrastructure rather than short-term attention.
Of course, Dusk faces real challenges. Regulated finance moves slowly, and onboarding institutions takes time. Balancing privacy and compliance is technically and politically difficult. A modular, cryptography-heavy system is complex, and complexity increases the risk of bugs and misunderstandings. Competition in the real-world asset and compliance space is also growing fast. None of these problems are easy, and none have quick fixes.
But Dusk was never designed for quick wins. It is designed for a future where blockchains are not just experimental networks, but part of the global financial system. If that future arrives, it will require infrastructure that respects privacy, follows rules, and still benefits from decentralization. Dusk is one of the projects quietly trying to build exactly that, without pretending the problem is simple or the path is short.

@Dusk #dusk $DUSK

Dusk is a Layer-1 blockchain built for one specific uncomfortable reality: finance needs privacy, but regulated finance also needs rules, proofs, and audit paths. Most blockchains lean hard toward “everything is public,” which sounds clean in theory, but in real markets it quickly becomes messy. Traders don’t want their positions broadcast. Businesses don’t want competitors tracking treasury flows. Customers don’t want their financial lives permanently exposed. At the same time, serious financial systems cannot just say “trust us”—they must support compliance, reporting, and selective disclosure. Dusk is designed to live in that middle zone: open enough to be a public blockchain, private enough to work for real financial use cases, and structured to support regulated assets and applications.
The simplest way to describe Dusk is this: it tries to make on-chain finance feel like real finance, without turning the blockchain into a public surveillance wall. Its own documentation frames the chain as “privacy-focused financial infrastructure” with compliance and auditability built into the design. That doesn’t mean Dusk is building a “dark” system where no one can see anything. It’s closer to “confidential by default, verifiable always, and revealable when needed,” which is exactly the kind of balance regulated environments usually demand.
The reason Dusk matters is not because privacy is trendy. It matters because finance is full of sensitive information that should not be public, but still needs to be provable. In traditional finance, privacy is handled by private databases and trusted intermediaries, and auditability is handled by reports, access controls, and legal frameworks. On a public blockchain, those assumptions break. If everything is visible forever, you get leakage of customer data, trading strategies, and counterparties. That is not just a “privacy preference” problem; it becomes a market integrity problem and a compliance problem. Dusk tries to solve this by giving the network native support for confidential transactions and selective disclosure, so you can prove correctness without publishing everything to the world.
To understand how Dusk approaches this, it helps to see how the chain is structured. Dusk uses a modular architecture. Instead of putting everything inside one execution system, it separates the foundation layer from the environments where apps run. In Dusk’s own descriptions, DuskDS is the settlement, consensus, and data availability base, and then execution layers sit on top. One of those layers is DuskEVM, an Ethereum-compatible environment, and another is DuskVM, a WASM-based virtual machine used for smart contracts that can be more privacy-native. This modular approach is basically Dusk saying: “We want strong, predictable settlement as the foundation, and we want flexible execution environments that developers can actually use.” It also means privacy and compliance tools can be integrated where they fit best, rather than forcing one model to handle everything.
Settlement is a big part of Dusk’s identity. In many consumer crypto systems, people tolerate probabilistic settlement or slow finality because the stakes are low. In regulated finance, finality is not a nice-to-have; it’s the product. Dusk’s base layer consensus is described as Succinct Attestation (SA), a Proof-of-Stake design with committee-based steps aimed at fast deterministic finality in normal operation. The high-level flow described in Dusk materials is that a block is proposed, committees validate it, and then it gets ratified, which is the step that finalizes it. Dusk also has older technical documents that discuss a related consensus framing under “Segregated Byzantine Agreement (SBA).” If you are researching Dusk, this is worth noting because the terminology and implementation details have evolved over time, and the newest docs reflect the current naming and architecture.
Privacy is where Dusk becomes much more than “another PoS chain.” DuskDS supports two transaction models that represent two different real-world needs. One is Moonlight, which is public, account-based, and more like standard transparent blockchain transfers. The other is Phoenix, which is shielded and note-based, using zero-knowledge proofs so transactions can be correct without revealing the sensitive parts publicly, and it supports selective disclosure through mechanisms like viewing keys. This dual-model design is not just a gimmick. It’s practical. In finance, some flows should be public, like transparent treasury actions, public contract interactions, or open activity where the market expects visibility. Other flows should be confidential, like individual holdings, position sizes, or transfers where public exposure creates risk. Dusk’s design essentially lets applications choose which world they need for a given action, without forcing everything to be either totally public or totally private.
Dusk also describes a Transfer Contract at the DuskDS level, which is basically the settlement engine that routes value movement through the correct verification logic depending on whether the transaction is Moonlight-style or Phoenix-style. This matters because it keeps value transfer logic anchored in the settlement layer instead of being scattered across apps in inconsistent ways. For regulated use cases, that kind of consistent settlement behavior is a big deal: you want predictable rules, not dozens of slightly different versions hidden inside random contracts.
