$FLNC In the past 24 hours, it rose by 3.52%. The quote is 10.88, but the funding rate remains steady at the zero line. This signal is clear: the price moving upward is not accompanied by a change in financing costs that would indicate crowded longs or short-covering pressure.

My view is that this looks more like local games between existing capital without any new catalysts, rather than a reflection of a shift in macro risk appetite. A funding rate at zero means both long and short sides have not materially added at the current price level; the rally lacks confirmation from incremental capital.

The strongest counter-argument: only if there is a subsequent breakout with rising volume and the funding rate turns positive at the same time could the trend be confirmed.

Trading tag: #TradFi #链上美股 #FLNC

Where do you think this thesis is most likely to be wrong?