On September 9, 2025, Israel launched a precision airstrike on Doha, the capital of Qatar, aimed at high-ranking leaders of the Palestinian group Hamas. The event, confirmed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), was presented as a counter-terrorism operation against key figures such as Khalil al-Hayya and Zaher Jabarin, accused of orchestrating the massacre of October 7, 2023. However, the action has unleashed a diplomatic storm and jeopardized the fragile regional stability.

---

⚔️ Violation of sovereignty and international condemnation

Qatar described the attack as 'cowardly' and a 'flagrant violation of international law'. The residential building attacked housed members of Hamas's political bureau, which has been interpreted as a direct aggression against Qatari territory. The United Nations, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and other Gulf countries have condemned the act, warning about its consequences for regional security.

This attack not only represents a breach of diplomatic protocol but also undermines Qatar's role as a key mediator in negotiations for a ceasefire in Gaza. The Hamas delegation was in Doha discussing a truce proposal supported by the United States.

---

🌍 Geopolitical repercussions

The implications of the attack are profound:

- Destabilization of Qatar's mediating role: Being the host of sensitive negotiations, the bombing raises doubts about the country's neutrality and security as a diplomatic host.

- Escalation of tensions between Israel and Gulf States: Saudi Arabia expressed 'full solidarity' with Qatar and warned of 'serious consequences'.

- Immediate economic impact: Oil prices surged more than 1.5% after the attack, reflecting fears of military escalation in a key region for global energy supply.

- Risk of indirect retaliation: Iran, an ally of Hamas, could intensify its military or diplomatic support, exacerbating the regional conflict.

---

🧨 A new paradigm of extraterritorial war?

This attack marks a disturbing precedent: the expansion of Israeli military operations outside of the territories traditionally involved in the conflict. While Israel claims to have taken measures to minimize civilian damage, the act of attacking on Qatari soil — without authorization or public coordination — raises serious questions about respect for national sovereignty and the balance of power in the Middle East.

---

🕊️ Path to peace or a new fracture?

The Israeli action could bury ongoing diplomatic efforts. Qatar, alongside Egypt and the U.S., has been a key player in negotiations to free hostages and establish a ceasefire in Gaza. By attacking negotiators in the midst of the process, Israel risks diplomatic isolation and provoking a chain reaction that could revive old alliances and enmities.

---

🧭 Conclusion

The Israeli attack in Qatar is not just a military episode: it is a signal that the rules of the game in the Middle East are changing. The extraterritoriality of war, the fragility of diplomatic channels, and the growing polarization among regional actors could lead to a new phase of conflict, more unpredictable and dangerous.

The lingering question is not whether there will be consequences, but how deep and lasting they will be.