blockTVBee

Start accepting spot goods, start accepting spot goods, will anyone laugh at me?

I dare not go long, do I still dare to accept spot goods? I’ll take back half of the ETH, Parti, and Plume I sold before.

Actually, I also bought some BTC call options, expiring Tuesday at 16:00, to prevent further declines when the US stock market opens on Monday. The strike price is 99,000. The cost is a bit high, 1,641. BTC needs to rise above 100,641 for the option to be profitable.

However, it's not necessary to exercise the option; selling with a limit order can also yield a profit.

Start accepting spot, I don't dare to go long, can I still accept spot? Let's first take back half of the ETH, Parti, and Plume that I sold before.

Actually, I also bought some BTC call options, which expire at 16:00 on Tuesday, to prevent further declines when the US stock market opens on Monday. The strike price is 99000. The cost is a bit high, 1641. BTC needs to rise above 100641 for the exercise to be profitable.

However, it doesn't necessarily have to be exercised; placing sell orders above can also yield profits.

Generate a Scary Idea

People are always accustomed to benchmarking against history, sometimes against the internet bubble of 2000, and then they see that Nvidia's price-to-earnings ratio isn't really that high.

Then they benchmark against the subprime mortgage crisis, and it seems like the real estate market doesn't have a bubble either, and there's no leverage on leverage.

Is there a possibility that the bubble everyone is looking for is actually in the crypto space?

If the third bubble in America is in the crypto space...

Then, are we currently in a state after the bubble? Has the bubble not arrived yet? Or is the bubble fermenting?

If the bubble has not yet arrived, or is still fermenting, how big will this bubble be?

I suspect this is the counterfeit season belonging to $HYPE itself
Overview of opportunities in the #Hyperliquid ecosystem extension

$HYPE has already surpassed $SUI, becoming the 11th ranked project by market capitalization.

Among the top 20 projects by market capitalization, only $HYPE, $SUI, and $TON are new coins in this round, while the others are classic old coins.

Let's take a look at the opportunities available in the Hyperliquid ecosystem extension.

💠deBridge
◆ Application Type: Cross-chain bridge.
◆ Product Advantages: Fast cross-chain transactions, with points and subsequent airdrops.
◆ Product Limitations: Only supports Hyperliquid's $USDC and HyperEVM's $HYPE.
◆ Applicable Scenarios: Cross-chain transfers into | funds into the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

deBridge should be the earliest project integrated into the Hyperliquid ecosystem, having supported it as early as March.

At that time, it only supported transfers into HyperEVM and Hyperliquid outflows. Now it fully supports both inflows and outflows for HyperEVM and Hyperliquid.

deBridge is a project very sensitive to Layer 1 and Layer 2, currently supporting cross-chain transactions between 26 ecosystems. Recently, with the launch of the Plume mainnet, deBridge supports cross-chain transactions between the Plume ecosystem and the other 25 ecosystems, quickly providing a funding entry for RWAfi.

Additionally, deBridge's token $DBR (a name I gave) has a bottoming pattern.

💠Defidotapp
◆ Application Type: DEX based on chain abstraction.
◆ Product Advantages: Aggregates Hyper
◆ Product Limitations: Supports only spot trading, no perpetual futures.
◆ Applicable Scenarios: Trading HyperEVM and other chains' MEME coins and mainstream coins with USDC as if on a CEX.

UniversalX directly lists the tokens of the HyperEVM ecosystem. Here you can see that the largest MEME by market and liquidity in the HyperEVM ecosystem is $PURR, with a market cap reaching $130 million.

UniversalX has recently updated many features, supporting market orders, limit orders, and TWAP trading modes.

Users can set 8 preset modes, where P is price priority mode and S is speed priority mode. UniversalX has set a default P1 strategy: double the capital out, halve the loss.

#UniversalX is now the DEX with the most product features and experience closest to CEX. Although users need to deposit funds, it differs from single-chain channel DEXs like Hyperliquid, where users deposit funds into their universal account, controlled by an external wallet.

