As a founding party of a blockchain, what do you think? $BTC
All blockchains initially start with a developer or a development team. However, from the time it is launched until you can use it, this blockchain no longer belongs to that developer or team; even the so-called foundation of the blockchain is just a node and not responsible for the entire blockchain. The foundation can guide the development direction of the blockchain, but it requires nodes to vote.
When a project on the blockchain encounters issues, should the founding team of the blockchain defend its rights? Should BTC seek rights from Satoshi Nakamoto? Should ETH seek rights from Vitalik Buterin? Should BNB CHAIN seek rights from Binance? No blockchain project party will admit that they control the entire blockchain, even if we think so, they will not admit it.
The reason why blockchain is called blockchain is that it is a decentralized distributed ledger, rather than a chain controlled by a single group. To achieve decentralization, even if nodes and tokens are given away, multiple parties or groups must share management.
So, do you think defending rights is useful?
