After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
All three EMA moving averages must be aligned in the same direction, and the momentum indicators must confirm at the same time—only then does a signal trigger.
Why be this strict?
Because I’ve seen too many people enter when they “feel it’s about to go up,” then watch the direction reverse, but end up stubbornly holding on because they “don’t have a clear stop-loss point,” thus getting wiped out.
SYS03’s strict conditions are designed to filter out these “looks-like” fake signals.
Do less, but every trade has a reason.
Search for SYS03 on TradingView and run your own backtest.
After trading for so long, I want to ask you a question.
Right now, on your trading path, what’s the biggest obstacle?
A. I can’t understand technical analysis B. I understand it, but I can’t control my hands C. Position management has no rules D. Once my mindset takes a hit, I fall apart
Leave a comment and tell me—I’ll definitely respond when I see it.
I’m not trying to sell a course. I’m just genuinely curious, and I also want to see where everyone gets stuck.
Trading is a thing—being slow is what makes it fast.
Just entering the market: I’m almost thinking I should double every day. After one year: I start learning to wait for signals. After three years: I realize that “not doing” is a skill.
The market won’t disappear—opportunities come every week. But your principal: one mistake can wipe it out.
Don’t use a “fast” rhythm—use a “slow” strategy. Don’t trade by “guessing”—trade by “waiting.”
A little slower, a little steadier—that’s how you go far.
In early 2024, BTC surged with high volume around 58,000.
I have a friend who checks the charts every day and tells me, “Just wait—let the signal be clearer.”
When it rose to 62,000: “It’s moving too fast. Wait for a pullback.”
When it hit 68,000: “Buy on the pullback. No rush.”
When it reached 73,000: “I couldn’t hold it anymore—I chased it in.”
Then BTC started to pull back, falling back to 60,000.
He said he didn’t lose that money— he lost: he saw an opportunity at 58,000, but kept waiting for a “more certain signal,” so he ended up missing the best spot.
I asked him, “What are you waiting for?” He said, “For a signal that won’t be wrong.” I said, “That kind of signal doesn’t exist.”
In trading, “waiting for something more certain” often results in “higher costs.”
Many people ask me: which is better, quantitative trading or manual trading?
My answer: it depends on who you are.
If you can do the following: ✓ Strictly set and follow stop-loss ✓ Not let emotions affect your decisions ✓ Maintain discipline in the long run
→ Then manual trading can also be done well.
But if you find that you: ✗ Often “wait a bit” and then delay your stop-loss ✗ Add to your position when you win, but then try to win it back when you lose ✗ Chase after profits when you see others making money
→ You need a system to keep you in check.
Quantitative trading isn’t smarter—it’s more disciplined.
The market is always there, and opportunities come every week. But your mindset is your most important asset.
When your mindset is thrown off—everything looks like an opportunity, and the results are traps. When your mindset is steady—when opportunities arrive, you can see clearly.
Now BTC suddenly jumps 5%—what’s your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately—I don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback to enter C. First check the volume/market momentum, then decide D. Don’t move—wait for system signals
There’s no standard answer, but your choice will reveal what kind of trader you are.
There was a time when I almost gave up on trading.
That was after six straight months of losses.
I remember that day, sitting in front of my computer, looking at the numbers in my account, thinking to myself: “Maybe this market just isn’t right for me.”
Later, I did something: I went back and carefully reviewed every single trade from those six months.
I found that 80% of the losses came from the same issue— I was taking trades “by feel” when there was no signal.
It wasn’t that the market wasn’t right for me; it was that my method was wrong.
That review was a turning point in my trading career.
Every consecutive losing streak is the market telling you: “There’s something you need to fix.”
When was the last time you did a serious post-trade review?
Many people ask me: Quantitative trading or manual trading, which is better?
My answer: It depends on who you are.
If you can do the following: ✓ Rigorously follow stop-losses ✓ Not let emotions affect your decisions ✓ Maintain discipline long-term
→ Then manual trading can also be done well.
But if you find that you: ✗ Keep “waiting a bit longer” before you set the stop-loss ✗ Add to your position when you’re winning, but gamble to get it back when you’re losing ✗ Chase after others when they’re making money
→ Then you need a system to help keep you in check.
Quant trading isn’t smarter—it’s more disciplined.