Users can buy a specific on-chain asset at any time, sell it anytime, and then buy other on-chain assets without needing cross-chain operations. This is because UniversalX's underlying infrastructure is Particle chain abstraction, allowing Particle technology to complete a series of operations like buying and selling across chains without user awareness, providing an experience similar to CEX.

Moreover, if users want to trade leveraged contracts, they can go to MYX, connect the same external wallet, and select the universal mode, allowing them to use funds in their universal account to trade perpetual futures.

💠CoinCall
◆ Application Type: An exchange primarily for options (of course, it also has spot and perpetual futures).
◆ Product Advantages: Professional options trading products
◆ Product Limitations: Options products have relatively high thresholds
◆ Applicable Scenarios: $HYPE options.

CoinCall is an exchange primarily focused on options products, ranking as the 5th options exchange, renowned for its user-friendly trading interface.

In the options field, 'Call' means bullish, so CoinCall means - bullish on cryptocurrency. Among the top 5 options exchanges, CoinCall may be the youngest, but its name indicates that it was born for options. Therefore, in terms of options trading interface and product experience, CoinCall has an excellent reputation.

As an external product of the HYPE ecosystem, CoinCall is the only trading platform that supports $HYPE options, providing $HYPE traders with more ways to play:

When the market is volatile, buy bullish or bearish $HYPE options,
When the market is stable, sell bearish or bullish $HYPE options.
Use $HYPE options to hedge $HYPE futures or spot.

💠In Conclusion

Hyperliquid has risen due to its product experience and innovative listing methods, and it has gained popularity due to the overseas version's coolness, James. However, the HyperEVM ecosystem is still in its infancy, and this article introduces the opportunities within the Hyperliquid ecosystem extension.

The deBridge recommended in this article has supported the Hyperliquid ecosystem for over 3 months, serving as a very convenient funding entry for Hyperliquid and HyperEVM, allowing cross-chain access from 18 ecosystems directly.

UniversalX allows direct trading of HyperEVM ecosystem tokens and switching between the HyperEVM ecosystem and other ecosystems at any time without cross-chain operations, providing an experience similar to that of a CEX.

Meanwhile, CoinCall offers $HYPE investors opportunities for options trading and hedging.

I haven't seen such violence in a long time

#fort pulled 80% in a day, with a peak of 100%.

Yet I am moved to tears... just managed to break even 😂😂😂😂

Say something scary

People always tend to benchmark against history, sometimes against the internet bubble of 2000, and then see that Nvidia's price-to-earnings ratio isn't actually that high.

Then they benchmark against the subprime mortgage crisis, and it seems that real estate and such don't have a bubble either, and there's no leverage on leverage.

Is there a possibility that the bubble everyone is looking for is in the crypto space?

If this third bubble is indeed in the crypto space... then are we currently in a post-bubble phase? Has the bubble not yet arrived? Or is the bubble in the process of fermentation?

What to do if you accidentally deposited the wrong coin into Binance?

Brother Bee accidentally deposited $USDbC into Binance, which does not support this coin.

At that moment, the Binance deposit page showed an error in the deposit.

You just need to follow two steps: the first step is to click on a prompt link.

The second step is to enter a form, where you only need to fill in your wallet address for the refund.

Of course, there is a manual processing fee of 5u, as it needs to enter the manual review process. Then, wait for the review to be completed within 2 working days, and the refund will be completed within 14 working days.

So, this is the difference between Binance and some other CEXs; there will be a prompt even for wrong deposits, and you can complete the application in less than a minute.
(So now when everyone asks for UID during transfers, it defaults to Binance UID, and neither party asks what UID it is; they just transfer directly 😆)

Of course, you still have to wait for manual processing. Brother Bee made a mistake this time by depositing a stablecoin, so there's no need to worry about the wait. It is advised that friends should think twice before operating when depositing or transferring!

Brother Bee feels that the new coins in the past two years seem to have three characteristics:

First, some coins will pump after the first wave of airdrops at TGE.
Second, after the pump, they gradually decline. Even if there are subsequent increases, it is rare for them to reach new highs.
Third, projects with broad public participation perform relatively better in the long run.

