In the cryptocurrency world, you may disagree with many things, but there is one thing you have to acknowledge: Litecoin founder Charlie Lee is perhaps the person who deserves the phrase 'open and aboveboard' the most after Satoshi Nakamoto. Back then, he publicly disclosed all technical details and code a day in advance on the forum, with the work timeline completely transparent across the network, without pre-mining a single coin, and without any zero-cost chips—this kind of 'open strategy' has remained a moral benchmark that the industry finds difficult to reach.
But ten years have passed, and the industry seems to be getting further away from this 'transparency and fairness.' Pre-mining, insider trading, teams secretly cashing out… have become the hidden rules of many projects. When we reminisce about the 'great, glorious, and correct' style of Litecoin, what exactly are we longing for? Essentially, we are longing for a trustworthy environment where there is no suspicion, rules are clear, and power is not concentrated in the hands of a few.
This is also why, in today's market filled with opaque operations, projects like @usddio that insist on public over-collateralization and real-time on-chain data are particularly valuable.#USDD以稳见信 The essence is to reconstruct 'trust' with code and mathematics: not relying on the 'reputation' of the founders, not relying on the 'promises' of the team, but only on 130%+ on-chain collateral and the automatic execution of smart contracts. Every USDD generated and circulated leaves a trace on the blockchain, and anyone can verify it—this is in line with the spirit of Li Qiwei publishing the code in advance and refusing to pre-mine back in the day.
The greatness of Litecoin lies in its proof that only projects that start fairly can sail further. What @usddio is proving is that assets that operate transparently can carry more stable value. As more and more projects operate in the dark, choosing assets that dare to put everything in the sunlight is not just an investment, but also a vote for the original intention of the industry.
Perhaps, the next one to be called 'great and just' will no longer be a certain founder, but a mechanism that is completely transparent, co-governed by the community, and anchored in credible value. @usddio is walking this path.
