$BTC is still trading below last year’s range upper quadrant, with the yearly range mid sitting near 73,500 and upper quadrant resistance around 90,998.7.

My bias remains bearish. The only short setup I am interested in is a move into the weekly bearish fair value gap (W‑FVG) near 95,934, where I expect supply to step in and premiums to get sold.

From that W‑FVG- region, my downside target is the weekly SSL liquidity around 74,388, which aligns closely with the yearly range mid and a key liquidity pocket.

As long as price trades below the upper quadrant and fails to close a strong weekly candle above 95,934, I will treat this as a distribution area and look for shorts into 74,388. A clean weekly close above 95,934 would invalidate this bearish idea and force a reassessment.”

## Why This Framing Works

1. It keeps your bias clear.

You state upfront that you are only interested in shorts and define exactly where you want to engage (W‑FVG at 95,934) and where you want to take profits (weekly SSL at 74,388).

2. It ties levels to a narrative.

You connect the yearly range mid at 73,500, the upper quadrant at 90,998.7, the weekly FVG at 95,934, and the SSL at 74,388 into one coherent range and liquidity story instead of random levels.

3. It includes invalidation.

Mentioning that a strong weekly close above 95,934 would invalidate the setup keeps the post professional and risk aware, which usually performs better with serious traders on social media.

Crisp takeaway: We are framing BTC as a premium short into a weekly fair value gap, targeting a liquidity sweep near the yearly range mid while clearly defining invalidation above the FVG.