For example:

$Hype is one of the best-performing coins, pumping to 30+, dropping to 10+, and now rising to 40+.

$kaito is also good, dropping to 1.2 at the airdrop, then rising to 2.9, ending up at 0.6 in April, and then climbing back to 2.4.

$Parti dropped to 0.14 after the airdrop with the market, then pumped to above the previous high of 0.4, and is currently around 0.25.

The common characteristics of these three projects are their relatively broad public participation. Hype is mainly a perpetual futures DEX, Kaito is primarily infoFi, and Parti is cross-chain meme coin/on-chain.

$huma dropped to 0.035 after the airdrop and has now climbed back to above 0.05.

So Brother Bee feels that after the first wave of airdrops, one can analyze and determine which coins will pump and acquire some. Brother Bee has picked up a little $SOON because this project has a relatively high profile and substantial trading volume. Then when it pumps, he will sell it off, without holding onto it.

Additionally, during the first wave of pumps, one should be particularly cautious when buying in.

What does everyone think?

Thinking about Trump continuing to raise tariffs,
Thinking about the escalation of Russia and Ukraine,
Even thinking about the Federal Reserve raising interest rates,
I never expected that the black swan would be their mutual tearing...

However, in fact, such events do not shake the fundamentals of cryptocurrency at all:

1. It does not affect the market's faith in cryptocurrency.

2. It does not affect the real economy of the U.S. stock market, at most it can only have a substantial impact on TSLA stock.

3. It does not affect the Federal Reserve's monetary policy.

Even Musk's position may not necessarily influence Trump's policies.

So the negative impact of this "black swan" is limited,

But the fragility of the market is evident. If this happened in 2024, the impact on the market would be weaker, but it happens to occur in June 2025, with some believing the bull market has already ended, leading to the crypto market being even more "weakened" than in 2024.

However, Brother Bee wants to ask, the impact of ETFs is increasing, will traditional on-chain indicators still be as effective as before? Do ETF investors believe more in macro cycles or BTC's halving cycle?

As for altcoins, the four-year cycle formed by BTC's halving, what does it have to do with altcoins?

Is there really a need for the BTC ecosystem and BTCFi? What is the significance of native BTC expansion?

💠 Supply-side perspective: The controversy over increasing the 21 million BTC cap

There has always been a controversy over raising the 21 million BTC cap.

For some friends, the belief is that the 21 million cap is a consensus, and raising the cap would break the scarcity of BTC.

However, if we look at it from the miner's perspective, we can understand the logic behind this controversy.

🔹 The emergence of the controversy: Future miner income may decrease

We all know that BTC halves approximately every four years, meaning that the mining rewards for miners will be halved every four years. With continuous halving, in the future, the BTC mined will decrease.

However, it is likely that the growth of BTC prices will slow down.

Without considering individual miners, let’s look at the entire BTC network. Every four years is a cycle; if BTC's native income is halved and the price of BTC does not double, then the entire BTC network's mining revenue may start to gradually decrease.

As a result, some miners may start to exit mining, and the overall hashing power of the BTC network may decrease, which means that the security of the BTC network may weaken.

This is the logic behind the idea of "increasing the 21 million BTC cap," which is, of course, a controversial idea.

🔹 Breaking the controversy: BTC network transaction fee revenue

Why did the brother say earlier that if BTC's native income is halved and the price of BTC does not double, the entire BTC network's mining revenue may decrease, rather than definitely decrease?

Because BTC mining revenue comes from two parts:

The first part: Newly produced BTC. The second part: BTC network transaction fees.

BTC halving refers to the halving of the first part of the revenue, while the second part of the revenue may increase.

In fact, previously, the brother discussed this topic with @KyleJustKnows.

However, after seeing the data on the second part, that is, BTC network transaction fees, the brother fell silent at that time.

First, let’s look at the daily mining rewards of BTC, where we can see the BTC halving. Currently, the daily mining rewards for BTC are just over 450 BTC.

However, the daily BTC transaction fee revenue is only about 5 BTC. On the other hand, we can see that BTC's current fee revenue is almost no different from 10 years ago.

