I just want to know how to distinguish between illegally issued tokens, and these tokens have already been sold to ordinary users. If you do not exchange them, then isn't the loss still borne by ordinary users? What loss is there for the hackers? Also, due to the vulnerability being exploited and the subsequent crash, who will compensate users for the losses from the contracts that were pressured and forced to sell at a loss?

UXLINK announced a new contract and token migration compensation plan.

On September 25, news came that UXLINK released an update stating that it has completed the deployment of the new smart contract and submitted an event report and migration plan to DAXA and major exchanges. Legally circulating tokens will be exchanged at a 1:1 ratio, with a total circulation of 479,713,462 tokens. Illegally issued and stolen tokens will not be exchanged, and some have been suspended from circulation. The official on-chain exchange portal will be launched within 5 working days, and a compensation plan will be introduced based on recovered assets, in cooperation with regulatory authorities in Singapore, South Korea, and Japan to freeze hacker-related wallets. $SOL