Echoes-Wisso

The United States is desperately supporting it, while 13 Chinese ministries are encircling it! Why is China cracking down on cryptocurrencies with an iron fist?

Thirteen Chinese departments are working together to ban cryptocurrency trading, while the United States is embracing it and promoting legislation. From the birth of Bitcoin during the 2008 financial crisis to its explosion in 2018 fueled by global anti-money laundering efforts, and now to the 2024 U.S. government binding cryptocurrencies to national debt—behind this digital asset game is the ultimate contest of financial sovereignty and regulatory wisdom. When fraud groups use Bitcoin to transfer hundreds of billions of black money, China chooses to build a firewall, while the U.S. is using encryption technology to reconstruct the dollar's hegemony.

The anonymity and cross-border nature of cryptocurrencies make them a breeding ground for money laundering, fraud, and illegal fundraising. Data from 2025 shows that multiple fraud cases using stablecoins (like USDT) have been investigated domestically, with the amount involved reaching 5.6 billion yuan. At the same time, cryptocurrency trading can bypass foreign exchange controls, exacerbating capital outflow pressure and affecting the stability of the RMB exchange rate.

As of November 2025, mainland China still fully prohibits cryptocurrency trading and mining, but the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area has piloted limited opening of cross-border investment channels, while the central bank continues to strengthen the crackdown on illegal domestic trading and promote the digital RMB strategy.

Is the Ether daily line at the bottom, or is it a rebound before the collapse?

Full live broadcast again, again, again eating meat $ZEC $BTC $SOL

Full live broadcast again, again, again eating meat $ZEC $BTC $SOL

Thunderous Breakthrough! Wall Street's Iron Curtain Crashes Down—Bank of America Announces that starting January 2026, its 15,000 wealth advisors will gain "active recommendation rights" to guide clients to allocate 1%-4% of their assets into cryptocurrency. This is not a mere tentative exploration, but a strategic declaration of surrender by traditional financial giants to digital assets, and the most radical move towards crypto openness on Wall Street to date!

Once upon a time, crypto products were a forbidden zone that "clients could only touch upon active application," and advisor recommendations were strictly prohibited. Now, the ban has crumbled, and Bank of America has directly included four Bitcoin ETFs—BITB, FBTC, BTC, IBIT—into its official investment list. The Chief Investment Officer of Private Banking candidly stated: "For those tolerant of high volatility, moderate allocation has become a reasonable choice."

The 1%-4% allocation hides an institutional re-evaluation of the value of crypto assets. Morgan Stanley simultaneously suggested a 2%-4% allocation, BlackRock anchored at 1%-2%, and Fidelity even opened a 7.5% upper limit for the younger demographic. Vanguard has also recently unlocked trading of crypto ETFs—the traditional financial camp has entirely shifted, collectively rewriting the rules of wealth management.

The policy tailwind arrives simultaneously: the Trump administration lifted bank separation restrictions, the congressional crypto bill accelerates, exchanges like Coinbase are deeply interconnected with the banking system, and regulatory barriers are visibly melting away.

Even as Bitcoin has retreated from a high of $126,000 to $87,000, Wall Street's collective "turning back" already speaks volumes: digital assets have long since shed the label of fringe speculation, becoming a must-have option for wealth allocation. When Merrill Lynch advisors present Bitcoin ETF recommendations to high-net-worth clients, a silently brewing financial revolution has already completed a fatal leap!

Tonight, HP59 being able to charge like that actually indicates the most crucial thing: Ultiland's issuance model has truly been proven to work.

It's not just that someone is paying, but rather — users are willing to participate, projects are willing to launch, and the market is willing to think, which represents that there is real demand for the artoken path.

But don't mistake the key point:

The ones making money are never a single HP59, nor a hot topic.

The real beneficiaries are the model itself.

Because:

Every issuance of an artoken = a round of fees for the platform
Issuing ten = ten rounds
The more you issue, the more stable the model, the stronger the cash flow, the thicker the ecosystem
And where will these long-term values and cash flows ultimately return to?
Not HP59, nor the next lottery ticket, but the only one capable of bearing the entire value of the issuance track — $ARTX .

HP59 is strong, it proves that "issuance can run."
But what runs out the entire track's value is ARTX.
Everything has just begun.

#Ultiland #RWAfi @ULTILAND $HP59 $ARTX

#马到成功 New Year's goods are here, which one do you like??
$币安人生 also has to celebrate the New Year, right?

The expectation of the Federal Reserve's interest rate cut in December continues to rise! Goldman Sachs' latest assessment predicts a rate cut in 2026!
#BTC
#BTC走势分析

According to a comprehensive report by Global Times Finance, the market's expectation for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates in December continues to grow due to weak employment data. The latest data shows that the probability of the Federal Reserve cutting rates by 25 basis points at the December meeting has risen to about 87%.

Goldman Sachs Research has clearly judged in its latest report that there are obvious signs of cooling in the U.S. labor market, and a 25 basis point rate cut by the Federal Reserve in December is “basically a done deal.” The firm’s chief economist, Jan Hatzius, pointed out that the delayed release of the September non-farm payroll report shows weak growth, and other indicators reveal new layoffs in October, especially as the unemployment rate for college graduates aged 20 to 24 has risen to 8.5%, significantly higher than the low point in 2022.

However, Wall Street analysts warn that even if Hassett is appointed, any intention to implement aggressive easing policies will face severe challenges from the Federal Reserve's collective decision-making system. PGIM Fixed Income's co-chief investment officer, Gregory Peters, pointed out that interest rate decisions are collectively made by the committee, and the new chair will find it difficult to push for rapid rate cuts unilaterally.