In December 2017, the daily BTC fee revenue once reached 1000. At that time, the SEC had approved BTC futures, and BTC entered a bull market peak phase. But this was only for a very short time; soon, BTC's fee revenue returned to calm.

This means that after 10 years, even with a significant improvement in BTC's consensus, the launch of BTC futures, the listing of BTC ETFs, and BTC becoming a strategic reserve in the U.S. ... still did not bring more fee revenue to miners by increasing on-chain activity.

However, in 2023-2024, BTC fee revenue has risen to around 400-500 multiple times. This is closely related to the first part of BTC mining revenue, which is newly produced BTC. The increases in BTC fees were due to inscriptions.

In other words, the prosperity of the BTC ecosystem can bring more fee revenue to miners. Although inscriptions are not the most ideal BTC expansion solution.

However, the BTC ecosystem needs BTC expansion and BTC ecology so that miners can earn more in the future without needing to increase the 21 million BTC cap, and more miners can participate in mining control, thereby maintaining and increasing the security of the BTC network.

💠 Demand-side perspective: BTC's Defi ecosystem

From the demand side, does the market need a BTC ecosystem?

In fact, the market has already provided an answer:

On one hand, BTC has properties of gold, currency, and securities. In traditional financial markets, gold, currency, and securities clearly have many derivative financial products.

On the other hand, $WBTC in the Web3 space has also provided an answer.

The market capitalization of $WBTC peaked at over $1.4 billion in 2021, falling alongside BTC prices during the bear market, currently returning to $130.59 million. Of course, the BTC-native $WBTC market cap is decreasing, but this may be due to the growth trend of coinbase's $cbBTC, which has consistently been increasing.

$WBTC is a cross-chain asset of BTC on Ethereum, and since 2019, WBTC's market cap has generally been on the rise. The significance of WBTC on Ethereum is to participate in various Defi ecosystems.

In Uniswap:
Ethereum chain $WBTC's TVL is $170 million, with a daily trading volume of $85.652 million;

On the Arbitrum chain, $WBTC's TVL is $45.449 million, with a daily trading volume of $55.053 million;

On the Unichain chain, wBTC's TVL is $42.913 million, with a daily trading volume of $28.187 million...

There are also many derivative tokens of BTC on Curve, with considerable trading volumes.

In Aave, $WBTC deposits amount to $4.44 billion;

In Makerdao/Spark, users have deposited $WBTC $105.6 million, along with $cbBTC $255 million.

...

So the market needs a BTC ecosystem, at least there is demand for BTCFi.

💠 In conclusion

Returning to the initial question, what is the significance of native BTC expansion?

On one hand, non-native BTC expansion is insufficient to significantly increase mining revenue. Native BTC expansion can provide more revenue for miners, and through incentives for miners, it can enhance the security of the BTC network.

On the other hand, non-native BTC expansion also carries certain uncertainties in terms of decentralization and security for users.

In summary, native BTC expansion technology and ecology are common needs from both the supply side and the demand side.

Why did PumpFun's financing and token issuance cause controversy?

💠 Financing Timing and Motivation

How should I put it? If we apply the logic of stocks, the essence of token issuance should be for financing. According to this logic, the project process should be:

Product → Financing → Mature Product → TGE → Airdrop → Product Ecosystem
or
Product → Financing → TGE → Airdrop → Mature Product → Product Ecosystem

The key point here is that financing should occur before the mature product and product ecosystem. The key to token financing should be to push the product and ecosystem towards maturity, and the objective of financing is to provide cost assurance for improving the product and developing the ecosystem.

However, for #PumpFun, the product and ecosystem may already be relatively mature. Of course, there is room for improvement in the PumpFun product, but in fact, there are already @virtuals_io and @believeapp in the market, leaving limited space for greater innovation for PumpFun.

Financing and token issuance at this time for #PUMP may raise some suspicions of “token issuance to harvest investors.”

💠 Financing Valuation and Revenue Trend

$PUMP financing is valued at 4 billion (400 million USD),

@xingpt has compiled some FDV/annual revenue statistics of DEX and DeFi protocols. (I’ve added a watermark for him).