Now, Dusk didn’t stop at the base layer. It also built DuskEVM because developers and liquidity gravitate toward familiar tooling. Most smart contract developers are trained on EVM workflows: Solidity, EVM-compatible wallets, common libraries, and the standard Ethereum developer stack. DuskEVM is described as an EVM-equivalent execution environment that sits within the modular Dusk stack, inheriting settlement guarantees from DuskDS. Dusk’s deep-dive documentation for DuskEVM also states it is built on the OP Stack and mentions support for EIP-4844 concepts, with settlement anchored to DuskDS rather than Ethereum. The documentation includes practical network details for developers, like chain IDs and endpoints. At the same time, Dusk’s own DuskEVM deep-dive page has mixed rollout signals: it explicitly shows “Testnet: Live = Yes,” while indicating “Mainnet: Live = No” in its network information table. So the honest, grounded takeaway is that DuskEVM is clearly a major focus with real tooling and documentation, but the exact “public mainnet availability” status is something you should always confirm from the latest official pages when you’re planning real deployments.
Privacy on EVM is even harder than privacy on a purpose-built base layer, because EVM was never designed for confidentiality. That’s where Hedger comes in. Dusk describes Hedger as a privacy engine purpose-built for the EVM execution layer. In Dusk’s own explanation, Hedger combines cryptographic techniques like homomorphic encryption (ElGamal over elliptic curves) and zero-knowledge proofs to enable confidential operations in a way that remains verifiable and composable. The big idea is simple: Dusk wants to let developers build EVM apps without giving up the privacy and compliance story that makes Dusk different. If Hedger ends up being reliable and usable, it becomes one of the strongest parts of Dusk’s long-term moat. If it becomes too complex or too slow, it could slow adoption because developers tend to pick what’s easiest and most battle-tested.
For regulated assets specifically, Dusk talks about standards and protocols aimed at tokenizing securities-like instruments properly, not just minting tokens and hoping regulators look away. Dusk describes XSC, a “Confidential Security Contract” standard designed for tokenized securities, and it also discusses an asset protocol called Zedger that supports lifecycle features like issuance, settlement, redemption, dividends, voting, and transfer restrictions, including identity constraints in some cases. The practical importance here is that real assets come with rules and lifecycle events. If a chain wants to host regulated assets, it needs to support those events cleanly, and it needs to support “who is allowed to hold this” style logic without turning the entire chain into a permissioned database. Dusk’s approach is to use privacy tech plus compliance primitives so the rules can exist without unnecessary exposure.
Identity is part of that world whether people like it or not. The trick is to do identity without destroying privacy. Dusk’s identity direction includes Citadel, described in research and materials as a privacy-preserving self-sovereign identity system where users can prove rights or attributes privately using zero-knowledge proofs. In plain language, the idea is: instead of posting your identity details on-chain, you prove what you need to prove—like eligibility, jurisdiction compliance, or access rights—without revealing everything. That’s the only identity model that has a chance of working in regulated blockchain finance without scaring off users.
Now let’s talk about the token, because tokenomics is where people often get lost in hype. DUSK is the native token used for staking, consensus participation, paying fees, deploying apps, and supporting the network’s incentive system. Dusk’s tokenomics page states an initial supply of 500,000,000 DUSK and a maximum supply of 1,000,000,000 DUSK, where the additional 500,000,000 is emitted over time through staking rewards. It also describes emissions over a 36-year timeline, broken into 9 periods of 4 years, with a halving-style geometric decay that reduces emissions each period. The tokenomics documentation includes a table showing per-block emission dropping over time and cumulative emitted supply approaching the full emitted amount by the end.
Distribution and vesting are also documented. Dusk’s allocation table (with vesting stated from May 2019 to April 2022) shows categories including Token Sale, Team, Advisors, Development, Exchange, and Marketing, along with percentages and amounts. Whatever your opinion about early allocations in any project, the useful part here is that Dusk publishes a clear table you can reference when evaluating supply history.
Staking is described with a minimum staking amount of 1000 DUSK, a stake maturity period (given as 2 epochs / 4320 blocks in the docs), and a “soft slashing” model where misbehavior does not burn stake but reduces participation and rewards temporarily. The reward split is also described: a majority goes to block generation, portions go to committees, and a portion goes to a development fund, with details specified in the tokenomics pages. On fees, Dusk uses gas and a smallest denomination called LUX, with 1 LUX described as 10⁻⁹ DUSK, and fees calculated as gas_used times gas_price, with standard “out of gas” behavior.
