As of November 26, 2025, the U.S. remains under the trade policy framework established by the previous Trump administration, characterized by widespread tariffs that currently remain in full effect.$TRUMP
In My Own Words: The Situation Explained
Currently, the default cost for bringing most foreign goods into the U.S. includes a 10% baseline tariff—often called the "reciprocal tariff." This general tax on imports is the centerpiece of a broader policy that also imposes significantly higher tariff rates on specific products and certain countries, depending on existing trade imbalances or geopolitical considerations.
The core reason this policy is still active is that the Supreme Court is reviewing its legality. Lower courts (like the Court of International Trade) previously ruled that the administration overstepped its authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose these broad tariffs. However, while the Supreme Court appeal is underway, the original tariffs stay in place, creating a massive amount of uncertainty for businesses that rely on international trade.
Key Additional Context:
The Legal Question: The Supreme Court's review centers on whether the President has the legal authority under the IEEPA to impose such sweeping tariffs on imports as a way to address trade deficits. Critics argue this power is reserved for Congress. The Court heard oral arguments on November 5, 2025, with a decision expected in late 2025 or early 2026.
The Two-Tier System:10% Baseline: A default tax on most goods from nearly all trading partners.
Higher "Reciprocal" Rates: Much steeper tariffs applied to imports from specific nations (like Canada, Mexico, and China) to address what the administration deems "unfair" trade practices. These are the tariffs most directly under Supreme Court scrutiny.
.
Economic Impact: These import taxes are generally paid by U.S. companies (importers), which often pass the cost on to American consumers through higher prices. The tariffs have caused major market disruption, supply chain shifts, and increased costs for manufacturers and retailers.
Recent Adjustment: In November 2025, the administration did remove the reciprocal tariffs on over 200 agricultural products (like certain fruits and coffee) that are not widely grown in the U.S. This was seen as a move to combat food inflation and potentially gain leverage in ongoing trade negotiations.
The Stakes: If the Supreme Court rules the tariffs are illegal, it could force the government to refund billions of dollars already collected to importers, creating a massive, complex logistical challenge. However, many experts believe the administration would simply attempt to re-impose similar tariffs using a different legal basis.
🚀🚀🚀 FOLLOW KAMRAN_TRADER 💰💰💰
Appreciate the work. 😍 Thank You. 👍 FOLLOW KAMRAN-TRADER 🚀 TO FIND OUT MORE $$$$$ 🤩 KAMRAN TRADER💰🤩
🚀🚀🚀 PLEASE CLICK FOLLOW KAMRAN_TRADER- Thank You.