Comparing, it can be seen that PUMPFUN is somewhat overvalued. Some friends say that PUMPFUN's annual income is more than this. But actually, the MEME ecosystem of Solana is showing some downturn.

According to the cross-chain data from Solana's cross-chain bridge DeBridge, in January 2025, Solana had a net inflow of funds; however, from February to now, the Solana ecosystem has clearly seen a net outflow.

@0xcrypto_max just mentioned the awkward situation of “Solana's meme has gone from not being able to go up on BN to recently not being able to go up on exchanges like Bybit.”

It can be seen that PUMP’s revenue may decline next, so PUMP’s valuation of 4 billion USD may be somewhat overvalued.

@monkeyjiang directly anticipated the script after $PUMP token issuance: "Just launched, a wave of hype, then many investors get trapped. Then a slow decline, and finally sideways trading."

Bee Brother calculated the FDV/annual revenue of #Debridge ($DBR), which also belongs to the Solana ecosystem.

$DBR's FDV is 139.25M, annual revenue 10.14M, giving a ratio of 13.73. Compared to the previous table, this is also relatively low; $DBR may also be somewhat undervalued.

💠 Airdrop Expectations

While PUMP has a high valuation for financing, it completely avoids mentioning the airdrop. @sleepy0x13 believes that “Don’t fantasize that Pump Fun will issue an airdrop anymore.”

An airdrop not only fulfills past promises but is also a way to give back to users. The relationship between users and platforms has always been symbiotic.

Not all projects lack vision; I still want to use Debridge ($DBR) as an example.

$DBR airdropped 600 million tokens last year, with an initial listing price of 0.03713 and a minimum of 0.01864. Let’s be conservative and calculate at 0.025, leading to a total claim amount of 437 million tokens, valued at $10.925 million.

In the second round of airdrops in April to May this year, 23,200,200 $DBR was distributed. This round saw $DBR between 0.01904 and 0.01388, conservatively calculated at 0.015, making the second round airdrop worth $0.348 million.

The total value of the two rounds of airdrops is $11.273 million, which has already exceeded Debridge's annual revenue.

Thus, after the second round of airdrops ended on May 17, $DBR continued to decline due to selling pressure from the airdrop, but there were no negative voices. Instead, Bee Brother feels that @deBridgeFinance has great vision.

Looking at PUMP again, it is acknowledged as an innovation, but it has indeed caused many people substantial losses. While airdrops cannot compensate for users' trading losses, they may soothe users' emotions.

💠 In Conclusion

It is indeed rare to see projects begin financing and token issuance during the mature or even declining stages of their products and ecosystems, raising doubts about their motivations. Furthermore, with such a high valuation for financing, there doesn’t seem to be much emphasis on airdrops for users...

To be frank, in the past bull markets, new retail investors were often called in to take over, getting the chop themselves.

Now, there may not be many new retail investors entering the market; this time, it might be the turn of the old retail investors.

Of course, the focus is mainly on those "experiential" investors who jumped in early during the bull market. Some of them even completely deny the influence of macro factors and overly trust the four-year cycle.

Flexible and comprehensive analysts among the old retail investors are a different story; this group has better judgment.

Regardless, with fewer new retail investors and more old retail investors, the latter becomes the main target for sniping. Disrupting market rhythm and breaking the mindset of retail investors is highly probable. So having just good judgment is not enough; one also needs composure and endurance...

Changing habitual thinking and engaging in a battle of ideas with old retail investors may mean that most of the old retail investors are already in the market. It’s difficult to have a big bull market or a season of altcoins, instead, it might be that when most old retail investors exit, that’s when a big bull market or season of altcoins could actually occur...

Considering the macro environment and the policy timing of the United States, it’s possible that the season of altcoins won’t really begin in 2025, but rather in the first half of 2026. DYOR

【Tool】A browser extension that can analyze KOLs and view investment and financing information

It can not only display the quality of KOL's followers and analyze KOL's content, but also show evaluations by netizens on KOLs and display investment and financing information from project parties and VCs.

