ckinfo
--
Recently, the whispers around the project @GAIB AI have become increasingly strange. There are occasionally bullish posts in the square, but on x, some have already started using the term "suspected exit" to describe it.
Let's not discuss whether it is confirmed or not; the objectively noticeable points are indeed quite unsettling: the contract was originally promoted to be launched, but suddenly postponed at the last minute; the website's earlier highlighted "reserve transparency" page quietly went offline, and later it was said to be under reconstruction; there are also doubts from outsiders about the lack of third-party proof for most of the reserves, and the safety of deposit-type products (AID, sAID, etc.) has naturally been repeatedly discussed.
The most awkward part is that many people were only reassured to deposit money because of the "team's real-name registration, based in HK, with formal experience."
Currently, the only certainty is: the project team is still making statements, and the channels are not completely closed, but the market's vigilance about "whether there will be any malicious intentions towards users' principal" is already at its peak. The above is just an organization of public information and personal feelings; it does not constitute any qualitative assessment, nor is it a confirmed accusation.
Don't blindly trust anyone regarding fund safety; the only thing you can do is: research more, ask more, test more, and carefully control your positions. DYOR.
Let's see if Binance will list the contract $GAIB ~ Everything will become clear~
Let's not discuss whether it is confirmed or not; the objectively noticeable points are indeed quite unsettling: the contract was originally promoted to be launched, but suddenly postponed at the last minute; the website's earlier highlighted "reserve transparency" page quietly went offline, and later it was said to be under reconstruction; there are also doubts from outsiders about the lack of third-party proof for most of the reserves, and the safety of deposit-type products (AID, sAID, etc.) has naturally been repeatedly discussed.
The most awkward part is that many people were only reassured to deposit money because of the "team's real-name registration, based in HK, with formal experience."
Currently, the only certainty is: the project team is still making statements, and the channels are not completely closed, but the market's vigilance about "whether there will be any malicious intentions towards users' principal" is already at its peak. The above is just an organization of public information and personal feelings; it does not constitute any qualitative assessment, nor is it a confirmed accusation.
Don't blindly trust anyone regarding fund safety; the only thing you can do is: research more, ask more, test more, and carefully control your positions. DYOR.
Let's see if Binance will list the contract $GAIB ~ Everything will become clear~
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
151
0