Last time I shared the trading logic regarding MMT, this time let's take a look at AIA, which is basically similar, with no difference except for the sustainability!

Combining the K-line trends and trading characteristics of both, we will analyze the differences and commonalities from four dimensions:

1. K-line Trend: "Single Peak Surge and Retracement" vs "Three-Stage Extreme Control"

AIA is a single peak type "rapid rise + slow retracement" that gently increased along the upward trend line, after reaching a peak of 20, it fluctuated and retraced, with the downward process accompanied by multiple small rebounds, overall the rhythm is relatively "slow".

MMT is a sharp peak type "extreme rise + cliff drop" that rapidly surged in a three-stage manner along the upward trend line, with no rebounds after reaching a peak, directly dropping off a cliff, the entire trend is under absolute control by the project party, with a rhythm that is relatively "harsh".

2. Price Increase: "High Multiple Gentle Rise" vs "Short Time Violent Surge"

AIA: Increased from 1.6 to 20, approximately 12 times increase, with a relatively long rising cycle, accompanied by pullback with some opportunities for retail investors to exit.

MMT: Increased from a low position (about 0.28U) to 6.4U, approximately 20 times increase, but the rise concentrated in the "last half hour", immediately after the violent surge the price was smashed down, with almost no time for retail investors to profit and exit.

3. End of Trading Handling: "Fluctuation Clearance" vs "Abandonment/Secondary Harvesting"

• AIA: After reaching the peak and falling back to 6.4 (halved), it entered a fluctuation range, belonging to "market spontaneous game clearance", with no obvious secondary harvesting actions;

• MMT: After the smash, it maintained a fluctuation between 0.4-0.5U, with the project party having already exited with profits, afterward either "secondary inducement and then smash", or "abandonment leading to liquidity exhaustion", is an active "trading tail design".

Summary:

AIA leans more towards "high volatility market targets", with market participation in its trend; while MMT is a purely controlled harvesting project, from flow, price difference, surge to smash rhythm to the end, all are targeted precise hunting of retail investors and KOLs, both are typical models of Chinese capital operation.