Actually, I have shared this extension before, mainly because today Alpha airdropped #LayerEdge ($EDGEN), which was quite disappointing, so I used this extension to check its financing situation... The ability to directly view project financing on Twitter is really practical.

💠 KOL Data and Evaluation

🔹 KOL Follower Data

This extension can show how many KOL followers a KOL/blogger has.

I found a 'KOL' who had previously posted about the XUEMANZI coin and checked it out; it has a total of 85,000 followers, but only 33 KOL followers. (No wonder the xuemanzi coin isn't gaining traction...)

In comparison, uh-huh has 62,000 followers, including 134 global KOLs, 1200 Chinese KOLs, and 3 top 100 KOLs.

The quality of follower data is evidently different.

🔹 Interaction and Evaluation

After installing HuntX, you can evaluate it here under the personal information section on Twitter.

🔹 KOL Analysis

In addition to KOL data, this extension also provides a personality analysis and evaluation of KOLs. Most are E-people, since most bloggers/KOLs put in effort to output and actively interact. So this personality evaluation may not be accurate.

There are also three tags and comments below, which are quite interesting.

The first tag is content, the second tag is language, and the third is interaction or influence.

I personally feel that the first tag called "Strategic XX" is likely to be well-written, although it’s not 100% guaranteed. There are also those whose first tag is not "Strategic XX" but are still well-written; after all, this should mainly be based on AI analysis, so it can't be extremely accurate.

I’ll screenshot a few influential or interesting evaluations.

I personally guess that those with significant influence should involve not only AI but also some human participation in the evaluation.

Additionally, it can be seen that plagiarized or rewritten texts can be identified (though images likely cannot).

From the evaluations given by Twitter users, CZ's reputation is obviously better, while the other three big shots have the term "sickle" mentioned, and even Trump's evaluations only consist of the word "sickle," but CZ does not.

🔹 Mentioned Tokens

Moreover, this also displays the tokens mentioned by big shots/KOLs/bloggers in the last 7 days, 30 days, and 90 days.

Overall, this extension is also a "panty-peeling" type of tool!

It provides us with some references in identifying KOL quality and focusing on KOL investment research directions.

In addition to KOLs, this extension also provides us with useful information about project parties, VCs, etc.

💠 Investment and Financing Information

By opening the project's Twitter, you can see the amount of financing for the project. Hovering over it will show which institutions participated in the investment. By clicking, you can also access these investors' (VCs or investors) Twitter accounts to see which projects they invested in.

For example, @ParticleNtwrk shows a financing amount of $23.5 million, while #LayerEdge ($EDGEN) doesn’t display any financing situation at all. From the price trend of this coin, I guess it probably didn't raise much money, hence it’s not disclosed.

By entering the Twitter of VCs or investors, hovering over here can also display the projects they invested in. For instance, YZi Labs invested in @Sidekick_Labs and other projects.

Kaito's founder, YuHu, previously invested in @infinex! The other two projects, Yappers, should also be kept an eye on!

💠 Plugin Security

First of all, I can't say it's 100% safe, but this extension was developed by @BiteyeCN, a reliable organization.

Secondly, the plugin code is open-sourced on GitHub, so the developers are unlikely to insert any harmful elements into it.

Thirdly, I checked the permissions of this plugin, which only applies to https://t.co/VkJ07HPOEi, so it probably won't involve fund security.

Fourthly, the current rating is 4.8, with 20 people participating in the evaluation and 3,000 users installed and using it. I have also been using it for a month and a half.

I have isolated my wallet with money, CEX, and the browser I usually use for posting, using different browsers for these three tasks.

Interested friends can search for "XHunt" in the Chrome extension market to experience it.

This article is not an advertisement; I just hope that project parties, agents, and crypto friends can keep their eyes open!

This Opensea gallery is always unfinished, I will share it again and showcase some original poetry. 😎
https://opensea.io/gallery/0xceea0f2068c47534043c48ea4ed1940d3df43aad/fc15505adc424496896987dd334fa37b

The focus in June is back on macroeconomic factors. The Federal Reserve is unlikely to cut interest rates in June, but the second dot plot will be released, which will provide forecasts for interest rates (rate cuts).

June 6: The U.S. will release non-farm payroll data.
June 11: The U.S. will release CPI data.
June 19: Federal Reserve interest rate meeting.

Brother Bee has purchased a put option for ETH with a strike price of 2600, expiring on June 20. Because there is none for June 19.

However, options do not necessarily have to be held until expiration; they can also be traded during the holding period. If ETH drops significantly before June 20, the price of the put option will rise, and there will be opportunities to make a profit by closing the position in between.

Brother Bee came up with a slogan for the Binance Alpha airdrop:

"With 'An', there are countless grand houses, providing shelter for all the cold scholars under the sky!"

Although it may seem a bit flattering, this activity is indeed beneficial to the public.

A friend in Brother Bee's group used not 10,000 dollars in Binance, but just over 500 dollars, trading 512*16 for about 10 minutes each day, with a loss of 2-3 dollars, and in 15 days, the loss was less than 40 dollars.

Every day, 2+13+1=16 points, participating in 3 activities over 15 days, selling for 300 dollars, and netting over 260 dollars in profit in 15 days.

@cz_binance @heyibinance Du Fu came to Brother Bee in a dream at midnight, and he said:

"In the wind and rain, 'An' stands firm like a mountain!"

Binance Alpha Points

Earning points is a queue,
But spending points is a stack.

Understand the likes

Brothers, quantum entanglement

Cryptocurrency, to traditional financial platforms like ETFs,
Traditional financial assets, to on-chain RWAs.

Additionally, it was originally thought that macro policies would bring liquidity to the crypto market, but as it turns out, macro liquidity hasn't arrived yet; stablecoins have already expanded the market for USD and US Treasuries. Isn't this reverse empowerment?

Focus on the integration of Web3 and Web2, particularly in the financial sector:

RWAs, $ONDO and $plume on Binance alpha... Don't forget about $link, which is also a data tool connecting traditional finance and blockchain.

Payfi, don't rush to connect with $HUMA yet; staking rewards will be distributed in June, and there's a possibility of selling pressure, so we might need to wait a bit longer to look at the K-line.

We are not at the final sprint stage yet; the Federal Reserve might release a dot plot in June, and they could stop tapering, so we need to shift our focus back to macro in June.

I can't believe this is what I'm seeing in my lifetime?

In the OKX web3 wallet, the first way to earn tokens is through the Binance Alpha Zone.

As amusing as it is, there are two things we have to acknowledge:

One is Binance's financial products.

Since the IEO innovation in 2019, Binance has transitioned from launchpad to launchpool, from consuming BNB to staking BNB.

From HOLDer airdrops to Alpha point airdrops, from holding BNB to being almost unrelated to BNB.

User participation thresholds have gradually decreased, yet the benefits have not diminished.

Now with the Alpha point airdrop, even if users have less than $200 and trade 2048 on the BSC chain daily (of course, they can trade more), they can receive an airdrop of around $100 every 15 days, which amounts to $200 a month, corresponding to an annualized return rate of about 1200% (at minimum).

The second is OKX's on-chain products.

The influence of Binance Alpha is tremendous, but it hasn't hindered the excellence of OKX's on-chain products.

The OKX Web3 wallet has surpassed the likes of the former MetaMask, imToken, and others.

Wallets, DEX, OKX Pay... The on-chain product experience is exhilarating.

While users are raking in huge trading volumes from Binance Alpha points, the Binance Alpha token is also generating profits here on the OKX web3 wallet, with a yield of 1347% for USDT-ZKJ.

Brother Bee has mentioned more than once that innovation carries risks. Innovation requires more investment; if the innovative product is unpopular or problematic, it can lead to losses for the innovator.

Binance and OKX innovate in different fields and have each succeeded; perhaps this is the excellence inherent in the Chinese gene!

◆ If many people are writing before a project issues its tokens:
Then there is a high probability of an airdrop.

◆ If many people are writing after a project issues its tokens and the price is rising:
Then there is a high probability of advertising.

◆ If many people are writing after a project issues its tokens and the price is falling:
Then there is a high probability that they are stuck.

Which tokens did you think of?