The ecosystem side is where people usually ask, “Okay, who is actually building here?” Dusk’s own ecosystem page lists tools and applications including staking platforms, explorers, and DeFi apps like a DEX on DuskEVM. It also lists partner and infrastructure names that align with the regulated finance story, including oracle/interoperability tooling, custody/settlement infrastructure, and the institutional exchange narrative around NPEX. Dusk announced an agreement with NPEX and described NPEX as a licensed Dutch MTF, framing this as a step toward issuing and trading regulated instruments using blockchain settlement. Later, Dusk announced adopting Chainlink standards with NPEX, describing cross-chain messaging and data tooling for regulated securities flows. The broader message is that Dusk is trying to build credibility not only with crypto-native apps, but also with regulated infrastructure connections. Whether that becomes real volume depends on time, execution, and regulatory momentum—but the direction is clearly intentional.
On roadmap and progress, it’s best to anchor to dated official updates instead of vague promises. Dusk published a mainnet rollout timeline describing a rollout beginning on December 20, 2024, with milestones like a dry-run on December 29, deposits on January 3, and an “immutable block” date scheduled for January 7. Earlier, Dusk also discussed mainnet timing and stated delays tied to regulatory changes, explaining that parts of the stack were rebuilt to align with compliance needs. Dusk also published audit updates (for example, Oak Security audits of consensus/node components), which is a meaningful maturity signal for a chain aiming at finance. It announced a two-way bridge in May 2025 and framed interoperability as a way to connect regulated assets to broader liquidity while DuskEVM work continued. It introduced Hedger in June 2025 as the privacy engine for the EVM execution layer, tying it directly to the modular architecture shift. It also published “Hyperstaking” in March 2025, describing stake abstraction that allows smart contracts to participate in staking workflows, enabling staking pools and automated distribution patterns. And in late 2025, community-facing updates discussed upgrades positioned as foundational steps before DuskEVM mainnet readiness.
Now for the part that makes a deep dive feel real: the challenges. Dusk’s entire mission is difficult because it combines the two hardest things in crypto infrastructure—privacy and regulation—and then it adds a modular stack on top. Compliance is not a one-time checkbox. It changes across jurisdictions, and even interpretations change. Dusk itself has mentioned that regulatory changes affected timelines and required rebuilding parts of the system. That will keep happening as the world figures out tokenized securities, on-chain settlement, and cross-chain asset movement.
Privacy technology is also not “set and forget.” Zero-knowledge systems need careful design, continuous audits, and developer tools that are actually usable. Hedger’s approach combines ZK and homomorphic encryption, which is powerful, but also increases complexity and performance questions that must be proven in the wild. Modularity makes scaling and flexibility easier in theory, but it also adds integration overhead. You have a settlement layer, multiple execution layers, privacy systems in different places, and bridges between them. That creates more moving parts, more edge cases, and more surfaces where UX can get confusing. Even in engineering discussions, you can see references to the complexity of moving value between different transaction models and thoughts about simplifying flows over time.
Another honest tension is finality expectations on the EVM side. Dusk’s base layer identity is fast deterministic settlement. But DuskEVM’s own deep-dive mentions inheriting a 7-day finalization period from the OP Stack currently, with a plan to upgrade toward one-block finality. That’s not unusual in rollup-style architectures, but it matters because regulated finance likes clean, fast finality. Dusk will need to close that gap in a way that feels solid and easy to explain to institutions and developers.
Then there is the adoption reality. Even if the tech is good, liquidity and usage do not appear because a chain has a nice vision. The ecosystem needs developers, apps, users, and real reasons for institutions to commit. Dusk’s strategy leans into institutional rails (licensed exchange narrative, oracle/data standards, custody/settlement partners). That is a defensible path, but it is slower and heavier than meme-driven adoption. Institutions move with risk committees, legal reviews, and slow onboarding. If Dusk succeeds there, it becomes “infrastructure,” which is powerful but takes time and patience.
There is also the general Proof-of-Stake challenge: decentralization pressure. Any PoS chain can drift toward stake concentration, especially if staking becomes pooled through a few dominant operators or pooled smart contracts. Dusk’s “stake abstraction” ideas could improve UX and participation, but also risk creating a few large hubs if most users stake in the same place. Balancing easy participation with decentralization is a forever problem for PoS systems, not a one-time fix.
Finally, interoperability brings both power and danger. Dusk’s direction includes bridges and cross-chain messaging standards. That increases utility and liquidity paths, but bridges are historically one of the most attacked parts of the crypto world. If Dusk wants to be “regulated infrastructure,” it needs cross-chain security and operational discipline that matches that level of responsibility.
If you strip all of this down to one human sentence, Dusk is trying to become a chain where regulated assets and compliant DeFi can exist without forcing the whole financial world to become public by default. It’s a chain built around the belief that privacy is not the enemy of regulation; the enemy is unverifiable secrecy. Dusk’s approach is: keep things confidential in public view, prove correctness cryptographically, and enable selective disclosure when it’s legally required.
That vision is ambitious, and it’s hard. But it’s also one of the few visions in crypto that actually matches how financial systems behave in the real world.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK